The
banns of marriage, commonly known simply as
"the
banns" (from an
Old English word meaning "to summon"),
are the public announcement in a Christian
parish church that a
marriage is going to take place between two
specified persons. It is most commonly associated with the
Roman Catholic Church and with other
denominations whose traditions closely match that of the Roman
Catholic Church.
The purpose of banns is to enable anyone to raise any legal
impediment to it, so as to prevent marriages that are legally
invalid, either under
canon law or under
civil law. Impediments vary
between legal jurisdictions, but would normally include a
pre-existing marriage (having been neither dissolved nor annulled),
a vow of
celibacy, lack of consent, or the
couple's being related within the
prohibited degrees of
kinship.
Roman Catholic Church
Under the 1983 Coder of Canon Law, publication of the banns is no
longer required. Formerly, banns were read from the pulpit along
with other parish announcements, and were usually published in the
parish weekly bulletin. Under Canon Law before 1983, the banns had
to be announced, or "asked", in the home parishes of both parties
on three Sundays or Holy Days of Obligation prior to the
marriage.
In some places, the form of words that were once spoken by the
priest is as follows: 'I publish the banns of marriage between
(Name of party) of the Parish of........ and (Name of other party)
of this Parish. If any of you know cause or just impediment why
these persons should not be joined together in Holy Matrimony, ye
are to declare it. This is for the (first, second, third) time of
asking'.
The original Catholic Canon law on the subject, calculated to check
the increase of clandestine, or secret, marriages, was decreed at
the
Council of Trent on November
11,
1563. (Sess. XXIV, De ref. matr., c. i)
which provided that before the celebration of any marriage the
names of the contracting parties should be announced publicly in
the church during Mass, by the parish priests (i.e., pastors) of
both parties on three consecutive Holy Days (Waterworth, The Canons
and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent, London,
1848, 196 ssq.). While the requirement was normally straightforward
in canon law, complications sometimes arose in a marriage between a
Catholic and a non-Catholic, where one of the parties to the
marriage does not have a home Parish within the Roman Catholic
Church.
Protestant
While the Council of Trent is best known as a Counter-Reformation
Council, neither the Lutheran Church, nor the Church of England
broke with the Catholic Church on the requirement of publication of
banns (or the equivalent) prior to marriage. An equivalent notice
was not required in the Orthodox Christian Churches, which used
another method to verify eligibility to marry. The break between
some Protestants and the Roman Catholic Church was over what would
constitute an impediment to marriage (the Church of England, for
example, permitted divorce in some circumstances), rather than over
the means by which impediments to marriage should be
identified.
In
England
, under the provisions of Lord Hardwicke's Marriage Act,
a marriage is only legally valid if the reading of the banns has
taken place or a marriage licence has been obtained, codifying
earlier practice within the Church of England. By this 1753
statute, 26
Geo. II, c. xxxviij, the banns are
required to be read aloud in church over a period of three Sundays
prior to the actual
wedding ceremony. Banns
must be read in the home parish churches of both parties to the
marriage, as well as in the church where the marriage ceremony is
to take place (where this is different). Omission of this formality
renders the marriage
void. This statutory
requirement had the effect of requiring
Catholics and
Dissenters
to obtain marriages through the Church of England, a requirement
lifted by subsequent English legislation.
Prior to
this law, it was possible for eloping couples
to marry clandestinely in various places—finding an imprisoned
clergyman in the Fleet
Prison
was one well known way (a "Fleet Marriage"), at least for couples near
London
. After the law, elopers had to leave England,
usually for Scotland
, and
proverbially to the village of Gretna Green
, in order to contract a marriage while avoiding
these formalities. These details often figure in
melodramatic literature set in the period .
According to the rites of the
Church
of England (Marriage Act 1984), similar wording is used. In
addition:
- (1) ... banns shall be published on three Sundays preceding the
solemnization of the marriage at the time of divine service.
- (2) Banns shall be published in an audible manner and in
accordance with one of the following forms of words:
- "I publish the banns of marriage between A.B. of ----- and C.D.
of -----. If any of you know any cause or just impediment why these
two persons should not be joined together in holy matrimony, ye are
to declare it. This is the first [second or third] time of asking".
or
- "I publish the banns of marriage between A.B. of ----- and C.D
of -----. If any of you know any reason in law why these persons
may not marry each other, you are to declare it now."
Civil
Austria and some other civil law countries have their own, secular,
publication requirements in order to obtain a marriage.
Lord Hardwicke's Act was inapplicable outside the British Isles,
and hence did not become law in the colonies that would later
become the United States of America. For this reason, and as a
conseqeuence of the American separation of church and state, banns
or equivalent notice by publication is not required prior to
marriage in most U.S. states, although most U.S. states require
that a marriage license which establishes the freedom of the
parties to marry be established prior to a valid marriage, often a
certain number of days prior to the marriage ceremony.
Canada
In the
Canadian
province of Ontario
, the
publication of banns "proclaimed openly in an audible voice during
divine service" in the church(es) of the betrothed remains a legal
alternative to obtaining a marriage
licence. Two same-sex couples married this way at the Metropolitan Community Church
of Toronto
on January
14, 2001, since the province was not then issuing marriage licences
to same-sex couples. The marriages were ruled valid in 2003.
See
Same-sex marriage in
Ontario.
Banns being read once in a church ordinarily
attended by both parties to the marriage is allowed in lieu of a
licence in Manitoba
.
In the
Canadian province of Québec
, equivalent
formalities are required for all marriages, although the statutes
do not use the word "banns". There is no requirement for a
government-issued license, but a written notice must be posted at
the place of the wedding for 20 days beforehand, and the officiant
verifies the eligibility of the intended spouses.
In
British
Columbia
, only
Doukhobors can be married by
banns.
Other uses
A second use of "the
banns" is as the prologue to
a play, i.e., a proclamation made at the beginning of a medieval
play announcing and summarizing the upcoming play. An example can
be found in the Croxton
Play of the Sacrament, a Middle
English
miracle play written sometime
after 1461.
References
External links