The Full Wiki

More info on Ecological sanitation

Ecological sanitation: Map


Wikipedia article:

Map showing all locations mentioned on Wikipedia article:

Ecological sanitation, also known as ecosan or eco-san, is a sanitation process that uses human of blackwater and sometimes immediately eliminates fecal pathogens from any still present wastewater (urine) at the source. The objectives are to offer economically and ecologically sustainable and culturally acceptable systems that aim to close the natural nutrient and water cycle.

Introduction to ecological sanitation

Ecological sanitation (ecosan) offers a new philosophy of dealing with what is presently regarded as waste and wastewater. Ecosan is based on the systematic implementation of reuse and recycling of nutrients and water as a hygienically safe, closed-loop and holistic alternative to conventional sanitation solutions. Ecosan systems enable the recovery of nutrients from human faeces and urine for the benefit of agriculture, thus helping to preserve soil fertility, assure food security for future generations, minimize water pollution and recover bioenergy. They ensure that water is used economically and is recycled in a safe way to the greatest possible extent for purposes such as irrigation or groundwater recharge.

The main objectives of ecological sanitation are:

  • To prevent the degradation of soil fertility

History of reuse-oriented sanitation approaches

In a very broad sense the recovery and use of urine and feces has been practiced over millennia by almost all cultures. The uses were not limited to agricultural production (although for modern application this may be of most relevance), like the Romans who were well aware of the disinfecting attributes of urine and also used it for washing clothing.

The most widely known example of the diligent collection and use of human excreta in agriculture is Chinamarker. Reportedly, the Chinese were aware of the benefits of using excreta in crop production before 500 B.C., enabling them to sustain more people at a higher density than any other system of agriculture. The value of “night soil” as a fertilizer was clearly recognized with well developed systems in place to enable the collection of excreta from cities and its transportation to fields.

Elaborate systems were developed in urban centers of Yemenmarker enabling the separation of urine and excreta even in multi-story buildings. Feces were collected from toilets via vertical drop shafts, while urine did not enter the shaft but passed instead along a channel leading through the wall to the outside where it evaporated. Here, feces were not used in agriculture but were dried and burnt as fuel.

In Mexicomarker and Perumarker, both the Aztec and Inca cultures collected human excreta for agricultural use. In Peru, the Incas had a high regard for excreta as a fertilizer, which was stored, dried and pulverized to be utilized when planting maize.

In the Middle Ages, the use of excreta and greywater was the norm. European cities were rapidly urbanizing and sanitation was becoming an increasingly serious problem, whilst at the same time the cities themselves were becoming an increasingly important source of agricultural nutrients.The practice of using the nutrients in excreta and wastewater for agriculture therefore continued in Europe into the middle of the 19th Century. Farmers, recognizing the value of excreta, were eager to get these fertilizers to increase production and urban sanitation benefited.

The increasing number of research and demonstration projects for excreta reuse carried out in Swedenmarker from the 1980s to the early 21st century aimed at developing hygienically safe closed loop sanitation systems. Similar lines of research began elsewhere, for example in Zimbabwemarker, in the Netherlandsmarker, Norwaymarker and Germanymarker. These closed-loop sanitation systems became popular under the name “ecosan”, “dewats”, “desar”, and other abbreviations. They placed their emphasis on the hygenisation of the contaminated flow streams, and shifted the concept from waste disposal to resource conservation and safe reuse.

Concepts of ecological sanitation

Ecological sanitation (Ecosan) is a new holistic paradigm in sanitation, which is based on an overall view of material flows as part of an ecologically and economically sustainable wastewater management system tailored to the needs of the users and to the respective local conditions. It does not favour a specific sanitation technology, but is rather a new philosophy in handling substances that have so far been seen simply as wastewater and water-carried waste for disposal.

According to Esrey et al. (2003) ecological sanitation can be defined as a system that:

Ecosan offers a flexible framework, where centralised elements can be combined with decentralised ones, waterborne with dry sanitation, high-tech with low-tech, etc. By considering a much larger range of options, optimal and economic solutions can be developed for each particular situation.

Thus, the most important advantages of ecological sanitation systems are:
  • Improvement of health by minimising the introduction of pathogens from human excreta into the water cycle
  • Promotion of safe, hygienic recovery and use of nutrients, organics, trace elements, water and energy
  • Preservation of soil fertility
  • Contribution to the conservation of resources through lower water consumption, substitution of mineral fertiliser and minimisation of water pollution
  • Improvement of agricultural productivity and food security
  • Preference for modular, decentralised partial-flow systems for more appropriate cost-efficient solutions adapted to the local situation
  • Promotion of a holistic, interdisciplinary approach
  • Material flow cycle instead of disposal of valuable resources

Technologies of ecosan systems

Determining ecosan systems as ecological sanitation is not easy, for it is not just one specific technology, but a new approach based on an ecosystem-oriented view of material flows.

The following diagram gives an overview of the different collection, treatment and reuse possibilities of the five flow streams considered in ecological sanitation systems:

Further information on ecosan technologies can be found in "Ecological Sanitation" by Winblad et al. , in "Toilets that make compost" by Peter Morgan or in the gtz-ecosan technical data sheets , among other relevant literature.

Project examples

Examples of ecosan projects can be found among others in the collection of project data sheets of gtz ecosan or on the Enhanced Global Map of ecosan activities by EcoSanRes . In the following some examples are given that underline the diversity of ecosan projects:

Guangxi province, China - large-scale project of urine diverting dehydration toiletsThe dissemination programme of ecological dry toilets for Hsinchu County, [[Guangxi province, one of the poorest provinces in China, started in 1997 with support of UNICEF, SIDA and the Red Crossmarker and has been expanded to 17 provinces until the year 2003. By this year, the scale of the project had increased to approximately 685,000 toilet units – today more than one million double vault urine diversion dehydration toilets (UDDTs) are installed in rural areas of Chinamarker.

In UDDTs, urine and faeces are collected separately: The urine is collected in the front and lead by a plastic pipe to a storage canister from where it can be used as a fertilizer in agriculture, the faeces fall at the back in one of two ventilated storage chambers and are covered with ash for better dehydration. After about one year of storage the dried material can be removed and used as a soil conditioner in agriculture.

KfW, Frankfurt, Germany - vacuum toilets + greywater treatmentThe sanitation concept of the modern office building “Ostarkarde” of the KfW Bankengruppe in Frankfurt is based on a separate excreta and greywater collection. While urine and faeces are collected via vacuum toilets and a vacuum sewerage using much less water for flushing, the greywater from hand washing and kitchen is collected and treated separately in a compact activated sludge reactor combined with membrane filtration. The treated greywater is then reused for toilet flushing and cleaning water. The amount of greywater can be reduced by 76% by this cost-efficient system which could be one of the prior choices for sanitation systems of newly constructed office buildings.

Tanum Municipalitymarker in Swedenmarker has introduced urine separation toilets to recover phosphorus.

Arguments for the use of ecological sanitation

Often, water used in flush toilets is of drinking quality. Only 1% of global water is drinkable, therefore, it is a precious resource. Water fit to be drunk is being used for other purposes that can use lesser quality water, such as toilets.

Mixing feces and urine makes treatment difficult. All waste water treatment plants use some natural/biological processes, but nature does not normally have this waste water, so there are no microbes that can deal with this mix. In order to treat waste, treatment plants have to do this in stages. Each stage treats a different component of the mix by creating the right environment for microbes to do their work (aerobic, anaerobic, anoxic and the right pH). This is costly and requires energy.

A mix of domestic and industrial effluent in water cannot be treated properly, for heavy metals and other pollutants make this water unsuitable for reuse. This is normally discharged into the ground or water bodies.

Because of the complexity of the treatment process, treatment plants tend to be large. This requires costly infrastructure to build and maintain it, often out of the reach of poorer communities.

John Jeavons argues that "Each person's urine and manure contain approximately enough nutrients to produce enough food to feed that person." Urea is the major component of urine, yet we produce vast quantities of urea by using fossil fuels. By properly managing urine, treatment costs as well as fertilizer costs can be reduced. Feces also contains recognized nutrients, and could be used for modern agriculture, as micronutrient deficiency is a significant problem.


  1. [Bracken et al. (2006): “The Road Not Taken: How traditional excreta and greywater management may point the way to a sustainable future”]
  2. [UNESCO/IHP and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (2006): “Capacity building for ecological sanitation – Concepts for ecologically sustainable sanitation in formal and continuing education”]
  3. [Werner, Christine (2006): “Closing the loop through ecological sanitation”]
  4. [Esrey, Steven A., Andersson, Ingvar et al. (2003): ”Closing the Loop – Ecological sanitation for food security”]
  5. [Jenssen, Petter D., Heeb, Johannes et al. (2004): “Ecological sanitation and reuse of wastewater. ecosan. A thinkpiece on ecological sanitation”]
  6. [Winblad, Uno and Simpson-Hébert, Mayling. (2004). Ecological Sanitation - revised and enlarged edition]
  7. [Morgan, Peter. (2007). Toilets that make compost. Low-cost, sanitary toilets that produce valuable compost for crops in an African context]
  8. [GTZ technical data sheets.]
  9. [GTZ project data sheets.]
  10. [EcoSanRes Global Map of ecosan activities.]
  11. [GTZ. (2005). Urine diversion dry toilets dissemination programme Guangxi province, China. Ecosan project data sheet #005. Available at:]
  12. [GTZ. (2005). Vacuum sewerage and greywater recycling, office building "Ostarkade" of the KfW Bankengruppe Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Ecosan project data sheet #001. Available at:]
  13. John Jeavons - Cultivating Our Garden

See also

External links

Embed code:

Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address