
the
Edna Lockwood, a
surviving bugeye
The
bugeye is a type of sailboat developed in the
Chesapeake Bay for
oyster dredging. The predecessor of the
skipjack, it was superseded by the
latter as oyster harvests dropped.
Origins
Between
1820 and 1865, the state of Maryland
banned the
practice of dredging for oysters. In the latter year, the
law was relaxed; the use of steam power remained banned, however,
and remained entirely prohibited until 1965, in which year powered
dredging was allowed two days of the week. As long as dredging for
oysters in the Chesapeake was prohibited, oystermen working from
log canoes tonged for oysters. In 1854 the Maryland legislature
permitted the use of dredges in the waters of Somerset County,
Maryland, expanding the use of dredges to the rest of the Bay
following the Civil War. Opening the Chesapeake to oyster dredging
after the Civil War created a need for larger, more powerful boats
to haul dredges across the oyster beds.
The first vessels used were the existing sloops,
pungys and
schooners on the
Bay, but none of these types was well suited to the purpose; pungys
and schooners were too deep in their draft to work the shallower
waters of the Bay, the schooners and sloops had bulwarks too high
to facilitate handling the dredges, the relatively complex rigs of
all three types required uneconomically large crews of skilled
sailors, and the vessels themselves were relatively expensive to
build and maintain.
The
log canoes had none of these
disadvantages, but were too small to successfully haul dredges. The
result was the development during the 1870s and 1880s of the
brogan, an enlarged log canoe. In
brogans, the open hull of the log canoe was decked, with hatches
covering holds created by subdividing the hull with bulkheads.
Brogans typically used the same sail plan as the log canoes of the
Tilghman Island region, a leg-of-mutton (i.e., triangular)
foresail, mainsail and jib, with the foremast taller than the main.
Both masts raked rather sharply aft, with the mainmast raked
significantly more sharply than the foremast.
1
Brogans were still too small to effectively haul dredges, and
continued to be enlarged and improved. By the early 1880s, or
possibly even earlier, the first bugeyes were being
built.
2 Over the next twenty years, the bugeye became
the dominant type of vessel employed in oystering, but by 1893
construction of new bugeyes began to decline with the introduction
of the
skipjack, which was less
expensive to build, operate and maintain yet was very well suited
to dredging for oysters. No working bugeyes appear to have been
built after 1918, but bugeyes continued to be employed in oystering
and freighting until the middle of the Twentieth Century, albeit in
ever-decreasing numbers.
3
The origin of the name is obscure.
Design
Like the earlier brogan, the typical bugeye was two-masted, with
leg-of-mutton mainsail, foresail and
jib. By
modern standards, this rig would be described as a
ketch rig, but it appears that watermen of the time
referred to it as simply a leg-of-mutton or a bugeye rig. Unlike
modern ketches, the forward-most mast was referred to as the
foremast and the after mast was termed the mainmast, although like
the brogan and log canoe, the mainmast was shorter than the
foremast. As with the earlier brogans and the log canoes, the masts
were sharply raked, although they were set up with stays and
shrouds. Unlike the brogan, however, the mainmast was raked only
slightly more sharply than the foremast.
4 A
bowsprit with
trailboards
was inevitably used.
The
hull was beamy and shallow,
with no
chine. Initially it was chunked from
logs, in the manner of the log canoe; eventually conventional
framed construction was introduced as the supply of suitable trees
was depleted. The usual form was double-ended, with a sharp stern,
and most such boats had a heavy beam called the "duck tail"
projecting a short distance from the stern in order to protect the
rudder. To increase deck space a "patent stern" was installed after
1893; it consisted of a set of three beams: one across the duck
tail, and two joining its ends to either side of the boat. The
ostensible purpose, according to the patent in question, was to
provide a mounting spot for
davits for a
dinghy; the whole area, however, could be
planked over to provide a considerable increase in deck space. All
log bugeyes were sharp-sterned, but some frame versions had round
sterns; a very few had a square
transom. The
freeboard was invariably low, the better to lift
the dredges onto the deck.
Due to the wide, flat bottom, a
centerboard was provided. Early boats used a
tiller for steering, but as patent steering
gear became available, the wheel came into use instead.
Besides the raked, paired masts, the other distinctive feature of
the bugeye is the mounting of the bowsprit. This was mounted
between paired hawsepieces and knightheads, and terminated in a
large vertical post called the "samson post", upon which the anchor
windlass was also typically mounted. The hawsepieces projected
above the deck and, with the prominent hawse holes, are thought
possibly to be the origin of the name "bugeye".
In the center of the ship sat the
windlass
(generally called the "winder") for the dredge lines. Early winders
were simple hand-cranked spools, eventually equipped with devices
to prevent injuries when the dredge caught on an obstruction. As
gas and diesel engines became available they replaced the
hand-cranked winder. In either case a pair of rollers was mounted
at the rail on either side, to protect the hull from rubbing and to
reduce friction as the dredges were raised.
By and large there was very little development within the type,
other than the minor improvements already listed. There was a small
trend towards increasing size; bugeyes averaged around 55 feet in
length, but some later examples were well over 80 feet long.
Variations in the sail plan were tried, particularly with
additional jibs,
gaff rigging and
staysails. A few were built with a single mast,
resulting in a boat with a superficial resemblance to the
skipjack.
Operation
Oystering was performed in the winter (the "R months" of September
through April); in the summer the boats were used in light freight
work where it was available. For oystering the boat would be taken
out to the bed, and the dredge would be dropped as a pass was made
at speed over the bed. At the end of the run the dredge would be
lifted onto the deck and the live oysters separated from the dead
shells and other debris. This process would be repeated until
sufficient oysters were obtained. More enterprising captains would
then sail the boat directly to the markets in Baltimore, Crisfield,
and other towns where the oysters were bought at wholesale and
processed. Alternatively, the catch could sold to a buy boat, which
acted as a middle man in the process. Some boats both dredged and
acted as buy boats, in which case a bushel basket would be mounted
on the fore mast to indicate the latter.
With its low freeboard, the bugeye was not generally considered to
be an ocean-going vessel; some boats were however sailed to the
West Indies in the off season for the tropical trade. One bugeye,
the
Brown Smith Jones, was built for the Maryland Oyster
Police. It had the curious distinction of being commissioned in the
United States Navy in
World War I, taking the name
USS
Dorchester in this service.
Decline of the type
Construction of bugeyes closely paralleled the oyster harvest,
which peaked in 1884. As the catch declined, the
skipjack became more popular, as it was smaller and
cheaper to build. Bugeye construction dropped to almost nothing
shortly after the turn of the century. Many of the survivors gave
up dredging and devoted themselves to the buy boat business, in
which case the sails were no longer wanted. In a typical conversion
the bowsprit and main mast were removed entirely, and the fore mast
shortened and modified into a
derrick for
hoisting. A stern
cabin for the wheel
and an engine for power completed the transformation.
(The William B.
Tennison
is a surviving example of such a conversion.)
As a result of such conversions, and simple attrition, surviving
bugeyes are extremely rare, and only one (the Edna
E. Lockwood) survives in its original form.
The plan was however taken up as a pleasure craft, and new versions
for that purpose continue to be built.

Edna E.
Lockwood on display at the Chesapeake Bay Maritime
Museum
Example on exhibit
One of the
best examples of the type still in existence is the Edna
E.
Lockwood
, which is on exhibit at the Chesapeake Bay Maritime
Museum in Saint Michaels, Maryland
. The Lockwood is a nine log bugeye
launched on October 5, 1899 at Tilghman Island, Maryland
, by John B. Harrison for Daniel Haddaway, at
a cost of $2,200. She worked for at least seven sets of owners from
1899 until 1967, and was then sailed as a yacht until donated to
the museum in 1973. The museum undertook an extensive restoration
of the
Lockwood from 1975 through 1979, which restored the
bugeye to its 1910 appearance with the "patent stern" that had been
added sometime prior to that year. She is the last bugeye retaining
the sailing rig and working appearance of the type, and is a
National Historic
Landmark. Her length is 53 ft-6 in, with a 15 ft-3 in beam and
a 2 ft-7 in draft with the centerboard up, and a maximum sail area
of approximately 1,700 square feet.
Footnotes
- M.V. Brewington, Chesapeake Bay Bugeyes (Newport News,
VA: The Mariners' Museum, 1941), p. 4-8; Howard I. Chapelle,
American Small Sailing Craft: Their Design, Development, and
Construction (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1951), p.
291-294; and Charles H. Kepner, The Edna E.
Lockwood (St. Michaels, MD: Chesapeake Bay Maritime
Museum, 1979), p. 2-3.
- Brewington, p. 8-9.
- Brewington, p. 71-72; and Howard I. Chapelle, Notes on
Chesapeake Bay Skipjacks (St. Michaels, MD: Chesapeake Bay
Maritime Museum), Introduction.
- Brewington, p. 4-8, 48-49.
References
- Kepner, Charles H. The Edna E. Lockwood (St. Michaels,
MD: Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum, 1979)
- Brewington, M.V. Chesapeake Bay Bugeyes (Newport News,
VA: The Mariners' Museum, 1941)
- National Landmark Designation from the Maryland
Historic Trust website
- National Historic Landmark Study from the US National
Park Service website