The Full Wiki

More info on Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court: Map

Advertisements
  
  

Wikipedia article:

Map showing all locations mentioned on Wikipedia article:



The Bombay High Court


History & Premises

The Bombay High Court was inaugurated on 14 August 1862. Although the name of the city was changed from Bombaymarker to Mumbaimarker in 1995, the Court as an institution did not follow suit and remained as the Bombay High Court. The work on the present building of the High Court was commenced in April 1871 and completed in November 1878. It was designed by Britishmarker engineer Col. J.A. Fuller. The first sitting in this building was on January 10, 1879. Architecture: Gothic revival in the Early English style. It is long and wide. To the west of the central tower are two octagonal towers. The statues of Justice and Mercy are atop this building.The 125th anniversary of the building is slated to be marked by the release of a book, commissioned by the Bar Association, called "The Bombay High Court: The Story of the Building - 1878–2003" by local historians Rahul Mehrotra and Sharada Dwivedi.

Judges

Sanctioned strength:75 judges. The court handles 3.4 lakh cases, both civil and criminal. 32 sitting judges of the court disposed around 2,000 cases each in 2004. The court has a ratio of 1:1.61 million :: judges to people. Recently 8 new judges have elevated as High Court Judge. Justice Swatanter Kumar is the Chief Justice. Former CJ Justice H. S. Bedi has been elevated to Supreme Court of Indiamarker.Hon'ble Justice S.B Bhasme who resigned in the year 1979 to practice in the supreme court had a notable tenure amongst the high courts judges and passed revered judgments affecting matters of public importance. Hon'ble Justice S H Kapadia, Hon'ble Justice Sirpurkar have been elevated to the Supreme Court from Bombay High Court.

Jurisdiction & Benches

The court has jurisdiction over the states of Maharashtramarker, Goamarker and the Union territories of Daman and Diumarker and Dadra and Nagar Havelimarker. The court has benches in Nagpurmarker, Aurangabadmarker and Panajimarker. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa has enrolled approximately 90,000 Advocates on its Roll till October 2009.

Nagpur Bench

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench

Aurangabad Bench

The Aurangabad bench was established in 1982. Initially only a few districts of Maharashtramarker were under the Aurangabad bench. Subsequently in 1988, Ahmednagarmarker & others districts were attached to the bench. The bench at Aurangabad has more than 12 judges.The jurisdiction of the Aurangabad Bench is over Aurangabadmarker, Ahmednagarmarker, Dhulemarker, Jalna, Jalgaonmarker, Beedmarker, Parbhanimarker, Laturmarker & Osmanabadmarker.Recently Hon'ble Justice P.B.Varale is elevated as High Court Judge, from the Aurangabad bench. The bench also has a Bar council of Maharashtramarker & Goamarker office.The present building of bench is situated in a very huge premises.The garden is beautifully maintained. Lush green grass invites the attention of any passerby.The HC bench at Aurangabad is just approximately 4 KM from the Aurangabad Airportmarker and around 6 km from central bus stand. The new building has 13 court halls in all now including two new. All the court halls are on the first floor of the building, while the registry of the Court is on the ground floor. The Aurangabad bench has a strong Bar of more than 700 advocates.The Aurangabad bench has now 15 judges,With Justice N. V. Dabholkar being the senior most judge. But Aurangabad bench does not have a jurisdiction for company law matters.The Aurangabad Bench celebrated its 28th anniversary on the 27th of August 2009.

HISTORY : Due to continued demand of the people of Marathwada region for the establishment of a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad under sub-section (2) of Sec. 51 of the Act, the State Government first took up the issue with the then Chief Justice (Kantawala, C.J.) In 1977. On March 22, 1978, the State Legislative Assembly passed a unanimous resolution supporting a demand for the establishment of a permanent Bench of the High Court at Auragabad to the effect :"With a view to save huge expenses and to reduce the inconvenience of the people of the Marathwada and Pune regions in connection with legal proceedings, this Assembly recommends to the Government to make a request to the President to establish a permanent Bench of the Bombay High Court having jurisdiction in Marathwada and Pune regions, one at Aurangabad and the other at Pune."The said demand for the constitution of a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad was supported by the State Bar Council of Maharashtra, Advocates' Association of Western India, several bar associations and people in general. It is necessary here to mention that the resolution as originally moved made a demand for the setting up of a permanent Bench of the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad for the Marathwada region, and there was, no reference to Pune which was added by way of amendment. Initially, the State Government made a recommendation to the Central Government in 1978 for the establishment of two permanent Benches under sub-sec. (2) of Section 51 of the Act, one at Aurangabad and the other at Pune, but later in 1981 confined its recommendation to Aurangabad alone.

The State Government thereafter took a Cabinet decision in Jan., 1981 to establish a permanent Bench of the High Court at Aurangabad and this was conveyed by the Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Law & Judiciary Department, communicated by his letter dated Feb. 3, 1981 to the Registrar and he was requested, with the permission of the Chief Justice, to submit proposals regarding accommodation for the Court and residential bungalows for the Judges, staff, furniture etc. necessary for setting up the Bench. As a result of this communication, the Chief Justice wrote to the Chief Minister on Feb. 26, 1981 signifying his consent to the establishment of a permanent Bench at Aurangabad. After adverting to the fact that his predecessors had opposed such a move and had indicated, amongst other things, that such a step involved, as it does, breaking up of the integrity of the institution and the Bar, which would necessarily impair the quality and quantity of the disposals.

It however became evident by the middle of June, 1981 that the Central Government would take time in reaching a decision on the proposal for the establishment of a permanent Bench under sub-sec. (2) of Section 51 of the Act at Aurangabad as the question involved a much larger issue, viz. the principles to be adopted and the criterion laid down for the establishment of permanent Benches of High Courts generally. This meant that there would be inevitable delay in securing concurrence of the Central Government and the issuance of a Presidential Notification under sub-sec. (2) of S. 51 of the Act. On June 19, 1981, the State Government accordingly took a Cabinet decision that pending the establishment of a permanent Bench under sub-sec. (2) of S. 51 of the Act at Aurangabad for the Marathwada region, resort be had to the provisions of sub-section (3) thereof. On June 20, 1981, Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, Law & Judiciary Department wrote to the Registrar stating that there was a possibility of the delay in securing concurrence of the Central Government and the issuance of a notification by the President under subsection (2) of S. 51 of the Act for the establishment of a permanent Bench at Aurangabad and in order to tide over the difficulty, the provisions of sub-sec. (3) of Section 51 of the Act may be resorted to and he therefore requested the Chief Justice to favour the Government With his views in the matter at an early date. On July 5, 1981, the Law Secretary waited on the Chief Justice in that connection. On July 7, 1981 the Chief justice wrote a letter to the Chief minister in which he stated that the Law Secretary had conveyed to him the decision of the State Government to have a Circuit Bench at Aurangabad under sub-sec. (3) of Section 51 pending the decision of the Central Government to establish a permanent Bench there under sub-section (2) of S. 51 of the Act. The Chief Justice then added :"I agree that some such step is necessary in view of the preparations made by the Government at huge costs and the mounting expectations of the people there."

On July 20, 1981, the Law Secretary addressed a letter to the Registrar requesting him to forward, with the permission of the Chief Justice, proposal as is required under sub-section (3) of S. 51 for the setting up of a Bench at Aurangabad. In reply to the same, the Registrar by his letter dated July 24, 1981 conveyed that the Chief Justice agreed with the suggestion of the State Government that action had to be taken under sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the Act for which the approval of the Governor was necessary and he enclosed a copy of the draft order which the Chief Justice proposed to issue under sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the Act. On Aug. 10, 1981, the Law Secretary conveyed to the Registrar the approval of the Governor. On Aug. 27, 1981, the Chief Justice issued an order under sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the Act to the effect :"In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of S. 51 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (No. 37 of 1956) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, with the approval of the Governor of Maharashtra, is pleased to appoint Aurangabad as a place at which the Hon'ble Judges and Division Courts of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay may also sit." This is the history how the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted. The Constitution of the Bench by The Hon’ble The Chief Justice V.S.Deshpande then came to be challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra was allowed and the aspirations of the people from Marathwada were recognised. The Judgment is a reported one (State of Maharashtra v. Narain Shyamrao Puranik) in AIR 1983 Supreme Court 43.

Goa Bench

When the High Court of Bombay constituted a bench in Goa, Justice G.F Couto was appointed its first Goan permanent judge. Justice G.D. Kamat was appointed as judge in 1983 and later in 1996 as Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court. Justice E.S da Silva was elevated in 1990 and was a judge of this court till his retirement in 1995. Justice R.K. Batta and Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar were Judges of the Goa bench for brief period. Presently Justice N.A.Britto is a permanent judge in Goa. Justice F.I Rebello, Justice A.P Lavande and Justice F.M.Reis, all sitting judges of the Bombay High Court, were senior lawyers who practised in the Goa Bench before their elevation.

Case Information

bombayhighcourt.nic.in is the official website of the Bombay High Court. The case status and judgments of all cases after 2006 is available on the website. The causelist of Bombay High court can be accessed at

See also



External links



References

  1. http://www.ebc-india.com/lawyer/hcourts.htm Jurisdiction and Seats of Indian High Courts
  2. http://pib.nic.in/archieve/lreleng/lyr2003/roct2003/30102003/r301020036.html Judge strength in High Courts increased
  3. Bombay High Court



Embed code:
Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message