Anti-ship missiles are
guided missiles designed for use against
ships. Most anti-ship missiles are of the
sea-skimming type and use a combination
of
inertial guidance and
radar homing. These missiles can be
launched from a variety of platforms including ships, aircraft
(including helicopters), land vehicles and submarines.
The typical acronym for the phrase is ASM, but AShM can also be
used to avoid confusion with
air-to-surface missiles and
anti-submarine missiles.
History
Anti-ship missiles were among the first instances of short range
guided missiles during the
Second World
War. The German Luftwaffe used
Fritz X
and others to some effect against Allied shipping and sank or
damaged a number of large warships successfully before the Allies
devised countermeasures (principally radio jamming). The Allies
also developed similar weapons, such as
Tiny Tim and the
SWOD-9 Bat.
During the
cold war, the USSR
turned to a
sea-denial strategy concentrating on submarines, mines, and
anti-ship missiles. One of the first products of the
decision was the
SS-N-2 Styx missile. Further
products were to follow and soon found the in the aircraft launched
KS-1 Komet carried by
Tu-95 Bear and Tu-22 Badger bombers.
In 1967
the Israeli Navy destroyer Eilat was sunk by a Styx missile
launched by Egyptian missile boats off the Sinai Peninsula
.
1973's
Battle of Latakia was the
site of the world's first combat between anti-ship missile-equipped
missile boats.
In it, the Israeli
navy
destroyed the Syrian
ships
without suffering any damage, using electronic
countermeasures.
Anti-ship missiles were used in the 1982
Falklands War.
HMS
Sheffield, a 4,820 ton
Type 42 Destroyer was struck by a single
air-launched
Exocet missile and later sank as
a result of damage sustained.
The container ship Atlantic
Conveyor
was also
sunk by an Exocet, while HMS
Glamorgan was damaged. Glamorgan was
struck by an MM38 missile launched from an improvised trailer-based
launcher taken from the destroyer
ARA
Comodoro Seguí by
Argentine
Navy technicians., but was able to take avoiding manoeuvres
that lessened the damage inflicted.
In 1987, a
US Navy guided-missile
frigate, the
USS Stark, was
hit by an
Exocet ASM fired by an Iraqi
Mirage F-1. The Stark was damaged but was
able to make it to a friendly port for repair.
The next year, ASMs
were fired by both US and Iranian forces in Operation Praying Mantis in the
Persian
Gulf
. During this naval battle, several Iranian
warships
were hit by US ASMs (and by Standard SAMs doing double-duty in this
role). Also, in October 1987, Sungari, an
American-owned tanker under the Liberian flag and a Kuwaiti tanker
under the US flag, the Sea Isle City
, were hit by Iranian HY-2 missiles.
During Operation Praying Mantis, the US Navy hit the Iranian light
frigate IS
Sahand with 3
Harpoon missiles, 4 AGM-123 Skipper
rocket-propelled bombs, a Walleye laser-guided bomb, and several
1,000 lb bombs. Despite the large number of munitions and
successful hits, the 1,540 ton IS Sahand did not sink until fire
reached its munitions magazine, causing it to explode.
[20778] However, in the same engagement, US
warships fired 3
RIM-66 Standard
missiles at an Iranian corvette - the corvette sunk low enough in
the water that a Harpoon missile arriving several minutes later had
nothing to lock on to.
In 2006,
Hezbollah forces fired an ASM at
the Israeli corvette
INS Hanit, inflicting
damage but the ship made it back to Israel. A second missile in
this salvo sunk an Egyptian merchant ship, as well.
Comparison
|
Name |
Year |
Warhead |
Range |
Speed
(km/h) |
Propulsion |
launched
by |
Guidance |
Built
by |
Comments |
| Fritz X |
1943 |
320 kg |
5 km |
1235 km/h |
none |
Air |
manual (radio link) |
DE |
used in combat |
| Henschel Hs 293 |
1943 |
295 kg |
5.0 km |
828 km/h |
Liquid-propellant, then gliding |
Air |
manual (radio link) |
DE |
used in combat |
| Blohm & Voss BV
246 |
1943 |
435 kg |
210 km |
450 km/h (280 mph) |
none |
Air |
manual (radio link) |
DE |
|
| Ohka |
1943 |
1200 kg |
36 km |
630 km/h |
Solid-propellant |
Air |
human kamikaze |
JP |
used in combat |
| Bat |
1942 |
273 kg |
37 km |
260–390 km/h |
None |
Air |
manual (radio link) |
USA |
used in combat |
| Boeing Harpoon |
1977 |
221 kg |
93–280 km |
864 km/h |
turbojet engine |
Air, surface, sub |
radar (B3: midcourse update) |
USA |
used in combat |
| AS.34 Kormoran |
1991 |
220 kg |
35 km |
Mach 0.9 |
rocket |
Air |
Inertial, active radar |
DE |
|
| Penguin |
1972 |
130 kg |
55+ km |
high subsonic |
Solid propellant |
Air, surface, sub |
Inertial, laser, IR |
NOR |
|
| Naval Strike Missile |
2009 |
125 kg |
185 km |
high subsonic |
turbojet and solid fuel booster |
Air, surface |
Inertial, GPS, terrain-reference, imaging IR, target
database |
NOR |
|
| AGM-123 Skipper II |
1985 |
450 kg |
25 km |
1,100 km/h |
solid-fueled |
Air |
laser-guided |
USA |
|
| Aerospatiale
SS.12/AS.12 |
1960 |
28 kg |
7 km |
370 km/h |
solid-fueled |
Air, surface |
wire MCLOS |
FR |
|
| BGM-109 Tomahawk |
1983 |
450 kg |
2500 km |
880 km/h |
turbofan |
Air, surface, sub |
GPS, TERCOM,
DSMAC |
USA |
|
| Rb 04 |
1955 |
300 kg |
32 km |
subsonic |
solid propellant |
Air |
active radar |
SWE |
|
| RB 08 |
1966 |
|
70 km |
subsonic |
turbojet |
surface |
radio link active radar |
SWE |
|
| RBS-15 |
1985 |
200 kg |
200 km |
subsonic |
turbojet |
Air, surface |
inertial, GPS, radar |
SWE |
|
| Exocet |
1979 |
165 kg |
180 km |
1134 km/h |
solid propellant |
Air, surface, sub |
Inertial, active radar |
FR |
used in combat |
| Gabriel |
1962 |
150 kg |
60 km |
840 km/h |
solid-fuel rocket |
Air, surface |
active radar |
IL |
used in comabt |
| Otomat |
1977 |
210 kg |
180+ km |
1116 km/h |
Turbojet |
Surface |
Inertial, GPS, active radar |
IT |
|
| Martel |
1984 |
150 kg |
60 km max |
1070 km/h |
solid propellant |
Air |
passive radar, video |
FR/UK |
|
| Sea Eagle |
1985 |
230 kg |
110 km + |
1000 km/h |
Turbojet |
Air |
Inertia, active radar |
UK |
|
| Sea Skua |
1983 |
28 kg |
25 km |
950 km/h |
solid fuel |
Air |
semi-active radar |
UK |
used in combat |
| RIM-66 Standard |
1967 |
blast fragmentation |
74 to 167 km |
4140 km/h |
solid fuel |
Surface |
inertial, semi-active radar |
USA |
used in combat |
| RIM-67 Standard |
1981 |
62 kg |
120–185 km |
4140 km/h |
solid fuel |
Surface |
inertial, semi-active radar |
USA |
|
| KSShch (SS-N-1 SCRUBBER) |
1958 |
nuclear |
40 km |
1150 kmph (Mach 0.95) |
liquid-fuel rocket |
Surface |
inertial |
USSR |
|
| P-15 Termit (SS-N-2 STYX) |
1958 |
454 kg |
80 km |
1100 km/h |
Liquid fuel rocket |
Surface |
active radar, IR |
USSR |
used in combat |
| P-5 Pyatyorka (SS-N-3
SHADDOCK) |
1959 |
1000 kg |
750 km |
1000 km/h |
turbojet |
Surface |
Inertial, mid course correction, active radar |
USSR |
|
| KH-22 (AS-4 Kitchen) |
1962 |
conventional/nuclear 1000 kg |
400 km |
4000 km/h |
liquid-fuel rocket |
Air |
inertial |
USSR |
|
| P-70 Ametist (SS-N-7
STARBRIGHT) |
1968 |
500 kg |
65 km |
1050 km/h |
solid rocket |
sub |
inertial, terminal homing |
USSR |
|
| Moskit (SS-N-22 SUNBURN) |
1970 |
320 kg |
120 km |
3600 km/h |
ramjet |
Surface, Air |
active radar, IR |
USSR |
|
| P-120 Malakhit (SS-N-9
SIREN) |
1972 |
500 kg (1,100 lb) |
110 km |
Mach 0.9 |
Turbojet, solid fuel |
Surface |
Inertial, mid course correction, active radar |
USSR |
used in combat |
| P-800 Oniks (SS-N-26) |
1983 |
250 kg |
300 km |
3600 km/h |
ramjet |
Surface, Air |
active-passive, radar |
USSR |
|
| 3M-54 Klub (SS-N-27 SIZZLER) |
1993 |
400 kg |
300 km |
Varies on variant |
Turbojet |
sub |
Inertial + Active Radar |
USSR |
|
| Kh-35 (AS-20 KAYAK) |
1983 |
145 kg |
130 km |
970 km/h |
turbofan |
Surface, Air |
Inertial, active radar |
USSR |
|
| KH-15 (AS-16 Kickback) |
1988 |
150 kg conventional/nuclear |
300 km |
6200 km/h |
solid-fuel rocket |
Air |
inertial or active radar |
USSR |
|
| BrahMos |
2006 |
300 kg |
290 km |
3675 km/h |
ramjet |
Ship,Surface, Air,Sub |
Inertial, active radar |
India/Russia |
|
| Hae Sung-I (SSM-700K) |
2005 |
300 kg |
150 km |
1013 km/h |
Turbojet |
Ship,Surface |
Inertial, active radar |
S.Korea |
|
Threat posed
Anti-ship missiles are the bane of the modern naval surface
combatant. Unlike the ground-combatant, who has the advantage of
concealment, terrain, and, fundamentally, ground beneath his feet,
the naval surface combatant is alone, aboard a warm boat, easily
distinguishable from the cold water that surrounds her, said boat
being packed to the gills with men, weaponry, and explosives,
sailing on a flat, relatively featureless expanse of ocean, which
offers concealment and shelter to none, and is (eventually)
naturally deadly to human life. As this is the case, threats that
would merely slow down the ground combatant—such as guided
missiles—are a much greater threat to the naval combatant.
Possessing a speed and an agility that naval platforms cannot
forseeably match, as well as computerized "smart" guidance systems
and a heavy payload of high-explosive, the modern anti-ship
missile, once it has acquired its target, is an enemy that the
target ship cannot usually run from, hide from, physically avoid,
or absorb.
Therefore, to counter the threat posed, the modern surface
combatant has to either avoid being acquired by a platform
possessing anti-ship missiles in the first place, has to destroy
the anti-ship missile carrying platform prior to it launching its
anti-ship missiles, or has to have active defense systems capable
of deceiving or destroying the anti-ship missile prior to the
anti-ship missile hitting its target. Modern navies have spent
thousands, if not millions of man-years considering and responding
to the threat of anti-ship missiles since World War II, and the
multiple, layered, computerized, active defense systems that they
field aboard their surface combatants are extremely effective
against almost all anti-ship missiles, with certain
exceptions.
For example, the United States Navy has developed the computerized,
automatic
AEGIS
anti-missile/anti-air/anti-satellite naval defense system, which is
claimed to be able to track, engage, and destroy massive, though
finite, quantities of incoming missiles (all at the same time)
using agile long-range surface to air missiles. Any missiles that
leak through the AEGIS system can then be deceived using electronic
countermeasures or decoys, or defeated by a
Close-in weapon system, such as the
Phalanx and
Goalkeeper CIWSes, or short-range
anti-aircraft missiles, like the
Sea
Sparrow or the
Rolling
Airframe Missile. Russia (and the former USSR), various
European nations, and the People's Republic of China have developed
and deployed similar systems.
However, even as effective as these naval air defense systems are,
they only retain their effectiveness as long as they retain their
ammunition. And, even as expensive as the most-effective, modern
anti-ship missiles are, they still remain extremely cost-effective,
and do not lose this cost-effectiveness when launched in their most
dangerous threat modality - namely, in massive,
defense-saturation-level quantities - as the replacement cost of a
single
Nimitz-class supercarrier, not
to mention the irreplaceable crew on board, is far in excess of
even 1,000 of the most modern anti-ship missiles available, a
quantity that, if launched en masse, would surely devastate even
the most well-defended carrier that any sea-faring power could
conceivably deploy.
As such, navies place a high premium on defending against anti-ship
missiles, as even a handful getting through ship-based defenses
could easily decimate an entire fleet.
Current Threats and Vulnerabilities
To counter these defense systems, countries like Russia are
developing or deploying very low flying missiles (~5 m ASL) that
slowly cruise at a very low level to within a short range of their
target and then, at the point when radar detection becomes
inevitable, initiate a supersonic, high-agility sprint (potentially
with anti-aircraft missile detection and evasion) to close the
terminal distance. Missiles, such as the
SS-N-27
Sizzler, that incorporate this sort of threat modality are
regarded by U.S. naval analysts as potentially being able to
penetrate current US Navy defensive platforms.
Countermeasures
Countermeasures against anti-ship missiles include:
Modern
stealth ships – or ships that at
least employ some
stealth
technology – to reduce the risk of detection and to make them
harder target by the missile itself. These passive countermeasures
include:
Examples include the Norwegian
Skjold class patrol boats, Swedish
Visby class corvettes, the
German
Sachsen class frigates,
the US
Arleigh Burke class
destroyers, the Chinese
Type 054
frigates, Chinese
Type 052C
destroyers, Indian
INS Shivalik
Class, and the French
La
Fayette class frigates.
Notes
- An interview with CL (R) Ing. Julio Pérez, chief designer
of Exocet trailer-based launcher
-
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=a5LkaU0wj714&refer=home
See also
External links