The
blanket primary is a system used for selecting
political party candidates in a
primary election in the USA
. In a
blanket primary voters may pick one candidate for each office
without regard to party lines; for instance, a voter might select a
Democratic
candidate for governor and a
Republican candidate for
senator. The candidates with the highest votes by party for each
office advance to the general election, as the respective party's
nominee. It differs from the
open
primary – in open primaries voters may pick candidates
regardless of their own party registration, but may only choose
among candidates from a single party of the voter's choice.
Compared to other primary systems, the blanket primary is less
restrictive for voters because it does not limit them to selecting
from only one party's candidates. Mainstream political parties,
however, saw this as a disadvantage because it discouraged party
loyalty, especially among moderate voters who did not identify
strongly with either party. The system also has potential for
tactical voting: Voters opposed to
one party might disingenuously choose a weaker candidate from that
party, setting the candidate up to lose in the
general election.
In
2000 the Supreme Court of
the United States
struck down California
's blanket primary in California Democratic Party
v. Jones.
Similar
systems used by Washington
and Alaska
were also
struck down in subsequent Supreme Court cases.
The
blanket primary survives in a different form, known as the nonpartisan blanket
primary or jungle primary, in Louisiana
; currently, this system is only used for partisan
elections to state and local office, while federal party nominees
are chosen using closed primary
elections followed by a plurality-winner election involving
the party nominees and any independent candidates qualified to
run.
In response to the aforementioned Supreme Court decision,
Washington state voters passed
Initiative
872 in 2004 to adopt the Louisiana-style nonpartisan blanket
primary; while lower courts, following the ruling in
California
Democratic Party v. Jones, struck down the
initiative, the Supreme Court ruled on
March
18,
2008 in
Washington State Grange
v. Washington State Republican Party et al. that
Initiative 872 was at least facially constitutional and could go
into effect.
References
- http://www.salon.com/politics/2000/06/26/blanket
-
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/06-713.pdf
External links