Depleted uranium (DU) is
uranium primarily composed of the
isotope uranium-238
(U-238). Natural uranium is about 99.27 percent U-238, 0.72 percent
U-235, and 0.0055 percent
U-234. U-235 is used for
fission in
nuclear reactors and
nuclear weapons. Uranium is
enriched in U-235 by separating the
isotopes by mass. The byproduct of enrichment, called depleted
uranium or DU, contains less than one third as much U-235 and U-234
as natural uranium. The external radiation dose from DU is about 60
percent of that from the same
mass of natural
uranium. DU is also found in
reprocessed spent nuclear reactor fuel,
but that kind can be distinguished from DU produced as a byproduct
of uranium enrichment by the presence of
U-236. In the past, DU has been called
Q-metal,
depletalloy, and
D-38.
DU is useful because of its very high
density of 19.1
g/
cm3. Civilian uses include
counterweights in aircraft, radiation shielding in medical
radiation therapy and industrial
radiography equipment, and containers used to
transport radioactive materials. Military uses include defensive
armor plating and
armor-piercing projectiles.
The use of DU in
munitions is
controversial because of questions about potential long-term health
effects. Normal functioning of the
kidney,
brain,
liver,
heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by
uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive,
uranium is a
toxic metal. It is weakly
radioactive and remains so because of its long
half-life. The aerosol produced during impact and
combustion of depleted uranium munitions can potentially
contaminate wide areas around the impact sites or can be inhaled by
civilians and military personnel. In a three week period of
conflict in Iraq during 2003 it was estimated over 1000 tons of
depleted uranium munitions were used, mostly in cities.
The
U.S.
Department of Defense
claims that no human cancer
of any type has been seen as a result of exposure to either natural
or depleted uranium;yet, U.S. DoD studies using cultured
cells and laboratory rodents continue to suggest the possibility of
leukemogenic,
genetic,
reproductive, and
neurological effects from chronic exposure, and
ample evidence of the carcinogenic properties of uranium has
appeared in the secondary medical literature since the 1950s.Also,
the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service in early 2004 attributed
birth defect claims from a February
1991
Gulf War combat veteran to depleted
uranium
poisoning. A 2005
epidemiology review concluded: "In aggregate
the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased
risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to DU."
History
Enriched
uranium was first manufactured in the 1940s when the US
and USSR
began their
nuclear weapons and nuclear power programs. It was at this
time that depleted uranium was first stored as an unusable waste
product. There was some hope that the enrichment process would be
improved and
fission isotopes of U-235 could, at some future date, be
extracted from the depleted uranium. This re-enrichment recovery of
the residual uranium-235 contained in the depleted uranium is no
longer a matter of the future: it has been practiced for several
years. Also, it is possible to design
civilian power reactors with
unenriched fuel, but only about 10 percent of reactors ever
built utilize that technology, and both nuclear weapons production
and
naval reactors require
the concentrated isotope.
In the
1970s, the
Pentagon
reported
that the Soviet military had developed
armor plating for Warsaw Pact tanks that NATO
ammunition could not penetrate. The Pentagon
began searching for material to make denser bullets. After testing
various metals,
ordnance researchers settled
on depleted uranium.
The US and NATO military used DU penetrator rounds in the
1991 Gulf War, the
Bosnia war,
bombing of Serbia, and the
2003 invasion of Iraq.
While
clearing a decades-old Hawai'i
firing range
in 2005, workers found depleted uranium training rounds from the
formerly classified Davy
Crockett tactical battlefield nuclear delivery system from the
1960-70s. These training rounds had been forgotten because
they were used in a highly classified program and had been fired
before DU had become an item of interest, more than 20 years before
the Gulf War.
Production and availability
Natural uranium metal contains about
0.71 percent
U-235, 99.28 percent
U-238, and about 0.0054 percent
U-234. In order to produce
enriched uranium, the process of
isotope separation removes a substantial
portion of the U-235 for use in nuclear power, weapons, or other
uses. The remainder,
depleted uranium, contains only 0.2
percent to 0.4 percent U-235. Because natural uranium begins with
such a low percentage of U-235, enrichment produces large
quantities of depleted uranium. For example, producing 1
kg of five percent enriched uranium requires
11.8 kg of natural uranium, and leaves about 10.8 kg of
depleted uranium with only 0.3 percent U-235 remaining.
The
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) defines depleted uranium as uranium
with a percentage of the 235U isotope that is less than
0.711 percent by weight (See 10 CFR 40.4.) The military specifications
designate that the DU used by the U.S.
Department of Defense
(DoD) contain less than 0.3 percent 235U
(AEPI, 1995). In actuality, DoD uses only DU that contains
approximately 0.2 percent
235U (AEPI, 1995).
Uranium hexafluoride

Hexafluoride tank leaking.
About 95 percent of the depleted uranium produced is stored as
uranium hexafluoride, a
crystalline solid, (D)UF
6, in steel cylinders in open
air storage yards close to enrichment plants. Each cylinder holds
up to 12.7 tonnes (or 14 short tons) of UF
6. In the U.S.
560,000 tonnes of depleted UF
6 had accumulated by 1993.
In 2008,
686,500 tonnes in 57,122 storage cylinders were located near
Portsmouth,
Ohio
and Paducah, Kentucky
. Depleted UF6 Management Program
Documents
The storage of DUF
6 presents environmental, health, and
safety risks because of its chemical instability. When
UF
6 is exposed to water vapor in the air, it reacts with
the moisture to produce UO
2F
2 (
uranyl fluoride), a solid, and HF (
hydrogen fluoride), a gas, both of which
are highly soluble and toxic. The uranyl fluoride solid acts to
plug the leak, limiting further escape of depleted UF
6.
Release of the hydrogen fluoride gas to the atmosphere is also
slowed by the plug formation. Storage cylinders must be regularly
inspected for signs of corrosion and leaks and are repainted and
repaired as necessary. The estimated life time of the steel
cylinders is measured in decades. The DOE is constructing two
facilities to convert the UF
6 to a more stable chemical
form for long term storage. These facilities are expected to be in
operation by early 2009 and take around 20 years to process the
entire US government stock of UF
6.
A ten-fold jump in uranium prices has transformed approximately
one-third of the U.S. depleted uranium inventory into an asset
worth $7.6 billion, assuming DOE re-enriches the tails. This
estimate is based on February 2008 market price for uranium and
enrichment services, and DOE's access to sufficient uranium
enrichment capacity.
There have been several accidents involving uranium hexafluoride in
the United States, including one in which 31 workers were exposed
to a cloud of UF
6 and its reaction products and a man
died after inhaling some of the resulting gas. Though some of the
more highly exposed workers showed evidence of short-term
kidney damage (e.g.,
protein
in the urine), none of these workers had lasting kidney
toxicity from the uranium exposure. The U.S. government has been
converting DUF
6 to solid uranium oxides for use or
disposal. Such disposal of the entire DUF
6 inventory
could cost anywhere from $15 million to $450 million.
- :::::::World depleted uranium inventory
- ::::{| class="wikitable"
- :::: Source: WISE Uranium
Project
Military applications

The 105mm M900 APFSDS-T (Depleted
Uranium Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot -
Tracer)
Depleted uranium is very dense; at 19050 kg/m³, it is 1.67
times as dense as
lead, only slightly less
dense than
tungstenand
gold, and 84% as dense as
osmiumor
iridium, which are
the densest known substances under standard (i.e., Earth-surface)
pressures. Thus a given mass of it has a smaller diameter than an
equivalent lead projectile, with less
aerodynamic dragand deeper
penetrationdue to a higher pressure at
point of impact. DU projectile ordnance is often
incendiarybecause of its
pyrophoricproperty.
Armor plate
Because of its high density, depleted uranium can also be used in
tank armor, sandwiched between sheets of steel armor plate. For
instance, some late-production
M1A1HA and M1A2
Abramstanks built after 1998 have DU reinforcement as part of
the armor plating in the front of the hull and the front of the
turret, and there is a program to upgrade the rest (see
Chobham armor).
Nuclear weapons
Depleted uranium is used as a
tamperin
fission bombsand as a nuclear explosive in
hydrogen bomb. It is a
potential containment material for a
Nuclear shaped
chargedue to its
opacityto
X-Rays.
Ammunition
Most military use of depleted uranium has been as
30 mm caliberordnance, primarily the
30 mm PGU-14/B armour-piercing
incendiaryround from the
GAU-8 Avengercannon of the
A-10 Thunderbolt IIused by the
United States Air Force. 25 mm
DU rounds have been used in the
M242gun mounted
on the U.S. Army's
Bradley Fighting
Vehicleand
LAV-25. The
United States Marine Corpsuses DU
in the 25 mm PGU-20 round fired by the
GAU-12 Equalizercannon of the
AV-8B Harrier, and also in the 20 mm
M197gun mounted on
AH-1
Cobrahelicopter gunships. The
United States Navy's
Phalanx CIWS's
M61
VulcanGatling gunused 20 mm
armor-piercing penetrator rounds with discarding
plasticsabotswhich were made
using depleted uranium, later changed to
tungsten.
Another use of depleted uranium is in
kinetic energy penetratorsanti-armorrounds, such as the 120 mm sabot
rounds fired from the M1A1 and M1A2 Abrams. Kinetic energy
penetrator rounds consist of a long, relatively thin penetrator
surrounded by discarding
sabot. Two materials
lend themselves to penetrator construction: tungsten and depleted
uranium, the latter in designated alloys known as
staballoys. Staballoys are metal alloys of
depleted uranium with a very small proportion of other metals,
usually
titaniumor
molybdenum. One formulation has a composition of
99.25 percent by mass of depleted uranium and 0.75 percent by mass
of
titanium. Staballoys are about twice as
dense as lead and are designed for use in
kinetic energy penetratorarmor-piercingammunition. The
US Armyuses DU in an alloy with around
3.5 percent titanium.
Staballoys, along with lower raw material costs, have the advantage
of being easy to melt and cast into shape; a difficult and
expensive process for tungsten. According to recent research, at
least some of the most promising tungsten alloys which have been
considered as replacement for depleted uranium in penetrator
ammunitions, such as tungsten-
cobaltor
tungsten-
nickel-cobalt alloys, also possess
extreme
carcinogenicproperties, which by
far exceed those (confirmed or suspected) of depleted uranium
itself: 100 percent of
ratsimplanted with a
pellet of such alloys developed lethal
rhabdomyosarcomawithin a few weeks. On more
properly military grounds, depleted uranium is favored for the
penetrator because it is self-sharpening and
pyrophoric. On impact with a hard target, such as
an armored vehicle, the nose of the rod fractures in such a way
that it remains sharp. The impact and subsequent release of heat
energy causes it to disintegrate to dust and burn when it reaches
air because of its
pyrophoricproperties.
When a DU penetrator reaches the interior of an armored vehicle, it
catches fire, often igniting ammunition and fuel, killing the crew,
and possibly causing the vehicle to explode. DU is used by the U.S.
Army in 120 mm or 105 mm cannons employed on the
M1 Abramsand
M60A3tanks. The Russian military has used DU ammunition in
tankmain gun ammunition since the late 1970s,
mostly for the 115 mm guns in the
T-62tank
and the 125 mm guns in the
T-64,
T-72,
T-80, and
T-90tanks.
The DU content in various ammunition is 180 g in 20 mm
projectiles, 200 g in 25 mm ones, 280 g in 30 mm,
3.5 kg in 105 mm, and 4.5 kg in 120 mm
penetrators. DU was used during the mid-1990s in the U.S. to make
grenades,
cluster bombs, and
mines, but those applications have been
discontinued, according to
Alliant
Techsystems. The
US Navyused DU in its
20 mm
Phalanx CIWSguns, but
switched in the late 1990s to armor-piercing tungsten.
It is thought that between 17 and 20 countries have weapons
incorporating depleted uranium in their arsenals.
They include the U.S.,
the UK
, France
, Russia
, China
, Turkey
, Israel
, Saudi Arabia
, Bahrain
, Egypt
, Kuwait
, Pakistan
, Thailand
, Iraq
and Taiwan
.DU ammunition is manufactured in 18
countries. Only the US and the UK have acknowledged using DU
weapons.
The
Iranian
GovernmentTV news channel
Press
TVclaimed on January 4, 2009, that evidence of depleted uranium
exposure has been found in wounds of casualties of the
2008–2009
Israel–Gaza conflict.
Legal status in weapons
In 1996
the International Court of
Justice
(ICJ) gave an advisory opinion on the "legality of the
threat or use of nuclear weapons".This made it
clear, in paragraphs 54, 55 and 56, that
international lawon poisonous weapons—the
Second Hague Declaration of 29 July 1899, Hague Convention IV of 18
October 1907 and the Geneva Protocol of 17 June 1925—did not cover
nuclear weapons, because their prime or exclusive use was not to
poison or asphyxiate. This ICJ opinion was about nuclear weapons,
but the sentence "The terms have been understood, in the practice
of States, in their ordinary sense as covering weapons whose prime,
or even exclusive, effect is to poison or asphyxiate," also removes
depleted uranium weaponry from coverage by the same treaties as
their primary use is not to poison or asphyxiate, but to destroy
materialand kill soldiers through
kinetic energy.
The
Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of
Minoritiesof the
United Nations Human
Rights Commission, passed two motions — the first in 1996 and
the second in 1997. They listed
weapons of mass destruction, or
weapons with indiscriminate effect, or of a nature to cause
superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering and urged all states to
curb the production and the spread of such weapons. Included in the
list was weaponry containing depleted uranium. The committee
authorized a working paper, in the context of
human rightsand humanitarian norms, of the
weapons. The requested UN working paper was delivered in 2002 by
Y.K.J. Yeung Sik Yuen in accordance with
Sub-Commission
on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rightsresolution
2001/36. He argues that the use of DU in weapons, along with the
other weapons listed by the Sub‑Commission, may breach one or more
of the following treaties:
the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the
Charter of the United Nations,
the
Genocide Convention, the
United Nations
Convention Against Torture, the
Geneva Conventionsincluding
Protocol I, the
Convention on Conventional
Weaponsof 1980, and the
Chemical Weapons Convention.
Yeung Sik Yuen writes in Paragraph 133 under the title "
Legal
compliance of weapons containing DU as a new weapon":
In 2001,
Carla Del Ponte, then the chief
prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia
, said that NATO's
use of
depleted uranium in former Yugoslavia
could be investigated as a possible war crime.Louise
Arbour, Del Ponte's predecessor as chief prosecutor, had
created a small, internal committee, made up of staff lawyers, to
assess the allegation. Their findings, that were accepted and
endorsed by Del Ponte, concluded that:
Requests for a moratorium on military use
Some states and the
International
Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons, a coalition of more than 120
non-governmental
organizations, have asked for a ban on the production and
military use of depleted uranium weapons.
The
European
Parliament
has repeatedly passed resolutions requesting an
immediate moratorium on the further
use of depleted uranium ammunition, but France
and Britain
– the only EU states that are
permanent members of the United Nations Security
Council – have consistently rejected calls for a ban,
maintaining that its use continues to be legal, and that the health
risks are entirely unsubstantiated.
In 2007
France, Britain, the Netherlands
, and the Czech Republic
voted against a United Nations General
Assembly resolution to hold a debate in 2009 about the effects
of the use of armaments and ammunitions containing depleted
uranium.All other European Union nations voted in favour or
abstained.The ambassador from the Netherlands explained his
negative vote as being due to the reference in the preamble to the
resolution "to potential harmful effects of the use of depleted
uranium munitions on human health and the environment [which]
cannot, in our view, be supported by conclusive scientific studies
conducted by relevant international organizations."
None of the other
permanent members of the United Nations Security Council supported
the resolution as China was absent for the vote, Russia abstained
and United
States
voted against the resolution.
In
September 2008, and in response to the 2007 General Assembly
resolution, the UN Secretary
General published the views of 15 states alongside those of the
International Atomic Energy
Agency
(IAEA) and World Health Organization
(WHO).The IAEA and WHO evidence differed little from
previous statements on the issue.
The report was largely split between
states concerned about depleted uranium's use such as Finland
, Cuba
, Japan
, Serbia
, Argentina
and predominantly NATO
members who
do not consider the use of depleted uranium munitions
problematic.
In December 2008, 141 states supported a resolution requesting that
three UN agencies:
United Nations Environment
Programme(UNEP), WHO and IAEA update their research on the
impact of uranium munitions by late 2010 - to coincide with the
General Assembly's 65th Session, four voted against, 34 abstained
and 13 were absent As before Britain and France voted against the
resolution.
All other European Union nations voted in
favour or abstained: the Netherlands, which voted against a
resolution in 2007, voted in favour, as did Finland and Norway
, both of
which had abstained in 2007, while the Czech Republic, which voted
against the resolution in 2007, abstained.The two other states
that voted against the resolution were Israel
and the
United States (both of which voted against in 2007), while as
before China
was absent
for the vote, and Russia abstained.
On June
21, 2009, Belgium
became the first country in the world to ban:
"inert ammunition and armour that contains depleted uranium or any
other industrially manufactured uranium."The move followed a
unanimous parliamentary vote on the issue on 22 March 2007. The
text of the 2007 law allowed for two years to pass until it came
into force. In April 2009, the Belgian Senate voted unanimously to
restrict investments by Belgian banks into the manufacturers of
depleted uranium weapons.
In September 2009, the
Latin
American Parliamentpassed a resolution calling for a regional
moratorium on the use, production and procurement of uranium
weapons. It also called on the Parlatino's members to work towards
an international uranium weapons treaty.
Civilian applications
Civilian applications for depleted uranium are typically unrelated
to its radioactive properties. Depleted uranium has a very high
density and is primarily used as shielding material for other
radioactive material, and as
ballast. Examples include sailboat
keels, as
counterweightsand as shielding in industrial
radiographycameras.
Shielding in industrial radiography cameras
Industrial radiography cameras include a very high activity
gamma radiationsource (typically
Ir-192(Activity >10 TBq). Depleted
uranium is often used in the cameras as a shield to protect
individuals from the gamma source. Typically the uranium will be
surrounded by
polyurethanefoam to
protect the uranium from the elements (and to protect operators and
maintenance engineers from the
beta
radiationproduced by the depleted uranium (a
semi-infiniteslab of depleted uranium has a
contact dose rate of about 2.1 mSv per hour of which ~1.95 mSv per
hour is attributable to beta radiation and the remaining 0.15 mSv
per hour attributable to gamma/x-ray/
bremsstrahlungradiation from the uranium)),
and stainless steel will be used to house the device.
Coloring in consumer products
Consumer product uses have included incorporation into
dental porcelain, used for
false teethto simulate the fluorescence of
natural teeth, and uranium-bearing reagents used in chemistry
laboratories (eg.
uranyl acetate,
used in
analytical chemistryand
as a
stainin
electron microscopy). Uranium (both
depleted uranium and natural uranium) was widely used as a coloring
matter for
porcelainand
glassin the 19th and early to mid 20th
century. The practice was largely discontinued in the late 20th
century.
In 1999 concentrations of 10% depleted
uranium were being used in "jaune no.17" a yellow enamel powder that was being produced in
France
by
Cristallerie de Saint-Paul, a manufacturer of enamel pigments.The depleted uranium used in the
powder was sold by
Cogéma's Pierrelatte
facility. In February, 2000, Cogema discontinued the sale of
depleted uranium to producers of enamel and glass.
Trim weights in aircraft
Aircraft that contain depleted uranium trim weights (
Boeing 747-100for example) may contain between
400 to 1,500 kg of DU. This application is controversial
because the DU may enter the environment if the aircraft were to
crash. The metal can also
oxidizeto a fine
powder in a fire. Its use has been phased out in many newer
aircraft.
Boeingand
McDonnell-Douglasdiscontinued using DU
counterweights in the 1980s.
Depleted uranium was released during the
Bijlmer
disaster
, in which 152 kg was lost, but an extensive
study concluded that there was no evidence to link depleted uranium
from the plane to any health problems..Counterweights
manufactured with
cadmiumplatingare considered non-hazardous while the
plating is intact.
U.S. NRC general license
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations at
10 CFR 40.25establish a general license for the
use of depleted uranium contained in industrial products or devices
for mass-
volumeapplications. This general
license allows anyone to possess or use depleted uranium for
authorized purposes. Generally, a registration form is required,
along with a commitment to not abandon the material. Agreement
states may have similar, or more stringent, regulations.
Health considerations
Normal functioning of the
kidney,
brain,
liver,
heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by
uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive,
uranium is a
toxic metal. DU is less
toxicthan other
heavy metalssuch as
arsenicand
mercury.
It is weakly radioactive but remains radioactive because of its
long
half-life. The
Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrystates that: "to be
exposed to radiation from uranium, you have to eat, drink, or
breathe it, or get it on your skin."
However, the
Institute of Nuclear Technology-Radiation Protection of Attiki
, Greece
, has noted
that "the aerosol produced during impact and combustion of depleted
uranium munitions can potentially contaminate wide areas around the
impact sites or can be inhaled by civilians and military
personnel."In a three week period of conflict in Iraq during
2003 it was estimated over 1000 tons of depleted uranium munitions
were used. While any radiation exposure has risks, no conclusive
data have correlated DU exposure to specific human health effects
such as
cancer. The U.S. Department of
Defense claims that no human
cancerof any
type has been seen as a result of exposure to either natural or
depleted uranium. Yet, studies using cultured cells and laboratory
rodents continue to suggest the possibility of
leukemogenic,
genetic,
reproductive, and
neurologicaleffects from chronic exposure. In
addition, the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service in early 2004
attributed
birth defectclaims from a
February 1991
Gulf Warcombat veteran to
depleted uranium
poisoning. Also, a 2005
epidemiologyreview concluded: "In
aggregate the human epidemiological evidence is consistent with
increased risk of birth defects in offspring of persons exposed to
DU."
DU is considered both a toxic and radioactive hazard that requires
long term storage as low level
nuclear
wastein very large quantities. Its use in incendiary ammunition
is controversial because of potential adverse health effects and
its release into the environment. Besides its residual
radioactivity, U-238 is a heavy metal whose compounds are known
from laboratory studies to be toxic to
mammals.
Although slow, metallic uranium is prone to
corrosionand small pieces are
pyrophoricat room temperature in air. When
depleted uranium munitions penetrate armor or burn, they create
depleted
uranium oxidesin the form of
dust that can be inhaled or contaminate wounds. Additionally,
fragments of munitions or armor can become embedded in the
body.
Chemical toxicity
Normal functioning of the
kidney,
brain,
liver,
heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by
uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive,
uranium is a
toxic metal. The chemical
toxicity of depleted uranium is about a million times greater
in vivothan its radiological hazard. Health effects of DU
are determined by factors such as the extent of exposure and
whether it was internal or external. Three main pathways exist by
which internalization of uranium may occur:
inhalation,
ingestion,
and embedded fragments or
shrapnelcontamination. Properties
such as phase (e.g. particulate or gaseous), oxidation state (e.g.
metallic or ceramic), and the solubility of uranium and its
compounds influence their
absorption,
distribution, translocation,
eliminationand the resulting
toxicity. For example, metallic uranium is relatively non-toxic
compared to hexavalent uranium(VI)
uranylcompounds such as
uranium trioxide.
Uranium is pyrophoric when finely divided. It will corrode under
the influence of air and water producing insoluble uranium(IV) and
soluble uranium (VI) salts. Soluble uranium salts are toxic.
Uranium slowly accumulates in several organs, such as the
liver,
spleen, and kidneys. The
World Health
Organizationhas established a daily "tolerated intake" of
soluble uranium salts for the general public of 0.5 µg/kg body
weight, or 35 µg for a 70 kg adult.
Epidemiological studiesand
toxicological testson laboratory animals point to
it as being
immunotoxic,
teratogenic,
neurotoxic, with
carcinogenicand
leukemogenicpotential. A 2005 report by
epidemiologists concluded: "the human epidemiological evidence is
consistent with increased risk of
birth
defectsin offspring of persons exposed to DU."
Early studies of depleted uranium aerosol exposure assumed that
uranium combustion product particles would quickly settle out of
the air and thus could not affect populations more than a few
kilometers from target areas, and that such particles, if inhaled,
would remain undissolved in the lung for a great length of time and
thus could be detected in urine. Burning uranium droplets violently
produce a gaseous vapor comprising about half of the uranium in
their original mass.
Uranylion contamination
in uranium oxides has been detected in the residue of DU munitions
fires.
Radiological hazards
External exposure to radiation from pure depleted uranium is less
of a concern because the
alpha
particleemitted by its isotopes travel only a few centimeters
in air or can be stopped by a sheet of paper. Also, the low
concentration of uranium-235 that remains in depleted uranium emits
only a small amount of low-
energygamma
radiation. According to the
World Health Organization, a
radiationdosefrom it would be about 60 percent of that from
purified natural uranium with the same mass. Approximately 90
microgramsof natural uranium, on average,
exist in the human body as a result of normal intake of water, food
and air. The majority of this is found in the
skeleton, with the rest in various organs and
tissues.
However, in a matter of a month or so, depleted uranium generates
amounts of
thorium-234and
protactinium-234which emit
beta particlesat almost the same rate as that
of the alpha particles from the uranium-238. Two beta particles are
emitted for each alpha particle. (See
Radium series.)
The
radiologicaldangers of pure
depleted uranium are lower (60 percent) than those of
naturally-occurring uranium due to the removal of the more
radioactive isotopes, as well as due to its long
half-life(4.46 billion years). Depleted uranium
differs from natural uranium in its
isotopic composition, but its
biochemistryis for the most part the same. For
further details see
actinides in the
environment.
Gulf War syndrome and soldier complaints

Graph showing the rate per 1,000
births of congenital malformations observed at Basra University
Hospital, Iraq
Increased rates of
immune
systemdisorders and other wide-ranging symptoms, including
chronic pain, fatigue and memory loss, have been reported in over
one quarter of combat veterans of the 1991
Gulf
War. Combustion products from depleted uranium munitions are
being considered as one of the potential causes by the Research
Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses, as DU was used
in 30 mm and smaller caliber machine-gun bullets on a large
scale for the first time in the Gulf War.
Veterans of the
conflicts in the Persian
Gulf
, Bosnia and Kosovo have been found to have up to 14
times the usual level of chromosome abnormalities in their
genes.Serum-soluble genotoxic teratogens produce
congenital disorders, and in white blood
cells causes immune system damage.
Human epidemiological evidence is consistent with increased risk of
birth defects in the offspring of persons exposed to DU. A 2001
study of 15,000 February 1991 U.S. Gulf War combat veterans and
15,000 control veterans found that the Gulf War veterans were 1.8
(fathers) to 2.8 (mothers) times more likely to have children with
birth defects. After examination of children's medical records two
years later, the birth defect rate increased by more than
20%:
- "Dr. Kang found that male Gulf War veterans reported having
infants with likely birth defects at twice the rate of
non-veterans. Furthermore, female Gulf War veterans were almost
three times more likely to report children with birth defects than
their non-Gulf counterparts. The numbers changed somewhat with
medical records verification. However, Dr. Kang and his colleagues
concluded that the risk of birth defects in children of deployed
male veterans still was about 2.2 times that of non-deployed
veterans."
In early 2004, the UK Pensions Appeal Tribunal Service attributed
birth defect claims from a February 1991 Gulf War combat veteran to
depleted uranium poisoning. Children of British soldiers who fought
in wars in which depleted uranium ammunition was used are at
greater risk of suffering genetic diseases such as
congenital malformations, commonly
called "birth defects," passed on by their fathers. In a study of
U.K. troops, "Overall, the risk of any malformation among
pregnancies reported by men was 50% higher in Gulf War Veterans
(GWV) compared with Non-GWVs."
The U.S. Army has commissioned ongoing research into potential
risks of depleted uranium and other projectile weapon materials
like tungsten, which the U.S. Navy has used in place of DU since
1993. Studies by the U.S. Armed Forces Radiobiology Research
Institute conclude that moderate exposures to either depleted
uranium or uranium present a significant
toxicologicalthreat.
One particular subgroup of veterans which may be at higher risk
comprises those who have internally retained fragments of DU from
shrapnel wounds. A laboratory study on rats produced by the Armed
Forces Radiobiology Research Institute showed that, after a study
period of 6 months, rats treated with depleted uranium coming from
implanted pellets, comparable to the average levels in the urine of
Desert Stormveterans with retained DU
fragments, had developed a significant tendency to lose weight with
respect to the control group. Substantial amounts of uranium were
accumulating in their
brainsand
central nervous systems, and showed a
significant reduction of
neuronalactivity in
the
hippocampusin response to external
stimuli. The conclusions of the study show that brain damage from
chronic uranium intoxication is possible at lower doses than
previously thought. Results from computer-based neurocognitive
tests performed in 1997 showed an association between uranium in
the urine and "problematic performance on automated tests assessing
performance efficiency and accuracy."
In 2003 Professor Brian Spratt FRS, chairman of the
Royal Society's working group on depleted
uranium, said: "The question of who carries out the initial
monitoring and clean-up is a political rather than scientific
question," and "
the
coalitionneeds to acknowledge that depleted uranium is a
potential hazard and make in-roads into tackling it by being open
about where and how much depleted uranium has been deployed."
Since
2001, medical personnel at the Basra
hospital in
southern Iraq have reported a sharp increase in the incidence of
child leukemia and genetic malformation among babies born in the
decade following the Gulf War.Iraqi doctors attributed these
malformations to possible long-term effects of DU, an opinion which
was echoed by several newspapers But no peer-reviewed study has
been undertaken in Basra. The
International
Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons(ICBUW) has made a call to
support an epidemiological study in the Basra region, as asked for
by Iraqi doctors.
1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia

Depleted uranium (DU) ammunition of
U-238
In 2001,
doctors at the Serb-run hospital in Kosovska Mitrovica
say the number of patients suffering from malignant
diseases has increased by 200% since 1998.In the same year, the
World Health Organization
reported that data from Kosovo
was
inconclusive and called for further studies.A 2003 study by the
United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP) in Bosnia and
Herzegovina
stated that low levels of contaminate were found in
drinking water and air particulate at DU penetrator impact
points.The levels were stated as not a cause for alarm. Yet,
Pekka Haavisto, chairman of the UNEP
DU projects stated, "The findings of this study stress again the
importance of appropriate clean-up and civil protection measures in
a post-conflict situation."
Studies indicating negligible effects
Studies in 2005 and earlier have concluded that DU ammunition has
no measurable detrimental health effects.
A 1999
literature reviewconducted
by the
Rand Corporationstated: "No
evidence is documented in the literature of cancer or any other
negative health effect related to the radiation received from
exposure to depleted or natural uranium, whether inhaled or
ingested, even at very high doses," and a RAND report authored by
the U.S. Defense department undersecretary charged with evaluating
DU hazards considered the debate to be more political than
scientific.
A 2001
oncologystudy concluded that "the
present scientific consensus is that DU exposure to humans, in
locations where DU ammunition was deployed, is very unlikely to
give rise to
cancer induction".
Former
NATO Secretary
GeneralLord
Robertsonstated in 2001 that "the existing medical consensus is
clear. The hazard from depleted uranium is both very limited, and
limited to very specific circumstances".
A 2002
study from the Australian defense ministry
concluded that “there has been no established increase in mortality
or morbidity in workers exposed to uranium in uranium processing
industries... studies of Gulf War veterans show that, in those who
have retained fragments of depleted uranium following combat
related injury, it has been possible to detect elevated urinary
uranium levels, but no kidney toxicity or other adverse health
effects related to depleted uranium after a decade of follow-up.”
Pier Roberto Danesi, then-director of the IAEA
Seibersdorf
+Laboratory, stated in 2002 that "There is a consensus now that DU
does not represent a health threat".
The
International Atomic Energy
Agency
reported in 2003 that, "based on credible
scientific evidence, there is no proven link between DU exposure
and increases in human cancers or other significant health or
environmental impacts," although "Like other heavy metals, DU is
potentially poisonous.In sufficient amounts, if DU is
ingested or inhaled it can be harmful because of its chemical
toxicity. High concentration could cause kidney damage." The IAEA
concluded that while depleted uranium is a potential
carcinogen, there is no evidence that it has been
carcinogenic in humans.
A 2005
study by Sandia National Laboratories’
Al Marshall used mathematical models to analyze
potential health effects associated with accidental exposure to
depleted uranium during the 1991 Gulf War.Marshall’s study
concluded that the reports of cancer risks from DU exposure are not
supported by veteran medical statistics, but Marshall did not
consider reproductive health effects.
Other contamination cases
On
October 4, 1992, an El Al Boeing 747-F cargo aircraft Flight
1862
, crashed into an apartment building in Amsterdam
.Local residents and rescue workers
complained of various unexplained health issues which were being
attributed to the release of hazardous materials during the crash
and subsequent fires. Authorities conducted an epidemiological
study in 2000 of those believed to be affected by the accident. The
study concluded that there was no evidence to link depleted uranium
(used as a counter balance in the plane) to any of the reported
health complaints.
In 2005,
uranium metalworkers at a Bethlehem plant near Buffalo, New
York
, exposed to frequent occupational uranium
inhalation, were found to have some of the same patterns of
symptoms as Gulf War Syndrome
victims.
In 2009,
a report from Fallujah
claimed that the use of uranium shells by USA
contributed to a large increase in deformed babies and miscarriages
after a battle in 2004 during the war in Iraq.
See also
References
External links
- Scientific bodies
- United Nations
- Scientific reports
- ATSDR - Case Studies in Environmental Medicine (CSEM):
Uranium Toxicity U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry:
Toxicological Profile for Uranium (includes discussion of
teratogenic and immunotoxic effects)
- "Depleted Uranium in Bosnia and Herzegovina -
Postconflict Assessment" by UN Environment Programme
- "Radiological Conditions in Areas of Kuwait With
Residues of Depleted Uranium" by International Atomic Energy
Agency

- "Technical Report on Capacity-building for the
Assessment of Depleted Uranium in Iraq" by UN Environment Programme
- "A Review of the Scientific Literature As It
Pertains to Gulf War Illnesses" by RAND
- Hindin, R. et al. (2005) "Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: A review
from an epidemiological perspective," Environmental
Health, vol. 4, pp. 17.
- Domingo, J.L. (2001) "Reproductive and developmental toxicity of natural and
depleted uranium: a review" Reproductive Toxicology,
15, 603–609.
- Lestaevel, P. et al. (2005) "The
brain is a target organ after acute exposure to depleted
uranium" Toxicology, 212,
219–226.
- Depleted Uranium article from the Royal Society
- An Analysis of Uranium Dispersal and Health Effects
Using a Gulf War Case Study by Sandia National
Laboratories
- Depleted Uranium Human Health Fact Sheet by
Argonne National Laboratory Environmental Assessment Division
- Uranium Human Health Fact Sheet
- Other publications
- Video
|
| Country |
| Organization |
Estimated DU stocks
(tonnes) |
| Reported |
|
|
| DOE |
| 480,000 |
| 2002 |
|
|
| FAEA |
| 460,000 |
| 1996 |
|
|
| Areva NC |
| 190,000 |
| 2001 |
|
|
| BNFL |
| 30,000 |
| 2001 |
|
|
| URENCO |
| 16,000 |
| 1999 |
|
|
| JNFL |
| 10,000 |
| 2001 |
|
|
| CNNC |
| 2,000 |
| 2000 |
|
|
| KAERI |
| 200 |
| 2002 |
|
|
| NECSA |
| 73 |
| 2001 |
|
| TOTAL |
|
| 1,188,273
|
| 2002 |
|
|
| Compilation of 2004 Review Information
Regarding Uranium Toxicity |
|
| Body system |
| Human studies |
| Animal studies |
| In vitro |
|
| Renal |
| Elevated levels of protein excretion, urinary catalase and
diuresis |
| Damage to Proximal convoluted tubules, necrotic cells cast from
tubular epithelium, glomerular changes |
| No studies |
|
| Brain/CNS |
| Decreased performance on neurocognitive tests |
| Acute cholinergic toxicity; Dose-dependent accumulation in
cortex, midbrain, and vermis; Electrophysiological changes in
hippocampus |
| No studies |
|
| DNA |
| Increased reports of cancers |
| Increased urine mutagenicity and induction of tumors |
| Binucleated cells with micronuclei, Inhibition of cell cycle
kinetics and proliferation; Sister chromatid induction, tumorigenic
phenotype |
|
| Bone/muscle |
| No studies |
| Inhibition of periodontal bone formation; and alveolar wound
healing |
| No studies |
|
| Reproductive |
| Uranium miners have more first born female children |
| Moderate to severe focal tubular atrophy; vacuolization of
Leydig cells |
| No studies |
|
| Lungs/respiratory |
| No adverse health effects reported |
| Severe nasal congestion and hemorrage, lung lesions and
fibrosis, edema and swelling, lung cancer |
| No studies |
|
| Gastrointestinal |
| Vomiting, diarrhea, albuminuria |
| n/a |
| n/a |
|
| Liver |
| No effects seen at exposure dose |
| Fatty livers, focal necrosis |
| No studies |
|
| Skin |
| No exposure assessment data available |
| Swollen vacuolated epidermal cells, damage to hair follicles
and sebaceous glands |
| No studies |
|
| Tissues surrounding embedded DU fragments |
| Elevated uranium urine concentrations |
| Elevated uranium urine concentrations, perturbations in
biochemical and neuropsychological testing |
| No studies |
|
| Immune system |
| Chronic fatigue, rash, ear and eye infections, hair and weight
loss, cough. May be due to combined chemical exposure rather than
DU alone |
| No studies |
| No studies |
|
| Eyes |
| No studies |
| Conjunctivitis, irritation inflammation, edema, ulceration of
conjunctival sacs |
| No studies |
|
| Blood |
| No studies |
| Decrease in RBC count and hemoglobin concentration |
| No studies |
|
| Cardiovascular |
| Myocarditis resulting from the uranium ingestion, which ended 6
months after ingestion |
| No effects |
| No studies |