The
Corinthian order is one of the three biggest
classical orders of ancient Greek
and Roman
architecture. It is the most ornate,
characterized by a slender
fluted column
and an elaborate
capital
decorated with
acanthus leaves
and scrolls. The other two orders were the
Doric and the
Ionic.
When classical architecture was revived during the
Renaissance, two more orders were added to the
canon, the
Tuscan
order and the
Composite
order.
The
Corinthian order's name is derived from the Greek city of Corinth
, though it
first appeared used externally at Athens
.
Although of Greek origin, the Corinthian order was actually seldom
used in Greek architecture.
It came into its own in Roman practice,
following precedents set by the Temple of Mars Ultor in the
Forum of
Augustus
, completed
ca. CE 2. It is employed in southern Gaul at the
Maison
Carrée
, Nimes (illustration, below) and at the
comparable podium temple at Vienne
.
Other
prime examples noted by Mark Wilson Jones are the lower order of
the Basilica Ulpia and the arch at Ancona
(both of the
reign of Trajan, 98-117) the "column of
Phocas
" reserected in Late
Antiquity but second century in its origins, and the "Temple of
Bacchus" at Baalbek
, c.
150.
Roman Corinthian order
Proportion is a defining characteristic of the Corinthian order:
the "coherent integration of dimensions and ratios in accordance
with the principles of
symmetria"
are noted by Mark Wilson Jones, who finds that the ratio of total
column height to column-shaft height is in a 6:5 ratio, so that,
secondarily, column-height is often a multiple of 6
Roman feet and the column height a multiple of 5.
In its proportions, the Corinthian column is similar to the
Ionic column, though it may be made more
slender, but it stands apart by its distinctive carved capital. The
abacus upon the capital has
concave sides to conform to the outscrolling corners of the
capital, and it may have a rosette at the center of each
side.
Renaissance Corinthian order
During the first flush of the Italian Renaissance, the Florentine
architectural theorist
Francesco di
Giorgio expressed the human analogies that writers who followed
Vitruvius often associated with the human form, in squared drawings
he made of the Corinthian capital overlaid with human heads, to
show the proportions common to both.

The Corinthian order as used in
extending the US Capitol in 1854: the column's shaft has been
omitted.
The Corinthian
architrave is divided in
two or three sections, which may be equal, or they may bear
interesting proportional relationships, one with another. Above the
plain, unadorned architrave lies the
frieze,
which may be richly carved with a continuous design or left plain,
as at the U.S. Capitol extension (
illustration, left). At
the Capitol the proportions of architrave to frieze are exactly
1:1. Above that, the profiles of the
cornice moldings are like those of
the Ionic order. If the cornice is very deep, it may be supported
by brackets or modillions, which are ornamental brackets used in a
series under a cornice.
The Corinthian column is almost always fluted. If it is not, it is
often worth pausing to unravel the reason why (sometimes simply a
tight budget). Even the flutes of a Corinthian column may be
enriched. They may be filleted, with rods nestled within the hollow
flutes, or stop-fluted, with the rods rising a third of the way, to
where the
entasis begins. The French like to
call these
chandelles and sometimes they end them
literally with carved wisps of flame, or with bellflowers.
Alternately, beading or chains of husks may take the place of the
fillets in the fluting, for Corinthian is the most playful and
flexible of the orders. Its atmosphere is rich and festive, with
more opportunities for variation than the other orders.
Elaborating upon an offhand remark when Vitruvius accounted for the
origin of its acanthus capital, it became a commonplace to identify
the Corinthian column with the slender figure of a young girl; in
this mode the classicizing French painter
Nicolas Poussin wrote to his friend
Fréart de Chantelou in
1642
The beautiful girls whom you will have seen
in Nîmes
will not, I
am sure, have delighted your spirit any less than the beautiful
columns of Maison
Carrée
for the one is no more than an old copy of the
other".
Sir William Chambers expressed
the conventional comparison with the Doric order:
The proportions of the orders were by the ancients
formed on those of the human body, and consequently, it could not
be their intention to make a Corithian column, which, as Vitruvius
observes, is to represent the delicacy of a young girl, as thick
and much taller than a Doric one, which is designed to represent
the bulk and vigour of a muscular full grown man.
History
The oldest
known example of a Corinthian column is in the Temple of Apollo
Epicurius at Bassae
in Arcadia,
ca 450–420
BC. It is not part of the order of the temple itself,
which has a Doric colonnade surrounding the temple and an Ionic
order within the
cella enclosure. A single
Corinthian column stands free, centered within the cella. Quite
mysterious, and the archaeologists debate what it is all about:
perhaps a votive column? A few examples of Corinthian columns in
Greece during the next century are all used
inside
temples.
A
more famous example, and the first documented use of the Corinthian
order on the exterior of a structure, is the circular Choragic
Monument of Lysicrates
in Athens, erected ca 334 BC.
A
Corinthian capital carefully buried in Antiquity in the foundations
of the circular tholos at Epidaurus
was recovered during modern archaeological
campaigns. Its enigmatic presence and preservation have been
explained by a a sculptor's model for stone-masons to follow in
erecting the temple dedicated to
Asclepius, credited in Antiquity to
Polykleitos the Younger, the son of
the Classical Greek sculptor
Polykleitos, the Elder. The temple was erected
in the 4th century BCE. These capitals, in one of the most-visited
sacred sites of Greece, influenced later Hellenistic and Roman
designs for the Corinthian order. The concave sides of the abacus
meet at a sharp keel edge, easily damaged, which in later and
post-Renaissance practice has generally been replaced by a canted
corner. Behind the scrolls the spreading cylindrical form of the
central shaft is plainly visible.
Much later, the Roman writer
Vitruvius
(
c. 75 BCE —
c. 15 BCE) related that the
Corinthian order had been invented by
Callimachus, a Greek architect and
sculptor who was inspired by the sight of a votive basket that had
been left on the grave of a young girl. A few of her toys were in
it, and a square tile had been placed over the basket, to protect
them from the weather. An
acanthus
plant had grown through the woven basket, mixing its spiny, deeply
cut leaves with the weave of the basket.
Claude Perrault incorporated a vignette epitomizing the Callimachus
tale in his illustration of the Corinthian order for his
translation of
Vitruvius, published in
Paris, 1684 (
illustration, left). Perrault demonstrates in
his engraving how the proportions of the carved capital could be
adjusted according to demands of the design, without offending. The
texture and outline of Perrault's leaves is dry and tight compared
to their 19th-century naturalism at the U.S. Capitol (
below,
left). A Corinthian capital may be seen as an enriched
development of the Ionic capital, though one may have to look
closely at a Corinthian capital (
illustration, right) to
see the Ionic
volutes ("helices"), at the
corners, perhaps reduced in size and importance, scrolling out
above the two ranks of
stylized
acanthus leaves and stalks ("cauliculi" or
caulicoles), eight in all, and to notice that smaller
volutes scroll inwards to meet each other on each side. The leaves
may be quite stiff, schematic and dry, or they may be extravagantly
drilled and undercut, naturalistic and spiky. In Late Antique and
Byzantine practice, the leaves may be blown sideways, as if by the
wind of Faith. Unlike the Doric and Ionic column capitals, a
Corinthian capital has no neck beneath it, just a ring-like
astragal molding or a banding that forms the base of the capital,
recalling the base of the legendary basket.
Most buildings (and most clients) are satisfied with just two
orders.
When orders are superposed one above
another, as they are at the Flavian Amphitheater— the Colosseum
— the natural progression is from sturdiest and
plainest (Doric) at the bottom, to slenderest and richest
(Corinthian) at the top. The Colosseum's topmost tier has an
unusual order that came to be known as the Composite order during
the 16th century. The mid-16th century Italians, especially
Sebastiano Serlio and
Jacopo Barozzi da Vignola, who
established a
canon version of the
orders, thought they detected a "
Composite order," combining the volutes of
the Ionic with the foliage of the Corinthian, but in Roman practice
volutes were almost always present.

Simplified Corinthian capital at the
Cistercian monastery at Sacramenia, province of Segovia, 12th-13th
century
In Romanesque and Gothic architecture, where the Classical system
had been replaced by a new esthetic composed of arched vaults
springing from columns, the Corinthian capital was still retained.
It might be severely plain, as in the typical Cistercian
architecture (
illustration left), which encouraged no
distraction from liturgy and ascetic contemplation, or in other
contexts it could be treated to numerous fanciful variations, even
on the capitals of a series of columns or colonettes within the
same system.
During the 16th century, a sequence of engravings of the orders in
architectural treatises helped standardize their details within
rigid limits.
Sebastiano Serlio;
the
Regola delli cinque ordini of
Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola
(1507-1573); the
Quattro libri di Architettura of
Andrea Palladio, and
Vincenzo Scamozzi's
Idea della
Architettura Universale, were followed in the 17th century by
French treatises with further refined engraved models, such as
Perrault's.
Indo-Corinthian capitals
Indo-Corinthian capitals are
capitals crowning columns or pilasters, which can be found in the northwestern
Indian subcontinent, and usually
combine Hellenistic and Indian
elements. These capitals are typically dated to the first
centuries of our era, and constitute important elements of
Greco-Buddhist art.
The Classical design was often adapted, usually taking a more
elongated form, and sometimes being combined with scrolls,
generally within the context of Buddhist stupas and temples.
Indo-Corinthian capitals also incorporated figures of the
Buddha or
Bodhisattvas, usually as central figures
surrounded, and often in the shade, of the luxurious foliage of
Corinthian designs.
Notable examples
- Greece
- Rome
- Renaissance and Baroque
- Neoclassical and Beaux-Arts
- Ukraine
- Germany
See also
The Doric, Ionic and Corninthian orders were Greek; the Roman
Tuscan and the Composite were based on the Doric order and the
Corinthian order.
Notes
- Mark Wilson Jones, "Designing the Roman Corinthian order",
Journal of Archaeology 2 (1989).
- Jones 1989.
- Francesco di Giorgio's sheet with the drawings, from the Turin
codex Saluzziano of his Trattati di architettura ingegneria e
arte militare, ca. 1480-1500, is illustrated by Rudolf Wittkower,
Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism (1962)
1965, pl. ic
- Quoted by Sir Kenneth Clark, The Nude: A Study in
Ideal Form, 1956, p. 45.
- Chambers, A Treatise on the Decorative Part of Civil
Architecture (Joseph Gwilt ed, 1825:pp 159-61).
- Alison Burford (The Greek Temple Builders at
Epidauros, Liverpool, 1969, p. 65) suggests instead that it
was spoilt in the carving, one volute being incorrectly detached
from its field; Hugh Plommer, reviewing it for The Classical
Review (New Series, 21.2 [June 1971], pp
269-272), remarks that the error involved an excess of work and
remains convinced that the capital was a model.
External links