
Asbestos
.jpg/180px-Blue_asbestos_(teased).jpg)
Blue asbestos showing the fibrous
nature of the mineral
Asbestos is a naturally occurring
silicate mineral with long, thin fibrous
crystals.Asbestos can be
toxic. The
inhalation of
asbestos fibers can cause serious
illnesses, including malignant
lung
cancer,
mesothelioma (a type of
malignant neoplasm
dependent mostly from exposure to asbestos), and
asbestosis (a type of
pneumoconiosis). Since the mid 1980s, the
European Union and most developed
countries have banned asbestos. . Since January 1 2005 the
European Union has banned all types of
utilization of asbestos
Directive 1999/77/EC and extraction,
manufacture and processing of asbestos products
Directive 2003/18/EC
For environmental samples, one must normally resort to electron
microscopy for positive identification.However today gravimetric
and PCM/PLM techniques are employed, which cannot readily identify
the smallest, most hazardous, fibers. These techniques being
limited to PM10 particulate size evaluation which completely
ignores UFPs.
Asbestos became increasingly popular among manufacturers and
builders in the late 19th century because of its resistance to
heat, electrical and chemical damage, sound absorption and tensile
strength. When asbestos is used for its resistance to fire or heat,
the fibers are often mixed with
cement or
woven into fabric or mats. Asbestos was used in some products for
its heat resistance, and in the past was used on electric oven and
hotplate wiring for its
electrical
insulation at elevated temperature, and in buildings for its
flame-retardant and insulating
properties,
tensile strength,
flexibility, and resistance to chemicals.
Types and associated fibres

Chrysotile asbestos

Asbestos fibers
Six minerals are defined as "asbestos" including:
chrysotile,
amosite,
crocidolite,
tremolite,
anthophyllite and
actinolite.
White
Chrysotile,
CAS No. 12001-29-5, is obtained from
serpentine rocks which are common
throughout the world. Serpentine rock is also the state rock of
California. Its idealized
chemical
formula is
Mg (
Si O )(
OH) . Chrysotile fibers are curly as opposed to
fibers from amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite, and
anthophyllite which are needlelike.
Chrysotile, along with other types of
asbestos, has been banned in dozens of countries and is only
allowed in the United
States
and Europe in very limited
circumstances. Chrysotile has been used more than any other
type and accounts for about 95% of the asbestos found in buildings
in America. Applications where chrysotile might be used include the
use of
joint compound. It is more
flexible than
amphibole types of asbestos;
it can be spun and woven into
fabric. The
most common use is within corrugated asbestos cement roof sheets
typically used for outbuildings, warehouses and garages. It is also
found as flat sheets used for ceilings and sometimes for walls and
floors. Numerous other items have been made containing chrysotile
including brake linings, cloth behind fuses (for fire protection),
pipe insulation, floor tiles, and rope seals for boilers.
Brown
Amosite, CAS No. 12172-73-5, is a
trade name for the
amphiboles belonging to the
Cummingtonite -
Grunerite
solid solution series, commonly from
Africa, named as an
acronym from Asbestos Mines of South Africa. One
formula given for amosite is
Fe7Si
8O
22(OH)
2.
It is found most frequently as a fire retardant in thermal
insulation products and ceiling tiles.
Blue
Crocidolite, CAS No. 12001-28-4 is an
amphibole found primarily in southern
Africa,
but also in
Australia. It is the fibrous
form of the amphibole
riebeckite. One
formula given for crocidolite is
Na2Fe2+3Fe
3+2Si8O22(
OH)
2.Notes:
chrysotile commonly occurs as soft
friable fibers.
Asbestiform amphibole may also occur as soft
friable fibers but some varieties such as
amosite are commonly straighter. All forms of
asbestos are fibrillar in that they are composed of fibers with
widths less than 1
micrometer that occur
in bundles and have very long lengths. Asbestos with particularly
fine fibers is also referred to as "amianthus".Amphiboles such as
tremolite have a
crystal structure containing strongly bonded ribbonlike
silicate anion
polymers that extend the length of the
crystal. Serpentine (
chrysotile) has a
sheetlike silicate anion which is curved and which rolls up like a
carpet to form the fiber.
Other materials
Other regulated asbestos minerals, such as tremolite asbestos, CAS
No. 77536-68-6,
Ca2Mg
5Si
8O
22(OH)
2;
actinolite asbestos (or
smaragdite), CAS No. 77536-66-4,
Ca
2(Mg,
Fe)
5(Si
8O
22)(OH)
2; and
anthophyllite asbestos, CAS No. 77536-67-5, (Mg,
Fe)
7Si
8O
22(OH)
2; are
less commonly used industrially but can still be found in a variety
of construction materials and insulation materials and have been
reported in the past to occur in a few
consumer products.
Other natural and not currently regulated asbestiform minerals,
such as richterite, Na(CaNa)(Mg,
Fe
++)
5(Si
8O
22)(OH)
2,
and winchite, (CaNa)Mg
4(Al,
Fe
3+)(Si
8O
22)(OH)
2, may
be found as a contaminant in products such as the
vermiculite containing
zonolite insulation manufactured by
W.R. Grace and Company. These minerals are
thought to be no less harmful than tremolite, amosite, or
crocidolite, but since they are not regulated, they are referred to
as "asbestiform" rather than asbestos although may still be related
to diseases and hazardous.
Producing nations

Asbestos output in 2005
In 2006, 2.3 million tons of asbestos were mined worldwide, in 11
or 12 countries. Russia was the largest producer with about 40.2%
world share followed by China (19.9%), Kazakhstan (13.0%), Canada
(10.3%), and Brazil (9.9%).
Uses
Historic usage
Asbestos was named by the ancient Greeks, although the naming of
minerals was not very consistent yet at that time (the
modern Greek word ἀσβεστος stands for
lime, not for the material known as asbestos
in English). The ancients already recognized certain hazards of the
material. The Greek geographer
Strabo and the
Roman naturalist
Pliny the Elder
noted that the material damaged lungs of slaves who wove it into
cloth.
Charlemagne, the first
Holy Roman Emperor, is said to have had a
tablecloth made of asbestos.
Wealthy
Persian, who bought asbestos imported
over the Hindu
Kush
, amazed guests by cleaning the cloth by simply
exposing it to fire. According to
Biruni in his book of
Gems, any
cloths made of asbestos ( ,
āzarshast or ,
āzarshab) were called ( )
shastakeh. Some of the
Persians believed the fiber was fur from an animal (named
samandar, )
that lived in fire and died when exposed to water.
While traveling to China,
Marco Polo
described observing miraculous garments that were cleaned by being
placed in fires . These garments were likely made from asbestos
.
Some archeologists believe that ancients made shrouds of asbestos,
wherein they burned the bodies of their kings, in order to preserve
only their ashes, and prevent their being mixed with those of wood
or other combustible materials commonly used in funeral
pyres.Others assert that the ancients used asbestos to make
perpetual wicks for
sepulchral or other
lamps. In more recent centuries, asbestos was indeed used for this
purpose. Although asbestos causes skin to itch upon contact,
ancient literature indicates that
it was prescribed for diseases of the skin, and particularly for
the itch. It is possible that they used the term
asbestos
for
alumen plumosum, because the two
terms have often been confused throughout history.
Recent usage
Asbestos became more widespread during the industrial revolution;
in the 1860s it was used as insulation in the U.S. and Canada.
Development of the first commercial asbestos
mine began in 1879 in the Appalachian
foothills of Quebec
. By
the mid 20th century uses included fire retardant coatings,
concrete, bricks, pipes and fireplace cement, heat, fire, and acid
resistant gaskets, pipe insulation, ceiling insulation, fireproof
drywall, flooring, roofing, lawn furniture, and drywall joint
compound.
Approximately 100,000 people in the United States have died, or
will die, from asbestos exposure related to ship building.
In the
Hampton
Roads
area, a shipbuilding center, mesothelioma occurrence is seven times the
national rate. Thousands of tons of asbestos were used in
World War II ships to wrap the pipes,
line the boilers, and cover engine and turbine parts. There were
approximately 4.3 million shipyard workers in the United States
during WWII; for every thousand workers about fourteen died of
mesothelioma and an unknown number died from
asbestosis.
Asbestos fibers were once used in automobile
brake pads, shoes, and
clutch
discs. Since the mid-1990s, a majority of brake pads, new or
replacement, have been manufactured instead with linings made of
ceramic, carbon, metallic and
Aramid fiber
(
Twaron or
Kevlar—the
same material used in
bulletproof
vests).
Kent, the first
filtered cigarette on the market, used
crocidolite asbestos in its "Micronite" filter from 1952 to
1956.
The first documented death related to asbestos was in 1906. In the
early 1900s researchers began to notice a large number of early
deaths and lung problems in asbestos mining towns. The first
diagnosis of
asbestosis was made in
England in 1924. By the 1930s, England regulated ventilation and
made asbestosis an excusable work related disease, about ten years
sooner than the U.S. The term
Mesothelioma was not used in medical literature
until 1931, and was not associated with asbestos until sometime in
the 1940s.
The United States government and asbestos industry have been
criticized for not acting quickly enough to inform the public of
dangers, and to reduce public exposure. In the late 1970s court
documents proved that asbestos industry officials knew of asbestos
dangers since the 1930s and had concealed them from the
public.
In Japan, particularly after
World War
II, asbestos was used in the manufacture of
ammonium sulfate for purposes of rice
production, sprayed upon the ceilings, iron skeletons, and walls of
railroad cars and buildings (during the 1960s), and used for energy
efficiency reasons as well. Production of asbestos in Japan peaked
in 1974 and went through ups and downs until about 1990, when
production began to drop severely.
Specific products
Serpentine group
Serpentine minerals have a sheet or layered structure. Chrysotile
is the only asbestos mineral in the serpentine group.
In the United States
, chrysotile has been the most commonly used type of
asbestos. According to the U.S. EPA Asbestos Building
Inspectors Manual, chrysotile accounts for approximately 95% of
asbestos found in buildings in the United States. Chrysotile is
often present in a wide variety of materials, including:
- drywall and joint compound
- plaster
- mud and texture coats
- vinyl floor tiles, sheeting, adhesives
- roofing tars, felts, siding, and shingles
- "transite" panels, siding, countertops, and pipes
- fireproofing
- caulk
- gaskets
- brake pads and shoes
- clutch plates
- stage curtains
- fire blankets
- interior fire doors
- fireproof clothing for firefighters
- thermal pipe insulation
A household heat spreader for cooking on gas stoves, made of
asbestos (probably 1950s; "Amiante pur" is French for "Pure
Asbestos")
In the
European Union and
Australia it has recently been banned as a
potential health hazard and is not used at all.
Japan
is moving in
the same direction, but more slowly. Revelations that
hundreds of workers had died in Japan over the previous few decades
from diseases related to asbestos sparked a scandal in mid-2005.
Tokyo had, in 1971, ordered companies handling asbestos to install
ventilators and check health on a regular basis; however, the
Japanese government did not ban crocidolite and amosite until 1995,
and a full-fledged ban on asbestos was implemented in October
2004.
Amphibole group
Five types of asbestos are found in the amphibole group: amosite,
crocidolite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite. Amosite, the
second most likely type to be found in buildings, according to the
U.S. EPA Asbestos Building Inspectors Guide, is the "brown"
asbestos.
Amosite and crocidolite were formerly used in many products until
the early 1980s. The use of all types of asbestos in the amphibole
group was banned in much of the Western world by the mid-1980s, and
by Japan in 1995. These products were mainly:
- Low density insulation board and ceiling tiles
- Asbestos-cement sheets and pipes for
construction, casing for water and electrical/telecommunication
services
- Thermal and chemical insulation (e.g., fire rated doors,
limpet spray, lagging and gaskets)
Health issues
Chrysotile asbestos, like all other forms of asbestos, has produced
tumors in animals.
Mesotheliomas have
been observed in people who were occupationally exposed to
chrysotile, family members of the occupationally exposed, and
residents who lived close to asbestos factories and mines. Amosite
and crocidolite are the most hazardous of the asbestos minerals
because of their long persistence in the lungs of exposed people.
Tremolite often contaminates chrysotile asbestos, thus creating an
additional hazard.
Asbestos exposure becomes a health concern when high concentrations
of asbestos fibers are inhaled over a long time period. People who
become ill from inhaling asbestos are often those who are exposed
on a day-to-day basis in a job where they worked directly with the
material. As a person's exposure to fibers increases, because of
being exposed to higher concentrations of fibers and/or by being
exposed for a longer time, then that person's risk of disease also
increases. Disease is very unlikely to result from a single,
high-level exposure, or from a short period of exposure to lower
levels.
Smoking combined with asbestos
exposure may increase the health risk dramatically.
Other asbestos-related diseases
- Asbestos warts: caused when the sharp fibers
lodge in the skin and are overgrown causing
benign callus-like growths.
- Pleural plaques: discrete fibrous or partially
calcified thickened area which can be seen on X-rays of individuals exposed to asbestos. Although
pleural plaques are themselves asymptomatic, in some patients this
develops into pleural thickening.
- Diffuse pleural thickening: similar to above
and can sometimes be associated with asbestosis. Usually no symptoms shown but if
exposure is extensive, it can cause lung
impairment.
Asbestos as a contaminant
Most respirable asbestos fibers are invisible to the unaided
human eye because their size is about 3.0–20.0
µm long and can be as thin as
0.01 µm.
Human hair ranges in size from 17
to 181 µm in width. Fibers ultimately form because when these
minerals originally cooled and crystallized, they formed by the
polymeric molecules lining up parallel with
each other and forming oriented
crystal lattices. These crystals thus have
three
cleavage planes, just as
other minerals and gemstones have. But in their case, there are two
cleavage planes that are much weaker than the third direction. When
sufficient force is applied, they tend to break along their weakest
directions, resulting in a linear fragmentation pattern and hence a
fibrous form. This fracture process can keep occurring and one
larger asbestos fiber can ultimately become the source of hundreds
of much thinner and smaller fibers.
As asbestos fibers get smaller and lighter, they more easily become
airborne and human respiratory exposures can result. Fibers will
eventually settle but may be re-suspended by air currents or other
movement.
Friability of a product containing
asbestos means that it is so soft and weak in structure that it can
be broken with simple finger crushing pressure. Friable materials
are of the most initial concern because of their ease of damage.
The forces or conditions of usage that come into intimate contact
with most non-friable materials containing asbestos are
substantially higher than finger pressure.
Environmental asbestos
Asbestos can be found naturally in the air outdoors and in some
drinkable water, including water from natural sources. Studies have
shown that members of the general (non-occupationally exposed)
population have tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of
asbestos fibers in each gram of dry lung tissue, which translates
into millions of fibers and tens of thousands of asbestos bodies in
every person's lungs.
Asbestos from natural geologic deposits is known as "Naturally
Occurring Asbestos" (NOA). Health risks associated with exposure to
NOA are not yet fully understood, and current US federal
regulations do not address exposure from NOA. Many populated areas
are in proximity to shallow, natural deposits which occur in 50 of
58 California counties and in 19 other U.S. states.
In one study, data was
collected from 3,000 mesothelioma
patients in California
and 890 men with prostate cancer, a malignancy not known to
be related to asbestos. The study found a correlation
between the incidence of mesotheliomas and the distance a patient
lived from known deposits of rock likely to include asbestos, the
correlation was not present when the incidence of prostate cancer
was compared with the same distances. According to the study, risk
of mesothelioma declined by 6 percent for every 10 kilometers that
an individual had lived away from a likely asbestos source.
Portions
of El Dorado
County, California
are known to contain natural asbestos formations
near the surface. The
USGS studied
amphiboles in rock and soil in the area in
response to an EPA sampling study and subsequent criticism of the
EPA study. The study found that many amphibole particles in the
area meet the counting rule criteria used by the EPA for chemical
and morphological limits, but do not meet morphological
requirements for commercial-grade-asbestos. The executive summary
pointed out that even particles that do not meet requirements for
commercial-grade-asbestos may be a health threat and suggested a
collaborative research effort to assess health risks associated
with "Naturally Occurring Asbestos."
Large
portions of Fairfax County, Virginia
were also found to be underlain with tremolite. The county monitored air quality
at construction sites, controlled soil taken from affected areas,
and required freshly developed sites to lay of clean, stable
material over the ground.
History of health concerns and regulation
Before 1900
By the first century AD, Greeks and Romans had already observed, at
least in passing, that slaves involved in the weaving of asbestos
cloth were afflicted with a sickness of the lungs.
Early concern in the modern era on the health effects of asbestos
exposure can be found in several sources. Among the earliest were
reports in Britain. The annual reports of the Chief Inspector of
Factories reported as early as 1898 that asbestos had "easily
demonstrated" health risks.
At about the same time, what was probably the first study of
mortality among asbestos workers was reported in France. While the
study describes the cause of death as
chalicosis, a generalized
pneumoconiosis, the circumstances of the
employment of the fifty workers whose death prompted the study
suggest that the root cause was asbestos or mixed asbestos-cotton
dust exposure.
1900s–1910s
Further awareness of asbestos-related diseases can be found in the
early 1900s, when London doctor H. Montague Murray conducted a post
mortem exam on a young asbestos factory worker who died in 1899.
Dr. Murray gave testimony on this death in connection with an
industrial disease compensation hearing. The post-mortem confirmed
the presence of asbestos in the lung tissue, prompting Dr. Murray
to express as an expert opinion his belief that the inhalation of
asbestos dust had at least contributed to, if not actually caused,
the death of the worker.
The record in the United States was similar. Early observations
were largely anecdotal in nature and did not definitively link the
occupation with the disease, followed by more compelling and larger
studies that strengthened the association. One such study,
published in 1918, noted:
- All of these processes unquestionably involve a considerable
dust hazard, but the hygienic aspects of the industry have not been
reported upon. It may be said, in conclusion, that in the practice
of American and Canadian life insurance companies, asbestos workers
are generally declined on account of the assumed health-injurious
conditions of the industry.
1920s and 1930s
Widespread recognition of the occupational risks of asbestos in
Britain was reported in 1924 by a Dr. Cooke, a pathologist, who
introduced a case description of a 33-year-old female asbestos
worker with the following: "Medical men in areas where asbestos is
manufactured have long suspected the dust to be the cause of
chronic bronchitis and fibrosis..." Dr. Cooke then went on to
report on a case in 1927 involving a 33-year-old male worker who
was the only survivor out of ten workers in an asbestos
carding room. In the report he named the disease
"asbestosis".
Dr. Cooke's second case report was followed, in the late 1920s, by
a large public health investigation (now known as the Merewether
report after one of its two authors) that examined some 360
asbestos-textile workers (reported to be about 15% of the total
comparable employment in Britain at the time) and found that about
a quarter of them suffered from pulmonary fibrosis. This
investigation resulted in improved regulation of the manufacturing
of asbestos-containing products in the early 1930s. Regulations
included industrial hygiene standards, medical examinations, and
inclusion of the asbestos industry into the British Workers'
Compensation Act .
The first known U.S. workers' compensation claim for asbestos
disease was in 1927. In 1930, the first reported autopsy of an
asbestosis sufferer was conducted in the United states and later
presented by a doctor at the Mayo Clinic, although in this case the
exposure involved mining activities somewhere in South
America.
In 1930, the major asbestos company Johns-Manville produced a
report, for internal company use only, about medical reports of
asbestos worker fatalities. In 1932, A letter from U.S. Bureau of
Mines to asbestos manufacturer Eagle-Picher stated, in relevant
part, "It is now known that asbestos dust is one of the most
dangerous dusts to which man is exposed." In 1933, Metropolitan
Life Insurance Co. doctors found that 29% of workers in a
Johns-Manville plant had asbestosis. Likewise, in 1933,
Johns-Manville officials settled lawsuits by 11 employees with
asbestosis on the condition that the employees' lawyer agree to
never again "directly or indirectly participate in the bringing of
new actions against the Corporation." In 1934, officials of two
large asbestos companies, Johns-Manville and Raybestos-Manhattan,
edited an article about the diseases of asbestos workers written by
a Metropolitan Life Insurance Company doctor. The changes
downplayed the danger of asbestos dust. In 1935, officials of
Johns-Manville and Raybestos-Manhattan instructed the editor of
Asbestos magazine to publish nothing about asbestosis. In
1936, a group of asbestos companies agreed to sponsor research on
the health effects of asbestos dust, but required that the
companies maintain complete control over the disclosure of the
results.
1940s
In 1942, an internal Owens-Corning corporate memo referred to
"medical literature on asbestosis.... scores of publications in
which the lung and skin hazards of asbestos are discussed." Either
in 1942 or 1943, the president of Johns-Manville,
Lewis H. Brown,
said that the managers of another asbestos company were "a bunch of
fools for notifying employees who had asbestosis." When one of the
managers asked, "do you mean to tell me you would let them work
until they dropped dead?" the response is reported to have been,
"Yes. We save a lot of money that way." In 1944, a Metropolitan
Life Insurance Company report found 42 cases of asbestosis among
195 asbestos miners.
1950s
In 1951, asbestos companies removed all references to cancer before
allowing publication of research they sponsored. In 1952, Dr.
Kenneth Smith, Johns-Manville medical director, recommended
(unsuccessfully) that warning labels be attached to products
containing asbestos. Later, Smith testified: "It was a business
decision as far as I could understand...the corporation is in
business to provide jobs for people and make money for stockholders
and they had to take into consideration the effects of everything
they did and if the application of a caution label identifying a
product as hazardous would cut into sales, there would be serious
financial implications." In 1953, National Gypsum's safety director
wrote to the Indiana Division of Industrial Hygiene, recommending
that acoustic plaster mixers wear respirators "because of the
asbestos used in the product." Another company official noted that
the letter was "full of dynamite" and urged that it be retrieved
before reaching its destination. A memo in the files noted that the
company "succeeded in stopping" the letter, which "will be
modified."
1960s–early 1980s
Through the 1970s, asbestos was used to fireproof roofing and
flooring, for heat insulation, and for a variety of other
purposes.
Modern regulation
- See main article at Asbestos and the law
United States
In 1989 the
United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Asbestos Ban
and Phase Out Rule which was subsequently overturned in the case of
Corrosion Proof Fittings v.
U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. This ruling leaves many
consumer products that can still legally contain trace amounts of
asbestos. For a clarification of products which legally contain
asbestos read the EPA's clarification statement.
The EPA has proposed a concentration limit of seven million fibers
per liter of drinking water for long fibers (lengths greater than
or equal to 5 µm). The
Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), has set limits of
100,000 fibers with lengths greater than or equal to 5 µm per
cubic meter of workplace air for eight-hour shifts and 40-hour work
weeks.
New Zealand
In 1984,
the import of raw amphibole (blue and brown) asbestos into New Zealand
was banned. In 2002 the import of chrysotile
(white) asbestos was banned.
Australia
A complete ban on asbestos-containing material in
Australia was introduced in 1991 although some
building materials in storage were still being used in the years
that followed.
Queensland
began regulation of asbestos removal and disposal
in 2005. Handlers of asbestos materials must have a B-Class
license for bonded asbestos and an A-Class license for friable
asbestos.
The town
of Wittenoom
, in Western Australia
was built around a (blue) asbestos mine. The
town has since been closed, and is contaminated. However one couple
remains there, refusing to leave the area and refusing to believe
in current medical advice.
Conversely, the town of Asbestos
, in Quebec
, which
remains the world's largest open pit asbestos mine, retains a
significant population, albeit one that aged as a result of the
failure of Magnola, a multi-million plant designed to extract
magnesium from asbestos tailings.
Contamination of other products
Asbestos and vermiculite
Vermiculite is a hydrated laminar
magnesium-aluminum-iron silicate which resembles mica. It can be
used for many industrial applications and has been used as a
replacement for asbestos. Some ore bodies of vermiculite have been
found to contain small amounts of asbestos. One vermiculite mine
operated by
W. R. Grace
and Company in Libby,
Montana
exposed workers and community residents to danger
by mining contaminated vermiculite. In 1999 the EPA began
cleanup efforts and now the area is a
Superfund cleanup area. The EPA has determined
that harmful asbestos is released from the mine as well as through
other activities that disturb soil in the area.
Asbestos and talc
Talc is sometimes contaminated with asbestos.
In 2000, tests in a certified asbestos-testing laboratory found the
tremolite form of amphibole asbestos in three out of eight major
brands of children's
crayons (oil pastels)
that are made partly from talc —
Crayola,
Prang, and Rose Art. In Crayola crayons, the tests found asbestos
levels from 0.05% in
Carnation Pink to 2.86% in
Orchid; in Prang crayons, the range was from 0.3% in
Periwinkle to 0.54% in
Yellow; in Rose Art
crayons, it was from 0.03% in
Brown to 1.20% in
Orange. Overall, 32 different types of crayons from these
brands contained more than trace amounts of asbestos, and eight
others contained trace amounts. The
Art and Creative Materials
Institute, a
trade association
which tests the safety of crayons on behalf of the makers,
initially insisted the test results must be incorrect, although
they later said they do not test for asbestos. In May 2000, Crayola
said tests by a materials analyst, Richard Lee, whose testimony has
been accepted in lawsuits over 250 times on behalf of the asbestos
industry, showed two of its crayons were negative for asbestos. In
June 2000, Binney & Smith, the maker of Crayola, and the other
makers agreed to stop using talc in their products, and changed
their product formulations in the United States.
The mining company, R
T Vanderbilt Co of Gouverneur, New York
, which supplied the talc to the crayon makers,
insists there is no asbestos in its talc "to the best of our
knowledge and belief", but a news article claimed that the United
States Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) did find
asbestos in four talc samples that it tested in 2000. At the
time, however, the Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health
informed the news reporter that his article was in error and that
the reporter had misquoted him stating that “In fact, the
abbreviation ND (non detect) in the laboratory report – indicates
no asbestos fibers actually were found in the samples.” Further
supporting the claim of Vanderbilt that asbestos is not found in
this industrial grade talc (composed of a very complex mineral
mixture) is a decades old record of analytical work that does not
find asbestos in this talc by mineral scientists in academia,
government and contract laboratories.
Human, animal and cell health studies conducted on Vanderbilt’s
controversial talc also lend no support for the presence of
asbestos in this talc. There does exist several non fully peer
reviewed health reports concerning Vanderbilt talc that does
suggest a "same as" asbestos risk some of which were referenced in
the previously cited news articles.
The ongoing issue of asbestos in Vanderbilt talc (a product no
longer mined), highlights the importance of recognizing all
pertinent available information. When reviewing controversial
scientific issues it is important to recognize and avoid selective,
sensationalized, incomplete and at times incorrect
information.
Asbestos in construction
Asbestos construction in developed countries
The use
of asbestos in new construction projects has been banned for health
and safety reasons in many developed countries or regions,
including the European Union,
Australia, Hong
Kong
, Japan, and New Zealand. A notable exception
is the United States, where asbestos continues to be used in
construction such as cement asbestos pipes. Until the mid-1980s,
white asbestos was used in the manufacture of
Artex, a decorative stipple finish.
Prior to the ban, asbestos was widely used in the construction
industry. Many older buildings contain asbestos. In the United
States, there is a minimum standard for asbestos surveys as
described by
ASTM Standard E 2356-04. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency includes some but not all
asbestos-contaminated facilities on the
Superfund National Priorities list . Renovation
and demolition of asbestos contaminated buildings is subject to EPA
NESHAP and OSHA Regulations. Asbestos is not
a material covered under
CERCLA's innocent
purchaser defense. In the UK, the removal and disposal of asbestos
and of substances containing it are covered by the Control of
Asbestos Regulations 2006
Asbestos construction in developing countries
Some
developing countries, such as India
and China
, have
continued widespread use of asbestos. The most common is
corrugated asbestos-cement sheets or "A/C Sheets" for roofing and
for side walls. Millions of homes, factories, schools or sheds and
shelters continue to use asbestos. Cutting these sheets to size and
drilling holes to receive 'J' bolts to help secure the sheets to
roof framing is done on site. There has been no significant change
in production and use of A/C Sheets in
developing countries following the
widespread restrictions in developed nations.
Litigation
Asbestos litigation is the longest, most expensive mass
tort in
U.S.
history, involving more than 8,400 defendants and 730,000
claimants as of 2002 according to the
RAND Corporation, and at least one
defendant reported claim counts in excess of $800,000 in
2006.
Current trends indicate that the worldwide rate at which people are
diagnosed with asbestos-related diseases will likely increase
through the next decade. Analysts have estimated that the total
costs of asbestos litigation in the USA alone is over $250
billion.
The Federal legal system in the United States has been faced with
numerous counts of asbestos related suits, which often included
multiple plaintiffs with similar symptoms.
The concern with
these court cases are the staggering numbers, which in 1999
recorded 200,000 cases pending in the Federal court system of the
United
States
. Further, it is estimated that within the
next 40 years, cases may balloon to seven hundred thousand cases.
These numbers help explain how there are thousands of current
pending cases.
Litigation of asbestos materials has been a difficult entity to
muster because of the multiple factors which play a role in every
case. The company that often is being exposed for their negligence
of working conditions and the worker or in many cases, workers who
were exposed to asbestos and did not know that they were, or knew
and now fear future medical problems, have current symptoms or were
upset for the negligence of the company. Companies sometimes
counter saying that health issues do not currently appear in their
worker or workers, or sometimes are settled out of court. The
Research and Development (RAND) think-tank has appropriated certain
legal information which is readily available for proclaimed victims
of natural resource accidents. This information, although sometimes
deemed radical, has helped many workers, regardless of health
condition, earn compensation through companies.
RAND, along with the Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ)
have been proponents of the organization of past cases in order to
determine one aspect of fair compensation for workers.
1999 saw the introduction of the Fairness in Asbestos Compensation
Act. This Act was used as a tool in order to determine which of the
numerous federal cases were true, and if the plaintiff’s were
actually suffering from asbestos related illness. This process was
necessary as thousands of false insurance claims were costing
companies billions and ultimately many companies were forced to
file for bankruptcy. While companies filed for bankruptcy, this
limited payouts to those who were actually affected by the
material. What the 1999 Act ultimately determined was “a judgment
that those resources should be spent on delivering full and prompt
compensation to those who are, and will become, impaired by
asbestos disease, and not dissipated on payments to those who are
not sick and may never become sick, on punitive damages that seek
retribution for the decisions of long-dead executives for conduct
that took place decades ago and on the extraordinary transaction
costs (Professor
Christopher
Edley, Jr.).” With this litigation, it was recommended by many
that the framework of the Act was set in a manner that was fair
towards most parties.
There is no effective way to allocate funding to every claimant
with the fair treatment of companies in question. Although a
majority of companies involved with numerous asbestos cases are
household names, they are also at the highest risk while faced with
workers health concerns. The 1999 Act has effectively helped save
time, money and aggravation for both sides of every asbestos case.
There are fewer cases of bankruptcy and fewer cases of fraudulent
medical concerns. Notable concerns with bankruptcy include the fact
that once a company is forced to divide funding amongst its
workers, it has a limited budget which lags on the economy and
ultimately cannot contribute back the way it once was. This was a
main reason for the hesitation of any strict enforcement policy.
However, the Act of 1999 helps to alleviate exuberant payouts to
unqualified claimants, all while safely and legally protecting
those who were, are and will be affected by asbestos related
illnesses.
Litigation exists outside the United States in England, Scotland,
Ireland, the Netherlands, France, Australia, and Japan among other
nations. See the
companion
article for further information.
The volume of the asbestos liability has concerned manufacturers
and
insurers and reinsurers. The
amounts and method of allocating compensation have been the source
of many court cases, and government attempts at resolution of
existing and future cases.
Critics of safety regulations
EU-Canada dispute
According
to Natural Resources Canada
, chrysotile
asbestos is not as dangerous as once thought. According to
their fact sheet, "...current knowledge and modern technology can
successfully control the potential for health and environmental
harm posed by chrysotile".
In May 1998, Canada requested consultations
before the WTO with the European
Commission
concerning France
's 1996
prohibition of the importation and sale of asbestos.
Canada claimed that the French measures contravened provisions of
the
Agreements on Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures and on Technical Barriers to Trade, and
the GATT 1994.
The EC said that substitute materials had been developed in place
of asbestos, which are safer to human health. It stressed that the
French measures were not discriminatory, and were fully justified
for public health reasons. The EC said that in the July
consultations, it had tried to convince Canada that the measures
were justified, and that just as Canada broke off consultations, it
was in the process of submitting substantial scientific data in
favour of the asbestos ban.
Critics of Canada's support of the use of chrysotile asbestos argue
that Canada is ignoring the risks associated with the material. The
CFMEU
pointed out that selling asbestos is illegal in Canada, but it is
exported and most exports go to developing countries.
Canada has pressured
countries, including Chile
, and the UN
to avoid asbestos bans.
Other criticism
Asbestos regulation critics include
Junkscience.com author
and
Fox News columnist
Steven Milloy and the asbestos industry.
Critics sometimes argue that increased regulation does more harm
than good and that replacements to asbestos are inferior. An
example is the suggestion by
Dixy Lee
Ray and others that the
shuttle
Challenger exploded because the maker of
O-ring putty was pressured by the EPA into ceasing
production of asbestos-laden putty. However, scientists point out
that the putty used in
Challenger s final flight did
contain asbestos, and failures in the putty were not responsible
for the failure of the O-ring that led to loss of the
shuttle.
Asbestos
was used in the first forty floors of the World Trade
Center
towers causing an airborne contamination among
lower Manhattan after the towers collapsed in the attacks on September 11th,
2001. Steven Milloy
suggests that the World Trade Center
towers could still be standing or at least would
have stood longer had a 1971 ban not stopped the completion of the
asbestos coating above the 64th floor . This was not
considered in the
National
Institute of Standards and Technology's report on the towers'
collapse. All
fireproofing materials,
regardless of what they are made of are required to obtain a
fire-resistance rating prior
to installation. All fibre-based lightweight commercial spray
fireproofing materials are vulnerable to
kinetic energy impacts that are outside of
the
fire testing upon which their ratings
are based, including asbestos-based materials, and would have been
removed in large areas by the impact of the planes.
Substitutes for asbestos in construction
Fiberglass insulation was invented in 1938 and is
now the most commonly used type of
insulation material. The
safety of this material is also being called into question, as
research shows that the composition of this material causes similar
toxicity as asbestos.
In Europe
stone- and
glasswool are the main insulators in
houses.
Many companies that produced asbestos-cement products that were
reinforced with asbestos fibres have developed products
incorporating organic fibres. One such product was known as
Eternit and another "Everite" now use
"Nutec" fibres which consist of organic fibres,
portland cement and
silica.
Cement-bonded wood fiber is another
substitute.Stonefibres are used in gaskets and friction
materials.
Another potential fiber is
polybenzimidazole or PBI fiber.
Polybenzimidazole fiber is a
synthetic fiber with high
melting point of 760 °C that also does
not ignite. Because of its exceptional thermal and chemical
stability, it is often used by
fire
departments and
space
agencies.
Asbestos alternatives for industrial use include sleeves, rope,
tape, fabric and insulation batt materials made from fiberglass and
silica.
Recycling and disposal
In most developed countries, asbestos is typically disposed of as
hazardous waste in
landfill sites.
Asbestos can also be recycled by transforming it into harmless
silicate glass. A process of thermal
decomposition at 1000–1250 °C produces a mixture of
non-hazardous
silicate phases, and at
temperatures above 1250 °C it produces silicate glass.
Microwave thermal treatment can be used in an industrial
manufacturing process to transform asbestos and asbestos-containing
waste into porcelain stoneware tiles, porous single-fired wall
tiles, and ceramic bricks.
See also
Mineralogy
Other asbestos-related topics
References
-
http://www.lightpollution.org.uk/dwnLoads/Asbestos_JoM1976.pdf
- American Cancer Society
- Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
- History of Asbestos
- Time Magazine
- Dehkhoda Persian Dictionary
- University of Calgary
- A Brief History of Asbestos Use and Associated
Health Risks EnvironmentalChemistry.com website
- History of science This article incorporates
content from the 1728 Cyclopaedia, a publication in the public
domain.
- Shipyards, a Crucible for Tragedy
- Horrible Toll Could Have Been Avoided
- Cancer
Research
- Asbestos in Japan
- Australian prohibition on use of chrysotile
asbestos
- Asbestos deaths just the tip of the iceberg
Japan Times Online
- 2001.09.16: (Fact Sheet) Asbestos
- Centre for disease control article on asbestos
- Medscape article on asbestos
- "Not in Their Back Yard", Mother
Jones, May/June 2007.
- P. Brodeur, "Annals of Law, The Asbestos Industry on Trial, 1-A
Failure to Warn", The New Yorker, June 10, 1985, pp
57
- Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops, "Annual Report of
the Chief Inspector of Factories and Workshops for the Year 1898",
1899, cited in Tweedale referenced below
- D. Auribault, "Note sur l'Hygiène et la Sécurité des Ouvriers
dans les Filatures et Tissages d'Amianté (On hygiene and security
of the workers in the spinning and weaving of asbestos)" in Le
Bulletin de l'Inspection du Travail, 1906, pp 120–132. This summary
was given by Brodeur~~~~ and roughly confirmed by Merewether &
Price in the report cited below.
- H. M. Murray, testimony before the Departmental Committee on
Compensation for Industrial Diseases "Minutes of Evidence,
Appendices and Index", 1907. pg 127 cited and summarized in
Merewether & Price referenced below.
- F. L. Hoffman, "Mortality from Respiratory Diseases in Dusty
Trades", Bulletin of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Vol. 231,
pp 176–180. Mr. Hoffman was a professional statistician, employed
by Prudential with an international reputation on public health
matters.
- W. E. Cooke, "Fibrosis of the Lungs Due to the Inhalation of
Asbestos Dust", British Medical Journal, 1927,
pg. 487.
- W. E. Cooke, "Pulmonary Asbestosis", British
Medical Journal, 1927, pp. 1024–1025, cited in G. Peters
& B. Peters, Sourcebook on Asbestos Diseases, Volume
1, 1980, pg. G1
- E.R.A. Merewether & C. W. Price, "Report on Effects of
Asbestos Dust on the Lung" H.M. Stationery Office, 1930
- Geoffrey Tweedale, Magic Mineral to Killer Dust, Turner
& Newall and the Asbestos Hazard, Oxford University Press,
2001, page 21. ISBN 0199243999.
- Broduer, pp 59–60.
- R. G. Mills, "Pulmonary Asbestosis: Report of a Case",
Minnesota Medicine, July 1930, pp 495–499.
- Barry I. Castleman, Asbestos: Medical and Legal
Aspects, 4th edition, Aspen Law and Business, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ, 1996, p.195.
- Testimony of Charles H. Roemer, Deposition taken April 25,
1984, Johns-Manville Corp., et al. v. the United States of America,
U.S. Claims Court Civ. No. 465-83C, cited in Barry I. Castleman,
Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th edition, Aspen
Law and Business, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996, p.581.
- Castleman, Asbestos, p.71.
- Castleman, Asbestos, p.666
- Castleman, Asbestos, p.669–70.
- EPA clarification statement on asbestos (PDF)
- ToxFAQs for Asbestos, Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
- Smartt, Pamela. "Mortality, morbidity, and asbestosis in New Zealand: the
hidden legacy of asbestos exposure". The New Zealand Medical
Journal, 5 November 2004, Vol. 117, No. 1205.
- EPA Asbestos Contamination In Vermiculite
- Libby Asbestos - US EPA Region 8
- Risk Assessment - US EPA
- A
USGS Study of Talc Deposits and Associated Amphibole Asbestos
Within Mined Deposits of the Southern Death Valley Region,
California
- J .Davitt McAteer, Assist. Secretary for Mine Safety and Health
correspondence to Andrew Schneider of the Seattle
Post-Intelligencer dated June 14, 2000 – copy obtainable through
records archives MSHA.
- Van Orden, D., R. J. Lee: Weight Percent Compositional Analysis
of Seven RTV Talc Samples. Analytical Report to R. T. Vanderbilt
Company, Inc. Nov. 22, 2000. Submitted to Public Comments Record -
C. W. Jameson, National Toxicology Program, 10th ROC Nominations
"Talc (containing asbestiform fibers)". Dec. 4, 2000.
- Nord, G. L, S. W. Axen, R. P. Nolan: Mineralogy and
Experimental Animal Studies of Tremolitic Talc. Environmental
Sciences Laboratory, Brooklyn College, The City University of New
York. Submitted to Public Comments Record - C. W. Jameson, National
Toxicology Program, 10th ROC Nominations "Talc (containing
asbestiform fibers)". December 1, 2000.
- Kelse, J. W., C. Sheldon Thompson: The Regulatory and
Mineralogical Definitions of Asbestos and Their Impact on Amphibole
Dust Analysis. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 50(11) pp. 613-622
(1989).
- Wylie, A.G.: Report of Investigation. Analytical Report on RTV
talc submitted to R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc. Feb. 13, 1987
(Submitted to Public Comments Record - C. W. Jameson, National
Toxicology Program, 10th ROC Nominations "Talc (containing
asbestiform fibers)". June 2, 2000.
- Crane, D.: Letter to Greg Piacitelli (NIOSH) describing the
analytical findings of the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration regarding R. T. Vanderbilt Talc. Nov. 26, 1986 (In
OSHA Docket H-33-d and In Public Comments Record - C. W. Jameson,
National Toxicology Program, 10th ROC Nominations - June 2,
2000).
- Crane, D.: Background Information Regarding the Analysis of
Industrial Talcs. Letter to the Consumer Product Safety Commission
from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. June 12,
2000 (Appended to CPSC Staff Report on "Asbestos in Children’s
Crayons" Aug. 2000).
- McCrone Associates - Atlanta Lab.: Report on the Analysis of
Paint CLS-5067-1 and Mineral Filler CLS-N-439-1. To Unspecified
Paint Company Sept. 23, 1992. (Submitted to Public Comments Record
- C. W. Jameson, National Toxicology Program, 10th ROC Nominations
"Talc (containing asbestiform fibers)". June 2, 2000.
- Langer, A. M., R. P. Nolan: Mineralogical Characterization of
Vanderbilt Talc Specimens & Comparison of the 1976 Rohl Talc
Report to NIOSH and Analysis Performed in 1988. In Public Comments
- Nat’l Toxicology Program 10th ROC review. W. Jameson NIEHS MED
EC-14, 79 Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC "Talc
(containing asbestiform fibers)". Nov. 2000.
- United States Department of the Interior: Selected Silicate
Minerals and Their Asbestiform Varieties by W. J. Campbell, et al
(Bureau of Mines Information Circular, I. C. 8751). Washington,
D.C.: Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines. (1977).
- Stille, W. T., I. R. Tabershaw: The Mortality Experience of
Upstate New York Talc Workers, J. Occ. Med. v. 24 #6 pp. 480-484.
(1982).
- Lamm, S. H.: Absence of Lung Cancer Risk from Exposure to
Tremolitic Talc - Retrospective Mortality Study, Study presented to
the R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc. Feb. 14, 1986. (In OSHA Docket
H-33-d).
- Lamm, S. H., M. Levine, J. Starr, J. Tirey: Analysis of Excess
Lung Cancer Risk in Short-Term Employees, Am. J. of Epid. v. 127 #6
pp. 1202-1209. (1988).
- Boehlecke, B.: Results of Medical Surveillance Examinations
Performed Every 2 Years on Workers at the Gouverneur Talc Company
(1985 -2000): Submitted to Public Comments Record - C. W. Jameson,
National Toxicology Program, 10th ROC Nominations "Talc (containing
asbestiform fibers)". (Nov. 19, 2000). (Partial in OSHA Docket
H-33-d, 1988).
- Gamble, J.: A Nested Case Control Study of Lung Cancer Among
New York Talc Workers, Int. Arch. Occup. Envir. Health 64 pp.
449-456. (1993).
- Honda, Y., C. Beall, E. Delzell, K. Oestenstad, I. Brill, R.
Matthews: Mortality Among Workers at a Talc Mining and Milling
Facility. Submitted and accepted - Am. Occup. Hyg. May 10, 2002.
(In Public Comments - NTP 10th ROC C.W. Jameson NIEHS MD EC-14, 79
Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27709).
- Lamm, S., J. Starr: Similarities in Lung Cancer and Respiratory
Disease Morality of Vermont and New York State Talc Workers,
Proceedings of the 11th International Pneumoconiosis Conference.
Epidemiology - Fibers, pp. 1576-1581, Aug. 1988
- Smith, W. E., D. Hubert, H. Sobel, E. Marquet: Biologic Tests
of Tremolite I Hamsters, Dusts and Disease, R. Lemen & J.
Dement Editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Occupational
Exposures to Fibrous and Particulate Dust and Their Extension into
the Environment. Pathotox Pub. Park Forest S. IL. pp 335-339.
(1979).
- Stanton, M. F., M. Layard, A. Tegeris, E. Miller, M. May. E.
Morgan, A Smith: Relation of Particle Dimension to Carcinogenicity
in Amphibole Asbestosis and Other Fibrous Minerals, JNCI 67, pp.
965-975. (1981).
- Wylie, A. G., Mossman, B. T. et al: Mineralogical Features
Associated with Cytotoxic and Proliferative Effects of Fibrous Talc
and Asbestos on Rodent Tracheal Epithelial and Pleural
Mesothlthelial Cells" Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 147,
000-000 Article # TO978276 (1997)
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health:
Occupational Exposure to Talc Containing Asbestos, Brown, D. P., J.
Wagoner, J.M. Dement, R. D. Zumwalde, J. Gamble, W Fellner, M.
DeMeo, NIOSH Publ. No. 80-115 (1980).
- Hull MJ.. Abraham JL & Case BW (2002) Mesothelioma among
Workers in Asbestiform Fiber-bearing Talc Mines in New York State.
Annals of Occupational Hygiene 46 (Supplement 1): 132-135.
- Where can asbestos be found, Asbestos
Surveying Ltd, Birmingham, UK, 02-08-2008.Accessed:
12-29-2008.
- Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006,
Health and Safety Exceutive, London, UK, Undated.Accessed:
12-29-2008.
- RAND 2002
- Enpro Public Filings
- Bianchi and Bianchi, "Malignant Mesothelioma: Global Incidence
and Relationship with Asbestos, Industrial Health 2007, 45.
379-387. This article identifies sources for data in 37 countries
including the US. Most of these sources are inadequate to directly
measure mesothelioma incidence over time, but it is clear that
rates vary, and are influenced by the amount of asbestos used, how
it was used, and when it was last used. See also Peto, Decarli,
LaVecchia, Levi, and Negri "The European Mesothelioma Epidemic"
British Journal of Cancer (1999), 79 (3/4), 666-672 which projects
mesothelioma incidence in six countries in Europe (France, Germany,
Britain, Italy, Netherlands, and Switzerland) as modified in
Pelucci, Malvezzi, LaVecchia, Levi, Decarli and Negri, "The
Mesothelioma Epidemic in Western Europe: an Update" Brit. J. of
Cancer (2004) 90, 1022–1024
- The Economist, January 26, 2005
- United States. Cong. Hearing: Asbestos Litigation. 107th Cong.,
2nd sess. HRG.107-993. Washington: GPO, 2002.
- Carroll, Stephen J., Deborah Hensler, Allan Abrahamse, Jennifer
Gross, Michelle White, Scott Ashwood, and Elizabeth Sloss. Asbestos
Litigation Costs and Compensation. Santa Monica,CA: RAND,
2002.
- United States. Cong. Senate. Finding Solutions to the Asbestos
Litigation Problem: the Fairness in Asbestos Compensation Act of
1999. 106nd Cong., 1st sess. S.758. Washington: GPO, 1999.
- American Academy of Acturaries' Mass Torts Subcomittee,
"Overview of Asbestos Claims Issues and Trends, August 2007 pp 7 -
8
- Chrysolite Asbsetos Fact Sheet
- EC measures affecting asbestos products World Trade
Organization
- Stop Canada's Export Of Asbestos CFMEU
- Multinational Monitor article on Corporate junk
science, retrieved December 16th, 2006
- Asbestos and Challenger Disaster
- MSNBC article on myths of the Challenger disaster,
retrieved December 16th, 2006
- The Junkman's Answer to Terrorism: Use More
Asbestos, retrieved July 16th, 2007
- Fox News - Asbestos Fireproofing Might Have
Prevented World Trade Center Collapse, retrieved July 27th,
2007
- Asbestos and the WTC collapse, retrieved December
16th, 2006
- Center for Fire Research PDF, retrieved
December 16th, 2006
- Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science,
Engineering, and Speculation, retrieved December 16th,
2006
Additional reading
- George B. Guthrie and Brooke T. Mossman, editors, Health
Effects of Mineral Dusts, Mineralogical Society of
America Reviews in Mineralogy v. 28, 584 pages (1993) ISBN
0-939950-33-2
External links
Regulatory and government links
Mineral and mining links
Health and the environment