
Fishing down the foodweb.
The
environmental effects of fishing can be
divided into issues that involve the availability of fish to be
caught, such as
overfishing,
sustainable fisheries, and
fisheries management; and issues that
involve the impact of fishing on the environment, such as
by-catch.
These conservation issues are part of
marine conservation, and are addressed
in
fisheries science programs.
There is a growing gap between how many fish are available to be
caught and humanity’s desire to catch them, a problem that gets
worse as the
world population
grows.
Similar to other
environmental
issues, there can be conflict between the
fishermen who depend on fishing for their
livelihoods and fishery scientists who realise that if future fish
populations are to be
sustainable
then some fisheries must reduce or even close.
The journal
Science
published a four-year study in November 2006, which predicted that,
at prevailing trends, the world would run out of wild-caught
seafood in 2048. The scientists stated that
the decline was a result of
overfishing,
pollution and other environmental factors
that were reducing the population of fisheries at the same time as
their ecosystems were being degraded. Yet again the analysis has
met criticism as being fundamentally flawed, and many fishery
management officials, industry representatives and scientists
challenge the findings, although the debate continues.
Many countries, such
as Tonga
, the
United
States
, Australia and New Zealand
, and international management bodies have taken
steps to appropriately manage marine resources.
Effects on habitat
Some fishing techniques also may cause habitat destruction.
Dynamite fishing and
cyanide fishing, which are illegal in many
places, harm surrounding habitat.
Bottom
trawling, the practice of pulling a fishing net along the sea
bottom behind
trawlers, removes
around 5 to 25% of an area's seabed life on a single run. A
2005 report of the
UN Millennium Project, commissioned by
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, recommended the elimination of
bottom trawling on the high seas by 2006 to protect seamounts and
other ecologically sensitive habitats.
In mid October 2006, U.S. President Bush joined other world leaders
calling for a moratorium on deep-sea
trawling, a practice shown to often have harmful
effects on sea habitat and, hence, on fish populations.
Overfishing
Overfishing has also been widely
reported due to increases in the volume of fishing hauls to feed a
quickly growing number of consumers. This has led to the breakdown
of some sea ecosystems and several fishing industries whose catch
has been greatly diminished. The extinction of many species has
also been reported. According to an FAO estimate, over 70% of the
world’s fish species are either fully exploited or depleted.
According to Nitin Desai, Secretary General of the
2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development,
"Overfishing cannot continue, the depletion of fisheries poses a
major threat to the food supply of millions of people."
The cover story of the May 15, 2003 issue of the science journal
Nature – with Dr.
Ransom A. Myers, an internationally prominent
fisheries biologist (Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada) as the
lead author – was devoted to a summary of the scientific
information. The story asserted that, as compared with 1950 levels,
only a remnant (in some instances, as little as 10%) of all large
ocean-fish stocks are left in the seas. These large ocean fish are
the species at the top of the food chains (e.g., tuna, cod, among
others). However, this article was subsequently criticized as being
fundamentally flawed, although much debate still exists (Walters
2003; Hampton et al. 2005; Maunder et al. 2006; Polacheck
2006;Sibert et al. 2006) and the majority of fisheries scientists
now consider the results irrelevant with respect to large
pelagics (the open seas).
Ecological disruption
Fishing may disrupt
food webs by targeting
specific, in-demand species. There might be too much fishing of
prey species such as
sardines and anchovies,
thus reducing the food supply for the predators. It may also cause
the increase of prey species when the target fishes are predator
species such as
salmon and
tuna. Fisheries can reduce fish stocks that
cetaceans rely on for food.
By-catch
By-catch is the portion of the catch that is not the target
species. These are either kept to be sold or discarded. In some
instances the discarded portion is known as
discards.
Possible remedies
Many governments and intergovernmental bodies have implemented
fisheries management policies
designed to curb the environmental impact of fishing. Fishing
conservation aims to control the human activities that may
completely decrease a fish stock or washout an entire aquatic
environment. These laws include the quotas on the total catch of
particular species in a fishery, effort quotas (e.g., number of
days at sea), the limits on the number of vessels allowed in
specific areas, and the imposition of seasonal restrictions on
fishing.
In 2008 a large scale study of fisheries that used
individual transferable quotas
and ones that didn't provided strong evidence that individual
transferable quotas can help to prevent collapses and restore
fisheries that appear to be in decline.
Fish farming has been proposed as a
more sustainable alternative to traditional capture of
wild fish. However, fish farming has been
found to have negative impacts on nearby wild fish. Further,
farming of predatory fish
like salmon can
rely on fish feed that is based on
fish
meal and
oil from
wild fish.
The environmental impact of recreational fishing may be alleviated
to some extent by
catch and
release fishing.
See also
References
- [1]
- Monterey Bay Aquarium: Seafood Watch Program - Issues -
Overfishing
- Overfishing | Greenpeace International
- Ocean Planet:perils-overfishing
- http://www.un.org/events/tenstories/story.asp?storyID=800
-
http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/whats_new/otherstories_fishing_2808.htm
- Changes in the Biomass of Large Pelagic
Predators – Pelagic Fisheries Research Program
- Costello, Christopher; Gaines, Steven D and Lynham, John (2008)
Can Catch Shares Prevent Fisheries
Collapse? Science Vol 321, No 5896, pp 1678–1681.
- New Scientist: Guaranteed fish quotas halt
commercial free-for-all
- A Rising Tide: Scientists find proof that
privatising fishing stocks can avert a disaster The Economist,
18th Sept, 2008.
- New study offers solution to global fisheries
collapse Eureka alert.
- PLoS Biology - Can Farmed and Wild Salmon
Coexist?
- Seafood Choices Alliance (2005)
It's all about salmon
Further reading
- Castro, P. and M. Huber. (2003). Marine Biology. 4th
ed. Boston: McGraw Hill.
- Hampton, J., Sibert, J. R., Kleiber, P., Maunder, M. N., and
Harley, S. J. 2005. Changes in abundance of large pelagic predators
in the Pacific Ocean. Nature, 434: E2-E3.
- Maunder, M.N., Sibert, J.R. Fonteneau, A., Hampton, J.,
Kleiber, P., and Harley, S. 2006. Interpreting
catch-per-unit-of-effort data to asses the status of individual
stocks and communities. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63:
1373-1385.
- Myers, Ransom and Boris Worm. (May 15, 2003). "Rapid worldwide
depletion of predatory fish communities," Nature, Vol 423.
London: Nature Publishing.
- Polacheck, T. 2006. "Tuna longline catch rates in the Indian
Ocean: did industrial fishing result in a 90% rapid decline in the
abundance of large predatory species?" Marine Policy, 30:
470-482.
- FAO Fisheries Department. (2002). The State of World Fisheries
and Aquaculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations.
- Sibert, et al. 2006. Biomass, Size, and Trophic Status of Top
Predators in the Pacific Ocean Science 314: 1773
- Walters, C. J. 2003. Folly and fantasy in the analysis of
spatial catch rate data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic
Sciences, 60: 1433-1436.
External links