The Full Wiki

More info on Cultural variations in adoption

Cultural variations in adoption: Map

Advertisements
  

Wikipedia article:

Map showing all locations mentioned on Wikipedia article:



Adoption is an arrangement by which a child whose biological parents are unable to care for it is "adopted" and given the same legal and social status as though he/she were the biological child of the adoptive parents. For example, under a system of adoption, if a parent dies intestate, the adopted child stands in exactly the same position regarding inheritance as a biological child. In adoption systems, the child can also inherit the parent's hereditary rank. Thus, in pre-modern Japan, which had a system of true adoption, a child could inherit the parent's aristocratic title or samuari rank, whereas in England, which only introduced legal adoption in 1926, only a biological child could inherit an aristocratic title. This does not negate the fact that English families often reared, cared for, loved and provided for parentless children. It is only to point out that adoption is a specific legal arrangement within the many kinds of wardship or guardianship or fostering practiced worldwide. While all societies make provision for the rearing of children whose own parents are unavailable to rear them, not all cultures use adoption.

Arab

Traditionally in Arab cultures if a child is adopted he or she does not become a “son” or “daughter,” but rather a ward of the adopting caretaker(s). The child’s family name is not changed to that of the adopting parent(s) and his or her “guardians” are publicly known as such. Legally, this is close to other nations' systems for foster care. Other common rules governing adoption in Islamic culture address inheritance, marriage regulations, and the fact that adoptive parents are considered trustees of another individual's child rather than the child's new parents. In addition, Islamic countries such as Iraqmarker and Malaysiamarker have prohibitions against a child of Muslim parents being adopted by non-Muslim individuals.

Korea

In traditionalKoreanmarker culture, adoption almost always occurred when another family member (sibling or cousin) gives a male child to the first-born male heir of the family. Adoptions outside the family were rare. This has also been the reason why most orphaned Korean children have been exported to countries such as the United States. This is also true to varying degrees in other Asian societies.

Africa

On the other hand, in many African cultures, children are regularly exchanged among families for the purpose of adoption. By placing a child in another family's home, the birth family seeks to create enduring ties with the family that is now rearing the child. The placing family may receive another child from that family, or from another. Like the reciprocal transfer of brides from one family to another, these adoptive placements are meant to create enduring connections and social solidarity among families and lineages.

India

There is no uniform adoption law in Indiamarker; however, this statement could be debated. The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act of 1956 allows only Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists to adopt. Muslims, Christians, Jews and Parsees can only become guardians under the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890. Guardianship expires once the child attains the age of 18 years. For children adopted outside India, guardianship is awarded with the expectation that the child will be quickly adopted by the adopted parents in the country where they legally reside. The Indian government regulates domestic and inter-country adoption of children in India. For current information on adoption of children in India, go to the Central Adoption Resource Authority or C.A.R.A. website on the Internet at http://www.adoptionindia.nic.in/.

Polynesia

“Fluid adoption” is common in Polynesian culture, and rarely are ties to the biological family severed, as in western adoptions. Many Europeans and Americans associate adoption with something gone wrong, ie. unwanted pregnancy or infertility. By contrast, some Polynesian cultures, for example in Sikaianamarker, prefer that children move between different households. Fosterage is viewed as a way to create and maintain close personal relations, and parents do not refuse to let others take their children. These transfers of children between different caretakers and households are not exclusive and, they do not permanently separate the children from their biological parents.

Tahitiansmarker practice “fa’a’amu” adoption (meaning literally “giving to eat” adoption). Its basic functions compare to the ones of other traditional adoption practices, notably in Africa : a child can be “given” with the agreement or on the initiative of the family council for a variety of reasons, they can even be asked for and given before birth.

Tikopia

Traditional Tikopiamarker (Solomon Islandsmarker) society did not practice adoption. It was not uncommon for families to rear children left parentless, and childless adults would sometimes take the child of another family and bring it up. The children, however, retained the tribal affiliation of their biological fathers, and inherited land only from the property of the paternal lineage, not from the property of the lineage of the guardian.

See also



References




Embed code:
Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message