Rocketdyne's
E-1 was a
liquid propellant rocket engine originally built as a backup
design for the
Titan I missile. While it was
being developed,
Heinz-Hermann
Koelle at the
Army
Ballistic Missile Agency (ABMA) selected it as the primary
engine for the rocket that would emerge as the
Saturn I. In the end, the Titan went ahead with its
primary engine, and the Saturn decided to use the lower-thrust
H-1 in order to speed
development.
The E-1 project was cancelled in 1959, but
Rocketdyne's success with the design gave NASA
confidence
in Rocketdyne's ability to deliver the much larger F-1, which powered the Saturn V to the Moon.
History
Genesis
In July 1954 the
Air
Force Scientific Advisory Board's ICBM working group advised
the
Western Development
Division (WDD) on their doubts about the
Atlas missile that was then under development.
Atlas used a number of unconventional features in order to meet its
performance goals, and they felt that there was undue risk that if
any of these proved unworkable in practice then the entire design
would fail. The group suggested that a second ICBM project be
started as a risk mitigation effort.
SAC's concerns were taken to heart within the Air Force, and they
directed
Ramo-Wooldridge to study the issue.
Ramo responded by inviting
Lockheed and the
Glenn L. Martin Company to propose
alternative ICBM designs. Based on these reports, Ramo suggested
that the Air Force begin development of a new missile that used a
conventional airframe in place of the Atlas's "balloon tanks", and
replaced the "stage and a half" layout with a two-stage
design.
Titan
Selecting from the two proposals, a contract was awarded to Martin
for what emerged as the
Titan.
Aerojet General was selected to build the
engines for the design, developing the two-chamber
LR-87 on the booster and the single
LR-91 on the upper stage. In keeping with the low-risk development
concept underpinning the entire Titan project, WDD also selected
North American Aviation's
Rocketdyne Division to develop a backup engine.
Rocketdyne, which was spun off as a separate company in 1955,
decided to meet the needs for the ~350,000 lbf thrust
requirements with a single engine, as opposed to a cluster of
smaller engines. Starting with the basic layout from their
successful
MB-3/S-3 (known to
the AF as the LR-79) from the
Thor and
Jupiter missiles, Rocketdyne
developed the E-1 by expanding its size and tuning the
engine bell for operation at lower altitudes -
the upper stage would be firing at higher altitudes.
Development of the E-1 was rapid and
prototypes were sent to the Santa Susana
Field Laboratory
later in 1955. However, development of a
stable fuel injector proved difficult, and took 18 months to fully
solve. Over a series of months the thrust was increased until it
developed over 379,837 lbf (1,689 kN) at
sea level. A complete booster stage equipped with
the E-1 was fired on 10 January 1956.
Saturn
In April 1957
Werner von Braun
tasked
Heinz-Hermann Koelle
with the development of a space launch system to meet new
requirements specified by the then-unofficial
ARPA. Koelle concluded that in order to meet their
payload requirements, 10,000 to 20,000 lbs into
low earth orbit, a booster stage with 1
million pounds of thrust would be needed.
Looking for an engine able to develop these sorts of power levels,
he learned about the E-1 from Rocketdyne's George Sutton. The E-1
was, by far, the most powerful engine that could be available in
the time frame that ARPA was demanding. Koelle selected a cluster
of four E-1's as the basis of a new booster they called the "Juno
V" (the latest in a series of Juno designs), supplied fuel from a
cluster of tanks taken from the existing Jupiter and
Redstone missiles. Later that year the team
started referring to the design as the "Saturn", for "the planet
after Jupiter", ABMA's latest successful rocket design. The name
stuck and became official at the end of the year.
After the launch of
Sputnik I on 4 October
1957, the U.S. was
in a panic over
how to quickly catch up with the Soviets in what appeared to be a
"
space race".
One idea quickly
gained currency; the formation of a civilian space agency that
would evolve into NASA
. The
Army had already lost interest in the development of the Saturn due
to a lack of mission requirements, and had agreed to turn over the
ABMA team to NASA on 1 July 1960.
In July 1958 von Braun was visited by Dick Canright and Bob Young
of ARPA, who informed von Braun they still had $10 million left in
their budget to spend before ABMA was turned over to NASA. von
Braun called in Koelle, who presented a 1/10th scale model of the
Juno V, still equipped with the E-1 engine. Canright and Young
noted that the engine wouldn't be ready in time for the handoff,
and asked if the rocket could be built with an existing engine
instead. Koelle suggested that eight engines from the existing S-3D
series could be used in place of the E-1, and everyone
approved.
Development of the Saturn moved ahead with a slightly upgraded
version of the S-3D, the
H-1.
When NASA started the process of taking over ABMA, they decided
that the project was worthwhile, and continued funding its
development.
Cancellation
When Aerojet successfully demonstrated the LR-71, the Titan moved
ahead with this engine and the first production example was
delivered to the Air Force in 1958. Koelle considered continuing
funding development of the E-1 from his budget but decided against
it. As von Braun later noted, the development costs were too high
for what would have given them a small performance boost,
especially when the F-1 could replace all of the E-1s for an even
greater advantage. Rocketdyne requested that the Air Force drop
their interest in the E-1, which they did, and development of the
engine ended.
Description
The E-1 was a single-chamber liquid fuel engine burning
RP-1 (refined
kerosene similar
to jet fuel) and
liquid oxygen.
Turbopumps were powered by a
gas
generator which dumped the burned fuel overboard. Thrust was
~380,000 lbf at sea level, rising to ~425,000 lbf in
vacuum, corresponding to a rise in
specific impulse from 260 seconds to 290.
The entire combustion chamber and engine bell were regeneratively
cooled using a system similar to the S-3 and later F-1.
References
Notes
- Jeff Foust, "Review: The Saturn V F-1 Engine", 16 March 2009
- Young, pg. 40
- Young, pg. 41
- Bilstein, pg. 111
Bibliography
- Anthony Young, "The Saturn V F-1 Engine: Powering Apollo Into
History", Springer, 2008, ISBN 0387096299
- Roger Bilstein, "Stages to Saturn", DIANE Publishing, 1999,
ISBN 0788181866
Further reading
External links
- E-1, astronautics.com (includes an image of
the E-1 being fired)