The
Aryan race is a concept historically
influential in
European culture in the period
of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It derives
from the idea that the original speakers of the
Indo-European languages and their
descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive
race or subrace of the
larger
Caucasian race.
While originally meant simply as a neutral ethnic classification,
as interpreted by late 19th century authors such as
Arthur de Gobineau, it was later used for
political
racism in
Nazi
and
neo-Nazi ideological form, it became a
concept of
scientific racism, and
hence also in other currents such as
occultism and
white
supremacism.
Belief in the existence of an Aryan race is sometimes referred to
as
Aryanism.
Origin of the term
The term
Aryan originates with the
Indo-Iranian self-designation
arya,
attested in the ancient texts of
Hinduism
and
Zoroastrianism, the
Rigveda and the
Avesta.
In the 18th century, the most ancient known
Indo-European languages were those
of the Indo-Iranians' ancestors. The word
Aryan was
adopted to refer not only to the Indo-Iranian people, but also to
native Indo-European speakers as a whole, including the
Albanians,
Armenians,
Greeks,
Latins,
and
Germans. It was soon
recognised that
Balts,
Celts, and
Slavs also belonged to the same group. It
was argued that all of these languages originated from a common
root—now known as
Proto-Indo-European—spoken by
an ancient people who must have been the original ancestors of the
European,
Iranian, and
Indo-Aryan peoples. The ethnic group composed of
the
Proto-Indo-Europeans and
their modern descendants was termed the
Aryans.
This usage was common in the late 19th and early 20th century. An
example of an influential best-selling book that reflects this
usage is the 1920 book
The Outline of History by
H. G. Wells. In it he wrote of the accomplishments of
the Aryan people, stating how they "learned methods of
civilization" while "Sargon II and Sardanapalus were ruling in
Assyria and fighting with Babylonia and Syria and Egypt". As such,
Wells suggested that the Aryans had eventually "subjugated the
whole ancient world, Semitic, Aegean and Egyptian alike". In the
1944 edition of
Rand McNally’s World
Atlas, the Aryan race is depicted as being one of the ten major
racial groupings of mankind. The
science
fiction author Poul Anderson (1926-2001), an
anti-racist Libertarian of
Scandanavian ancestry, in his many
novels,
novellas, and
short stories, consistently used the term
Aryan as a synonym for
Indo-Europeans. He spoke
of the
Aryan bird of prey which impelled those of the
Aryan race to take the lead in developing
interstellar travel,
colonize
habitable planets in other
planetary systems and become leading
business
entrepreneurs on the newly
colonized
planets.
The use of "Aryan" as a synonym for "Indo-European" or to a lesser
extent for "Indo-Iranian", is regarded today by many as obsolete
and
politically incorrect, but
may still occasionally appear in material based on older
scholarship, or written by persons accustomed to older usage, such
as in a 1989 article in
Scientific
American by
Colin Renfrew in which
he uses the word "Aryan" in its traditional meaning as a synonym
for "Indo-European".
19th-century physical anthropology
In 19th century
physical
anthropology, represented by some as being
scientific racism, the "Aryan race" was
considered a subgroup of the
Caucasian (or Europid) race, essentially
corresponding to the speakers of
Indo-European languages native to
Europe, Persia and
Northern
India.
The original 19th-century and early 20th-century use of the term
Aryan referred to "the early speakers of Proto-Indo
European and their descendents".
Max
Müller is often identified as the first writer to speak of an
Aryan "
race" in English. In his
Lectures on the Science of Language in 1861 he referred to
Aryans as a "race of people". At the time, the term
race
had the meaning of "a group of tribes or peoples, an ethnic
group".
OED underrace,
n.6
I.1.c has "A group of several tribes or peoples, regarded as
forming a distinct ethnic set. Esp. used in 19th-cent.
anthropological classification, sometimes in conjunction with
linguistic groupings."
When Müller's statement was interpreted to imply a biologically
distinct sub-group of humanity, he soon clarified that he simply
meant a line of descent, insisting that it was very dangerous to
mix linguistics and anthropology. "The Science of Language and the
Science of Man cannot be kept too much
asunder ... I must repeat what I have said many times before,
it would be wrong to speak of Aryan blood as of
dolichocephalic grammar". He restated his
opposition to this method in
1888 in his essay
Biographies of words and the home of the Aryas.
Müller was responding to the development of racial anthropology,
and the influence of the work of
Arthur de Gobineau who argued that the
Indo-Europeans represented a superior branch of humanity. A number
of later writers, such as the French anthropologist
Vacher de Lapouge in his book
L'Aryen, argued that this superior branch could be
identified biologically by using the cephalic index (a measure of
head shape) and other indicators. He argued that the long-headed
"dolichocephalic-blond" Europeans, characteristically found in
northern Europe, were natural leaders, destined to rule over more
"brachiocephalic" (short headed) peoples..
The division of the Caucasian race into Aryans, Semites and Hamites
is in origin linguistic, not based on physical anthropology, the
division in physical anthropology being that into
Nordic,
Alpine and
Mediterranean. However, the
linguistic classification of "Aryan" became closely associated, and
conflated, with the classification of "Nordic".
This claim became increasingly important during the 19th century.
In the
mid-19th century, it was commonly believed that the Aryans
originated in the southwestern steppes of
present-day Russia
.
However, by the late 19th century the steppe theory of Aryan
origins was challenged by the view that the Aryans originated in
ancient Germany or
Scandinavia, or at
least that in those countries the original Aryan ethnicity had been
preserved. The German origin of the Aryans was especially promoted
by the archaeologist
Gustaf
Kossinna, who claimed that the Proto-Indo-European peoples were
identical to the
Corded Ware
culture of Neolithic Germany. This idea was widely circulated
in both intellectual and popular culture by the early twentieth
century, and is reflected in the concept of "
Corded-Nordics" in
Carleton S. Coon's 1939
The Races of Europe.
Other anthropologists contested such claims.
In Germany, Rudolf Virchow launched a study of craniometry, which prompted him to denounce
"Nordic mysticism" in the 1885 Anthropology Congress in Karlsruhe
, while Josef Kollmann
, a collaborator of Virchow, stated in the same congress that the
people of Europe, be they English, German, French, and Spaniard
belonged to a "mixture of various races," furthermore declaring
that the "results of craniology" led to "struggle against any
theory concerning the superiority of this or that European race" on
others.
Virchow's contribution to the debate sparked a controversy.
Houston Stewart
Chamberlain, a strong supporter of the theory of a superior
Aryan race, attacked Josef Kollmann arguments in detail. While the
"Aryan race" theory remained popular, in particular in Germany,
some authors defended Virchow's perspective, in particular
Otto Schrader,
Rudolph von Jhering and the ethnologist
Robert Hartmann (1831-1893), who
proposed to ban the notion of "Aryan" from anthropology.
British Raj
In India, under the
British Empire,
the British rulers also used the idea of a distinct Aryan race in
order to ally British power with the Indian
caste
system. It was widely claimed that the Aryans were white people
who had invaded India in ancient times, subordinating the darker
skinned native
Dravidian peoples, who
were pushed to the south. Thus the foundation of Hinduism was
ascribed to northern invaders who had established themselves as the
dominant castes, and who were supposed to have created the
sophisticated
Vedic texts.
Much of these theories were simply conjecture fueled by European
imperialism. This styling of an
Aryan invasion by British colonial
fantasies of racial supremacy lies at the origin of the fact that
all discussion of historical
Indo-Aryan migrations or Aryan and
Dravidian races remains highly controversial in India to this day,
and does continue to affect political and religious debate. Some
Dravidians, and supporters of the
Dalit
movement, most commonly
Tamil,
claim that the worship of
Shiva is a distinct
Dravidian religion going back to the Indus Civilization, to be
distinguished from
Brahminical "Aryan"
Hinduism. In contrast, the Indian nationalist
Hindutva movement argues that no Aryan invasion or
migration ever occurred, asserting that Vedic beliefs emerged from
the
Indus Valley
Civilisation, which pre-dated the supposed advent of the
Indo-Aryans in India, and is identified as a likely candidate for a
Proto-Dravidian culture.
Some Indians were also influenced by the debate about the Aryan
race. The Indian nationalist
V.
D. Savarkar believed in the theory that an
"Aryan race" migrated to India, but he didn't find much value in a
racialized interpretation of the "Aryan race". Some Indian
nationalists supported the British version of the theory because it
gave them the prestige of common descent with the ruling British
class.
Genetic studies
A recent genetic study in Andhra Pradesh state of India found that
the upper caste Hindus were closer relatives to Eastern-Europeans
than to Hindus from lower castes.
However, a study conducted by the Centre for Cellular
and Molecular Biology in 2009 (in
collaboration with Harvard Medical School
, Harvard
School of Public Health and the Broad Institute of Harvard and
MIT
) analyzed
half a million genetic markers across the genomes of 132
individuals from 25 ethnic groups from 13 states in India across
multiple caste groups. The study asserts, based on the
impossibility of identifying any genetic indicators across caste
lines, that castes in South Asia grew out of traditional tribal
organizations during the formation of Indian society, and was not
the product of any Aryan invasion and "subjugation" of Dravidian
people.
Occultism
Theosophy
These debates were addressed within the
Theosophical movement founded by
Helena Blavatsky and
Henry Olcott at the end of the nineteenth
century. This philosophy took inspiration from Indian culture, in
this case, perhaps, from the Hindu reform movement the
Arya Samaj founded by
Swami Dayananda.
Blavatsky argued that humanity had descended from a series of
"
Root Races", naming the fifth root race
(out of seven) the Aryan Race. She thought that the
Aryans originally came from
Atlantis and
described the Aryan races with the following words:
- "The Aryan races, for instance, now varying from dark brown,
almost black, red-brown-yellow, down to the whitest creamy colour,
are yet all of one and the same stock -- the Fifth Root-Race -- and spring from one single
progenitor, (...) who is said to have lived over 18,000,000 years
ago, and also 850,000 years ago -- at the time of the sinking of
the last remnants of the great continent of Atlantis."
Blavatsky used "
Root Race" as a technical
term to describe human evolution over the large
time periods in her
cosmology.
However, she also claimed that there were modern non-Aryan peoples
who were inferior to Aryans. She regularly contrasts "Aryan" with
"
Semitic" culture, to the detriment of the
latter, asserting that Semitic peoples are an offshoot of Aryans
who have become "degenerate in spirituality and perfected in
materiality." She also states that some peoples are "semi-animal
creatures". These latter include "the Tasmanians, a portion of the
Australians and a mountain tribe in China." There are also
"considerable numbers of the mixed Lemuro-Atlantean peoples
produced by various crossings with such semi-human stocks -- e.g.,
the wild men of Borneo, the Veddhas of Ceylon, classed by Prof.
Flower among Aryans (!), most of the remaining Australians,
Bushmen, Negritos, Andaman Islanders, etc."
Despite this, Blavatsky's admirers claim that her thinking was not
connected to fascist or racialist ideas, asserting that she
believed in a
Universal
Brotherhood of humanity and wrote that "all men have
spiritually and physically the same origin" and that "mankind is
essentially of one and the same essence". On the other hand, in
The Secret Doctrine, Blavatsky states: "Verily mankind is
'of one blood,' but not of the same essence."
Blavatsky connects physical race with spiritual attributes
constantly throughout her works:
- "Esoteric history teaches that idols and their worship died out
with the Fourth Race, until the survivors of the hybrid races of
the latter (Chinamen, African Negroes, &c.) gradually brought
the worship back. The Vedas countenance no idols; all the modern
Hindu writings do".
- "The intellectual difference between the Aryan and other
civilized nations and such savages as the South Sea Islanders, is inexplicable on
any other grounds. No amount of culture, nor generations of
training amid civilization, could raise such human specimens as the
Bushmen, the Veddhas
of Ceylon
, and some
African tribes, to the same
intellectual level as the Aryans, the Semites, and the Turanians
so called. The 'sacred spark' is missing in them and it is
they who are the only inferior races on the globe, now happily --
owing to the wise adjustment of nature which ever works in that
direction -- fast dying out. Verily mankind is 'of one blood,' but
not of the same essence. We are the hot-house, artificially
quickened plants in nature, having in us a spark, which in them is
latent".
According to Blavatsky, "the MONADS of the lowest specimens of
humanity (the "narrow-brained" savage South-Sea Islander, the
African, the Australian) had no Karma to work out when first born
as men, as their more favoured brethren in intelligence had".
She also prophecies of the destruction of the racial "failures of
nature" as the future "higher race" ascends:
- "Thus will mankind, race after race, perform its appointed
cycle-pilgrimage. Climates will, and have already begun, to change,
each tropical year after the other dropping one sub-race, but only
to beget another higher race on the ascending cycle; while a series
of other less favoured groups -- the failures of nature -- will,
like some individual men, vanish from the human family without even
leaving a trace behind".
It is interesting to note that the second subrace of the Fifth or
Aryan root race, the Arabian, is regarded by Theosophists as one of
the Aryan subraces. It is believed by Theosophists that the
Arabians, although asserted in traditional Theosophy to be of Aryan
(i.e., Indo-European) ancestry, adopted the
Semitic language of the people around them
who had migrated earlier from Atlantis (the fifth or (original)
Semite subrace of the Atlantean
root
race).
Theosophists assert that the Jews originated as an offshoot of the Arabian subrace
in what is now Yemen
about 30,000
BC. They migrated first to Somalia
and then
later to Egypt
where they
lived until the time of Moses. Thus,
according to the teachings of Theosophy, the Jews are part of the
Aryan race.
Ariosophy
Guido von List (and his followers
such as
Lanz von Liebenfels)
later took up some of Blavatsky's ideas, mixing her ideology with
nationalistic and fascist ideas; this system of thought became
known as
Ariosophy. It was believed in
Ariosophy that the
Teutonic were
superior to all other peoples because according to Theosophy the
Teutonics or Nordics were the most recent subrace of the Aryan root
race to have evolved. Such views also fed into the development of
Nazi ideology. Theosophical publications such as
The Aryan Path were strongly opposed to
the Nazi usage, attacking
racialism.
Nazism and Neo-Nazism
Nazism
The idea
of the Northern origins of the Aryans was particularly influential
in Germany
. It
was widely believed that the "Vedic Aryans" were ethnically
identical to the
Goths,
Vandals and other ancient Germanic peoples of the
Völkerwanderung. This
idea was often intertwined with
anti-Semitic ideas. The distinctions between
the "Aryan" and "
Semitic" peoples were based
on the aforementioned linguistic and ethnic history.
Semitic peoples came to be seen as a foreign presence within Aryan
societies, and the Semitic peoples were often pointed to as the
cause of conversion and destruction of social order and values
leading to culture and civilization's downfall by proto-Nazi and
Nazi theorists such as
Houston Stewart Chamberlain and
Alfred Rosenberg.
According to the adherents to
Ariosophy,
the Aryan was a "
master race" that built
a civilization that dominated the world from
Atlantis about ten thousand years ago. This alleged
civilization declined when other parts of the world were colonized
after the 8,000 BC destruction of
Atlantis
because the inferior races mixed with the Aryans but it left traces
of their civilization in
Tibet (via
Buddhism), and even in
Central America,
South America, and
Ancient Egypt. (The date of 8,000 BC for the
destruction of
Atlantis in
Ariosophy is 2,000 years later than the date of
10,000 BC given for this event in
Theosophy.) These theories affected the more
esotericist strand of Nazism.
A complete, highly speculative theory of Aryan and anti-Semitic
history can be found in
Alfred
Rosenberg's major work,
The Myth of the Twentieth
Century. Rosenberg's well-researched account of ancient
history, melded with his racial speculations, proved to be very
effective in spreading racialism among German intellectuals in the
early twentieth century, especially after the
First World War.
These and other ideas evolved into the
Nazi
use of the term "Aryan race" to refer to what they saw as being a
master race of people of northern
European descent. They worked to maintain the purity of this race
through
eugenics programs (including
anti-miscegenation legislation,
compulsory sterilization of
the mentally ill and the mentally deficient, the execution of the
institutionalized mentally ill as part of a
euthanasia program).
Heinrich Himmler (the Reichsfuhrer of the SS
), the person
ordered by Adolf Hitler to implement
the final solution (Holocaust), told his personal masseur Felix Kersten that he always carried with him
a copy of the ancient Aryan scripture, the
Bhagavad Gita because it relieved him
of guilt about what he was doing — he felt that like the warrior
Arjuna, he was simply doing his duty without
attachment to his actions.
Himmler was also interested in Buddhism and his institute
Ahnenerbe sought to mix some
traditions from Hinduism and Buddhism. Himmler sent a
1939 German expedition to
Tibet as part of his research into Aryan origins.
Neo-Nazism
Since the military defeat of
Nazi
Germany by the
Allies in 1945, some
neo-Nazis have expanded their concept of
the Aryan race, moving from the Nazi concept that the purest Aryans
were the Teutonics or
Nordics of Northern
Europe to the idea that the true Aryans are everyone descended from
the Western or
European branch of the
Indo-European peoples. This is
sometimes referred to as
pan-Aryanism. According to
Nicholas Goodrick-Clark, many neo-Nazis want to establish an
autocratic state to be called the
Western Imperium.
This proposed state would be led by a
Führer-like figure, and would include all areas
inhabited by the
Aryan race (defined as non-Jews of
European ancestry), i.e.
Europe (includes all of Russia
), Anglo-America, South
Africa (may include Rhodesia or Zimbabwe
) with its white minority, Australia, New Zealand
, and southern South
America (especially Chile
, Argentina
, southern Brazil
and Uruguay
.) Only those
of the Aryan race would be full citizens of the state. This
concept is based on the 1947 book
Imperium: The
Philosophy of History and Politics by
Francis Parker Yockey.
Tempelhofgesellschaft
A
neo-Nazi esoteric Nazi Gnostic
sect headquartered in Vienna, Austria
called the Tempelhofgesellschaft,
founded in the early 1990s, teaches a form of what it calls
Marcionism. They distribute
pamphlets claiming that the Aryan race originally came to
Atlantis from the
star
Aldebaran (this information is
supposedly based on "ancient
Sumerian
manuscripts").
See also
Philosophical:
Third Reich specific:
Contemporaneous concepts of race:
References
Further reading
External links