The
Battle of Hastings (14 October 1066) was the
decisive
Norman victory in the
Norman Conquest of England.
It was
fought between the Norman army of Duke William of Normandy, and the
English
army led by Harold
II. The battle took place at Senlac Hill
, approximately 6 miles northwest of Hastings
, close to
the present-day town of Battle, East Sussex
.
The battle was a decisive Norman victory. Harold II was killed;
traditionally, it is believed he was shot through the eye with an
arrow. Although there was further English resistance, this battle
is seen as the point at which William gained control of
England.
The famous
Bayeux Tapestry depicts
the events before and during the battle.
An abbey, known as
Battle
Abbey
in East
Sussex
, was subsequently built on the site of the
conflict.
Background
Harold Godwinson belonged to the most
powerful family in England; he claimed the throne of England
for himself
in January 1066, shortly after Edward the Confessor died. He
secured the support of the
Witenagemot,
the
Anglo-Saxon assembly of nobles, for
his accession. Some sources say that while Edward had earlier
promised the throne to his cousin,
William, the
Duke of Normandy, on his deathbed, however,
he decided to confer it on Harold instead. While Edward the
Confessor had an English nephew who might have qualified as his
successor, he could not become king because he was too young to
protect himself, let alone a country.
Duke William of Normandy held fast to his claim to the throne. He
took Harold's crowning as a declaration of war. William had been
establishing policy in England for over 15 years, and was not ready
to give up his position so easily. He planned to invade England,
and take the crown for himself.
The initial difficulty was that the Norman
army was not powerful enough, so nobles as far as Southern Italy
were called
to convene at Caen
, in
Normandy. There, William promised land and titles to his
followers and that the voyage was secured by the
Pope himself. William assembled a fleet said to number
696 ships, which if accurate would imply an army well in excess of
20,000 men. This force waited in port all through the summer,
supposedly because of adverse weather but quite possibly from fear
of a clash at sea with the large fleet that Harold had assembled to
oppose the invasion. They finally sailed for England after the
exhaustion of supplies had forced Harold to dismiss his fleet and
army, and many of the English ships had then been wrecked by a
storm.
On
28 September 1066 William landed unopposed at Pevensey
.
Upon
hearing the news of the landing of the Duke's forces, the English
King, Harold
II, who had just annihilated an invading Norwegian
Viking army under King
Harald Hardråda and Tostig Godwinson (Harold's brother) at the
Battle of
Stamford Bridge
, near York
, hurried
southward to meet the invaders. His brother, Earl Gyrth,
urged a delay while more men could be assembled, but Harold was
determined to show his people that he could defend his new kingdom
decisively against every invader. He departed London on the morning
of 12 October, gathering what available forces he could on the way.
After
camping at Long
Bennington
, he arrived
at Senlac Hill the night of 13 October.
Harold
deployed his force, astride the road from Hastings
to London
, on Senlac Hill
, some 6 miles inland north-west of Hastings.
Behind
him was the great forest of Anderida
(the
Weald
), and in front, the ground fell away in a long
glacis-like slope, which at the bottom rose
again as the opposing slope of Telham Hill.
The English army
The English army consisted entirely of
infantry. It is possible that some or all the
members of the army rode to battle, but once at the appointed place
they dismounted to fight on foot.
The
English army had fought a major battle at Stamford
Bridge
in Yorkshire
less than three weeks earlier, which affected its
battle-worthiness at Hastings. Indeed, Harold's brothers had
supposedly asked Harold to wait for reinforcements before launching
their assault on the Norman army, but he refused.
The core of the English army was made up of full-time professional
soldiers called
Housecarls. They had a
long-standing dedication to the King, and would fight to the last
man if necessary. Their armour consisted of a conical helmet, a
chain mail hauberk, and they carried a kite-shaped
shield. Their primary weapon was the
Danish battleaxe which was wielded with two
hands, although every man would have carried a sword as well.
The bulk of the army, called the
fyrd, comprised part-time English soldiers
drawn from the landowning minor nobility. These
thegns were the land-holding aristocracy of
pre-conquest England and were required to serve with their own
armour and weapons for a certain number of days each year. The
Victorian concept of the Noble Peasant
defending his lands with a pitchfork has been relentlessly quashed
by modern archaeological research.
The most formidable defence of the English was the
shield wall, in which all the men on the front
ranks locked their shields together. In the early stages of the
battle, the shield wall was very effective at defending against the
Norman
archery barrages. The entire army
took up position along the ridge-line; as casualties fell in the
front lines the rear ranks would move forward to fill the
gaps.
The Norman army
William's tactics relied on archers to soften the enemy, followed
by a general advance of the infantry and then a cavalry charge. The
Norman army was made up of
noble,
mercenaries, and troops from mainly
Normandy,Flemish, Bretons and France to as far as southern
Italy.
The Norman army's power derived from its cavalry which were
reckoned amongst the best in Europe. They were heavily armoured,
and usually had a
lance and a sword. As with
all cavalry, they were generally at their most effective against
troops whose formation had begun to break up.
Apart from the missile troops, the Norman infantry were probably
protected by
ring mail and armed with
spear,
sword and
shield, like their English counterparts.
The inclusion of large numbers of missile troops in William's army
reflected the trend in other European armies for composite forces
who combined on the battlefield. The bow was a relatively short
weapon with a short draw, but was effective on the battlefield at
this time. Hastings also marks the first known use of the
crossbow in English history.
The Battle

The battle field from the north
side
William relied on basic tactics with
archers
in the front rank weakening the enemy with arrows, followed by
infantry which would engage in close combat, and finally
culminating in a cavalry charge that would break through the
English forces. However, his tactics did not work as well as
planned. William's army attacked the English as soon as they were
ready and formed up. The Norman archers started shooting with
several volleys, but many of the arrows hit the shield wall and had
very little effect. Believing the English to have been softened up,
William ordered his infantry to attack. As the Normans charged up
the hill, the English threw down whatever they could find: stones,
javelins, and
maces.
The barrage inflicted heavy casualties amongst the Norman ranks,
causing the lines to break up.
The infantry charge reached the English lines, where hand-to-hand
fighting of very heavy ferocity took place. William had expected
the English to falter, but did not get the results he wanted. The
arrow barrage had little to no effect, and nearly all the English
troops still stood, their shield wall intact. As a result, William
ordered his cavalry to charge far sooner than planned. Despite
their careful breeding and training, and faced with a wall of axes,
spears and swords, many of the horses simply shied away. After an
hour of fighting, the
Breton division on
William's left faltered and broke completely, fleeing down the
hill. Suffering heavy casualties, and realising they would be
quickly outflanked, the Norman and Flemish divisions retreated
along with the Bretons. Unable to resist the temptation, many of
the English broke ranks, including hundreds of fyrdmen and Harold's
brothers, Leofwyne and Gyrthe. In the following confused fighting,
William's horse was killed from underneath him, and he toppled to
the ground. Witnessing the apparent death of their leader, the
Normans panicked and took to flight. However, William took off his
helmet to show he was alive and rallied his army.
William and a group of knights successfully counter-attacked the
pursuing English, who were no longer protected by the shield wall,
and cut down large numbers of fyrdmen. Many did not recognise the
Norman counter-attack until it was too late, but some did manage to
scramble back up the hill to the safety of the
housecarls; others, including Harold's brothers,
were not so fortunate. The two armies formed up, and a temporary
lull fell over the battle. William took advantage of this lull to
ponder new tactics. The Normans' near-rout had turned to William's
advantage, since the English lost much of the protection provided
by the shield wall. Without the cohesion of a disciplined, strong
formation, the individual English were easy targets. Keeping this
in mind, William launched his army at the strong English position
yet again. What happened next is open to debate. Some historians
state that the Normans attempted several feint retreats, but this
seems unlikely, as it would have inflicted too heavy casualties and
would have been very complicated to carry out. The tactics worked
either way, and many of the English
housecarls were killed.
With a large number of English fyrdmen now holding the front rank,
the disciplined shield wall that the housecarls had maintained
began to falter and this presented an interesting opportunity to
William. At the start of the battle, William's
bowmen had fired directly into the English force,
and the hail of arrows was thus ineffective because of their
shields. Though many on the front ranks still had shields, William
ordered his archers to fire directly over the shield wall, so their
arrows landed in the clustered rear ranks of the English army. The
archers did this, and with great success. Legend states that it was
at this point that Harold was hit in the eye by an arrow, though
that is speculated from a scene in the
Bayeux Tapestry. Many of the English were
now weary, and lost the discipline of the shield wall. William's
army attacked again, and managed to make small chinks in the shield
wall. They were able to exploit these gaps, and the English army
began to fragment. William and a handful of knights broke through
the wall, and struck down the English king. Without their leader,
and many of the nobles now killed, hundreds of fyrdmen fled the
field. The housecarls kept their oath of loyalty to the king, and
fought bravely until they were all killed.
Aftermath
Only a remnant of the defenders made their way back to the forest.
Some of the Norman forces pursued the English but were ambushed and
destroyed in the dusk when they ran afoul of steep ground, called,
in later (12th century) sources, "
the Malfosse", or
"
bad ditch".
William rested his army for two weeks near
Hastings
, waiting for the English lords to come and submit
to him. Then, after he realised his hopes of
submission at that point were in vain, he began his advance on
London
. His
army was seriously reduced in November by
dysentery, and William himself was gravely ill.
However,
he was reinforced by fresh troops crossing the English
Channel
. After being thwarted in an attempt to cross
London
Bridge
, he approached the city by a circuitous route
crossing the Thames at Wallingford
, and advancing on London from the
north-west.
The northern
earls,
Edwin and
Morcar, Esegar the
sheriff of London, and
Edgar the Atheling, who had been elected
king in the wake of Harold's death, all came out and submitted to
the Norman duke before he reached London.
William was crowned
king on Christmas Day, 1066 at
Westminster
Abbey
.
Legacy
- See also: Norman conquest of
England#Consequences.
Plaque at Battle Abbey commemorating the fusing of the English and
Norman peoples
Battle Abbey
was built on the site of the battle. A
plaque marks the place where Harold is believed to have fallen and
the location where the high altar of the church once stood.
The
settlement of Battle,
East Sussex
, grew up around the abbey and is now a small
market town.
The
Bayeux Tapestry depicts the
events before, during, and after the Battle of Hastings.
The Battle of Hastings is an excellent example of the application
of the theory of
combined arms. The
Norman bowmen, cavalry and infantry cooperated together to deny the
English the initiative, and gave the homogeneous English army few
tactical options except defence.
Nevertheless, it is quite likely that this tactical sophistication
existed primarily in the minds of the Norman
chroniclers. The account of the battle given in
the earliest source,
the
Carmen de Hastingae Proelio, is one where the Norman advance
surprises the English, who manage to gain the top of Senlac Hill
before the Normans. The Norman light infantry is sent in while the
English are forming their shield wall (to no avail) and then the
main force was sent in (no distinction being made between infantry
and cavalry).
Succeeding sources include (in chronological order)
William of Poitiers's
Gesta
Guillelmi (written between 1071 and 1077), The Bayeux Tapestry
(created between 1070 and 1077), and the much later
Chronicle
of Battle Abbey, the chronicles written by
William of Malmesbury,
Florence of Worcester, and
Eadmer's
Historia Novorum in Anglia
embellishes the story further, with the final result being a
William whose tactical genius was at a high level—a level that he
failed to display in any other battle.
The Battle of Hastings also had a tremendous influence on the
English language. The Normans were French-speaking, and as a result
of their rule, they introduced many French words that started in
the nobility and eventually became part of the English language
itself.
As Paul K. Davis writes, "William’s victory placed a foreign ruler
on the throne of England, introducing European rather than
Scandinavian society onto the isolated island" in "the last
successful invasion of England."
See also
References
Notes
Bibliography
Films
Articles
- The Battle of Hastings (including army strengths)
- Anglorum, Regia. The Battle of Hastings
- Beck, Steven. The Battle of Hastings armies, weapons and
battle tactics.
- Crack, Glen Ray. 10 January, 1998 The Battle of Hastings,
1066 (1998-2007)
- Grout, James. The Battle of Hastings Encyclopedia Romana
- Larsen, Douglas. The
Bayeux Tapestry, primary source for the Battle of Hastings uses
the Bayeaux Tapestry as a primary
source of information.
- Larsen, Douglas. My Battle of Hastings: 14 Oct 1066, website
www.1066.us. An extensive website on the battle, with an emphasis
on wargaming simulation.
- Murrt, Steven J. The
Battle of Hastings, website www.dot-domesday.me.uk. Contemporary accounts of the
Battle of Hastings.
- Origins of the conflict, the battle itself and its
aftermath BBC History website
- Poyntz-Wright, Peter. "Hastings" In-depth book on the Battle of
Hastings.
- Staff. "Information on the Battle of
Hastings", website of www.battle-of-hastings-1066.org.uk. Includes facts and
full story.
- William of Malmesbury's Account.[7330]
Re-enactments