[[Image:Zonescale.png|right|120px|thumb|Temperature scale of
hardiness zones, showing the average annual
minimum temperature in degrees Celsius.
The main factors determining average minimum temperature are
altitude, latitude and proximity to the coast.]]A
hardiness
zone (a subcategory of Vertical Zonation) is a
geographically-defined area in which a specific category of
plant life is capable of growing, as defined
by climatic conditions, including its ability to withstand the
minimum temperatures of the zone (see the scale on the right or the
table below).
The zones were first developed by the
United States Department of
Agriculture
(USDA) and have subsequently been adopted
elsewhere. For example, a plant that is described as "hardy
to zone 10" means that the plant can withstand a minimum
temperature of -1°C. A more resilient plant that is "hardy to zone
9" can tolerate a minimum temperature of -7°C.
USDA Hardiness Zones
|
| Zone |
From |
To |
| 0 |
a |
-53.9°C (-65°F) |
| b |
-51.1°C (-60°F) |
-53.9°C (-65°F) |
| 1 |
a |
-48.3°C (-55°F) |
-51.1°C (-60°F) |
| b |
-45.6°C (-50°F) |
-48.3°C (-55°F) |
| 2 |
a |
-42.8°C (-45°F) |
-45.6°C (-50°F) |
| b |
-40°C (-40°F) |
-42.8°C (-45°F) |
| 3 |
a |
-37.2°C (-35°F) |
-40°C (-40°F) |
| b |
-34.4°C (-30°F) |
-37.2°C (-35°F) |
| 4 |
a |
-31.7°C (-25°F) |
-34.4°C (-30°F) |
| b |
-28.9°C (-20°F) |
-31.7°C (-25°F) |
| 5 |
a |
-26.1°C (-13°F) |
-28.9°C (-20°F) |
| b |
-23.3°C (-10°F) |
-26.1°C (-13°F) |
| 6 |
a |
-20.6°C (-5°F) |
-23.3°C (-10°F) |
| b |
-17.8°C (0°F) |
-20.6°C (-5°F) |
| 7 |
a |
-15°C (5°F) |
-17.8°C (0°F) |
| b |
-12.2°C (10°F) |
-15°C (5°F) |
| 8 |
a |
-9.4°C (15°F) |
-12.2°C (10°F) |
| b |
-6.7°C (20°F) |
-9.4°C (15°F) |
| 9 |
a |
-3.9°C (25°F) |
-6.7°C (20°F) |
| b |
-1.1°C (30°F) |
-3.9°C (25°F) |
| 10 |
a |
+1.7°C (35°F) |
-1.1°C (30°F) |
| b |
+1.7°C (35°F) |
+4.4°C (40°F) |
| 11 |
a |
+4.4°C (40°F) |
+7.2°C (45°F) |
| b |
+7.2°C (45°F) |
+10°C (50°F) |
| 12 |
a |
+10°C (50°F) |
+12.8°C (55°F) |
| b |
> +12.8°C (55°F) |
Benefits and drawbacks
The hardiness zones are informative in that the extremes of winter
cold are a major determinant of whether a plant species can be
cultivated outdoors at a particular location; however, the USDA
hardiness zones have a number of drawbacks if used without
supplementary information.
The zones do not incorporate summer heat levels into the zone
determination; thus sites which may have the same mean winter
minima, but markedly different summer temperatures, will be
accorded the same hardiness zone.
An extreme example of this phenomenon is
seen when comparing the Shetland Islands
and southern Alabama
, which are
both on the boundary of zones 8 and 9 and share the same winter
minima, but little else in their climates; in summer, the humid subtropical climate of
Alabama is about 20 degrees Celsius hotter
than the oceanic climate of
Shetland, and there are very few similar plants that can be grown
at both locations. Due to its maritime climate, the UK is in
AHS Heat Zone 2 (having 1 to 8 days hotter than 30 degrees
Celsius) according to the AHS (
American Horticultural
Society), whereas Alabama is in Zones 7 to 9 (61 to 150 days
hotter than 30 degrees
Celsius). It is,
therefore, efficacious to combine the hardiness zone with the heat
zone to gain greater understanding of what can be grown in a
particular location.
Another problem is that the hardiness zones do not take into
account the reliability of the snow cover. Snow acts as an
insulator against extreme cold, protecting the root system of
hibernating plants. If the snow cover is reliable, and generally
present through winter, the actual temperature to which the roots
are exposed will not be as low as the hardiness zone number would
indicate.
As an example, Quebec City
in Canada
is located
in zone 4, but can rely on an important snow cover every year,
making it possible to cultivate plants normally rated for zones 5
or 6, whereas Montreal
, located to
the southwest in zone 5, it is sometimes difficult to cultivate
plants adapted to the zone because of the unreliable snow
cover.
Other factors that affect plant survival, though not considered in
hardiness zones, are: soil moisture, humidity, the number of days
of frost, and the risk of a rare catastrophic cold snap. Some risk
evaluation – the probability of getting a particularly severe low
temperature – often would be more useful than just the average
conditions.
Lastly, many plants will survive in a locality but will not flower
if the day length is insufficient or if they require
vernalization (a particular duration of low
temperature). With annuals, the time of planting can often be
adjusted to allow growth beyond their normal geographical
range.
An alternative means of describing plant hardiness is to use
indicator plants (the USDA also publishes a list of these to go
with their map); in this method, common plants with known limits to
their range are used.
Sunset Books (Associated with
Sunset
magazine) publishes a series of gardening books that break up
climate zones more finely than the USDA zones. Under this system,
the US is broken into 45 distinct zones. These zones incorporate
ranges of temperatures in all seasons, precipitation, wind
patterns, elevation, and length and structure of the growing
season.
Hardiness zones remain a useful source of information, if used in
conjunction with other data, such as heat zones, air moisture and
rainfall distribution.
Britain and Ireland Hardiness Zones

Britain and Ireland's hardiness
zones
Owing to
the moderating effect of the Gulf Stream
on the Irish
and British
temperate maritime climate, Britain, and Ireland even
more so, have milder winters than their northerly position
suggests. This means that the hardiness zones relevant to
Britain and Ireland are quite high, from 7 to 10, as shown
below.
- 7. In
Scotland
the
Grampians, Highlands and locally in the Southern Uplands, in England
the Pennines and in Wales
the highest
part of Snowdonia
.
- 8. Most of England, Wales and Scotland, and parts of central
Ireland.
- 9. Most of western and southern England and
Wales, western Scotland, also a very narrow coastal fringe on the
east coast of Scotland and northeast England (within 5 km of the
North
Sea
), London
, and most of
Ireland.
- 10. Very low lying coastal areas of the southwest
of Ireland
including
the city of Cork
and the
Isles of
Scilly
.
Central Europe Hardiness Zones
Central Europe's climate is a good example of a transition from an
oceanic climate to a
continental climate, which can be
noticed immediately when looking at the hardiness zones, which tend
to decrease mainly eastwards instead of northwards. Also, the
plateaux and low mountain ranges in this region have a significant
impact on how cold it might get during winter. Generally speaking,
the hardiness zones are high considering the latitude of the
region, although not as high as in the UK or even the Faroe Islands
where zone 9 extends to 62°N.
In Central Europe, the relevant zones
decrease from zone 9 at the Belgian
and Dutch
coasts, as well as some of the Frisian Islands and the island of Heligoland
, to zone 6 on the far eastern border between Poland
and Belarus. Some isolated, high elevation areas of the
Alps and Carpathians
may even go down to zone 3 or 4.
An
extreme example of a cold sink is Funtensee
, Bavaria
which is in zone 2.
Northern Europe Hardiness Zones
Scandinavia lies at the same latitude as
Alaska or Greenland, but the effect of the warm Gulf Stream is even more pronounced here than it
is in the British
Isles
. Save for a very small spot near Karasjok
, Norway
which is in
zone 2, nowhere in the Arctic part of Scandinavia does it get below
zone 3. The Faroe Islands
, at 62-63°N are in zone 9, the southern coast of
Iceland
is in zone 8 at 64°N, as are the outer Lofoten Islands at 68°N. Tromso
, a coastal
city in Norway at 70°N, is in zone 7, and even Longyearbyen
, the northernmost true city in the world at 78°N,
is still in zone 5. Al these coastal locations have one
thing in common, though, which are cold, damp summers, with
temperatures rarely exceeding 20°C, or 15°C in Longyearbyen.
For this
reason, hardiness zones have little meaning in these places, for
the same reason as they have little meaning in the Aleutians
, which have a similar climate as Iceland or the
Faroes despite being 10° further south.In Sweden and
Finland, however, with their warmer and drier summers and colder
winters, it is more valid to use them.
In these countries,
generally, at sea level to 500 metres, zone 3 is north of the
Arctic Circle, including cities like Karesuando
, Pajala
and Rovaniemi
. Kiruna
is the big
exception here, which being located on a hill above frost traps, is
in zone 5. Zone 4 lies between the Arctic Circle and
about 64-65°N, with cities such as Oulu
and
Jokkmokk
, Zone 5 (south to 61-62°N) contains cities such as
Tampere
, Umea
and
Ostersund
. Zone 6 covers the south of mainland Finland,
Sweden north of 60°N, and the high plateau of Smaland
further south. Here one will find
cities such as Gavle
, Orebro
, Sundsvall
and Helsinki
. The Aland Islands
, as well as coastal Southern Sweden, and the
Stockholm
area are in zone 7.The west coast of Sweden
(Gothenburg and southwards) enjoy particularly mild winters,
therefore being friendly to more exotic species (The Botanical
Garden of Gothenburg), the southeast coast of Sweden has a colder
winter due to the absent gulf stream.

A Garden in Simrishamn, Sweden.
European cities
The table herein provides hardiness zone data for most European
cities (based on climatological data)
[126003]:
| City |
Zone |
City |
Zone |
Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
8b |
Antwerp,
Belgium |
8b |
Belfast,
Northern Ireland |
9b |
Berlin,
Germany |
8a |
Bratislava, Slovakia |
5-6 |
Bucharest, Romania |
7 |
Cardiff,
Wales |
9 |
Catania,
Italy |
10 |
Copenhagen, Denmark |
7b |
Cork, Ireland |
10 |
Dublin,
Ireland |
9b |
Düsseldorf, Germany |
8a |
Edinburgh, Scotland |
8a |
Gdańsk, Poland |
7 |
Glasgow,
Scotland |
9a |
Hamburg,
Germany |
8a |
Helsinki,
Finland |
5 |
Istanbul,
Turkey |
9 |
Kaliningrad, Russia |
6 |
Kiev,
Ukraine |
5 |
Kraków, Poland |
7a |
Lisbon,
Portugal |
10 |
Ljubljana, Slovenia |
7 |
London,
England |
8-9 |
Madrid,
Spain |
8b |
Málaga, Spain |
10 |
Marseille, France |
9 |
Milan,
Italy |
7 |
Minsk,
Belarus |
5 |
Moscow,
Russia |
4 |
Munich,
Germany |
7 |
Murmansk,
Russia |
5 |
Nicosia,
Cyprus |
10 |
Oslo,
Norway |
6 |
Oulu,
Finland |
4 |
Palma, Spain |
10 |
Paris,
France |
8 |
Perm,
Russia |
3 |
|
Prague,
Czech Republic |
7 |
Reykjavík, Iceland |
7-8 |
Riga,
Latvia |
5 |
Rome,
Italy |
10 |
Rovaniemi, Finland |
4 |
Saint Petersburg, Russia |
5 |
Sarajevo,
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
7 |
Santander, Spain |
10 |
Simrishamn, Sweden |
8a |
Sochi, Russia |
8b |
Sofia,
Bulgaria |
7 |
Stockholm, Sweden |
7 |
Strasbourg, France |
7 |
Tallinn,
Estonia |
5 |
Tuapse, Russia |
7 |
Tórshavn, Faroe Islands |
8 |
Tromsø, Norway |
7 |
Trondheim, Norway |
6 |
Umeå,
Sweden |
5 |
Vienna,
Austria |
6 |
Vilnius,
Lithuania |
5 |
Vorkuta, Russia |
2 |
Warsaw,
Poland |
6 |
Zürich, Switzerland |
7 |
North American hardiness zones

USDA Map of North American hardiness
zones, issued 1990 (for data 1974-1986).
An interactive version of this map is available at
http://www.usna.usda.gov/Hardzone/ushzmap.html
Using as its basis the average annual minimum temperature for a
given location, the idea of the USDA map is that it provides an
easy guideline for categorizing locations suitable for winter
survival of a rated plant in an "average" winter. Since
temperatures in the non-coastal-adjacent areas of the continent
rarely present a consistent experience from year to year, and
occasionally present a major--and often agriculturally
devastating--deviation from the average minimum, it is difficult to
use this map for much of the country with any long-term
reliability, at least in areas close to the margin of a plant's
rated hardiness-zone.
The USDA first issued its standardized hardiness zone map in 1960,
and revised it in 1965. A new map was issued in 1990, based on U.S.
and Canadian data from 1974 through 1986 (and 1971-1984 for
Mexico). While the 1990-issue map utilized approximately double the
number of stations, it also divided the temperature zones into
five-degree a/b zones for greater accuracy. This revised map showed
many areas to be suddenly colder than the 1960 map, due largely to
a number of severely colder winters in the central and eastern U.S.
in the 1974-1986 data-gathering period as opposed to the mid-20th
century data-sampling period used in the 1960 map.
The 1990 map shows 10 different zones, each of which represents an
area of winter hardiness for the plants of agriculture and our
natural landscape. This was revised to introduce zone 11,
representing areas that have average annual minimum temperatures
above 40°F (4.4°C) and that are therefore essentially
frost-free.
Updates
In 2003, a preliminary draft of a new USDA map was produced by the
American Horticultural
Society (AHS), compiled by Meteorological Evaluation Services
Co., Inc. of Amityville, NY, using temperature data collected from
July 1986 to March 2002. This was a period of warmer winters than
the 1974-1986 period, especially in the eastern U.S.A., and thus
the 2003 map placed many areas approximately a half-zone higher
(warmer) than the 1990 map had. Many have noted that the map seemed
to have drifted closer to the original 1960 map in its overall
zone-delineations. While the 2003 AHS draft map purported to show
finer detail, for example reflecting
urban heat islands by showing the downtown
areas of several cities (e.g., Baltimore, Maryland and Washington,
DC) as a full zone warmer than outlying areas, the map also did
away with the detailed a/b half-zones introduced in the 1990 map,
an omission widely criticized by horticulturists and gardeners due
to the coarseness of the resulting map. The USDA rejected the AHS
2003 draft map; the agency has stated it is creating its own
internal map in an interactive computer format. As of May 2009 the
AHS and the National Arboretum websites still present the 1990 map
as current.
In
addition, the National
Arbor Day Foundation in the United States
recently completed an extensive updating of
U.S. Hardiness Zones in 2006, utilizing essentially the same
data used by the AHS, the then-most-recent 15 years’ data available
from more than 5,000
National Climatic Data Center
cooperative stations across the United States. Once the Foundation
analyzed the new data, hardiness zones were revised, generally
reflecting warmer recent temperatures in many parts of the country.
The Arbor Day Foundation used the updated versions of the same
sources of data as had been utilized by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture in the creation of its hardiness zone maps. The 2006
map appears to validate the data used in the 2003 draft completed
by the AHS. Like the AHS map, it also did away with the more
detailed a/b half-zone delineations.
U.S. Cities
Here are the USDA plant hardiness zones for major U.S. cities
(based on the draft 2003 map):
| City |
Zone |
City |
Zone |
Albuquerque, New Mexico |
7 |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma |
7 |
Anchorage, Alaska |
4 |
Omaha, Nebraska |
5 |
Atlantic City, New Jersey |
7 |
Orlando, Florida |
10 |
Atlanta, Georgia |
8 |
Owensboro, Kentucky |
6-7 |
Baltimore, Maryland |
7-8 |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
7 |
Boston,
Massachusetts |
7 |
Phoenix, Arizona |
9 |
Burlington, Vermont |
4 |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania |
6-7 |
Chicago, Illinois |
5-6 |
Portland, Maine |
6 |
Charlotte, North Carolina |
7-8 |
Portland, Oregon |
8-9 |
Cleveland, Ohio |
5-6 |
Providence, Rhode Island |
6 |
Dallas, Texas |
8 |
Raleigh, North Carolina |
8 |
Denver, Colorado |
5-6 |
St. Louis, Missouri |
7 |
Detroit, Michigan |
5-6 |
Salt Lake City, Utah |
5 |
Fairbanks, Alaska |
1 |
San Antonio, Texas |
9 |
Honolulu, Hawaii |
11 |
San
Diego, California |
10-11 |
Houston, Texas |
9 |
San Francisco, California |
10 |
Las Vegas, Nevada |
9 |
San Jose, California |
10 |
Los Angeles, California |
10-11 |
Seattle, Washington |
8 |
Memphis, Tennessee |
7 |
Tampa, Florida |
9-10 |
Miami,
Florida |
11 |
Tucson, Arizona |
8 |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota |
4 |
Tulsa, Oklahoma |
7 |
Nashville, Tennessee |
7 |
Washington, D.C. |
7-8 |
New Orleans, Louisiana |
9 |
Wichita, Kansas |
6 |
New York, New York |
6 |
Newark, New Jersey |
7 |
|
Wilmington, Delaware |
7 |
Trenton, New Jersey |
7 |
|
|
|
|
Australian Hardiness Zones
The Australian continent, though surrounded by ocean, is drier than
Europe or North America. Australia numbers its climate zones
differently but these can be made roughly equivalent to North
American hardiness zones by adding an offset of 6. For example,
Australian Zone 3 is roughly equivalent to North America Zone 9.
The higher Australian zone numbers have no US equivalents.
- Zone 1 covers the alpine areas of southeastern Australia.
- Zone 2 the tablelands of south east Queensland, New South Wales
and Victoria, and the uplands of central Tasmania.
- Zone 3 includes much of the southern half of the continent,
except for near the coast.
- Zone 4, because of the warmer seaboard, covers a broad area
from coastal Queensland across to Shark Bay and Geraldton in the
west, and includes the Mornington Peninsula, areas adjacent to
Spencer Gulf and Adelaide, the southwestern coastal zone, Sydney
and the north coast of NSW, along with a number of localities
dotted all around the southern coast of the continent.
- Zone 5 covers some of the Queensland coast, Western Australia
north of Shark Bay, and across the Top End.
- Zone 6 includes the Queensland coast north of Cairns, Cape York
Peninsula and the coast of the Northern Territory.
- Zone 7 is mainly restricted to islands off the north
coast.
There are problems with classifications of this type: the spread of
weather stations is insufficient to give clear zones and too many
places with different climates are lumped together. Only 738
Australian stations have records of more than ten years (one
station per 98,491 hectares), though more populated areas have
relatively fewer hectares per station. Local factors such as
aspect, altitude, proximity to the sea also complicate the matter.
For example, Mount Isa has three climatic stations with more than a
ten year record. One is in Zone 4a, one in Zone 4b and the other is
in Zone 5a. Likewise, Sydney residents can choose between Zones 3a
and 4b. Most other cities have similar problems. Different
locations in the same city are suitable for different plants,
making it hard to draw a meaningful map. There may even be a case
for publishing a list of weather stations and their zone
classification to allow best use of local conditions.
AHS Heat Zones
In addition to the USDA Hardiness zones there are the
American Horticultural
Society (AHS) Heat Zones.
The criterion is the average number of days per year when the
temperature exceeds 30°C(86°F)
[126004]. The AHS Heat Zone Map for the US is
available here
[126005].
|
| Zone |
From |
To |
| 1 |
1 |
| 2 |
1 |
7 |
| 3 |
8 |
14 |
| 4 |
15 |
30 |
| 5 |
31 |
45 |
| 6 |
46 |
60 |
| 7 |
61 |
90 |
| 8 |
91 |
120 |
| 9 |
121 |
150 |
| 10 |
151 |
180 |
| 11 |
181 |
210 |
| 12 |
>210 |
European cities
| City |
Zone |
City |
Zone |
Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
2 |
Antwerp, Belgium |
2 |
Belfast, Northern Ireland |
1 |
Berlin,
Germany |
3 |
Bratislava, Slovakia |
4 |
Bucharest, Romania |
6 |
Cardiff, Wales |
1 |
Catania, Italy |
8 |
Copenhagen, Denmark |
2 |
Cork, Ireland |
1 |
Dublin,
Ireland |
1 |
Düsseldorf, Germany |
3 |
Edinburgh, Scotland |
1 |
Gdańsk, Poland |
2 |
Glasgow, Scotland |
1 |
Hamburg, Germany |
2 |
Helsinki, Finland |
2 |
Istanbul, Turkey |
7 |
Kaliningrad, Russia |
2 |
Kiev,
Ukraine |
4 |
Kraków, Poland |
4 |
Lisbon,
Portugal |
7 |
Ljubljana, Slovenia |
6 |
London,
England |
2 |
Madrid,
Spain |
7 |
Málaga, Spain |
7 |
Marseille, France |
7 |
Milan,
Italy |
6 |
Minsk,
Belarus |
3 |
Moscow,
Russia |
2 |
Munich,
Germany |
3 |
Murmansk, Russia |
1 |
Nicosia, Cyprus |
9 |
Oslo,
Norway |
1 |
Oulu,
Finland |
1 |
Palma, Spain |
8 |
Paris,
France |
3 |
Perm,
Russia |
3 |
|
Prague,
Czech Republic |
3 |
Reykjavík, Iceland |
1 |
Riga,
Latvia |
2 |
Rome,
Italy |
7 |
Rovaniemi, Finland |
1 |
Saint Petersburg, Russia |
2 |
Sarajevo, Bosnia and
Herzegovina |
5 |
Santander, Spain |
3 |
Simrishamn, Sweden |
1 |
Sochi, Russia |
6 |
Sofia,
Bulgaria |
6 |
Stockholm, Sweden |
2 |
Strasbourg, France |
4 |
Tallinn, Estonia |
2 |
Tuapse, Russia |
7 |
Tórshavn, Faroe Islands |
1 |
Tromsø, Norway |
1 |
Trondheim, Norway |
1 |
Umeå,
Sweden |
1 |
Vienna,
Austria |
4 |
Vilnius, Lithuania |
2 |
Vorkuta, Russia |
1 |
Warsaw, Poland |
3 |
Zürich, Switzerland |
4 |
See also
References
Notes
- Sunset National Garden Book. Sunset Books Inc. Menlo
Park, CA (1997)
Bibliography
External links