
French naval piece of the late 19th
century
Artillery is a military
combat Arm that employs
weapons capable of discharging large
projectiles in
combat. They
are generally capable of adding considerable
fire power to the
military capability of an
armed force. Artillery is the third oldest
combat Arm, and in many armed forces the gunners exhibit their own
pride and a unique set of traditions associated with their
service.
Artillery is also a system of
scientific research and its application
towards
design, capability and
combat use of the above matériel. Over the course of military
history the projectiles were manufactured from a wide variety of
materials, made in a wide variety of shapes, and used different
means of inflicting physical damage and
casualties to defeat specific types of
targets. The engineering designs
of the means of delivery have likewise changed significantly over
time, and have become some of the most complex technological
application today.
For much of artillery’s history during the
Middle Ages and the
Early modern period the
artillery pieces on land were moved with the
assistance of
horse teams. During the
more recent
Modern era and in the
Post-Modern period the artillery crew
has used wheeled or tracked vehicles as a mode of transportation.
Artillery used by naval forces has changed significantly also, with
missiles replacing guns in
surface warfare.
In some armies the weapon of artillery is the projectile, not the
piece that fires it. The process of delivering fire onto the target
is called gunnery. The actions involved in operating the piece are
called serving the gun by the gun crew (or detachment) to produce
artillery fire, and can be either direct artillery fire, or
indirect artillery fire.The manner in which artillery units or
formations are used is called artillery support, and may at
different periods in history refer to weapons designed to be fired
from ground, naval, and even air
weapons platform.
Although the term also describes
soldiers
and
sailors with the primary function of
using artillery weapons, the individuals who operate them are
called
gunners irrespective of
their
rank, however 'gunner' is the
lowest rank in artillery Arms. There is no generally recognised
generic term for a gun, howitzer, mortar, etc. Some armies use
'artillery piece' others
use 'gun'. The projectiles fired by artillery are either 'shot'(if
solid) or 'shell' if not. Shell is a widely used generic term for a
projectile, which is a component of
munitions.
The term 'artillery' is also applied to a
combat arm of most
military services when used
organizationally to describe
units and
formation of the national
armed forces that operate the weapons.The
gunners and their guns are usually grouped in teams called either
'crews' or 'detachments'. Several such crews and teams with other
functions are combined into a unit of artillery usually called a
battery, although sometimes called
a company. Batteries are roughly equivalent to a
company in the infantry, and are
combined into larger
military
organizations for
administrative and
operational purpose.
During
military
operations the role of field artillery is to provide close
support other Arms in combat or attack targets in depth. Typically
by delivering either high explosive munitions to inflict casualties
on the enemy from
casing fragments
and other debris and
blast, or by
demolition of enemy positions and damaging or destroying equipment
and vehicles. The artillery fire may be directed by an
artillery observer.
Military doctrine has played a
significant influence on the core
engineering design considerations
of Artillery ordnance through its history, in seeking to achieve a
balance between delivered volume of fire with ordnance mobility.
However, during the modern period the consideration of protecting
the gunners also arose due to the late-19th century introduction of
the new generation of infantry weapons using
conoidal bullet, better known as
the
Minié ball, with a range almost
as long as that of field artillery.
The gunners’ increasing proximity to, and participation in direct
combat against other combat arms and attacks by aircraft made the
introduction of substantial amounts of armour (e.g.
gun shield) necessary. This led to the
development of the
tank, and the evolution of
armoured warfare. These influences
have guided the development of artillery ordnance, systems,
organisations and operations until the present, with artillery
systems capable of providing support at ranges from as little as
100 m to the intercontinental ranges of
ballistic missiles. The only combat in
which artillery is unable to take part in is
close quarters combat.
Etymology
The word as used in the current context originated in the
Middle Ages. One suggestion is that it comes
from the
Old French atellier
meaning "to arrange", and
attillement meaning
"equipment".
From the 13th century an
artillier referred to a builder
of any war equipment, and for the next 250 years the sense of the
word "artillery" covered all forms of military weapons. Hence the
naming of the
Honourable
Artillery Company an essentially
Infantry unit until the 19th century. Another
suggestion is that comes from the Italian
arte de tirare
(art of shooting) coined by one of the first theorists on the use
of artillery,
Niccolo
Tartaglia.
History

A Roman Ballista
Mechanical systems used for throwing ammunition in ancient warfare,
also known as "
engines of war", like the
catapult,
onager,
trebuchet and the
ballista
are also referred to by military historians as artillery.
Middle Ages – first gunpowder artillery
The first
documented record of artillery with gunpowder propellant used on the battlefield was
on January 28, 1132 when General Han
Shizhong of the Song Dynasty used
escalade and Huochong to capture a city in Fujian
.
These small, crude weapons diffused into the
Middle East (the
madfaa)
and reached Europe in the 13th century, in a very limited
manner.
In Asia,
Mongols adopted the Chinese
artillery and used it effectively in the
great conquest. By late 14th AD, Chinese
rebels used organized artillery and cavalry to push Mongols
out.
The new
Ming
Dynasty
established the "Divine Engine Division" 神机营 –
specialized in various types of artillery. Light cannons and
cannons with multiple volleys were developed. In a campaign to
suppress a local minority rebellion near today's Burmese border,
the Ming army used a 3-line method of arquebuses/muskets to destroy
an elephant formation. Between 1593 and 1597, about 300,000 Chinese
and Japanese troops
fought
in Korea and both sides used heavy artillery in land and sea
battles.
In 1415, the Portuguese invaded the Mediterranean port town of
Ceuta. While it is difficult to confirm the use of firearms in the
siege of the city, it is known that the Portuguese defended it
thereafter with firearms, namely bombardas, colebratas, and
falconetes. In 1419, Sultan Abu Sa'id led an army to reconquer the
fallen city, and Moroccans brought cannons and used them in the
assault on Ceuta. Finally, hand-held firearms and riflemen appear
in Morocco, in 1437, in an expedition against the people of
Tangiers. It is clear that these weapons had developed into several
different forms, from small guns to large artillery units.
The artillery revolution in
Europe caught on
during the
Hundred Years War and
changed the way that battles were fought. In the following year,
the English used a gunpowder weapon in a military campaign against
the Scottish. However, at this time, the cannons used in battle
were very small and not particularly powerful. Cannons were only
useful for the defense of a
castle, as
demonstrated in the battle of Breteuil in 1356, when the besieged
English used a cannon to destroy an attacking French assault tower.
By the end of the 14th century, cannons were only powerful enough
to knock in roofs, and therefore could not penetrate castle
walls.
However, a major change occurred between 1420–1430, when artillery
became much more powerful and could now batter strongholds and
fortresses quite efficiently. Both the English, French, and
Burgundians advanced in military technology, and as a result the
traditional advantage that went to the defense in a siege was lost.
The cannons during this period were elongated, and the recipe for
gunpowder was improved to make it three times as powerful as
before. These changes led to the increased power in the artillery
weapons of the time.
Joan of Arc encountered gunpowder
weaponry several times. When she led the French against the English
at the Battle of Tourelles, in 1429, she faced heavy gunpowder
fortifications, and yet her troops prevailed in that battle. In
addition, she led assaults against the English-held towns of
Jargeau, Meung, and Beaugency, all with the support of large
artillery units.
When she led the assault on Paris
, Joan faced
stiff artillery fire, especially from the suburb of St. Denis,
which ultimately led to her defeat in this battle. In April
1430, she went to battle against the Burgundians, whose support was
purchased by the English. At this time, the Burgundians had the
strongest and largest gunpowder arsenal among the European powers,
and yet the French, under Joan of Arc's leadership, were able to
beat back the Burgundians and defend themselves. As a result, most
of the battles of the Hundred Years War that Joan of Arc
participated in were fought with gunpowder artillery.
As small smoothbore tubes these were initially cast in iron or
bronze around a core, with the first drilled bore ordnance recorded
in operation near Seville in 1247 . They fired lead, iron, or stone
balls, sometimes large arrows and on occasions simply handfuls of
whatever scrap came to hand. During the
Hundred Years' War (1337–1453) these
weapons became more common, initially as the
bombard and later the
cannon. Cannon were always
loaded from the muzzle. While there were many
early attempts at breech-loading designs, a lack of engineering
knowledge rendered these even more dangerous to use than
muzzle-loaders.
Early modern period – age of the smoothbores
Bombards developed in Europe were massive smoothbore weapons
distinguished by their lack of a field carriage, immobility once
emplaced, highly individual design, and noted unreliability (in
1460 James II, King of Scots, was killed when one exploded at the
siege of Roxburgh). Their large size precluded the barrels being
cast and they were constructed out of metal staves or rods bound
together with hoops like a barrel, giving their name to the
gun barrel.
Bombards were of value mainly in
sieges, a
famous Turkish example used at the
siege of Constantinople in 1453
weighed 19 tons , took 200 men and sixty oxen to emplace and could
fire seven times a day. The Fall of Constantinople was perhaps
"
the first event of supreme importance whose result was
determined by the use of artillery" when the huge bronze
cannons of
Mehmed II breached the walls of
Constantinople thereby ending the
Byzantine Empire according to Sir
Charles Oman.
The use of the word "cannon" marks the introduction in the 15th
century of a dedicated field carriage with axle, trail and
animal-drawn limber—this produced mobile field pieces that could
move and support an army in action, rather than being found only in
siege and static defences. The reduction in the size of the barrel
was due to improvements in both iron technology and gunpowder
manufacture, while the development of the
trunnion – projections at the side of the cannon as
an integral part of the cast – allowed the barrel to be fixed to a
more movable base, and also made raising or lowering the barrel
much easier.
The first land-based mobile weapon is usually credited to
Jan Žižka, who deployed his oxen-hauled
cannon during the
Hussite Wars of
Bohemia (1418–1424). However cannons were still large and
cumbersome. With the rise of musketry in the 16th century, cannon
were largely (though not entirely) displaced from the
battlefield—the cannon were too slow and cumbersome to be used and
too easily lost to a rapid enemy advance.

Polish multiple gun from 16th-17th
century
The combining of shot and powder into a single unit, a cartridge,
occurred in the 1620s with a simple fabric bag, and was quickly
adopted by all nations. It speeded loading and made it safer, but
unexpelled bag fragments were an additional fouling in the gun
barrel and a new tool—a
worm—was
introduced to remove them.
Gustavus
Adolphus is identified as the general who made cannon an
effective force on the battlefield—pushing the development of much
lighter and smaller weapons and deploying them in far greater
numbers than previously. But the outcome of battles was still
determined by the clash of infantry.
Shells, explosive-filled fused projectiles, were also developed in
the 17th century. The development of specialized pieces—shipboard
artillery,
howitzers and
mortars—was also begun in this period. More
esoteric designs, like the multi-barrel
ribauldequin, were also built.
The 1650 book by
Kazimierz
Siemienowicz "
Artis Magnae Artilleriae pars prima" was
one of the most important contemporary publications on the subject
of artillery. For over two centuries this work was used in
Europe as a basic artillery manual.
One of the most significant effects of artillery during this period
was however somewhat more indirect – by easily reducing to rubble
any medieval-type fortification or city wall (some which had stood
since Roman times), it abolished millennia of siege-warfare
strategies and styles of fortification building. This led, amongst
other things, to a frenzy of new
bastion-style fortifications to be built all over
Europe and in its colonies, but also had a strong integrating
effect on emerging nation-states, as kings were able to use their
newfound artillery superority to force any local dukes or lords to
submit to their will, setting the stage for the absolutist kingdoms
to come.
Modern era – age of rifled guns
Cannons continued to become smaller and lighter—Frederick II of
Prussia deployed the first genuine light artillery during the
Seven Years War—but until the
mid-19th century improvements in metallurgy, chemistry,
manufacturing and other sciences did not alter the basic design and
operation of a cannon.
Artillery continued to gain prominence in the 18th century when
Jean-Baptiste de
Gribeauval, a French artillery engineer introduced the
standardization of cannon design. He developed a field howitzer
whose gun barrel, carriage assembly and ammunition specifications
were made uniform for all French cannons. The standardized
interchangeable parts of these cannons down to the nuts, bolts and
screws made their mass production and repair much easier. Another
major change at this time was the development of a
flintlock firing mechanism for the cannons. The
old method of firing the cannon involved the use of a linstock or
match to light a small quantity of powder charge in a touchhole
drilled into the breech. This technique was quite faulty because
the ignited powder could easily be extinguished by rain and an
excess amount of charge could cause the guns to burst. The
flintlock mechanism on the other hand only needs to be cocked and
when its trigger is pulled the flint of the hammer strikes the
frizzen throwing sparks into the pan and detonating the charge at
the breech. The trigger can be tied to a lanyard and fired from a
safe distance. These changes laid down in 1789 would prove decisive
for
Napoleon's conquests. Napoleon,
himself a former artillery officer, perfected the tactic of massed
artillery batteries unleashed upon a critical point in his enemies'
line as prelude to infantry and cavalry assault and, more often
than not, victory.
Rifling had been tried on small arms in the 15th century. The
machinery to accurately rifle a cannon barrel did not arrive until
the 19th century. Cavelli, Wahrendorff, and Whitworth all
independently produced rifled cannon in the 1840s, but these guns
did not see widespread use until the latter stages of the
American Civil War—when designs such as
the various caliber
Rodman guns came to
prominence.
From the 1860s artillery was forced into a series of rapid
technological and operational changes, accelerating through the
1870s and thereafter. The first effective breech-loader (allowing a
higher rate of fire while keeping the detachment behind the gun)
was developed in 1855 by Sir William Armstrong, and accepted for
British service in 1859. The first cannon to contain all 'modern'
features is generally considered to be the
French 75 of 1897 with its
cased ammunition, effective breech-loading, modern sights,
self-contained firing mechanism, and
hydro-pneumatic recoil
dampening.
After the War of 1870 the Germans became strong advocates of
indirect fire. In 1882 a Russian
officer Lieutenant Colonel KG Guk published a book
Indirect
Fire for Field Artillery that provided a practical method of
using aiming points for indirect fire. A few years later the
Richtfläche sight was
invented in Germany and provided a means of indirect laying in
azimuth, clinometers for indirect laying in elevation already
existed. In the following 15 years the techniques of indirect fire
became available for all types of artillery. Indirect fire was the
defining characteristic of 20th Century artillery and led to
undreamt of changes in the amount of artillery, its tactics,
organisation and techniques most of which occurred during World War
I. To quote McCamley,
[By WWII] decades if not centuries of weapons
development had settled into maturity on an almost imperceptibly
rising plateau; the sciences of ballistics and explosive chemistry had achieved near
perfection given the available technology of the age. Arguably the
only new developments of note were discarding sabot rounds... and the hollow-charge projectile...
both of which were of marginal significance in the Second World
War.
After the Second World War – age of precision

WWI German Field Gun
Modern artillery is most obviously
distinguished by its large caliber, firing an
explosive shell
or
rocket, and being of such a size and
weight as to require a specialized carriage for firing and
transport. However, its most important characteristic is the use of
indirect fire, whereby the firing
equipment is aimed without seeing the target through its sights.
Indirect fire emerged at the beginning of the 20th century and was
greatly enhanced by the development of predicted fire methods in
World War I. Indirect fire uses firing data set on the sights,
predicted fire methods ensure that these data are accurate and
corrects for variations from the standard conditions for muzzle
velocity, temperature, wind and air density.
Weapons covered by the term 'modern artillery' include "
cannon" artillery such as the
howitzer,
mortar,
field gun and
rocket artillery. Certain smaller-caliber
mortars are more properly designated small arms rather than
artillery, albeit indirect-fire small arms. This term also came to
include
coastal artillery which
traditionally defended coastal areas against seaborne attack and
controlled the passage of ships. With the advent of powered flight
at the start of the 20th century, artillery also included
ground-based
anti-aircraft
batteries.
The term "artillery" has traditionally not been used for
projectiles with internal
guidance
systems, even though some artillery units employ
surface-to-surface
missiles. Advances in
terminal guidance systems for small munitions has allowed
large-caliber projectiles to be developed, blurring this
distinction.
Ammunition
One of the most important role of logistics is the supply of
munitions as a primary type of artillery
consumable, their
storage and the
provision of fuses, detonators and warheads at the point where
artillery troops will assemble the charge, projectile, bomb or
shell.
A round of artillery ammunition comprises four components:
- 1: The Fuze
- 2: The Projectile
- 3: The Propellant
- 4: The Primer
Fuzes
The normal artillery spelling is "fuze".
Fuzes are the devices that trigger
explosion of the artillery ammunition charge. Broadly there are
four main types:
- impact (including graze and delay)
- mechanical time including airburst
- proximity sensor airburst
- electronic time including airburst
Most artillery fuzes are nose fuzes. However, base fuzes have been
used with armour piercing shells and for squash head (HESH or HEP)
anti-tank shells. At least one nuclear shell and its non-nuclear
spotting version also used a multi-deck mechanical time fuze fitted
into its base.
Impact fuzes were, and in some armies remain, the standard fuze for
HE. Their default action is normally 'superquick', some have had a
'graze' action which allows them to penetrate light cover and
others have 'delay'. Delay fuzes allow the shell to penetrate the
ground before exploding, concrete piercing fuzes are an extreme
case of this and specially hardened. During World War I and later
ricochet fire with delay or graze fuzed HE shells, fired with a
flat angle of descent, was used to achieve airburst.
HE shells can be fitted with other fuzes, airburst fuzes usually
have a combined airburst and impact function. However, until the
introduction of
proximity fuzes, the
airburst function was mostly used with cargo munitions—for example
shrapnel, illumination, and smoke. The larger calibers of
anti-aircraft artillery are almost always used
airburst. Airburst fuzes have to have the fuze length (running
time) set on them. This is done just before firing using either a
wrench or a fuze setter pre-set to the required fuze length.
Early airburst fuzes used igniferous timers which lasted into the
second half of the 20th century. Mechanical time fuzes appeared in
the early part of that century. These required a means of powering
them. The Thiel mechanism used a spring and escapement (i.e.
'clockwork'), Junghans used
centrifugal force and gears, and Dixi used
centrifugal force and balls. From about 1980 electronic time fuzes
started replacing mechanical ones for use with cargo
munitions.
Proximity fuzes have been of two types: photo-electric or radar.
The former was not very successful and seems only to have been used
with British
anti-aircraft
artillery 'unrotated projectiles' (ie rockets) in World War II.
Radar proximity fuzes were a big improvement over the mechanical
(non-proximity) fuzes which they replaced. Mechanical time fuzes
required an accurate calculation of their running time, which was
affected by non-standard conditions. With HE (requiring a burst 20
to 30 feet above the ground), if this was very slightly wrong the
rounds would either hit the ground or burst too high. Accurate
running time was less important with cargo munitions that burst
much higher.
The first
radar proximity
fuzes(called 'VT' for variable time as an obfuscating security
measure) were initially used against aircraft in World War II.
Their ground use was delayed for fear of the enemy recovering
'blinds' (artillery shells which failed to detonate) and copying
the fuze. The first proximity fuzes were designed to detonate about
above the ground. These air-bursts are much more lethal against
personnel than ground bursts because they deliver a greater
proportion of useful fragments and deliver them into terrain where
a prone soldier would be protected from ground bursts.
However, proximity fuzes can suffer premature detonation because of
the moisture in heavy rain clouds. This led to 'controlled variable
time' (CVT) after World War II. These fuzes have a mechanical timer
that switched on the radar about 5 seconds before expected impact,
they also detonated on impact.
The proximity fuze emerged on the battlefields of Europe in late
December 1944. They have become known as the U.S. Artillery's
"Christmas present", and were much appreciated when they arrived
during the
Battle of the Bulge.
They were also used to great effect in
anti-aircraft projectiles in the Pacific
against
Kamikaze planes as well as in
Britain against
V-1 flying
bombs.
Electronic multi-function fuzes started to appear around 1980.
Using solid-state electronics they were relatively cheap and
reliable, and became the standard fitted fuze in operational
ammunition stocks in some western armies. The early versions were
often limited to proximity airburst, albeit with height of burst
options, and impact. Some offered a go/no-go functional test
through the fuze setter.
Later versions introduced induction fuze setting and testing
instead of physically placing a fuze setter on the fuze. The
latest, such as Junghan's DM84U provide options giving, superquick,
delay, a choice of proximity heights of burst, time and a choice of
foliage penetration depths.
A new type of artillery fuze will appear soon. In addition to other
functions these offer some course correction capability, not full
precision but sufficient to significantly reduce the dispersion of
the shells on the ground.
Projectiles
The projectile is the munition or "bullet" fired downrange. This
may or may not be an explosive device. Traditionally, projectiles
have been classified as "shot" or "shell", the former being solid
and the latter having some form of "payload".
Shells can also be divided into three configurations: bursting,
base ejection or nose ejection. The latter is sometimes called the
shrapnel configuration. The most modern is base ejection, which was
introduced in World War I. Both base and nose ejection are almost
always used with airburst fuzes. Bursting shells use various types
of fuze depending on the nature of the payload and the tactical
need at the time.
Payloads have included:
- Bursting: high-explosive, white
phosphorus ("Willie Pete" or "Wilson Picket"), coloured marker,
chemical, nuclear devices; high
explosive anti-tank (HEAT) and canister may be considered
special types of bursting shell.
- Base Ejection: dual purpose improved conventional munitions
(DPICM)-bomblet, scatterable mines,
illuminating, coloured flare, smoke, incendiary, propaganda, chaff
(foil to jam radars: originally known as "window") and modern
exotics such as electronic payloads and sensor-fuzed
munitions.
- Nose Ejection: shrapnel, flechette, star, incendiary.
Projectile stabilization
- Rifled Traditionally, artillery projectiles
have been spin-stabilised, meaning that they spin in flight so that
gyroscopic forces prevent them from
tumbling. Spin is induced by gun barrels having rifling which engages a soft metal band around the
projectile, called a "driving band"
(UK) or "rotating band" (U.S.). The driving band is usually made of
copper, but synthetic materials have also been used.
- Smoothbore/Fin-Stabilized In modern artillery
smoothbore tubes have been used mostly by
mortars. These projectiles use fins
in the airflow at their rear to maintain correct orientation. The
primary benefit over rifled barrels is reduced barrel wear and
longer ranges that can be achieved (due to the reduced loss of
energy to friction and gas escaping around the projectile via the
rifling).
- Rifled/Fin-Stabilized A combination of the
above can be used, where the barrel is rifled, but the projectile
also has deployable fins for stabilization, guidance or
gliding.
Propellant
All forms of artillery require a
propellant to propel the projectile at the
target. Propellant is always a low explosive, this means it
deflagrates instead of
detonating, as with high explosives. The shell is
accelerated to a high velocity in a very short time by the rapid
generation of gas from the burning propellant. This high pressure
is achieved by burning the propellant in a contained area, either
the chamber of a gun barrel or the combustion chamber of a rocket
motor.
Until the late 19th century the only available propellant was
black powder. Black powder had many
disadvantages as a propellant; it has relatively low power,
requiring large amounts of powder to fire projectiles, and created
thick clouds of white smoke that would obscure the targets, betray
the positions of guns and make aiming impossible. In 1846
nitrocellulose (also known as guncotton) was discovered, and the
high explosive
nitroglycerin was
discovered at much the same time.
Nitrocellulose was significantly more
powerful than black powder, and was smokeless. Early guncotton was
unstable however, and burned very fast and hot, leading to greatly
increased barrel wear. Widespread introduction of smokeless powder
would wait until the advent of the double-base powders, which
combine nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin to produce powerful,
smokeless, stable propellant.
Many other formulations were developed in the following decades,
generally trying to find the optimum characteristics of a good
artillery propellant; low temperature, high energy, non corrosive,
highly stable, cheap, and easy to manufacture in large quantities.
Broadly, modern gun propellants are divided into three classes:
single-base propellants which are mainly or entirely nitrocellulose
based, double-base propellants composed of a combination of
nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin, and triple base composed of a
combination of nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin and
Nitroguanidine.
Artillery shells fired from a barrel can be assisted to greater
range in three ways:
- rocket assisted projectiles (RAP) enhance and sustain the
projectile's velocity by providing additional 'push' from a small
rocket motor that is part of the projectile's base.
- Base bleed uses a small pyrotechnic
charge at the base of the projectile to introduce sufficient
combustion products into the low-pressure region behind the base of
the projectile responsible for a large proportion of the drag.
- ramjet assisted, similar to rocket assisted but using a ramjet
instead of a rocket motor; it is anticipated that a ramjet-assisted
120-mm mortar shell could reach a range of .
Propelling charges for tube artillery can be provided in one of two
ways: either as cartridge bags or in metal cartridge cases.
Generally anti-aircraft artillery and smaller caliber (up to 6" or
155 mm) guns use metal cartridge cases that include the round
and propellant, similar to a modern rifle cartridge. This
simplifies loading and is necessary for very high rates of fire.
Bagged propellant allows the amount of powder to be raised or
lowered depending on the range to the target. it also makes
handling of larger shells easier. Each requires a totally different
type of breech to the other. A metal case holds an integral primer
to initiate the propellant and provides the gas seal to prevent the
gases leaking out of the breech, this is called obturation. With
bagged charges the breech itself provides obturation and holds the
primer. In either case the primer is usually percussion but
electrical is also used and laser ignition is emerging. Modern
155 mm guns have a primer magazine fitted to their
breech.

Artillery ammunition has four classifications according to use:
- Service: ammunition used in live fire training or for wartime use in
a combat zone. Also known as "warshot" ammunition.
- Practice: Ammunition with a non- or
minimally-explosive projectile that mimics the characteristics
(range, accuracy) of live rounds for use under training conditions.
Practice artillery ammunition often utilizes a
colored-smoke-generating bursting charge for marking purposes in
place of the normal high explosive charge.
- Dummy: Ammunition with an inert warhead, inert
primer, and no propellant; used for training or display.
- Blank: Ammunition with live primer, greatly
reduced propellant charge (typically black
powder) and no projectile; used for training, demonstration or
ceremonial use.
Field artillery system

Cyclone of the 320th French
Artillery, in Hoogstade, Belgium, 5 September 1917.
Because field artillery mostly uses
indirect fire the guns have to be part of a
system that enables them to attack targets invisible to them in
accordance with the combined arms plan.
The main functions in the field artillery system are:
- Communications
- Command: authority to allocate resources;
- Target acquisition: detect, identify and deduce the location of
targets;
- Control: authority to decide which targets to attack and allot
fire units to the attack;
- Production of firing data – to deliver fire from a fire unit
onto its target;
- Fire units: guns, launchers or mortars grouped together;
- Specialist services – produce data to support the production of
accurate firing data;
- Logistic services – to provide combat supplies, particularly
ammunition, and equipment support.
Organisationally and spatially these functions can be arranged in
many ways. Since the creation of modern indirect fire different
armies have done it differently at different times and in different
places. Technology is often a factor but so are military-social
issues, the relationships between artillery and other arms, and the
criteria by which military capability, efficiency and effectiveness
are judged. Cost is also an issue because artillery is expensive
due to the large quantities of ammunition that it uses and its
level of manpower.
Communications underpin the artillery system, they
have to be reliable and in real-time to link the various elements.
During the 20th century communications used flags, morse code by
radio, line and lights, voice and teletype (teleprinter) by line.
Radio has included HF, VHF, satellite and radio relay as well as
modern tactical trunk systems. In western armies at least radio
communications are now usually encrypted.
The emergence of mobile and man-portable radios after World War I
had a major impact on artillery because it enable fast and mobile
operations with observers accompanying the infantry or armoured
troops. In World War II some armies fitted their self-propelled
guns with radios. However, sometimes in the first half of the 20th
century hardcopy artillery fire plans and map traces were
distributed.
Data communications can be especially important for artillery
because by using structured messages and defined data types fire
control messages can be automatically routed and processed by
computers. For example a target acquisition element can send a
message with target details which is automatically routed through
the tactical and technical fire control elements to deliver firing
data to the gun's laying system and the gun automatically laid. As
tactical data networks become pervasive they will provide any
connected soldier with a means for reporting target information and
requesting artillery fire.
Command is the authority to allocate resources,
typically by assigning artillery formations or units. Terminology
and its implications vary widely. However, very broadly, artillery
units are assigned in direct support or in general support.
Typically, the former mostly provide close support to manoeuvre
units while the latter may provide close support and or depth fire,
notably counter-battery. Generally, ‘direct support’ also means
that the artillery unit provides artillery observation and liaison
teams to the supported units. Sometimes direct support units are
placed under command of the regiment/brigade they support. General
support units may be grouped into artillery formations eg brigades
even divisions, or multi-battalion regiments, and usually under
command of division, corps or higher HQs. General support units
tend to be moved to where they are most required at any particular
time. Artillery command may impose priorities and constraints to
support their combined arms commander's plans.
Target acquisition can take many forms, it is
usually observation in real time but may be the product of
analysis. Artillery observation teams are the most common means of
target acquisition. However, air observers have been use since the
beginning of indirect fire and were quickly joined by air
photography. Target acquisition may also be by anyone that can get
the information into the artillery system. Targets may be visible
to forward troops or in depth and invisible to them.
Observation equipment can vary widely in its complexity.
- Unmanned air vehicles are the latest form of air observation,
having been first introduced in the early 1960s.
- The equipment available to observation teams has progressed
from just prismatic compass, hand-held or tripod mounted binoculars
and sometimes optical range-finders.
- Special equipment for locating hostile artillery: flash
spotting and notably sound ranging
appeared in World War I the latter has been undergone increasing
refinement as technology has improved. These were joined by radar
in World War II.
- In the mid-1970s several armies started equipping their
artillery observation teams with laser rangefinders, ground
surveillance radars and night vision devices, these were soon
followed by inertial orienting and navigating devices to improve
the accuracy of target locations. The Global Positioning System (GPS)
provided a smaller and cheaper means of quick and accurate fixation
for target acquisition devices.
- Specialised units with ground surveillance radars, unattended
ground sensors or observation patrols operating in depth have also
been used.
- Targets in depth may also be 'acquired' by intelligence
processes using various sources and agencies such as HUMINT, SIGINT, ELINT and IMINT.
- Laser guided shells require laser target designators, usually
with observation teams on the ground but UAV installations are
possible.
- Specialised artillery observation vehicles appeared in World
War II and have greatly increased in sophistication since that
time.
Control, sometimes called tactical fire control,
is primarily concerned with 'targeting' and the allotment of fire
units to targets. This is vital when a target is within range of
many fire units and the number of fire units needed depends on the
nature of the target, and the circumstances and purpose of its
engagement. Targeting is concerned with selecting the right weapons
in the right quantities to achieve the required effects on the
target. Allotment attempts to address the artillery
dilemma—important targets are rarely urgent and urgent targets are
rarely important. Of course importance is a matter of perspective;
what is important to a divisional commander is rarely the same as
what is important to an infantry platoon commander.

Afghans with two captured artillery
field guns in Jaji, 1984.
Broadly, there are two situations: fire against opportunity targets
and targets whose engagement is planned as part of a particular
operation. In the latter situation command assigns fire units to
the operation and an overall artillery fire planner makes a plan,
possibly delegating resources for some parts of it to other
planners. Fire plans may also involve use of non-artillery assets
such as mortars and aircraft.
Control of fire against opportunity targets is an important
differentiator between different types of artillery system. In some
armies only designated artillery HQs have the tactical fire control
authority to order fire units to engage a target, all ‘calls for
fire’ being requests to these HQs. This authority may also extend
to deciding the type and quantity of ammunition to be used. In
other armies an ‘authorised observer’ (eg artillery observation
team or other target acquisition element) can order fire units to
engage. In the latter case a battery observation team can order
fire to their own battery and may be authorised to order fire to
their own battalion and sometimes to many battalions. For example a
divisional artillery commander may authorise selected observers to
order fire to the entire divisional artillery. When observers or
cells are not authorised they can still request fire.
Armies that apply forward tactical control generally put the
majority of the more senior officers of artillery units forward in
command observation posts or with the supported arm. Those that do
not use this approach tend to put these officers close to the guns.
In either case the observation element usually controls fire in
detail against the target, such as adjusting it onto the target,
moving it and co-ordinating it with the supported arm as necessary
to achieve the required effects.
Firing data has to be calculated and is the key to
indirect fire, the arrangements for this have varied widely. In the
end firing data has two components: quadrant elevation and
azimuth, to these may be added the size of
propelling charge and the fuze setting. The process to produce
firing data this is sometimes called technical fire control. Before
computers, some armies set the range on the gun's sights, which
mechanically corrected it for the gun's muzzle velocity. For the
first few decades of indirect fire, the firing data were often
calculated by the observer who then adjusted the fall of shot onto
the target.
However, the need to engage targets at night, in depth or hit the
target with the first rounds quickly led to predicted fire being
developed in World War I. Predicted fire existed alongside the
older method. After World War II predicted methods were invariably
applied but the fall of shot usually needed adjustment because of
inaccuracy in locating the target, the proximity of friendly troops
or the need to engage a moving target. Target location errors were
significantly reduced once laser rangefinders, orientation and
navigation devices were issued to observation parties.
In predicted fire the basic geospatial data of range, angle of
sight and azimuth between a fire unit and its target was produced
and corrected for variations from the ‘standard conditions’. These
variations included barrel wear, propellant temperature, different
projectiles weights that all affected the muzzle velocity, and air
temperature, density, wind speed & direction and rotation of
the earth that affect the shell in flight. The net effect of
variations can also be determined by shooting at an accurately
known point, a process called ‘registration’.
All these calculations to produce a quadrant elevation (or range)
and azimuth were done manually by highly trained soldiers using
instruments, tabulated data, data of the moment and approximations
until battlefield computers started appearing in the 1960s and
‘70s. While some early calculators copied the manual method
(typically substituting
polynomials for
tabulated data), computers use a different approach. They simulate
a shell's trajectory by 'flying' it in short steps and applying
data about the conditions affecting the trajectory at each step.
This simulation is repeated until it produces a quadrant elevation
and azimuth that lands the shell within the required 'closing'
distance of the target co-ordinates. NATO has a standard ballistic
model for computer calculations and has expanded the scope of this
into the NATO Armaments Ballistic Kernel (NABK).
Technical fire control has been performed in various places, but
mostly in firing batteries. However, in the 1930s the French moved
it to battalion level and combined it with some tactical fire
control. This was copied by the US. Nevertheless most armies seemed
to have retained it within firing batteries and some duplicated the
technical fire control teams in a battery to give operational
resilience and tactical flexibility. Computers reduced the number
of men needed and enabled decentralisation of technical fire
control to autonomous sub-battery fire units such as platoons,
troops or sections, although some armies had sometimes done this
with their manual methods. Computation on the gun or launcher,
integrated with their laying system, is also possible.
MLRS led the way in this.
A
fire unit is the smallest artillery or mortar
element, consisting of one or more weapon systems, capable of being
employed to execute a fire assigned by a tactical fire controller.
Generally it is a battery, but sub-divided batteries are quite
common, and in some armies very common. On occasions a battery of 6
guns has been 6 fire units. Fire units may or may not occupy
separate positions. Geographically dispersed fire units may or may
not have an integral capability for technical fire control.
Specialist services provide data need for
predicted fire. Increasingly, they are provided from within firing
units. These services include:
- Survey: accurate fixation and orientation of the guns,
historically this involved specialists within field artillery units
and specialist units. In some armies mapping and amp supply has
also been an artillery responsibility. Survey is also essential for
some target acquisition devices. Traditional survey methods of
measurement and calculation have been replaced by inertial
orientation and navigators and GPS.
- Meteorological data: historically these were usually divisional
level specialist teams but advances in technology mean they are now
increasingly part of artillery units.
- Calibration: periodically establishing the "normal" muzzle
velocity of each gun as it wears. Originally this involved special
facilities and army level teams. Measurement using Doppler radar,
introduced in the 1950s, started to simplify arrangements. Some
armies now have a muzzle velocity measuring radar permanently
fitted to every gun.
Logistic services, supply of artillery ammunition
has always been a major component of military logistics. Up until
World War I some armies made artillery responsible for all forward
ammunition supply because the load of small arms ammunition was
trivial compared to artillery. Different armies use different
approaches to ammunition supply, which can vary with the nature of
operations. Differences include where the logistic service
transfers artillery ammunition to artillery, the amount of
ammunition carried in units and extent to which stocks are held at
unit or battery level. A key difference is whether supply is ‘push’
or ‘pull’. In the former the ‘pipeline’ keeps pushing ammunition
into formations or units at a defined rate. In the latter units
fire as tactically necessary and replenish to maintain or reach
their authorised holding (which can vary), so the logistic system
has to be able to cope with surge and slack.
Artillery has always been equipment intensive and for centuries
artillery provided its own artificers to maintain and repair their
equipment. Most armies now place these services in specialist
branches with specialist repair elements in batteries and
units.
Classification of artillery
Artillery types can be categorised in several ways, for example by
type or size of weapon or ordnance, by role or by organizational
arrangements.
Types of ordnance
The types of cannon artillery are generally distinguished by the
velocity at which they fire projectiles.Types of artillery:
- Field artillery: mobile weapons
used to support armies in the field. Subcategories include:
- infantry support guns:
directly support infantry units.
- mountain guns: lightweight weapons
that can be moved through difficult terrain.
- field guns; capable of long range
fire.
- howitzers: capable of high angle
fire.
- gun howitzers: capable of high or
low angle fire with a long barrel.
- mortars: larger towed or
self-propelled weapons that fire projectiles at an angle of over 45
degrees to the horizontal.(not usually considered field
artillery)
- rocket artillery: alternative
propulsion.
- Motorized artillery: towed by Artillery tractors.
- Self-propelled
artillery: typically guns, mortars or gun howitzers mounted on
a vehicle.
- Naval artillery: guns mounted on
warships and used either against other ships or in support of
ground forces. The crowning achievement of naval artillery
was the battleship, bristling with guns
of up to , mounted on the Japanese battleship Yamato
, but the advent of airpower and missiles have
rendered this type of artillery largely obsolete. The
correct term for an individual piece of naval artillery is a 'naval
rifle'.
- Coastal artillery:
Fixed-position weapons dedicated to defense of a particular
location, usually a coast (e.g. the Atlantic Wall in WW
II) or harbor. Not needing to be mobile, coastal artillery used
to be much larger than equivalent field artillery pieces, giving
them longer range and more destructive power. Modern coastal
artillery (e.g., Russia's "Bereg" system) is often self propelled,
(allowing it to avoid counter-battery fire) and fully integrated,
meaning that each battery has all of the support systems that it
requires (maintenance, targeting radar, etc.) organic to its
unit.
- Anti-aircraft artillery:
weapons, usually mobile, designed for attacking aircraft from the
ground. Some guns were suitable for dual-role anti-aircraft and
field (anti-tank) use. The World War II German
88 mm gun was a famous example.
Naval guns are typically longer-barreled, low-trajectory,
high-velocity weapons designed primarily for a direct-fire role.
Typically the length of a cannon barrel is greater than 25 times
its caliber (inner diameter).

Naval piece of artillery, early 19th
century
Howitzers are relatively shorter. Capable
of both high- and low-angle fire, they are most often employed in
an
indirect-fire role, capable of
operating in
defilade. Typically, the
length of a howitzer
barrel is between 15 and
25 times its caliber.
Mortars are smaller, low-velocity,
high-angle weapons capable of only high-trajectory fire at a
relatively short range. Typically the length of a mortar barrel is
less than 15 times its caliber.
Modern field artillery can also be split into two other categories:
towed and self-propelled. As the name suggests,
towed artillery has a prime mover, usually a
jeep or
truck, to move the
piece, crew, and ammunition around. Self-propelled howitzers are
permanently mounted on a carriage or vehicle with room for the crew
and ammunition and are thus capable of moving quickly from one
firing position to another, both to support the fluid nature of
modern combat and to avoid
counter-battery fire. There are also
mortar carrier vehicles, many of which allow the mortar to be
removed from the vehicle and be used dismounted, potentially in
terrain in which the vehicle cannot navigate, or in order to avoid
detection.
Types of use
Organizational types
At the beginning of the modern artillery period, the late 19th
century, many armies had three main types of artillery, in some
case they were sub-branches within the artillery branch in others
they were separate branches or corps. There were also other types
excluding the armament fitted to warships:
- Horse artillery, first formed as
regular units in late 18th century, with the role of supporting
cavalry, they were distinguished by the entire crew being
mounted.
- Field or "foot" artillery, the
main artillery arm of the field army, using either guns, howitzers
or mortars. In World War II this branch
again started using rockets and
later surface to surface missiles.
- Fortress or garrison artillery, manned a nation's fixed
defences using guns, howitzers or mortars, either on land or
coastal frontiers. Some had deployable elements to provide heavy
artillery to the field army. In some nations coast defence artillery was a naval
responsibility.
- Mountain artillery, a few nations
treated mountain artillery as a separate branch, in others it was a
speciality in another artillery branch. They used light guns or
howitzers, usually designed for pack animal transport and easily
broken down into small easily handled loads
- Naval artillery, some nations carried pack artillery on some
warships, these were used and manhandled by naval (or marine)
landing parties. At times, part of a ship's armament would be
unshipped and mated to makeshift carriages and limbers for actions
ashore, for example during the Second
Boer War, during the First World War the guns from the stricken
SMS Königsberg
formed the main artillery strength of the German forces in East
Africa.

After
World War I many nations merged
these different artillery branches, in some cases keeping some as
sub-branches. Naval artillery disappeared apart from that belonging
to marines. However, two new branches of artillery emerged during
that war and its aftermath, both used specialised guns (and a few
rockets) and used direct not
indirect
fire, in the 1950s and '60s both started to make extensive use
of missiles:
- Anti-tank artillery, also under various organisational
arrangements but typically either field artillery or a specialist
branch and additional elements integral to infantry, etc, units.
However, in most armies field and anti-aircraft artillery also had
at least a secondary anti-tank role. After World War II anti-tank
in Western armies became mostly the responsibility of infantry and
armoured branches and ceased to be an artillery matter, with some
exceptions.
- Anti-aircraft artillery,
under various organisational arrangements including being part of
artillery, a separate corps, even a separate service or being split
between army for the field and airforce for home defence. In some
cases infantry and the new armoured corps also operated their own
integral light anti-aircraft artillery. Home defence anti-aircraft
artillery often used fixed as well as mobile mountings. Some
anti-aircraft guns could also be used as field or anti-tank
artillery, providing they had suitable sights.
However, the general switch by artillery to
indirect fire before and during
World War I led to a reaction in some armies.
The result was accompanying or infantry guns. These were usually
small, short range guns, that could be easily man-handled and used
mostly for direct fire but some could use indirect fire. Some were
operated by the artillery branch but under command of the supported
unit. In
World War II they were joined
by self-propelled assault guns, although other armies adopted
infantry or close support tanks in armoured branch units for the
same purpose, subsequently tanks generally took on the accompanying
role.
Equipment types
The three main types of artillery 'gun' are guns,
howitzers and
mortars. During the 20th century, guns and
howitzers have steadily merged in artillery use, making a
distinction between the terms somewhat meaningless. By the end of
the 20th century, true guns with calibers larger than about
60 mm had become very rare in artillery use, the main users
being tanks, ships, and a few residual anti-aircraft and coastal
guns.
The traditional definitions differentiated between guns and
howitzers in terms of maximum elevation (well less than 45° as
opposed to close to or greater than 45°), number of charges (one or
more than one charge), and having higher or lower muzzle velocity,
sometimes indicated by barrel length. These three criteria give
eight possible combinations, of which guns and howitzers are but
two. However, modern 'howitzers' have higher velocities and longer
barrels than the equivalent 'guns' of the first half of the 20th
century.
True guns are characterised by long range, having a maximum
elevation significantly less than 45°, a high muzzle velocity and
hence a relatively long barrel, and a single charge. The latter
often led to fixed ammunition where the projectile is locked to the
cartridge case. There is no generally accepted minimum muzzle
velocity or barrel length associated with a gun.
Howitzers can fire at maximum elevations at least close to 45°, and
up to about 70° is normal for modern ones. They also have a choice
of charges, meaning that the same elevation angle of fire will
achieve a different range depending on the charge used. They have
lower muzzle velocities and shorter barrels than equivalent guns.
All this means they can deliver fire with a steep angle of descent.
Because of their multi-charge capability, their ammunition is
mostly separate loading (the projectile and propellant are loaded
separately).
That leaves six combinations of the three criteria, some of which
have been termed
gun howitzers. A term
first used in the 1930s when howitzers with a relatively high
maximum muzzle velocities were introduced, it never became widely
accepted, most armies electing to widen the definition of 'gun' or
'howitzer'. By the 1960s, most equipments had maximum elevations up
to about 70°, were multi-charge, had quite high maximum muzzle
velocities and relatively long barrels.
Mortars are simple, the modern
mortar originated in World War I and there were several patterns.
After that war, most mortars settled on the Stokes pattern,
characterised by a short barrel, smooth bore, low muzzle velocity,
generally firing at an elevation angle greater that 45°, and a very
simple and light mounting using a 'baseplate' on the ground. The
projectile with its integral propelling charge was dropped down the
barrel from the muzzle to hit a fixed firing pin. Since that time,
a few mortars have become rifled and adopted breech loading.
There are other recognised typifying characteristics for artillery.
First the type of obturation used to seal the chamber and prevent
gases escaping through the breech. This may use a metal cartridge
case that also holds the propelling charge, a configuration called
'QF' or 'quickfiring' by some nations. The alternative does not use
a metal cartridge case, the propellant being merely bagged or in
combustible cases with the breech itself providing all the sealing.
This is called 'BL" or 'breech loading' by some nations.
A second characteristic is the form of propulsion. Basically modern
equipment can either be towed or self-propelled (SP). A towed gun
fires from the ground and any inherent protection is limited to a
gun shield. Towing by horse teams lasted throughout World War II in
some armies, but others were fully mechanised with wheeled or
tracked gun towing vehicles by the outbreak of that war. The size
of a towing vehicle depends on the weight of the equipment and the
amount of ammunition it has to carry.
A variation of towed is portee where the vehicle carries the gun
which is dismounted for firing. Mortars are often carried this way.
A mortar is sometimes carried in an armoured vehicle and can either
fire from it or be dismounted to fire from the ground. Since the
early 1960s it has been possible to carry lighter towed guns and
most mortars by helicopter. Even before that, they were parachuted
or landed by glider from the time of the first airborne trials in
the USSR in the 1930s.
In an SP equipment, the gun is an integral part of the vehicle that
carries it. SPs first appeared during World War I, but did not
really develop until World War II. They are mostly tracked
vehicles, but wheeled SPs started to appear in the 1970s. Some SPs
have no armour and carry little or no ammunition. Armoured SPs
usually carry a useful ammunition load. Early armoured SPs were
mostly a 'casemate' configuration, in essence an open top armoured
box offering only limited traverse. However, most modern armoured
SPs have a full enclosed armoured turret, usually giving full
traverse for the gun. Many SPs cannot fire without deploying
stabilisers or spades, sometimes hydraulic. A few SPs are designed
so that the recoil forces of the gun are transferred directly onto
the ground through a baseplate. A few towed guns have been given
limited self-propulsion by means of an auxiliary engine.
Two other forms of tactical propulsion were used in the first half
of the 20th century: Railways or transporting the equipment by
road, as two or three separate loads, with disassembly and
re-assembly at the beginning and end of the journey.
Railway artillery took two forms, railway
mountings for heavy and super-heavy guns and howitzers and armoured
trains as 'fighting vehicles' armed with light artillery in a
direct fire role. Disassembled transport was also used with heavy
and super heavy weapons and lasted into the 1950s.
Caliber categories
A third form of artillery typing is to classify it as 'light',
'medium', 'heavy' and various other terms. It appears to have been
introduced in World War I, which spawned a very wide array of
artillery in all sorts of sizes so a simple categorical system was
needed. Some armies defined these categories by bands of calibers.
Different bands were used for different types of weapons—field
guns, mortars, anti-aircraft guns and coast guns.
Modern operations
Artillery is used in a variety of roles depending on its type and
caliber. The general role of artillery is to provide
fire
support—"the application of fire, coordinated with the
manoeuvre of forces to destroy,
neutralize or
suppress the enemy". This NATO definition, of course,
makes artillery a supporting arm although not all NATO armies agree
with this logic. The italicised terms are NATO's.
Unlike rockets, guns (or howitzers as some armies still call them)
and mortars are suitable for delivering
close supporting
fire. However, they are all suitable for providing
deep
supporting fire although the limited range of many mortars
tends to exclude them from the role. Their control arrangements and
limited range also mean that mortars are most suited to
direct
supporting fire. Guns are used either for this or
general
supporting fire while rockets are mostly used for the latter.
However, lighter rockets may be used for direct fire support. These
rules of thumb apply to NATO armies.
Modern
mortars, because of their
lighter weight and simpler, more transportable design, are usually
an integral part of
infantry and, in some
armies,
armor units. This means they generally
don't have to
concentrate their fire so their shorter
range is not a disadvantage. Some armies also consider infantry
operated mortars to be more responsive than artillery, but this is
a function of the control arrangements and not the case in all
armies. However, mortars have always been used by artillery units
and remain with them in many armies, including a few in NATO.
In NATO armies artillery is usually assigned a tactical mission
that establishes its relationship and responsibilities to the
formation or units it is assigned to. It seems that not all NATO
nations use the terms and outside NATO others are probably used.
The standard terms are:
direct support,
general
support,
general support reinforcing and
reinforcing. These tactical missions are in the context of
the command authority:
operational command,
operational control,
tactical command or
tactical control.
In NATO direct support generally means that the directly supporting
artillery unit provides observers and liaison to the manoeuvre
troops being supported, typically an artillery battalion or
equivalent is assigned to a brigade and its batteries to the
brigade's battalions. However, some armies achieve this by placing
the assigned artillery units under command of the directly
supported formation. Nevertheless, the batteries' fire can be
concentrated onto a single target, as can the fire of
units in range and with the other tactical missions.
Application of fire
There are several dimensions to this subject. The first is the
notion that fire may be against an
opportunity target or
may be
prearranged. It the latter it may be either
on-call or
scheduled. Prearranged targets may be
part of a
fire plan. Fire may be either
observed
or
unobserved, if the former it may be
adjusted,
if the latter then it has to be
predicted. Observation of
adjusted fire may be directly by a forward observer or indirectly
via some other
target acquisition system.
NATO also recognises several different types of fire support for
tactical purposes:
- Counterbattery fire: delivered for the purpose of
destroying or neutralizing the enemy's fire support
system.
- Counterpreparation fire: intensive prearranged fire
delivered when the imminence of the enemy attack is
discovered.
- Covering fire: used to protect troops when they are
within range of enemy small arms.
- Defensive fire: delivered by supporting units to
assist and protect a unit engaged in a defensive action.
- Final Protective Fire: an immediately available
prearranged barrier of fire designed to impede enemy movement
across defensive lines or areas.
- Harassing fire: a random number of shells are fired at
random intervals, without any pattern to it that the enemy can
predict. This process is designed to hinder enemy forces' movement,
and, by the constantly imposed stress, threat of losses and
inability of enemy forces to relax or sleep, lowers their
morale.
- Interdiction fire: placed on an area or point to
prevent the enemy from using the area or point.
- Preparation fire: delivered before an attack to weaken
the enemy position.
These purposes have existed for most of the 20th century, although
their definitions have evolved and will continue to do so, lack of
suppression in
counterbattery is an omission.
Broadly they can be defined as either:
- Deep supporting fire: directed at objectives not in
the immediate vicinity of own force, for neutralizing or destroying
enemy reserves and weapons, and interfering with enemy command,
supply, communications and observation; or
- Close supporting fire: placed on enemy troops, weapons
or positions which, because of their proximity present the most
immediate and serious threat to the supported unit.
Two other NATO terms also need definition:
- Neutralization fire: delivered to render a target
temporarily ineffective or unusable; and
- Suppression fire: that degrades the performance of a
target below the level needed to fulfill its mission. Suppression
is usually only effective for the duration of the fire.
The tactical purposes also include various "mission verbs", a
rapidly expanding subject with the modern concept of "effects based
operations".
Targeting is the process of selecting target and matching
the appropriate response to them taking account of operational
requirements and capabilities. It requires consideration of the
type of fire support required and the extent of coordination with
the supported arm. It involves decisions about:
- what effects are required, eg neutralization or
suppression;
- the proximity of and risks to own troops or
non-combatants;
- what types of munitions, including their fuzing, are to be used
and in what quantities;
- when the targets should be attacked and possibly for how
long;
- what methods should be used, eg converged or
distributed, whether adjustment is permissible or surprise
essential, the need for special procedures such as precision or
danger close
- how many fire units are needed and which ones they should be
from those that are available (in range, with the required
munitions type and quantity, not allotted to another target, have
the most suitable line of fire if there is a risk to own troops or
non-combatants);
The
targeting process is the key aspect of tactical fire
control. Depending on the circumstances and national procedures it
may all be undertaken in one place or may be distributed. In armies
practicing control from the front, most of the process may be
undertaken by a forward observer or other target acquirer. This is
particularly the case for a smaller target requiring only a few
fire units. The extent to which the process is formal or informal
and makes use of computer based systems, documented norms or
experience and judgement also varies widely armies and other
circumstances.
Surprise may be essential or irrelevant. It depends on what effects
are required and whether or not the target is likely to move or
quickly improve its protective posture. During World War II UK
researchers concluded that for impact fuzed munitions the relative
risk were as follows:
- men standing – 1
- men lying – 1/3
- men firing from trenches – 1/15–1/50
- men crouching in trenches – 1/25–1/100
Airburst munitions significantly increase the relative risk for
lying men, etc. Historically most casualties occur in the first
10–15 seconds of fire, i.e. the time needed to react and improve
protective posture, however, this is less relevant if airburst is
used.
There are several ways of making best use of this brief window of
maximum vulnerability:
- ordering the guns to fire together, either by executive order
or by a "fire at" time. The disadvantage is that if the fire is
concentrated from many dispersed fire units then
there will be different times of flight and the first rounds will
be spread in time. To some extent a large concentration offsets the
problem because it may mean that only one round is required from
each gun and most of these could arrive in the 15 second
window.
- burst fire, a rate of fire to deliver three rounds from each
gun within 10 or 15 seconds, this reduces the number of guns and
hence fire units needed, which means they may be less dispersed and
have less variation in their times of flight. Smaller caliber guns,
such as 105 mm, have always been able to deliver three rounds
in 15 seconds, larger calibers firing fixed rounds could also do it
but it wasn't until the 1970s that a multi-charge 155 mm
howitzer, FH-70 first gained the
capability.
- multiple round simultaneous impact (MRSI).
- time on target, fire units fire at the time less their
time of flight, this works well with prearranged scheduled fire but
is less satisfactory for opportunity targets because it means
delaying the delivery of fire by selecting a 'safe' time that all
or most fire units can achieve. It can be used with both the
previous two methods.
Counter-battery fire
Counter-battery fire is a type of mission assigned
to military artillery forces, which are tasked with locating and
firing upon enemy artillery. Typically, enemy artillery would be
detected when they fire, and a counter-battery fire mission must
proceed as quickly as possible before the enemy
artillery battery finishes their salvo and
relocates.
Originally, counter-battery fire relied on ground or air-based
artillery observers noticing the source of the artillery fire (due
to muzzle flashes, smoke, spotting the artillery pieces, etc.) and
calculating
firing solutions to
strike back at them. Artillery spotting, along with reconnaissance,
was one of the major roles for aircraft in warfare (see
World War I). Modern counter-battery fire relies
on
counter-battery radar,
which calculate the source of incoming artillery shells very
accurately and quickly—so quickly, in fact, that return fire can
sometimes begin before the first enemy
shell or
rocket has
landed.
The
development of fast and accurate counter-battery fire has led to
the concept of shoot-and-scoot and
concentration on the development of highly mobile artillery pieces
(typically self-propelled guns like the US
M109 Paladin, the South African G6
Howitzer or Soviet
2S1 Gvozdika, or rocket
artillery like the Soviet Katyusha or the multi-national
M270
MLRS). The idea is to fire and then move before any
counter-battery fire can land on the original position.
The task of destroying enemy artillery batteries can also fall to
attack aircraft, but unless they are
already on patrol overhead, they are usually not quick enough to
save friendly forces from damage. More often, ground-based
counter-battery fire would suppress the enemy battery/batteries and
force them to move, while aircraft would follow up later with a
strike to destroy the rest of the enemy artillery.
Field artillery team
Modern field artillery (Post-
World War
I) has three distinct parts: the
forward observer (or FO), the
fire direction center (FDC) and the
actual guns themselves. The forward observer observes the target
using tools such as
binoculars,
laser rangefinders, designators and call
back fire missions on his radio, or relays the data through a
portable computer via an encrypted digital radio connection
protected from jamming by computerized frequency hopping.
The FO can communicate directly with the battery FDC, of which
there is one per each
battery of
4–8 guns. Otherwise the several FOs communicate with a higher FDC
such as at a Battalion level, and the higher FDC prioritizes the
targets and allocates fires to individual batteries as needed to
engage the targets that are spotted by the FOs or to perform
preplanned fires.
The Battery FDC computes firing data—ammunition to be used, powder
charge, fuse settings, the direction to the target, and the
quadrant elevation to be fired at to reach the target, what gun
will fire any rounds needed for adjusting on the target, and the
number of rounds to be fired on the target by each gun once the
target has been accurately located—to the guns. Traditionally this
data is relayed via radio or wire communications as a warning order
to the guns, followed by orders specifying the type of ammunition
and fuse setting, direction, and the elevation needed to reach the
target, and the method of adjustment or orders for fire for effect
(FFE). However in more advanced artillery units, this data is
relayed through a digital radio link.
Other parts of the field artillery team include meteorological
analysis to determine the temperature, humidity and pressure of the
air and wind direction and speed at different altitudes. Also radar
is used both for determining the location of enemy artillery and
mortar batteries and to determine the precise actual strike points
of rounds fired by battery and comparing that location with what
was expected to compute a registration allowing future rounds to be
fired with much greater accuracy.
Time on Target
A technique called Time on Target was developed by the U.S. Army
during World War II. This technique uses a precise determination of
the time of flight from each firing battery to the target area.
When a Time on Target (TOT) is designated each battery that will
join in firing on that target subtracts the time of flight from the
TOT to determine the time to fire. Individual firing batteries
train to fire their rounds as close to simultaneously as possible.
When each firing battery fires their rounds at their individual
time to fire every round will reach the target area nearly
simultaneously. This is especially effective when combined with
techniques that allow fires for effect to be made without
preliminary adjusting fires.
A similar effect may be obtained by a single battery firing
sequential rounds with different trajectories, with all rounds
timed to arrive simultaneously.
MRSI

Illustration of different trajectories
used in MRSI: For any muzzle velocity there is a steeper (> 45°,
solid line) and a lower (<45°, dashed="" line)="" trajectory.=""
On="" these="" different="" trajectories,="" the="" shells=""
have="" flight="" times.<=""></45°,>div>
This is a modern version of the earlier "time on target" concept in
which fire from different weapons was timed to arrive on target at
the same time. It is possible for modern computer-controlled
artillery to fire more than one volley at a target and have all the
shells arrive simultaneously, which is called MRSI (Multiple Rounds
Simultaneous Impact). This is because there is more than one
trajectory for the rounds to fly to any given target: typically one
is below 45 degrees from horizontal and the other is above it, and
by varying the amount of propellant with each shell, it possible to
create multiple trajectories. Because the higher trajectories cause
the shells to arc higher into the air, they take longer to reach
the target and so if the shells are fired on these trajectories for
the first volleys (starting with the shell with the most propellant
and working down) and then after the correct pause more volleys are
fired on the lower trajectories, the shells will all arrive at the
same time. This is useful because many more shells can land on the
target with no warning. With traditional volleys along the same
trajectory, anybody at the target point will have a certain amount
of time (however long it takes to reload and re-fire the guns) to
run away or take cover between volleys. In addition, if guns in
more than one location are firing on one target, with careful
timing it can be arranged for all their shells to land at the same
time for the same reason.
Examples
of MRSI guns are South Africa's
Denel G6-52 (which can land six rounds
simultaneously at targets at least 25 km away), Germany
's Panzerhaubitze 2000 (which can land five
rounds simultaneously at targets at least 17 km away) and
Slovakia
's 155 mm SpGH ZUZANA model 2000. The
Archer project (Developed by
BAE-Systems in Sweden), a 155 mm howitzer on a wheeled chassis
claiming to be able to deliver up to 7 shells on target
simultaneously from the same gun. The 120 mm twin barrel
AMOS mortar system, developed in Finland, is
capable of 7 + 7 shells MRSI.
The United States
Crusader program
(now canceled) was slated to have MRSI capability.
MRSI was a stunt popular at artillery demonstrations in the 1960s.
With its increased risk of a mistake (needing a range to the target
that gives time for several rounds to be fired and only useful
against a few types of target in an era where PPD fuzes are
becoming standard), whether MRSI is still merely a stunt or has
real tactical value over other methods is debatable.
Air burst
The destructiveness of artillery bombardments can be enhanced when
some or all of the shells are set for airburst, meaning that they
explode in the air above the target instead of upon impact. This
can be accomplished either through time
fuze or
proximity fuzes. Time fuzes use a precise
timer to detonate the shell after a preset delay. Unfortunately,
this technique is tricky and slight variations in the functioning
of the fuze can cause it to explode too high and be ineffective, or
to strike the ground instead of exploding above it. Since December
1944 (
Battle of the Bulge),
proximity fuzed artillery shells have been available that take the
guesswork out of this process. These embody a miniature, weak
radar transmitter in the fuze to detect the
ground and explode them at a predetermined height above it. The
return of the weak radar signal completes an electrical circuit in
the fuze which explodes the shell.
This is a very effective tactic against infantry and light
vehicles, because it scatters the
fragmentation of the shell over a
larger area and prevents it from being blocked by terrain or
entrenchments that do not include some form of robust overhead
cover. Combined with TOT or MRSI tactics that give no warning of
the incoming rounds, these rounds are especially devastating
because many enemy soldiers are likely to be caught in the open.
This is even more so if the attack is launched against an assembly
area or troops moving in the open rather than a unit in an
entrenched tactical position.
See also
- New artillery theories, concepts, methods and systems
Citations and notes
- see siege
engines for more information on pre-gunpowder devices
- Cook, W: Warfare and Firearms in Fifteenth Century Morocco,
1400-1492. 1993
- Rogers, C: The Military Revolutions of the Hundred Years War.
1993
- DeVries, K: The Use of Gunpowder Weaponry By and Against Joan
or Arc During the Hundred Years War. 1996
- A History of Warfare – Keegan, John, Vintage 1993
- p.70, Holmes
- pp. 407–416, Ordway, Vice-Commander of Artillery of the Polish
king, Wladyslaw IV ("Great Art of Artillery, the First Part," also
known as "The Complete Art of Artillery")
- Smithsonian
- p.266, Browne & Thurbon
- p.262, International Aeronautic Federation
- The public NABK Brochure
https://mipcee-sps.lsec.dnd.ca/sites/s4_public_info/S4%20Document%20Information/NABK%20brochure.pdf
- AAP-6(2006) NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions.
References
- TM 9-2300
- Holmes, Richard, The World Atlas of Warfare: Military
Innovations that Changed the Course of History, Viking Press
1988
- McCamley, N. J., Disasters Underground, Pen &
Sword Military (2004)
- Maj Gen AGL McNaughton The
Development of Artillery in the Great War, Canadian Defence
Quarterly Vol 6 No 2, January 1929
- Ordway, Frederick I., History of Astronautics Symposium: Mar
Del Plata, Argentina, October 1969, Technology and
Culture, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Jul., 1970)
- Browne, J. P. R., & Thurbon, M. T., Electronic
Warfare, Brassey's Defence Publishing, London, 1998
- International Aeronautic Federation, Interavia,
p. 262, v.32, 1977 (Jan-Jun), Jane's Information Group,
London
Further reading
- Hogg, Oliver Frederick Gillilan, Artillery: Its Origin,
Heyday and Decline (Hamden, 1970)
- Bailey, J.B.A., Field Artillery and Firepower (Naval
Institute Press, 2003)
External links