The terms
Mong ( ) and Hmong ( ) refer to
an Asian ethnic group in the mountainous regions of Vietnam
, Laos
, Thailand
and Burma
.
Hmong are also one of the sub-groups of the
Miao ethnicity in southern China. Hmong groups
began a gradual southward migration in the 18th century due to
political unrest and to find more arable land.
A number of Hmong/Mong people fought against the
communist-nationalist
Pathet Lao during
the
Secret War in Laos. Hmong/Mong
people were singled out for retribution when the Pathet Lao took
over the Laotian government in 1975, and tens of thousands fled to
Thailand seeking political asylum.
Thousands of these refugees have resettled
in Western countries since the late 1970s, mostly the United States
but also Australia,
France
, French
Guiana
, and Canada
.
Others have been returned to Laos under
United Nations-sponsored
repatriation programs. Around 8,000 Hmong/Mong
refugees remain in Thailand.
Nomenclature
Hmong people have their own terms for their subcultural divisions,
"White Hmong" (
Hmong Der) and "Green" (
Mong Leng)
being the terms for two of the largest groups. In the
Romanized Popular Alphabet,
developed in the 1950s in Laos, these terms are written
Hmoob
Dawb (White Hmong) and
Moob Leeg (Green Mong). The
doubled vowels indicate nasalization, and the final consonants
indicate with which of the eight
lexical tones the word is pronounced.
White Hmong and Green Mong people speak mutually intelligible
dialects of the
Hmong language with
some differences in pronunciation and vocabulary. One of the most
obvious differences is the use of the aspirated /m/ in White Hmong
(indicated by the letter "h") not found in the Green Mong dialect.
Other groups of Hmong/Mong people include the Black Hmong
(
Hmoob Dub), Striped Hmong (
Hmoob Txaij/Hmoob Quas
Npab), Hmong Shi, Hmong Pe, Hmong Pua, and Hmong Xau.
Since
1949, Miao has been an official term for
one of the 55 official
minority groups recognized by the government of the People's
Republic of China
. The Miao live mainly in southern China, in
the provinces of Guizhou
, Hunan
, Yunnan
, Sichuan
, Guangxi, Hainan
, Guangdong
, Hubei
, and
elsewhere in China. According to the 2000 census, the number
of 'Miao' in China was estimated to be about 9.6 million. The Miao
nationality includes Hmong/Mong people as well as other culturally-
and linguistically-related ethnic groups who do not call themselves
either Hmong or Mong. These include the Hmu, Kho (Qho) Xiong, and A
Hmao. The White Miao (Bai Miao) and Green Miao (Qing Miao) are both
Hmong/Mong groups.
Usage of the term "Miao" in Chinese documents dates back to the
Shi Ji (1st century BC) and the
Zhan Guo Ce (late
Western Han Dynasty).
During this time, it
was generally applied to people of the southern regions thought to
be descendants of the San Miao kingdom (dated to around the 3rd
century BC.) The term does not appear again until the Ming dynasty
(1368–1644), by which time it had taken on the
connotation of "barbarian." Interchangeable with "man" and
"yi," it was used to refer to the indigenous people of the
south-western frontier who refused to submit to imperial rule.
During this time, references to Raw (
Sheng) and Cooked
(
Shu) Miao appear, referring to level of assimilation and
political cooperation of the two groups.
Not until the Qing dynasty
(1644–1911) do more finely grained distinctions
appear in writing. Even then, discerning which ethnic groups
are included in various classifications can be problematic. This
inconsistent usage of "Miao" makes it difficult to say for sure if
Hmong/Mong people are always included in these historical writings.
Linguistic evidence, however, places Hmong/Mong people in the same
regions of southern China that they inhabit today for at least the
past 2,000 years. By the mid-18th century, classifications become
specific enough that it is easier to identify references to
Hmong/Mong people.
In Southeast Asia, Hmong/Mong people are referred to by other
names, including:
Vietnamese:
Mèo or H'Mông;
Thai: แม้ว (Maew) or
ม้ง (Mong);
Burmese:
mun lu-myo
(မံုလူမ်ိဳး). "
Mèo", or variants
thereof, is considered highly derogatory by many Hmong/Mong people
and is infrequently used today outside of Southeast Asia.
Because the Hmong lived mainly in the highland areas of Southeast
Asia and China, the French occupiers of Southeast Asia gave them
the name
Montagnards or "mountain people", but this should
not be confused with the
Degar people of
Vietnam, who were also referred to as
Montagnards.
Controversy over nomenclature
Hmong and Mong
When Western authors came in contact with Hmong and Mong people,
beginning in the eighteenth-century, they referred to them in
writing by ethnonyms assigned by the Chinese (i.e. Miao, or
variants). This practice continued into the twentieth century. Even
ethnographers studying the Hmong/Mong
people in Southeast Asia often referred to them as Meo, a
corruption of Miao applied by Thai and Lao people to the
Hmong/Mong. Although "Meo" was an official term, it was often used
as an insult against Hmong/Mong people and it is considered to be
highly derogatory. In the middle of the twentieth century, a
concerted effort was made to refer to Hmong/Mong by their own
ethnonyms in scholarly literature. By the 1970s, it became standard
to refer to the entire ethnic group as "Hmong." This was reinforced
during the influx of Hmong/Mong immigrants to the United States
after 1975. Research proliferated, much of it being directed toward
the American Hmong Der community. Several states with Hmong/Mong
populations issued official translations only in the Hmong Der
dialect. At the same time, more Mong Leng people voiced concerns
that the supposed inclusive term "Hmong" only served to exclude
them from the national discourse.
The issue came to a head during the passage of California State
Assembly Bill (AB) 78, in the 2003–2004 season. Introduced by Doua
Vu and Assembly Member Sarah Reyes, District 31 (Fresno), the bill
encouraged changes in secondary education curriculum to include
information about the
Secret War
and the role of Hmong/Mong people in the war. Furthermore, the bill
called for the use of oral histories and first hand accounts from
Hmong/Mong people who had participated in the war and who were
caught up in the aftermath. Originally, the language of the bill
mentioned only "Hmong" people, intending to include the entire
community.
A number of Mong Leng activists, led by Dr.
Paoze Thao (Professor of Linguistics and Education at California
State University, Monterey Bay
), drew attention to the problems associated with
omitting "Mong" from the language of the bill. They noted
that despite nearly equal numbers of Hmong Der and Mong Leng in the
United States, resources are disproportionately directed toward the
Hmong Der community. This includes not only scholarly research, but
also the translation of materials, potentially including curriculum
proposed by the bill. Despite these arguments, "Mong" was not added
to the bill. In the version that passed the assembly, "Hmong" was
replaced by "Southeast Asians", a more broadly inclusive
term.
Dr. Paoze Thao and others feel strongly that "Hmong" can refer only
to Hmong Der people and does not include Mong Leng people. He feels
that the usage of "Hmong" in reference to both groups perpetuates
the marginalization of Mong Leng language and culture. Thus, he
advocates the usage of both "Hmong" and "Mong" when referring to
the entire ethnic group. Other scholars, including anthropologist
Dr.
Gary Yia Lee (a Hmong Der person),
suggest that "Hmong" has been used for the past 30 years to refer
to the entire community and that the inclusion of Mong Leng people
is understood. Some argue that such distinctions create unnecessary
divisions within the global community and will only confuse
non-Hmong/Mong people trying to learn more about Hmong/Mong history
and culture.
The designation (H)mong seems to solve this conundrum and is seeing
increasing use.
Hmong, Mong, and Miao
Some non-Chinese Hmong advocate that the term Hmong or Mong be used
not only for designating their dialect group, but also for the
other Miao groups living in China. They generally claim that the
word "Miao" is a derogatory term, with connotations of barbarism,
that probably should not be used at all. The term was later adapted
by Tai-speaking groups in Southeast Asia where it took on
especially insulting associations for Hmong people despite its
official status. In modern China, the term "Miao" does not carry
these negative associations and people of the various sub-groups
that constitute this officially recognized nationality freely
identify themselves as Miao or Chinese, typically reserving more
specific ethnonyms for intra-ethnic communication. During the
struggle for political recognition after 1949, it was actually
members of these ethnic minorities who campaigned for
identification under the umbrella term "Miao" — taking advantage of
its familiarity and associations of historical political
oppression.
Contemporary transnational interactions between Hmong in the West
and Miao groups in China, following the 1975 Hmong diaspora, have
led to the development of a global Hmong identity that includes
linguistically and culturally related minorities in China that
previously had no ethnic affiliation. Scholarly and commercial
exchanges, increasingly communicated via the Internet, have also
resulted in an exchange of terminology, including Hmu and A Hmao
people identifying as Hmong and, to a lesser extent, Hmong people
accepting the designation "Miao," within the context of China. Such
realignments of identity, while largely the concern of economically
elite community leaders, reflect a trend towards the
interchangeability of the terms "Hmong" and "Miao."
History
The early history of the Hmong has proven difficult to trace.
According to Ratliff, there is linguistic evidence to suggest that
they have occupied the same areas of southern China for at least
the past 2,000 years. Evidence from mitochondrial DNA in
Hmong-Mien/Miao-Yao language speaking
populations supports the southern origins of maternal lineages even
further back in time, although Hmong/Miao speaking populations show
more contact with northeast Asians (i.e. northern Han) than
Mien/Yao populations. Historical Chinese documents describe that
area being inhabited by 'Miao' people, a group with whom Hmong
people are often identified.
Yet, the history of the 'Miao' cannot be equated with the history
of the Hmong. Although the term 'Miao' is used today by the Chinese
government to denote a group of linguistically and culturally
related people (including the Hmong, Hmu, Kho Xiong, and A Hmao),
it has been used inconsistently in the past. Throughout the written
history of China, it was applied to a variety of peoples considered
to be marginal to Han society, including many who are unrelated to
contemporary Hmong/Mong people. Christian Culas and Jean Michaud
note: "In all these early accounts, then, until roughly the middle
of the nineteenth century, there is perpetual confusion about the
exact identity of the population groups designated by the term
Miao. We should therefore be cautious with respect to the
historical value of any early associations."
Conflict
between Miao groups and newly arrived settlers increased during the
eighteenth-century under repressive economic and cultural reforms
imposed by the Qing
Dynasty
. This led to armed conflict and large-scale
migrations continuing into the late nineteenth-century, the period
during which most Hmong people emigrated to Southeast Asia. The
process began as early as the late-seventeenth-century, before the
time of major social unrest, when small groups went in search of
better agricultural opportunities.
From July 1919 to March 1921 the Hmong of
French Indochina revolted against the
colonial authorities in what the French
called the
War of the Insane
("
La Guerre des Fous") and what the Hmongs call Rog Paj
Cai (named after the leader Paj Cai, but literally means The War of
the flowering of the Law).
Geography
While China has the largest population of Hmong people, an exact
figure is hard to determine. According to the 1990 census, of the
7.4 million Miao people, 5.4 million were recorded as speaking a
Miao language. Of these, around 2 million spoke a dialect of the
Hmong language. Currently, based on
projected growth rates, along with the inclusion of previously
overlooked dialects, the number of speakers of the Hmong language
in China has been estimated to be around 3 million.
Figures for Indochina are more concrete:
There is
also small population of Hmong people in Myanmar
, but no exact figure is available.
Outside of Asia, the United States is home to the largest Hmong
population. The 2000 census counted 169,428 persons of Hmong
people. This number has been criticized for seriously undercounting
the actual population, which has been estimated to be anywhere
between 250,000 and 300,000. Other countries with significant
populations include:
Within
the United States, the Hmong population is centred in the Upper Midwest (Wisconsin
, Minnesota
) and California
.
Laos
The "Secret War"

General Vang Pao
In the early 1960s, the U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency's
(CIA)
Special Activities
Division began to recruit, train and lead the indigenous Hmong
people in Laos to join fighting the
Vietnam
War, named as a Special Guerrilla Unit led by General
Vang Pao. About 60% of the Hmong men in Laos were
supported by the CIA to join fighting for the
"Secret War" in Laos. The CIA used the
Special Guerrilla Unit as the counter attack unit to block the
Ho Chi Minh Trail, the main
military supply route from the north to the south.Hmong soldiers
put their lives at risk in the frontline fighting for the United
States to block the supply line and to rescue downed American
pilots. In 1967-1971, 3,772 Hmong soldiers were killed in the
frontline, 5,426 were injured and disabled. In 1962-1975, about
12,000 Hmong died fighting against
Pathet
Lao.
General
Vang Pao led the Region II (MR2) defense against NVA incursion from his headquarters in
Long
Cheng
, also known as Lima Site 20 Alternate (LS
20A). At the height of its activity, Long Cheng became the
second largest city in Laos. Long Cheng was a micro-nation
operational site with its own bank, airport, school system,
officials, and many other facilities and services in addition to
its military units. Before the end of the Secret War, Long Cheng
would fall in and out of General Vang Pao's control.
The Secret War began around the time that the U.S. became
officially involved in the Vietnam War. Following the U.S.
withdrawal from Vietnam in 1975, the Lao kingdom was overthrown by
the communists and the Hmong people became targets of retaliation
and persecution. While some Hmong people returned to their villages
and attempted to resume life under the new regime, thousands more
made the trek to and across the
Mekong
River into Thailand, often under attack. This marked the
beginning of a mass exodus of Hmong people from Laos. Those who did
make it to Thailand generally were held in squalid
United Nations refugee camps. Nearly 20 years
later, in the 1990s, a major international debate ensued over
whether the Hmong should be returned to Laos, where opponents of
their return argued they were being subjected to persecution, or
afforded the right to emigrate to the U.S. and other Western
nations.
Hmong Lao resistance
Of those Hmong who did not flee Laos, somewhere between two and
three thousand were sent to re-education camps where political
prisoners served terms of 3–5 years. Many Hmong died in these
camps, after being subjected to hard physical labor and harsh
conditions.
Thousands more Hmong people, mainly former
soldiers and their families, escaped to remote mountain regions -
particularly Phou
Bia
, the highest (and thus least accessible) mountain
peak in Laos. Initially, some Hmong groups staged attacks
against Pathet Lao and Vietnamese troops while others remained in
hiding to avoid military retaliation and persecution. Spiritual
leader
Zong Zoua Her rallied his
followers in a guerrilla resistance movement called Chao Fa
(
RPA: Cauj Fab). Initial
military successes by these small bands led to military
counter-attacks by government forces, including aerial bombing and
heavy artillery, as well as the use of defoliants and chemical
weapons.
Small groups of Hmong people, many of them second or third
generation descendants of former CIA soldiers, remain internally
displaced in remote parts of Laos, in fear of government reprisals.
Faced with continuing military operations against them by the
government and a scarcity of food, some groups have begun coming
out of hiding, while others have sought asylum in Thailand and
other countries.
Throughout the Vietnam War, and for two decades following it, the
U.S. government stated that there was no "Secret War" in Laos and
that the U.S. was not engaged in air or ground combat operations in
Laos. In the late 1990s, however, several U.S. conservatives,
alleging that the Clinton administration was using the denial of
this covert war to justify a
repatriation of Thailand-based Hmong war
veterans to Laos, urged the U.S. government to acknowledge the
existence of the Secret War and to honor the Hmong and U.S.
veterans from the war. On May 15, 1997, in a total reversal of U.S.
policy, the U.S. government acknowledged that it had supported a
prolonged air and ground campaign against the NVA and VietCong.
It
simultaneously dedicated the Laos
Memorial on the grounds of Arlington
National Cemetery
in honor of the Hmong and other combat veterans
from the Secret War.
Controversy over repatriation
In 1989, the
UNHCR, with
the support of the United States government, instituted the
Comprehensive Plan of
Action, a program to stem the tide of
Indochinese refugees from Laos, Vietnam, and
Cambodia. Under the plan, the status of the refugees was to be
evaluated through a screening process. Recognized asylum seekers
were to be given resettlement opportunities, while the remaining
refugees were to be repatriated under guarantee of safety.
After talks with the UNHCR and the Thai government, Laos agreed to
repatriate the 60,000 Lao refugees living in Thailand, including
several thousand Hmong people. Very few of the Lao refugees,
however, were willing to return voluntarily. Pressure to resettle
the refugees grew as the Thai government worked to close its
remaining refugee camps. While some Hmong people returned to Laos
voluntarily, with development assistance from UNHCR, allegations of
forced repatriation surfaced. Of those Hmong who did return to
Laos, some quickly escaped back to Thailand, describing
discrimination and brutal treatment at the hands of Lao
authorities.
In 1993, Vue Mai, a former Hmong soldier who had been recruited by
the U.S.
Embassy in Bangkok
to return to Laos as proof of the repatriation
program's success, disappeared in Vientiane
. According to the U.S. Committee for
Refugees, he was arrested by Lao security forces and was never seen
again.
Following the Vue Mai incident, debate over the Hmong's planned
repatriation to Laos intensified greatly, especially in the U.S.,
where it drew strong opposition from many
American conservatives and
some
human rights advocates.
In an
October 23, 1995 National
Review article, Michael Johns, the former Heritage Foundation foreign policy
expert and Republican White House
aide, labeled the Hmong's repatriation a Clinton administration "betrayal," describing
the Hmong as a people "who have spilled their blood in defense of
American geopolitical interests." Debate on the issue
escalated quickly. In an effort to halt the planned repatriation,
the Republican-led
U.S.
Senate and
U.S. House of
Representatives both appropriated funds for the remaining
Thailand-based Hmong to be immediately resettled in the U.S.;
Clinton, however, responded by promising a veto of the legislation.

In the 1990s, many Flower Hmong
switched from their traditional colourful dress to western
clothing.
In their opposition of the repatriation plans, Republicans also
challenged the Clinton administration's position that the Laotian
government was not systematically violating Hmong human rights.
U.S. Representative
Steve
Gunderson (R-WI), for instance, told a Hmong gathering: "I do
not enjoy standing up and saying to my government that you are not
telling the truth, but if that is necessary to defend truth and
justice, I will do that." Republicans also called several
Congressional hearings on alleged persecution of the Hmong in Laos
in an apparent attempt to generate further support for their
opposition to the Hmong's repatriation to Laos.
Although some accusations of forced repatriation were denied,
thousands of Hmong people refused to return to Laos. In 1996, as
the deadline for the closure of Thai refugee camps approached, and
under mounting political pressure, the U.S. agreed to resettle
Hmong refugees who passed a new screening process.
Around 5,000 Hmong
people who were not resettled at the time of the camp closures
sought asylum at Wat Tham
Krabok
, a Buddhist monastery in central Thailand where
more than 10,000 Hmong refugees were already living. The
Thai government attempted to repatriate these refugees, but the Wat
Tham Krabok Hmong refused to leave and the Lao government refused
to accept them, claiming they were involved in the
illegal drug trade and were of non-Lao
origin.
In 2003, following threats of forcible removal by the Thai
government, the U.S., in a significant victory for the Hmong,
agreed to accept 15,000 of the refugees. Several thousand Hmong
people, fearing forced repatriation to Laos if they were not
accepted for resettlement in the U.S., fled the camp to live
elsewhere within Thailand where a sizable Hmong population has been
present since the 19th-century.
In 2004
and 2005, thousands of Hmong fled from the jungles of Laos to a
temporary refugee camp in the Thai province of Phetchabun
. These Hmong refugees, many of whom are
descendants of the former-CIA Secret Army and their relatives,
claim that they have been attacked by both the Lao and Vietnamese
military forces operating inside Laos as recently as June 2006. The
refugees claim that attacks against them have continued almost
unabated since the war officially ended in 1975, and have become
more intense in recent years.
Lending further support to earlier claims that the government of
Laos was persecuting the Hmong, filmmaker
Rebecca Sommer documented first-hand accounts
in her documentary,
Hunted Like Animals, and in a
comprehensive report which includes summaries of claims made by the
refugees and was submitted to the U.N. in May 2006.
The European Union ,
UNHCHR,
UNHCR, and international groups have since spoken out
about the forced repatriation.
The Thai foreign ministry has said that it will halt deportation of Hmong refugees held in Detention Centers Nong Khai, while talks are underway to resettle them in Australia, Canada
, the Netherlands
and the United States.
For the time being, countries willing to resettle the refugees are
hindered to proceed with immigration and settlement procedures
because the Thai administration does not grant them access to the
refugees. Plans to resettle additional Hmong refugees in the U.S.
have been complicated by provisions of President Bush's
Patriot Act and
Real ID
Act, under which Hmong veterans of the Secret War, who fought
on the side of the United States, are classified as terrorists
because of their historical involvement in armed conflict.
Alleged plot to overthrow government of Laos
On June 4, 2007, as part of a lengthy and still ongoing federal
investigation labeled "Operation Flawed Eagle," warrants were
issued by U.S. federal courts ordering the arrest of Vang Pao and
nine others for plotting to overthrow the government of Laos in
violation of the federal
Neutrality
Acts and for multiple weapons charges. The federal charges
allege that members of the group inspected weapons, including
AK-47s, smoke
grenades,
and Stinger
missiles, with the intent of
purchasing them and smuggling them into Thailand in June 2007 where
they were intended to be used by Hmong resistance forces in Laos.
The one non-Hmong person of the nine arrested, Harrison Jack, a
1968 West Point graduate and retired Army infantry officer,
allegedly attempted to recruit
Special Operations veterans to act as
mercenaries.
In an effort to obtain the weapons, Jack allegedly met unknowingly
with undercover U.S. federal agents posing as weapons dealers,
which prompted the issuance of the warrants as part of a
long-running investigation into the activities of the U.S.-based
Hmong leadership and its supporters.
On June 15, the defendants were indicted by a grand jury and a
warrant was also issued for the arrest of an 11th man, allegedly
involved in the plot. Simultaneous raids of the defendants homes
and work locations, involving over 200 federal, state and local law
enforcement officials, were conducted in approximately 15 cities in
central and southern California.
The defendants face possible life prison terms for violation of the
Neutrality Acts and various weapons charges. They initially were
denied bail, with a federal court ruling that they were likely
flight risks, given their extensive connections, access to private
aircraft, and resources.
Multiple protest rallies in support of the suspects, designed to
raise awareness of the treatment of Hmong peoples in the jungles of
Laos, have taken place in California, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, and
several of Vang Pao's high-level supporters in the U.S. have
criticized the California court that issued the arrest warrants,
arguing that Vang is an historically important American ally and a
currently valued leader of U.S. and foreign-based Hmong. However,
calls for Californian Republican Governor
Arnold Schwarzenegger and former
President
George W. Bush to pardon the defendants have yet to be
answered, presumably pending a conclusion of the large and
still-ongoing federal investigation.
On September 18, 2009, the federal government dropped all charges
against Vang Pao, announcing in a release that the federal
government was permitted to consider "the probable sentence or
other consequences if the person is convicted.”
The Americas
Many
Hmong/Mong refugees resettled in the United States
after the Vietnam
War. Beginning in December 1975, the first Hmong/Mong
refugees arrived in the U.S., mainly from refugee camps in
Thailand; however, only 3,466 were granted asylum at that time
under the
Indochina
Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1975. In May 1976,
another 11,000 were allowed to enter the United States, and by 1978
some 30,000 Hmong/Mong people had immigrated. This first wave was
made up predominantly of men directly associated with General
Vang Pao's secret army. It was not until
the passage of the
Refugee Act of
1980 that families were able to enter the U.S., becoming the
second wave of Hmong/Mong immigrants.
Today, approximately
270,000 Hmong/Mong people reside in the United States, the
plurality of whom live in California
(65,095 according to the 2000 U.S. census),
Minnesota
(41,800), and Wisconsin
(33,791).Chico
, Fresno
, Eureka
, Banning
, Stockton
, and Sacramento
, California
; Detroit, Michigan
; Minneapolis
-Saint Paul, Minnesota
; Lowell, Massachusetts
; and Madison
, Milwaukee
, and Wausau
, Wisconsin have especially high concentrations of
Hmong/Mong people.
There are
smaller Hmong/Mong populations scattered across the country,
including Anchorage,
Alaska
, Missoula, Montana
;Northeastern Washington State[Spokane]; western
North Carolina (Charlotte
, Hickory
, and Morganton
); northeastern Georgia (Auburn
, Duluth
, Monroe
, Atlanta
, and Winder
); Linda Vista, California; Wisconsin
(Eau
Claire
, Appleton
, Green Bay
, La Crosse
, and Sheboygan
), Winooski, Vermont
; and Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania
, centered around the Pennsylvania
towns of Ephrata
and Denver
. There is also a small community of several
thousand Hmong who migrated to French Guiana
in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
Community leaders
Popular culture
See also
Notes
References
- [TYPN 1992] The section on nomenclature draws heavily on
Thai-Yunnan Project Newsletter, Number 17, June 1992,
Department of Anthropology, Australian National University.
Material from that newsletter may be freely reproduced with due
acknowledgement.
- W.R. Geddes. Migrants of the Mountains: The Cultural Ecology of
the Blue Miao (Hmong Njua) of Thailand. Oxford: The Clarendon
Press, 1976.
Earlier books
- Edkins, The Miau-tsi Tribes. Foochow: 1870.
- Henry, Lingnam. London: 1886.
- Bourne, Journey in Southwest China. London: 1888.
- A. H. Keaw, Man: Past and Present. Cambridge:
1900.
- Merritt, Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and
the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942–1992. Indiana: 1999.
External links
- HmongNet.org, list of Hmong-related web sites edited
by Mark Pfeifer of the Hmong Cultural Center.
- Hmong
Studies Internet Resource Center, including multimedia educational content about Hmong
culture.
- GaryYiaLee.com, articles on Hmong history and culture
by Hmong Australian anthropologist, Dr. Gary Yia Lee
- Hmong Contemporary Issues, articles on
Hmong culture, history, and other topics by Hmong French
Anthropologist & Linguist, Dr. Kao-Ly Yang (English, French,
and Hmong languages).
- Hmong History Timeline