Biological warfare (BW), also known as
germ warfare, is the use of
pathogens such as
viruses,
bacteria,
other disease-causing
biological
agents, or the
toxins produced by them as
biological weapons (or
bioweapons).
There is a clear overlap between biological warfare and
chemical warfare, as the use of toxins
produced by living organisms is considered under the provisions of
both the
Biological and Toxin
Weapons Convention and the
Chemical Weapons Convention.
Toxins, which are of organic origin, are often called "midspectrum
agents".
A biological weapon may be intended to kill, incapacitate, or
seriously impair a person, group of people, or even an entire
population. It may also be defined as the material or defense
against such employment.
Biological warfare is a military technique that can be used by
nation-states or non-national groups.
In the latter case, or if a nation-state uses it
clandestinely, it may also be
considered
bioterrorism.
Overview
The creation and stockpiling of biological weapons ("offensive
biological warfare") was outlawed by the 1972
Biological Weapons Convention
(BWC), signed by over 100 countries. The BWC remains in force, and
it prohibits storage, stockpiling, and usage of these weapons. The
rationale behind the
agreement is to avoid the devastating impact of a successful
biological attack which could conceivably result in millions,
possibly even billions of deaths and cause severe disruptions to
societies and economies. Many countries currently pursue "defensive
BW" research (defensive or protective applications) which are not
prohibited by the BWC.
As a tactical weapon, the main military problem with a BW attack is
that it would take days to be effective, and therefore, unlike a
nuclear or
chemical attack, would not immediately stop
an opposing force. Some biological agents (especially
smallpox,
plague,
and
tularemia) have the capability of
person-to-person transmission via
aerosolized respiratory droplets, which can be
undesirable, especially if they are transmitted to unintended
target populations, including neutral or even friendly forces.
Containment of transmission is less of a concern for terrorists,
but it was very much a concern for post-WWII BW development by
major powers.
The consensus among military analysts is that, except in the
context of
bioterrorism, BW is of
little military use.
History
Biological warfare has been practiced repeatedly throughout
history. Before the 20th century, the use of biological agents took
three major forms:
- Deliberate poisoning of food and water with infectious
material
- Use of microorganisms, toxins or animals, living or dead, in a
weapon system
- Use of biologically inoculated fabrics
Biological weapons are so lethal that one gram of purified
botulinum toxin could kill 10 million
people. It is said that it is 3 million times more deadly than
sarin.
The ancient world
The earliest documented incident of the intention to use biological
weapons is recorded in
Hittite texts of
1500-1200 B.C, in which victims of plague were driven into enemy
lands. Although the Assyrians knew of
ergot, a
parasitic
fungus of rye which produces
ergotism when ingested, there is no
evidence that they poisoned enemy wells with the fungus, as has
been claimed.
According to
Homer's epic poems about the
legendary
Trojan War, the
Iliad and the
Odyssey, spears
and arrows were tipped with poison.
During the First Sacred War in Greece
, in about
590 BC, Athens
and the
Amphictionic League poisoned the
water supply of the besieged town of Kirrha
(near
Delphi
) with the toxic plant hellebore. The Roman commander Manius
Aquillus poisoned the wells of besieged enemy cities in about 130
BC.
During the 4th century BC
Scythian archers
tipped their arrow tips with snake venom, human blood, and animal
feces to cause wounds to become
infected. There are numerous other instances of
the use of plant toxins, venoms, and other poisonous substances to
create biological weapons in antiquity.
In 184 B.C,
Hannibal of Carthage had
clay pots filled with
venomous
snakes and instructed his soldiers to throw the pots onto the
decks of
Pergamene ships.
In about AD 198, the
city of Hatra
(near
Mosul
, Iraq
) repulsed
the Roman army led by Septimius
Severus by hurling clay pots filled with live scorpions at
them.
Medieval biological warfare
When the
Mongol Empire established
commercial and political connections between the Eastern and
Western areas of the world, its Mongol armies and merchant caravans
probably inadvertently brought
bubonic
plague from central Asia to the Middle East and Europe. The
Black Death swept through
Eurasia, killing approximately one third to one half
of the population and changing the course of Asian and European
history.
During the
Middle Ages, victims of the
bubonic plague were used for
biological attacks, often by flinging corpses and excrement over
castle walls using
catapults.
In 1346, the bodies of
Mongol warriors of the Golden Horde who had died of plague were thrown
over the walls of the besieged Crimean
city of
Kaffa (now Theodosia). It has been speculated that
this operation may have been responsible for the advent of the
Black Death in Europe.
At the siege of
Thun l’Eveque
in 1340, during the
Hundred Years'
War, the attackers catapulted decomposing animals into the
besieged area.
In 1422,
during the siege of Karlstein Castle
in Bohemia, Hussite attackers used catapults to throw dead (but
not plague-infected) bodies and 2000 carriage-loads of dung over the walls.
The last
known incident of using plague corpses for biological warfare
occurred in 1710, when Russian
forces
attacked the Swedes
by flinging
plague-infected corpses over the city walls of Reval
(Tallinn). However, during the 1785 siege of La Calle
, Tunisian
forces flung diseased clothing into the
city.
Though not used for warfare, in ancient times (circa 1 BC) one form
of execution/torture was attaching a corpse to a live person. The
person who carried the corpse would become a social outcast and die
from sicknesses in about a week.
Modern times
The 18th century
The
Native
American population was decimated after contact with the
Old World due to the introduction of many
different fatal diseases. There two documented cases of alleged and
attempted germ warfare. The first, during a parley at Fort Pitt on
June 24, 1763, Ecuyer gave representatives of the besieging
Delawares two blankets and a handkerchief that had been exposed to
smallpox, hoping to spread the disease to the Natives in order to
end the siege.
William Trent, the
militia commander, left records that clearly indicated that the
purpose of giving the blankets was "to Convey the Smallpox to the
Indians."
British commander Lord
Jeffrey
Amherst and Swiss-British officer Colonel
Henry Bouquet, whose correspondence referenced
the idea of giving
smallpox-infected
blankets to Indians in the course of
Pontiac's Rebellion. Historian Francis
Parkman verifies four letters from June 29, July 13, 16 and 26th,
1763. Excerpts: Commander Lord
Jeffrey
Amherst writes July 16, 1763, "P.S. You will Do well to try to
Inocculate the Indians by means of Blankets, as well as to try
Every other method that can serve to Extirpate this Execrable Race.
I should be very glad your Scheme for Hunting them Down by Dogs
could take Effect,..." Colonel
Henry
Bouquet replies July 26, 1763, "I received yesterday your
Excellency's letters of 16th with their Inclosures. The signal for
Indian Messengers, and all your directions will be observed."
While the intent for biological warfare is clear, there is a debate
among historians as to whether this actually took place despite
Bouquet's affirmative reply to Amherst and each having written to
the other about it twice. Smallpox transmitted to Native American
tribes could have been due to the transfer of the disease to
blankets during transportation. Historians have been unable to
establish whether or not this plan was implemented, particularly in
light of the fact that smallpox was already present in the region,
and that scientific knowledge of disease at that time had yet to
discover bacteria or develop an understanding of plague
vectors.
Regardless of whether this plan was carried out, trade and combat
provided ample opportunity for transmission of the disease. See
also:
Small pox during Pontiac's Rebellion.
The roots of diseases that killed millions of indigenous peoples in
the Americas can be traced back to Eurasians living for millennia
in close proximity with domesticated animals. Without long contact
with domesticated animals, indigenous Americans had no resistance
to plague,
measles,
tuberculosis, smallpox or most
influenza strains.
The 19th century
In 1834
Cambridge Diarist Richard Henry
Dana visited San
Francisco
on a
merchant ship. His ship traded many items including blankets
with Mexicans and Russians who had established outposts on the
northern side of the San Francisco Bay.
Local histories document that the California smallpox epidemic
began at the Russian fort soon after they left. Blankets were a
popular trading item, and the cheapest source of them was
second-hand blankets which were often contaminated.
During the
American Civil War,
General Sherman reported
that
Confederate
forces shot farm animals in ponds upon which the Union depended for
drinking water. This would have made the water unpleasant to drink,
although the actual
health
risks from dead bodies of humans and animals which did not die
of disease are minimal.
Jack London in his story '"Yah! Yah!
Yah!"'
describes a punitive European expedition to a Pacific
island
deliberately exposing the Polynesian population to Measles, of which many of them died [351]. While much of the material for
London's
South Sea Tales is derived
from his personal experience in the region, it is not certain that
this particular incident is historical.
The 20th century
During the First World War, Germany pursued an ambitious biological
warfare program. Using diplomatic pouches and couriers, the German
General Staff supplied small teams of saboteurs in the Russian
Duchy of Finland, and in the then-neutral countries of Romania, the
US and Argentina.
In Finland, Scandinavian freedom fighters mounted on reindeer
placed ampules of
anthrax in stables of
Russian horses in 1916
[352]. Anthrax was also supplied to the German
military attache in Bucharest, as was
Glanders, which was employed against livestock
destined for Allied service.
German
intelligence officer and US
citizen Dr. Anton Casimir Dilger
established a secret lab in the basement of his sister's home in
Chevy Chase,
Maryland
, that produced Glanders which was used to infect
livestock in ports and inland collection points including, at
least, Newport News, Norfolk, Baltimore, and New York, and probably
St. Louis and Covington, Kentucky. In Argentina, German
agents also employed Glanders in the port of Buenos Aires and also
tried to ruin wheat harvests with a destructive fungus.
The
Geneva Protocol of 1925
prohibited the use of chemical weapons and biological weapons, but
said nothing about production, storage or transfer; later treaties
did cover these aspects. Twentieth-century advances in microbiology
enabled the first pure-culture biological agents to be developed by
WWII.
There was
a period of development by many nations, and Japanese Unit 731, based primarily at Pingfan in occupied China
and
commanded by Shirō Ishii, did
research on BW, conducted forced human experiments, often fatal, on
prisoners, and provided biological weapons for attacks in
China.. Biological experiments, often using twins with one
subject to the procedure and the other as a control, were carried
out by
Nazi Germany on
concentration camp inmates, particularly
by
Joseph Mengele.
1937-1945
During the
Sino-Japanese
War and
World War II,
Unit 731 of the
Imperial Japanese Army conducted
human experimentation on
thousands, mostly Chinese, Russian, American prisoners. In military
campaigns, the Japanese army used biological weapons on Chinese
soldiers and civilians.
For
example, in 1940, the Imperial Japanese Army Air
Force bombed Ningbo
with ceramic
bombs full of fleas carrying the bubonic plague. A film showing this
operation was seen by the imperial princes
Tsuneyoshi Takeda and
Takahito Mikasa during a screening made by
mastermind
Shiro Ishii.
However, some operations were ineffective due to inefficient
delivery systems, using disease-bearing insects rather than
dispersing the agent as an
aerosol cloud. It
is estimated that 400,000 Chinese died as a direct result of
Japanese field testing of biological weapons.
During
the Khabarovsk War Crime
Trials the accused, such as Major General Kiyashi Kawashima,
testified that as early as 1941 some 40 members of Unit 731
air-dropped plague-contaminated
fleas on Changde
. These operations caused epidemic plague
outbreaks..
Some other firsthand accounts testify the Japanese infected
civilians through the distribution of foodstuffs, such as dumplings
and vegetables, contaminated with plague. There are also reports of
contaminated water supplies.
Three veterans of Unit
731 testified, in a 1989 interview to the Asahi Shimbun, that they were part of a
mission to contaminate the Horustein river with typhoid near the Soviet troops during the Battle of
Khalkhin Gol
.
In response to biological weapons development in Japan, and at the
time suspected in Germany, the United States, United Kingdom, and
Canada initiated a BW development program in 1941 that resulted in
the weaponization of
tularemia,
anthrax,
brucellosis, and
botulism toxin.
The
center for U.S. military BW research was Fort Detrick
, Maryland, where USAMRIID
is currently based; the first director was
pharmaceutical executive George
W. Merck.
Some biological and
chemical weapons research and testing was also conducted at
Dugway Proving Grounds" in
Utah
, at a munition manufacturing complex in Terre Haute
, Indiana
, and at a tract on Horn
Island, Mississippi
.
Much of
the British work was carried out at Porton Down
. Field testing carried out in the United
Kingdom
during World War II
left Gruinard
island
in Scotland
contaminated with anthrax for the next 48
years.
1946 to 1972
During
the 1948 Israel War of
Independence, Red Cross reports raised suspicion that the
Jewish Haganah militia had released Salmonella typhi bacteria into the water
supply for the city of Acre
, causing an
outbreak of typhoid among the inhabitants. Egyptian
troops later captured disguised Haganah soldiers
near wells in Gaza
, whom they
executed for allegedly attempting another attack. Israel
denies these allegations.
During the
Cold War, US
conscientious objectors were used as
consenting test subjects for biological agents in a program known
as
Operation Whitecoat. There
were also many unpublicized tests carried out on the public during
the
Cold War.
Considerable research on the topic was
performed by the United
States
(see US
Biological Weapon Testing), the Soviet Union
, and probably other major nations throughout the
Cold War era, though it is generally
believed that biological weapons were never used after World War II. This view was
challenged by China and North Korea
, who accused the United States of large-scale field
testing of biological weapons, including the use of
disease-carrying insects against them during the Korean War
(1950-1953).
Cuba also accused the US of spreading human and animal disease on
their island.
Recently revealed documents indicate that this was disinformation produced by Soviet intelligence.
At the time of the
Korean War the US had
only
weaponized one agent,
brucellosis (agent US), which is caused by
Brucella suis. The original weaponized form used the M114
bursting bomblet in M33 cluster bombs.
While the specific form of the biological bomb was classified until
some years after the Korean War, in the various exhibits of
biological weapons that Korea alleged were dropped on their country
nothing resembled an
M114 bomblet. There
were ceramic containers that had some similarity to Japanese
weapons used against the Chinese in WWII, developed by Unit
731.
Some of the Unit 731 personnel were imprisoned by the Soviets , and
would have been a potential source of information on Japanese
weaponization. The head of Unit 731, Lieutenant General
Shiro Ishii, was granted immunity from war
crimes prosecution in exchange for providing information to the
United States on the Unit's activities.
The Korean War allegations also stressed the use of disease
vectors, such as
fleas, which, again, were
probably a legacy of Japanese biological warfare efforts. The
United States initiated its weaponization efforts with disease
vectors in 1953, focused on
Plague-
fleas,
EEE-mosquitoes, and yellow fever - mosquitoes (OJ-AP). . However,
US medical scientists in occupied Japan undertook extensive
research on insect vectors, with the assistance of former Unit 731
staff, as early as 1946.
The United States Air Force was not satisfied with the operational
qualities of the M114/US and labeled it an interim item until the
US Army Chemical Corps could deliver a superior weapon. The Air
Force also changed its plans and wanted lethal biologicals.
The Chemical Corps then initiated a crash program to weaponize
anthrax (N) in the E61 1/2-lb hour-glass bomblet. Though the
program was successful in meeting its development goals, the lack
of validation on the infectivity of anthrax stalled
standardization.
Around 1950 the Chemical Corps also initiated a program to
weaponize
tularemia (UL). Shortly after
the E61/N failed to make standardization, tularemia was
standardized in the 3.4"
M143 bursting
spherical bomblet. This was intended for delivery by the
MGM-29 Sergeant missile warhead and
could produce 50% infection over a area.
Unlike anthrax, tularemia had a demonstrated infectivity with human
volunteers (
Operation
Whitecoat). Furthermore, although tularemia is treatable by
antibiotics, treatment does not shorten the course of the
disease.
In addition to the use of bursting bomblets for creating biological
aerosols, the Chemical Corps started investigating
aerosol-generating bomblets in the 1950s. The E99 was the first
workable design, but was too complex to be manufactured. By the
late 1950s the 4.5"
E120 spraying spherical
bomblet was developed; a B-47 bomber with a
SUU-24/A dispenser could infect 50% or
more of the population of a area with tularemia with the E120. The
E120 was later superseded by dry-type agents.
Dry-type biologicals resemble talcum powder, and can be
disseminated as aerosols using gas expulsion devices instead of a
burster or complex sprayer. The Chemical Corps developed
Flettner rotor bomblets and later
triangular bomblets for wider coverage due to improved glide angles
over Magnus-lift spherical bomblets. Weapons of this type were in
advanced development by the time the program ended.
Richard Nixon signed an executive
order on November 1969, which stopped production of biological
weapons in the U.S. and allowed only scientific research of lethal
biological agents and defensive measures such as
immunization and
biosafety. The biological munition stockpiles were
destroyed, and approximately 2,200 researchers became
redundant.
United States special forces and the CIA also had an interest in
biological warfare, and a series of special munitions was created
for their operations. The covert weapons developed for the military
(M1, M2, M4, M5, and M32 - or
Big Five
Weapons) were destroyed in accordance with Nixon's executive
order to end the offensive program. The CIA maintained its
collection of biologicals well into 1975 when it became the subject
of the senate
Church
Committee.
The Biological Weapons Convention
In 1972, the U.S. signed the
Biological and Toxic Weapons
Convention, which banned the "development, production and
stockpiling of microbes or their poisonous products except in
amounts necessary for protective and peaceful research." By 1996,
137 countries had signed the treaty; however it is believed that
since the signing of the Convention the number of countries capable
of producing such weapons has increased.
The
Soviet
Union
continued research and production of offensive
biological weapons in a program called biopreparat, despite having signed the
convention. The United States was unaware of the program
until Dr. Vladimir Pasechnik defected in 1989, and
Dr. Kanatjan Alibekov, the first
deputy director of
Biopreparat defected
in 1992.
After the 1991 Persian Gulf War, Iraq admitted to the United
Nations inspection team to having produced 19,000 L of concentrated
botulinum toxin, of which
approximately 10,000 L were loaded into military weapons; the
19,000 L have never been fully accounted for. This is approximately
3 times the amount needed to kill the entire current human
population by inhalation, although in practice it would be
impossible to distribute it so efficiently, and, unless it is
protected from oxygen, it deteriorates in storage.
On September 18, 2001 and for a few days after several letters were
received by members of the U.S. Congress and media outlets
containing anthrax spores: the attack killed five people. The
identity of the perpetrator remained unknown until 2008, when a
primary suspect was named. See
2001
anthrax attacks.
Biological agents
Biological warfare is the deliberate use of
disease and
natural poisons to
incapacitate
humans. It employs
pathogens as
weapons.
Pathogens are the micro-organism, whether
bacterial,
viral or
protozoic, that cause disease.There are four kinds
of biological warfare agents:
bacteria,
viruses,
rickettsiae and
fungi.
Biological weapons are distinguished by being living
organisms, that reproduce within their
host victims, who then become
contagious with a
deadly,
if
weakening,
multiplier effect.
Toxins in contrast do not reproduce in the victim and
need only the briefest of incubation periods; they kill within a
few hours.
Biological weapons characteristics
Anti-personnel BW

The international biological hazard
symbol.
Ideal characteristics of biological weapons targeting humans are
high infectivity, high potency, non-availability of vaccines, and
delivery as an aerosol.
Diseases most likely to be considered for use as biological weapons
are contenders because of their lethality (if delivered
efficiently), and robustness (making
aerosoldelivery feasible).
The biological agents used in biological weapons can often be
manufactured quickly and easily. The primary difficulty is not the
production of the biological agent but delivery in an effective
form to a vulnerable target.
For example, anthrax is considered an effective agent for several
reasons. First, it forms hardy spores, perfect for dispersal
aerosols. Second, pneumonic (lung) infections of anthrax usually do
not cause secondary infections in other people. Thus, the effect of
the agent is usually confined to the target. A pneumonic anthrax
infection starts with ordinary "cold" symptoms and quickly becomes
lethal, with a fatality rate that is 90% or higher. Finally,
friendly personnel can be protected with suitable
antibiotics.
A mass attack using anthrax would require the creation of aerosol
particles of 1.5 to 5 micrometres. Too large and the aerosol would
be filtered out by the respiratory system. Too small and the
aerosol would be inhaled and exhaled. Also, at this size,
nonconductive powders tend to clump and cling because of
electrostatic charges. This hinders dispersion. So the material
must be treated to insulate and discharge the charges. The aerosol
must be delivered so that rain and sun does not rot it, and yet the
human lung can be infected. There are other technological
difficulties as well.
Diseases considered for weaponization, or known to be weaponized
include
anthrax ,
ebola,
Marburg virus,
plague ,
cholera ,
tularemia,
brucellosis,
Q
fever,
Bolivian
hemorrhagic fever,
Coccidioides
mycosis ,
Glanders,
Melioidosis,
Shigella,
Rocky Mountain spotted
fever,
typhus ,
Psittacosis,
yellow
fever ,
Japanese B
encephalitis ,
Rift Valley
fever, and
smallpox .
Naturally-occurring toxins that can be used as weapons include
ricin,
SEB,
botulism toxin,
saxitoxin, and many
mycotoxins. The organisms causing these diseases
are known as
select agents. In the
United States, their possession, use, and transfer are regulated by
the
Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention's Select Agent
Program.
Anti-agriculture BW
Biological warfare can also specifically target plants to destroy
crops or defoliate vegetation. The United States and Britain
discovered plant growth regulators (i.e.,
herbicides) during the Second World War, and
initiated an
herbicidal warfare
program that was eventually used in
Malaya and
Vietnam in counter insurgency. Though
herbicides are chemicals, they are often grouped
with biological warfare as
bioregulators in a similar manner as
biotoxins. Scorched earth tactics or destroying
livestock and farmland were carried out in the Vietnam war and
Eelam War in Sri Lanka.
The United States developed an anti-crop capability during the Cold
War that used plant diseases (
bioherbicides, or
mycoherbicides) for destroying enemy
agriculture. It was believed that destruction of enemy agriculture
on a strategic scale could thwart
Sino-Soviet aggression in a general war.
Diseases such as
wheat blast and
rice blast were weaponized in aerial
spray tanks and cluster bombs for delivery to enemy water sheds in
agricultural regions to initiate epiphytotics (epidemics among
plants). When the United States renounced its offensive biological
warfare program in 1969 and 1970, the vast majority of its
biological arsenal was composed of these plant diseases.
In 1980s Soviet Ministry of Agriculture had successfully developed
variants of
foot-and-mouth
disease and
rinderpest against
cows,
African
swine fever for
pigs, and
psittacosis to kill
chicken. These agents were prepared to spray them
down from tanks attached to airplanes over hundreds of miles. The
secret program was code-named "Ecology".
Attacking animals is another area of biological warfare intended to
eliminate animal resources for transportation and food. In the
First World War German agents were arrested attempting to inoculate
draft animals with anthrax, and they were believed to be
responsible for outbreaks of
Glanders in
horses and mules. The British tainted small feed cakes with anthrax
in the Second World War as a potential means of attacking German
cattle for food denial, but never employed the weapon. In the 1950s
the United States had a field trial with
hog
cholera. During the
Mau Mau
Uprising in
1952, the poisonous
latex of the
African milk
bush was used kill
cattle.
Unconnected with inter-human wars, humans have deliberately
introduced the rabbit disease
Myxomatosis, originating in South America, to
Australia and Europe, with the intention of reducing the rabbit
population - which had devastating but temporary results, with wild
rabbit populations reduced to a fraction of their former size but
survivors developing immunity and increasing again.
Biodefense
Role of public health departments and disease surveillance
It is important to note that all of the classical and modern
biological weapons organisms are animal diseases, the only
exception being smallpox. Thus, in any use of biological weapons,
it is highly likely that animals will become ill either
simultaneously with, or perhaps earlier than humans.
Indeed,
in the largest biological weapons accident known– the anthrax
outbreak in Sverdlovsk (now Yekaterinburg
) in the Soviet Union
in 1979, sheep became ill with anthrax as far as
200 kilometers from the release point of the organism from a
military facility in the southeastern portion of the city (known as
Compound 19 and still off limits to
visitors today, see Sverdlovsk
Anthrax leak).
Thus, a robust surveillance system involving human clinicians and
veterinarians may identify a bioweapons attack early in the course
of an epidemic, permitting the prophylaxis of disease in the vast
majority of people (and/or animals) exposed but not yet ill.
For example in the case of anthrax, it is likely that by 24 – 36
hours after an attack, some small percentage of individuals (those
with compromised immune system or who had received a large dose of
the organism due to proximity to the release point) will become ill
with classical symptoms and signs (including a virtually unique
chest X-ray finding, often recognized by
public health officials if they receive timely reports). By making
these data available to local public health officials in real time,
most models of anthrax epidemics indicate that more than 80% of an
exposed population can receive antibiotic treatment before becoming
symptomatic, and thus avoid the moderately high mortality of the
disease.
Identification of bioweapons
The goal of
biodefense is to integrate
the sustained efforts of the national and homeland security,
medical, public health, intelligence, diplomatic, and law
enforcement communities. Health care providers and public health
officers are among the first lines of defense. In some countries
private, local, and provincial (state) capabilities are being
augmented by and coordinated with federal assets, to provide
layered defenses against biological weapons attacks. During the
first Gulf War the United Nations
activated a biological and chemical response team,
Task Force Scorpio, to respond to any
potential use of weapons of mass destruction on civilians.
The traditional approach toward protecting agriculture, food, and
water: focusing on the natural or unintentional introduction of a
disease is being strengthened by focused efforts to address current
and anticipated future biological weapons threats that may be
deliberate, multiple, and repetitive.
The growing threat of biowarfare agents and
bioterrorism has led to the development of
specific field tools that perform on-the-spot analysis and
identification of encountered suspect materials.
One such technology,
being developed by researchers from the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL), employs a "sandwich immunoassay", in which
fluorescent dye-labeled antibodies aimed at specific pathogens are
attached to silver and gold nanowires.
Researchers at Ben Gurion
University
in Israel are developing a different device called
the BioPen, essentially a "Lab-in-a-Pen", which can detect known
biological agents in under 20 minutes using an adaptation of the
ELISA, a similar widely employed immunological
technique, that in this case incorporates fiber
optics.
List of BW institutions and programs by country
According
to the United States Office of Technology
Assessment, since disbanded, seventeen countries were believed
to possess biological weapons in 1995: Libya
, North Korea
, South
Korea
, Iraq
, Taiwan
, Syria
, Israel
, Iran
, China
, Egypt
, Vietnam
, Laos
, Cuba
, Bulgaria
, India
, South Africa, and Russia
.
United States
United Kingdom
Former Soviet Union and Russia
- Biopreparat (18 labs and production
centers)
- Stepnagorsk Scientific and Technical
Institute for Microbiology
, Stepnogorsk
, northern Kazakhstan
- Institute of
Ultra Pure Biochemical Preparations, Leningrad
, a weaponized plague center
- Vector State Research Center of Virology
and Biotechnology
(VECTOR), a weaponized smallpox center
- Institute of
Applied Biochemistry, Omutninsk
- Kirov bioweapons production
facility, Kirov,
Kirov Oblast

- Zagorsk smallpox production
facility, Zagorsk

- Berdsk bioweapons
production facility, Berdsk

- Sverdlovsk bioweapons
production facility (Military Compound 19), Sverdlovsk, a
weaponized anthrax center
Japan
Iraq
- Main articles: Iraqi biological weapons
program and Iraq and weapons of mass
destruction (passim)
Treaties banning or restricting BW
List of people associated with BW
Bioweaponeers:
Writers and activists:
See also
References
Further reading
- Alibek, K. and S. Handelman.
Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert
Biological Weapons Program in the World– Told from Inside by the
Man Who Ran it. Delta (2000) ISBN 0-385-33496-6
- Appel, J. M. Is
all fair in biological warfare? The
controversy over genetically engineered biological weapons,
Journal of Medical Ethics, Volume 35, Pp. 429-432
(2009).
- Crosby, Alfred W., Ecological Imperialism: The Biological
Expansion of Europe, 900-1900 (New York, 1986).
- Endicott, Stephen and Edward Hagerman, The United States
and Biological Warfare: Secrets from the Early Cold War and
Korea, Indiana University Press (1998). ISBN 0253334721
- Knollenberg, Bernhard, "General Amherst and Germ Warfare,"
Mississippi Valley Historical Review 41 (1954-1955), 489-494.
- Maskiell, Michelle, and Adrienne Mayor. "Killer Khilats:
Legends of Poisoned Robes of Honour in India. Parts 1 & 2.”
Folklore [London] 112 (Spring and Fall 2001): 23-45, 163-82.
- Mayor, Adrienne, Greek Fire, Poison Arrows & Scorpion
Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World.
Overlook, 2003, rev. ed. 2009. ISBN 1-58567-348-X.
- Pala, Christopher (19??), Anthrax Island
- Preston, Richard (2002),
The Demon in the
Freezer, New York: Random House.
- Rózsa, Lajos 2009. The
motivation for biological aggression is an inherent and common
aspect of the human behavioural repertoire. Medical Hypotheses,
72, 217-219.
- Woods, Lt Col Jon B. (ed.), USAMRIID’s Medical Management of Biological
Casualties Handbook, 6th edition, U.S.
Army Medical Institute of Infectious
Diseases
, Fort Detrick, Maryland (April 2005).
External links
- Irish Medical Times: War has always been a dirty
'biological' battle
- The
Sunshine Project
- WHO: Health Aspects of Biological and Chemical
Weapons
- Green Goo - Life In The Era Of Humane Genocide
by Nick Szabo
- Center for Biosecurity of UPMC
- Council for
Responsible Genetics
- Info on
chemical and biological weapons for emergency and security
personnel
- Potomac Institute Course Notes
- The
Terrorist Threat, Parts I, II & III
- US Army Treatment Summary Sheet
- Failed establishment of an international
Organisation for the Prohibition of Biological Weapons
- Monterey Institute of International
Studies
article on the Yellow Rain
controversy
- Lewis, Susan K. History of Biowarfare, NOVA Online, 2001
(2003–04–24)
- DECONference:
Yearly conference on decontamination, including a decontamination
drill
- Drug Preparedness and Response to
Terrorism
- alt.war.biological Usenet - Google
- Rapport counter measures of Coalition in War of
Gulf
- Russian Biological and Chemical Weapons, a
useful page about non-state weapons transfers with a lot of links
to information from CRS, the GAO and NGOs.
- Hidden history of US germ testing, BBC, 13 February 2006
- Uncovering bioterrorism Bert Weinstein on bioweapons on
LLNL
- BioPen Senses BioThreats - Researchers at Ben Gurion
University in Israel are working on a new tool for identifying
BioThreats - November 2006 TFOT article
- Biological weapons effects: Bacteria, viruses,
fungi, toxins, animals, agricultural and dispersion methods.
(bomb-shelter.net)
- Biological weapons publications