The
AIM-9 Sidewinder is a
heat-seeking, short-range,
air-to-air missile carried by
fighter aircraft and recently, certain
gunship helicopters. Variants and
upgrades remain in active service with many air forces after five
decades.
When a Sidewinder missile is being launched,
NATO
pilots use the brevity
code Fox Two in
radio communication, as with all "heat-seeking"
missiles.
The Sidewinder is the most widely used missile in the West, with
more than 110,000 missiles produced for the U.S. and 27 other
nations, of which perhaps one percent have been used in combat. It
has been built under license by some other nations including
Sweden. The AIM-9 is one of the oldest, least expensive and most
successful air-to-air missiles, with an estimated 270
kills worldwide to date.
The missile was designed to be simple to upgrade. It has been said
that the design goals for the original Sidewinder were to produce a
reliable and effective missile with the "electronic complexity of a
table model radio and the mechanical complexity of a washing
machine"—goals which were well accomplished in the early missiles.
The United States Navy hosted a 50th anniversary celebration of its
existence in 2002.
The name
sidewinder refers to a
venomous rattlesnake of the
same name, which uses infrared
sensory organs to hunt warm-blooded prey.
Physics of infrared detection
In the 1920s, it was discovered that exposing
lead sulfide to
infrared rays (
thermal
radiation) reduces the
compound's
electrical resistance. This is an
example of a property called
photoconductivity; photoconductivity is
also seen with
illumination by other
wavelengths of
light
(see Ron Westrum's book in reference section). One can measure the
resulting current and then link that result to an action—in this
case, a seeker head causing the missile to fly toward the
heat source (a target aircraft or missile).
Prior to World War II, most of the major forces attempted to
produce night-vision systems using lead sulfide detectors and
image intensifiers as displays,
mostly for long-distance aircraft detection. None of these proved
very successful, and only the German "Spanner" system entered
production. "Spanner" used a long sighting tube projecting through
the aircraft windscreen to give the pilot a view of the air
directly ahead of their aircraft, but had limited range. All of
these projects ended with the introduction of useful airborne radar
sets.
IR detectors found more widespread use for land-based systems.
These included everything from sighting systems for tanks and even
snipers, to a variety of night driving aids. German scientists also
experimented with an automatic missile guidance system intended to
home in on the heat of aircraft engines and guide their
Enzian missile. It used a single detector located at
the focus of a small telescope, with four vanes positioned between
the detector and telescope. The telescope "nodded", causing the
signal falling on the detector to increase and decrease depending
on how much of the signal was being blocked by the vanes. This
signal would then be used as an input to a simple
autopilot, by continually turning toward the
telescope optical axis, the missile was guided toward the target
using what is known as a
pure pursuit.
Development was not complete when the war ended.
History
Early development
The
development of the Sidewinder missile began in 1946 at the Naval
Ordnance Test Station (NOTS), Inyokern, California, now the
Naval Air Weapons Station China
Lake
, California as an in-house research project
conceived by William B.
McLean. McLean initially called
his effort "Local Fuze Project 602" using laboratory funding,
volunteer help and fuze funding to develop what it called a
heat-homing rocket. It did not receive official funding until 1951
when the effort was mature enough to show to Admiral
William "Deak" Parsons, the Deputy Chief
of the
Bureau of Ordnance
(BuOrd). It subsequently received designation as a program in 1952.
The Sidewinder introduced several new technologies that made it
simpler and much more reliable than its
United States Air Force (USAF)
counterpart, the
AIM-4 Falcon that was
under development in the same time period. After disappointing
experiences with the Falcon in the
Vietnam
War, the Air Force replaced its Falcons with Sidewinders.

Geometric arrangement of mirror, IR
detector and target.
The Sidewinder took several design tips from the Enzian, but made a
number of innovations that dramatically improved its performance.
The first was to replace the "steering" mirror with a
forward-facing mirror rotating around a shaft pointed out the front
of the missile. The detector was mounted in front of the mirror.
When the long axis of the mirror, the missile axis and the line of
sight to the target all fell in the same plane, the reflected rays
from the target reached the detector (provided the target was not
very far off axis). Therefore, the angle of the mirror at the
instant of detection estimated the direction of the target in the
roll axis of the missile.
The yaw/pitch direction of the target depended on how far to the
outer edge of the mirror the target was. If the target was further
off axis, the rays reaching the detector would be reflected from
the outer edge of the mirror. If the target was closer on axis, the
rays would be reflected from closer to the centre of the mirror.
Rotating on a fixed shaft, the mirror's linear speed was higher at
the outer edge. Therefore if a target was further off-axis its
"flash" in the detector occurred for a briefer time, or longer if
it was closer to the center. The off-axis angle could then be
estimated by the duration of the reflected pulse of infrared.
The Sidewinder also included a dramatically improved guidance
algorithm. The Enzian attempted to fly directly at its target,
feeding the direction of the telescope into the control system as
it if were a joystick. This meant the missile always flew directly
at its target, and under most conditions would end up behind it,
"chasing" it down. This meant that the missile had to have enough
of a speed advantage over its target that it didn't run out of fuel
during the interception.
The Sidewinder isn't guided on the actual position recorded by the
detector, but on the
change in position since the last
sighting. So if the target remained at 5 degrees left between two
rotations of the mirror, the electronics would not output any
signal to the control system. Consider a missile fired a right
angles to its target; if the missile is flying at the same speed as
the target it should "lead" it by 45 degrees, flying to an impact
point far in front of where the target was when it was fired. If
the missile is traveling four times the speed of the target, it
should follow an angle about 11 degrees in front. In either case,
the missile should keep that angle all the way to interception,
which means that the angle that the target makes against the
detector is constant. It was this constant angle that the
Sidewinder attempted to maintain. This "
proportional pursuit" system is very
easy to implement, yet it offers high-performance lead calculation
almost for free and can respond to changes in the target's flight
path, which is much more efficient and makes the missile "lead" the
target.
However this system also requires the missile to have a fixed roll
axis orientation. If the missile spins at all, the timing based on
the speed of rotation of the mirror is no longer accurate.
Correcting for this spin would normally require some sort of sensor
to tell which way is "down" and then adding controls to correct it.
Instead, small control surfaces were placed at the rear of the
missile with spinning disks on their outer surface, these are known
as
rollerons. Airflow over the disk spins
them to a high speed. If the missile starts to roll, the gyroscopic
force of the disk drives the control surface into the airflow,
cancelling the motion. Thus the Sidewinder team replaced a
potentially complex control system with a simple mechanical
solution.
Flight test and service introduction
A prototype Sidewinder, the
XAAM-N-7 (later
AIM-9A), was first fired successfully in September
1953. The initial production version, designated
AAM-N-7 (later
AIM-9B), entered
operational use in 1956, and has been improved upon steadily
since.
Combat introduction
The first
combat use of the Sidewinder was on September 24, 1958 with the
air force of the
Republic of
China
(Taiwan
), during the
Second Taiwan Strait
Crisis. During that period of time, ROC F-86 Sabres were routinely engaged in air battles
with the People's Republic of China
over the Taiwan Strait
. The PRC
MiG-17s had higher altitude ceiling
performance and in similar fashion to Korean War encounters between
the F-86 and earlier MiG-15, the PRC formations cruised above the
ROC Sabres immune to their .50 cal weaponry and only choosing
battle when conditions favored them. In a highly secret effort,
United States provided a few dozen Sidewinders to ROC forces and a
team to modify their Sabres to carry the Sidewinder. In the first
encounter on 24 September 1958, the Sidewinders were used to ambush
the MiG-17s as they flew past the Sabres thinking they were
invulnerable to attack. The MiGs broke formation and descended to
the altitude of the Sabres in swirling dogfights.
Compromised technology
The Taiwan
Strait battles inadvertently produced a new derivative of
Sidewinder: shortly after that conflict the Soviet Union
began the manufacture of the K-13/R-3S missile (NATO reporting name AA-2
'Atoll'), a reverse-engineered copy of the
Sidewinder. It was made possible after a Taiwanese AIM-9B
hit a Chinese Communist
MiG-17 without
exploding; amazingly, the missile lodged itself in the airframe of
the MiG-17 and the pilot was able to bring the plane and the
missile back to his base. According to Ron Westrum in his book
"Sidewinder", the Soviets obtained the plans for Sidewinder from a
Swedish Colonel,
Stig
Wennerström, and rushed their version into service by 1961
copying it so closely that even the part numbers were duplicated.
Years later, Soviet engineers would admit that the captured
Sidewinder served as a "university course" in missile design and
substantially improved Soviet and allied air-to-air capabilities.
The K-13 and its derivatives remained in production for nearly 30
years. In the 1960s, the possession of the K-13 in the Soviet
arsenal caused major changes in the USAF bombing tactics, forcing
bombers from high-altitudes down to lower levels, below enemy radar
coverage.
USAF adoption
Although originally developed for the USN and a competitor to the
USAF
AIM-4 Falcon, the Sidewinder was
subsequently introduced into USAF service when DoD directed that
the
F-4 Phantom be adopted by the USAF.
The Air Force originally borrowed F-4B model Phantoms, which were
equipped with AIM-9B Sidewinders as the short-range armament. The
first production USAF Phantoms were the F-4C model, which carried
the AIM-9B Sidewinder. The Air Force opted to carry only AIM-4
Falcon on their F-4D model Phantoms introduced to Vietnam service
in 1967, but disappointment with combat use of the Falcon led to a
crash effort to reconfigure the F-4D so that it could carry
Sidewinders. The USAF nomenclature for the Sidewinder was the
GAR-8 (later
AIM-9E). During the
1960s the USN and USAF pursued their own separate versions of the
Sidewinder, but cost considerations later forced the development of
common variants beginning with the AIM-9L.
Continued evolution
The Sidewinder subsequently evolved through a series of upgraded
versions with newer, more sensitive seekers with various types of
cooling and various propulsion,
fuse, and warhead
improvements. Although each of those versions had various seeker,
cooling, and fusing differences, all but one shared infrared
homing. The exception was the U.S. Navy
AAM-N-7 Sidewinder
IB (later
AIM-9C), a Sidewinder with a
semi-active radar homing
seeker head developed for the
F-8
Crusader. Only about 1,000 of these weapons were produced, many
of which were later rebuilt as the
AGM-122 Sidearm anti-radiation missile.

The U.S.
Navy's AIM-9B, AIM-9D, and AIM-9C in the early 1970s
Vietnam influence on Sidewinder development
When air combat started over North Vietnam in 1965, Sidewinder was
the standard short range missile carried by the US Navy on its
F-4 Phantom and
F-8 Crusader fighters and could be carried on
the
A-4 Skyhawk and on the
A-7 Corsair for self-defense. The Air Force also
used the Sidewinder on its F-4C Phantoms and when MiGs began
challenging strike groups, the
F-105
Thunderchief also carried the Sidewinder for self-defense.
Performance of the Sidewinder and the
AIM-7 Sparrow was not as satisfactory as hoped
and both the Navy and Air Force studied their performance of their
aircrews, aircraft, weapons and training as well as supporting
infrastructure. The Air Force conducted the classified
Red Baron Report while the Navy conducted a
study concentrating primarily on performance of air-to-air weapons
that was unofficially called and better known as the "
Ault Report". The impact of both was
modifications to the Sidewinder by both services to improve its
ability to perform in the demanding air-to-air arena and increase
reliability.
Navy AIM-9D/G/H

A F-4B of VF-111 on the
USS Coral
Sea armed with AIM-9Ds
The Navy Sidewinder design progression went from the early
production B model to the D model that was used extensively in
Vietnam. The G and H models followed with new forward
canard design improving ACM performance
and expanded acquisition modes and improved envelopes. The "Hotel"
model followed shortly after the "Golf" and featured a solid state
design that improved reliability in the carrier environment where
shock from catapult launches and arrested landings had a
deteriorating effect on the earlier vacuum tube designs. The Ault
report had a strong impact on Sidewinder design, manufacture, and
handling.
Air Force AIM-9E/J/N/P
Once the Air Force adopted the Sidewinder as part of its arsenal,
it developed the AIM-9E, introducing it in 1967. The "Echo" was an
improved version of the basic AIM-9B featuring larger forward
canards as well as a more aerodynamic IR seeker and an improved
rocket motor. The missile, however still had to be fired at the
rear quarter of the target, a drawback of all early IR missiles.
Significant upgrades were applied to the first true dogfight
version, the AIM-9J, which was rushed to the South-East Asia
Theatre in July 1972 during the
Linebacker campaign, in which many
aerial encounters with North Vietnamese MiGs occurred. The Juliet
model could be launched at up to 7.5
g ( /s²) and
introduced the first solid state components and improved actuators
capable of delivering 90
lbf·ft (120
N·m) torque to the canards, thereby
improving dogfight prowess. In 1973, Ford began production of an
enhanced AIM-9J-1, which was later redesignated the AIM-9N. The
AIM-9J was widely exported. The J/N evolved into the P series, with
five versions being produced (P1 to P5) including such improvements
as new
fuze,
reduced-smoke rocket motors, and all-aspect capability on the
latest P4 and P5. BGT in Germany has developed a conversion kit for
upgrading AIM-9J/N/P guidance and control assemblies to the AIM-9L
standard, and this is being marketed as AIM-9JULI. The core of this
upgrade is the fitting of the DSQ-29 seeker unit of the AIM-9L,
replacing the original J/N/P seeker to give improved
capabilities.
All-aspect Sidewinders
AIM-9L
The next major advance in IR Sidewinder development was the
AIM-9L (
"Lima") model, introduced
in 1978. This was the first "
all-aspect"
Sidewinder with the ability to attack from all directions,
including head-on, which had a dramatic effect on close in combat
tactics.
In its first combat use by Israel
over
Lebanon
and by the United Kingdom
during the Falklands
War, the "Lima" reportedly achieved a kill ratio of around 80%,
a dramatic improvement over the 10-15% levels of earlier
versions. In both initial combat uses of AIM-9L, the
opponents had not developed any tactics for the evasion of a
head-on missile shot of this kind, making them all the more
vulnerable. The AIM-9L was also the first Sidewinder that was a
joint variant used by both the US Navy and Air Force since the
AIM-9B. The "Lima" was distinguished from earlier Sidewinder
variants by its double delta forward canard configuration and
natural metal finish of the guidance and control section. The Lima
was also built under license in Europe by a team headed by
Diehl BGT Defence. There are a number of
"Lima" variants in operational service at present. First developed
was the 9L Tactical, which is an upgraded version of the basic 9L
missile. Next was the 9L Genetic, which has increased infra-red
counter counter measures (IRCCM); this upgrade consisted of a
removable module in the Guidance Control Section (GCS) which
provided flare-rejection capability. Next came the 9L(I), which had
its IRCCM module hardwired into the GCS, providing improved
countermeasures as well as an upgraded seeker system. Diehl BGT
also markets the AIM-9L(I)-1 which again upgrades the 9L(I)GCS and
is considered an operational equivalent to the initially "US only"
AIM-9M.
AIM-9M
The subsequent
AIM-9M (
"Mike")
has the all-aspect capability of the L model while providing
all-around higher performance. The M model has improved capability
against infrared countermeasures, enhanced background
discrimination capability, and a reduced-smoke rocket motor. These
modifications increase its ability to locate and
lock-on to a target and decrease the
missile's chances for detection. Deliveries of the initial AIM-9M-1
began in 1982. The only changes from the AIM-9L to the AIM-9M were
related to the Guidance Control Section (GCS). Several models were
introduced in pairs with even numbers designating Navy versions and
odd for USAF: AIM-9M-2/3, AIM-9M-4/5, and AIM-9M-6/7 which was
rushed to the Persian Gulf area during Desert Shield to address
specific threats expected to be present. The AIM-9M-8/9
incorporated replacement of five circuit cards and the related
parentboard to update infrared counter counter measures (IRCCM)
capability to improve 9M capability against the latest threat
IRCM. The first AIM-9M-8/9 modifications,
fielded in 1995, involved deskinning the guidance section and
substitution of circuit cards at the depot level, which is labor
intensive and expensive—as well as removing missiles from inventory
during the upgrade period. The AIM-9X concept is to use
reprogrammable software to permit upgrades without
disassembly.
Further development
AIM-9R
The Navy began development of AIM-9R, a Sidewinder seeker upgrade
in 1987 that featured a
Focal Plane
Array (FPA) seeker using video-camera type
charge-coupled device (CCD) detectors
and featuring increased off-boresight capability. The technology at
the time was restricted to visual (daylight) use only and the USAF
did not agree on this requirement, preferring another technology
path. AIM-9R reached flight test stage before it was cancelled and
subsequently both services agreed to join a joint development of
the AIM-9X variant.
BOA/Boxoffice

Testing compressed carriage Sidewinder
BOA configuration at China Lake
China
Lake
developed an improved compressed carriage control
configuration titled BOA. Data from the testing was used for
subsequent AIM-9X development. The BOA design reduced size of
control surfaces eliminating the rollerons and returned to simple
forward canard design. Although the Navy and Air Force had jointly
developed and procured AIM-9L/M, BOA was a Navy only effort
supported by internal China Lake Independent Research &
Development (IR&D) funding. Meanwhile, the Air Force was
pursuing a parallel effort to develop a compressed carriage version
of Sidewinder for the F-22 called Boxoffice. The Joint Chiefs of
Staff directed that the services collaborate on AIM-9X, which
effectively put an end to the disparate efforts. The results of BOA
and Boxoffice were provided to the industry teams competing for
AIM-9X and elements of both can be found in the AIM-9X
design.
AIM-9X
After
looking at advanced short range missile designs during the AIM
portion of the ACEVAL/AIMVAL Joint Test and Evaluation at
Nellis
AFB
in the 1974-78 timeframe, the Air Force and Navy
agreed on the need for the Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile
AMRAAM. But agreement over development
of an Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air Missile
ASRAAM was problematic and disagreement between the
Air Force and Navy over design concepts (Air Force had developed
AIM-82 and Navy had flight-tested
Agile and flown it in AIMVAL). Congress
eventually insisted the services work on a Joint effort and AIM-9M
became the result thereby compromising without exploring the
improved off boresight and kinematic capability potential offered
by Agile. In 1985, the Soviet Union did field a SRM (
AA-11 Archer/R-73) that was very similar to
Agile. At that point, the Soviet Union took the lead in SRM
technology and correspondingly fielded improved
IRCM to defeat or reduce the effectiveness of the
latest Sidewinders. As relations improved in the aftermath of the
Soviet Union, the West became aware of how potent both the AA-11
and IRCM were and SRM requirements were readdressed.
For a brief period in the late '80s, an
ASRAAM effort led by a European consortium was in
play under a
MOA with the
United States in which AMRAAM development would be led by the US
and ASRAAM by the Europeans. The UK working with the aft end of the
ASRAAM and Germany developing the seeker (Germany had first hand
experience improving the Sidewinder seeker of the AIM-9J/AIM-9F).
By 1990, technical and funding issues had stymied ASRAAM and the
problem appeared stalled so in light of the threat of AA-11 and
improved IRCM, the US embarked on determining requirements for
AIM-9X as a counter to both the AA-11 and improving the IRCCM
features. The first draft of the requirement was ready by 1991 and
the primary competitors were Raytheon and Hughes. Later, the UK
resolved to revive the ASRAAM development and selected Hughes to
provide the seeker technology in the form of a high off-boresight
capable Focal Plane Array. However, the UK did not choose to
improve the turning kinematic capability of ASRAAM to compete with
AA-11. As part of the AIM-9X program the US conducted a foreign
cooperative test of the ASRAAM seeker to evaluate its potential and
an advanced version featuring improved kinematics was proposed as
part of the AIM-9X competition. In the end, the Hughes evolved
Sidewinder design featuring virtually the same seeker as used by
ASRAAM was selected as the winner.

An AIM-9X on an 422d Test &
Evaluation Squadron F-15C, 2002.
The
AIM-9X Sidewinder, developed by
Raytheon engineers, entered service in November
2003 with the USAF (lead platform is the F-15C; the USN lead
platform is the F/A-18C) and is a substantial upgrade to the
Sidewinder family featuring an
imaging
infrared focal plane array
(FPA) seeker with claimed 90° off-boresight capability,
compatibility with
helmet-mounted
displays such as the new U.S.
Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing
System, and a totally new three-dimensional thrust-vectoring
control (TVC) system providing increased turn capability over
traditional control surfaces. Utilizing the JHMCS, a pilot can
control the AIM-9X missile by simply looking at a target, thereby
increasing air combat effectiveness. It retains the same rocket
motor, fuze and warhead of the "Mike," but its lower drag gives it
improved range and speed. AIM-9X also includes an internal cooling
system eliminating the need for use of nitrogen bottles (U.S. Navy
and Marines) in the launch rail or argon internal bottle (USAF). It
also features an electronic safe and arm device similar to the
AMRAAM allowing reduction in minimum range and reprogrammable
InfraRed Counter Counter Measures (IRCCM) capability that coupled
with the FPA provide improved look down into clutter and
performance against the latest IRCM. Though not part of the
original requirement, AIM-9X has demonstrated a Lock on After
Launch capability, allowing for possible internal use for the
F-35,
F-22
Raptor and even in a submarine launched configuration for use
against ASW platforms. Combined with the
Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing
System this delivers combined kill ratios exceeding 50:1
against nonhigh-off-boresight equipped fighters.
As of September 2008, Raytheon has delivered 3,000 AIM-9X missiles
to the armed services and has begun testing the Block II version of
the missile. The Block II adds lock on after launch and a datalink
so the missile can be launched first and then directed to its
target afterwards by an aircraft with the proper equipment for 360
degree engagements, such as the F-35 and F-22.
Design
The AIM-9 is made up of a number of different components
manufactured by different companies, including
Aerojet and
Raytheon. The
missile is divided into four main sections:
guidance, target detector,
warhead, and rocket motor.
The Guidance and Control Unit (GCU) contains most of the
electronics and mechanics that enable the missile to function. At
the very front is the
IR seeker head
utilizing the rotating reticle, mirror, and five
CdS cells or “pan and
scan”
focal-plane array (AIM-9X),
electric motor, and armature, all
protruding into a glass dome. Directly behind this are the
electronics that gather data, interpret signals, and generate the
control signals that steer the missile. An umbilical on the side of
the GCU attaches to the launcher, which detaches from the missile
at launch. To cool the seeker head, a 5,000
psi (35
MPa)
argon bottle (TMU-72/B
or A/B) is carried internally in Air Force AIM-9L/M variants while
the Navy uses a rail mounted nitrogen bottle. The AIM-9X model
contains a Sterling cryoengine to cool the seeker elements. Two
electric servos power the canards to steer the missile (except
AIM-9X). At the back of the GCU is a gas grain generator or
thermal battery (AIM-9X) to
provide electrical power. The AIM-9X features High-Off-Boresight
capability; together with
JHMCS (Joint Helmet
Mounted Cueing System), this missile is capable of locking on to a
target that is in its field of regard said to be up to 90 degrees
off boresight. The AIM-9X has several unique design features
including built-in-test to aid in maintenance and reliability, an
electronic safe and arm device, an additional digital umbilical
similar to the AMRAAM and jet vane control.
Next is a target detector with four IR
emitters and
detectors that
detect if the target is moving farther away. When it detects this
action taking place, it sends a signal to the Warhead Safe and Arm
device to detonate the warhead. Versions older than the AIM-9L
featured an influence
fuze that relied on the
target's magnetic field as input. Current trends in shielded wires
and non-magnetic metals in aircraft construction rendered this
obsolete.
The AIM-9H model contained a 25-pound ( )
expanding rod-blast fragmentary
warhead. All other models up to the AIM-9M contained a 22-pound
( )
blast fragmentary warhead. The missile's
warhead rods can break rotor blades (an immediately fatal event for
any helicopter).
Recent models of the AIM-9 are configured with an annular blast
fragmentation
warhead, the WDU-17B by
Argotech Corporation. The case is made of spirally wound spring
steel filled with 8 pounds ( ) of
PBX-3 explosive. The warhead
features a safe/arm device requiring five seconds at 20
g ( ) acceleration before the
fuze is armed,
giving a minimum range of approximately 2.5 kilometers.
The Mk36
solid propellant rocket motor
provides propulsion for the missile. A reduced smoke propellant
makes it difficult for a target to see and avoid the missile. This
section also features the launch lugs used to hold the missile to
the rail of the missile launcher. The forward of the three lugs has
two contact buttons that electrically activate the motor igniter.
The fins provide stability from an aerodynamic point of view, but
it is the "rollerons" at the end of the wings providing
gyroscopic precession that prevents the
serpentine motion that gave the Sidewinder its name in
the early days. The wings and fins of the AIM-9X are much smaller
to accommodate one in each side bay of the
F-22 Raptor as originally planned, AIM-9X
control surfaces are reversed from earlier Sidewinders with the
control section located in the rear, while the wings up front
provide stability. The AIM-9X also features
vectored thrust or jet vane control to
increase maneuverability and accuracy, with four vanes inside the
exhaust that move as the fins move. The last upgrade to the missile
motor on the AIM-9X is the addition of a wire harness that allows
communication between the guidance section and the control section,
as well as a new
1760 bus to connect
the guidance section with the launcher’s digital
umbilical.
Other Sidewinder developments
TC-1 Taiwan
The TC-1 is a Taiwanese development of the AIM-9L originally meant
to arm the ROCAF's indigenous F-CK-1 fighter. A ground-launched
version was since developed as part of the Antelope Air Defense
System, being carried on a
HMMWV-based
launcher vehicle. The Pelican-Hardigg Technical Packaging division
of Pelican Products Inc. has designed, qualified, and now
manufactures a single missile AUR (All Up Round) Container for this
missile. The Pelican-Hardigg Missile Container has been designed to
be light enough for the loaded container to be physically handled
by 6 men.
[701736]
Chaparral
A version for the U.S. Army with a launcher of four Sidewinder
AIM-9D missiles on a tracked vehicle called
MIM-72/M48 Chaparral was also
developed. In this configuration an operator sat in a protected
capsule that was incorporated into the launcher assembly that
rotated as an integrated unit. The Chaparral was introduced into
service in 1969 and remained an integral part of the Army's air
defense network for several decades.
AGM-122A Sidearm
The Sidewinder was also the basis for the
AGM-122A Sidearm anti-radiation missile utilizing an
AIM-9C guidance section modified to detect and track a radiating
ground-based air defense system radar. The target-detecting device
is modified for air-to-surface use, employing forward hemisphere
acquisition capability. Sidearm stocks have apparently been
expended, and the weapon is no longer in the active
inventory.
Anti-tank variant
China Lake experimented with Sidewinder in the air-to-ground mode
including use as an anti-tank weapon.
Larger rocket motor
Under the High Altitude Project, engineers at China Lake mated a
Sidewinder warhead and seeker to a Sparrow rocket motor to
experiment with usefulness of a larger motor.
General characteristics (AIM-9L)
Operators
- Egypt

- Ethiopia

- Finland

- Germany
- being replaced by IRIS-T
- Greece
- will
be replaced by IRIS-T
- Hungary
- used on JAS-39
Gripen
- Indonesia
, used on F-5, F-16 and Hawk 209
- Iran

- Israel

- Italy
- to be
replaced by IRIS-T
- Japan

- Jordan

- Kuwait

- Malaysia

- Mexico
- used on
F-5
- Morocco

- Netherlands

- New Zealand
- used on RNZAF A-4 Skyhawk, no longer in use
- Norway
- being
replaced by IRIS-T
- Pakistan
- AIM-9B: F-86, F-6. AIM-9P/L: F-16A/B, F-6, F-7P/PG, Mirage
III/V, JF-17. AIM-9M on order for
F-16C/D.
- Philippines
- never used due to retirement of F-5 and F-8
Crusader
- Poland
-
AIM-9X
- Portugal

- Romania
- Used on the Mig-21 Lancer
upgrade
- Saudi Arabia

- Singapore
: Republic of Singapore Air
Force
- South Africa - Used on the F-86 Sabre and Dassault Mirage III , no longer in
use
- South Korea

- Spain
- AIM-9L,
L(I) and JULI. Replaced by IRIS-T
- Sweden
-
called Robot 24 and Robot 74, will be replaced by IRIS-T.
- Switzerland

- Republic of China
(Taiwan
)
- Thailand
use on JAS 39 C/D, F-16 A/B/ADF, F-5 E/F/T, L-39ZA/ART (Westernized weapon system), Alphajet.
- Turkey

- United Kingdom

- United States

- Venezuela
, AIM-9B on VF-5 and Mirage 50 - AIM-9L on
F-16A/B
- Zimbabwe

Please note that this list is not exhaustive.
See also
References
- Raytheon AIM-9 Sidewinder
- Air Weapons: Beyond Sidewinder
- Encyclopedia Britannica
- Interestingly, echo-locating bats as they pursue flying insects
also adopt such a strategy [1]
- http://www.ewarbirds.org/sidewinder.html
- Raytheon Press Release
- AIM-9X--the next generation sidewinder
- Raytheon Press Release, September 18, 2008
- Raytheon AIM-9X Block II Missile Completes First
Captive Carry Flight
- Czech Air force ordered 100 AIM-9M
- Finland Ordering 150 AIM-9X Sidewinders
- Taking on Iran's air force
- 150 AIM-9 Sidewinder Missiles for Saudi
Arabia
- Turkey Buys 127 AIM-9X Sidewinder Missiles
- Babcock, Elizabeth (1999). Sidewinder Invention and Early
Years. The China Lake Museum Foundation. 26 pp. A concise
record of the development of the original Sidewinder version and
the central people involved in its design.
- Westrum, Ron (1999). "Sidewinder—Creative missile
development at China Lake." Naval Institute Press. ISBN
978-1557509512
- The Sidewinder Story
External links