American immigration
(emigration to the United States
of America) refers to the movement of non-residents to the United States
. Immigration has been a major source of
population growth and cultural
change throughout much of
American history.The economic,
social, and political aspects of
immigration have caused controversy regarding
ethnicity,
religion,
economic benefits,
job growth,
settlement patterns,
environmental impact,
impact on upward social
mobility,
levels of
criminality,
nationalities, political
loyalties, moral values, and
work
habits. As of 2006, the United States accepts more legal
immigrants as permanent residents than any other country in the
world. In 2006, the number of immigrants totaled 37.5
million.
A record 1,046,539 persons were
naturalized as U.S. citizens in 2008.
The
leading countries of birth of the new citizens were Mexico
, India
and the
Philippines
.
While an influx of new residents from different cultures presents
some challenges, "the United States has always been energized by
its immigrant populations..." At the 1998 commencement address at
Portland State University, U.S. president
Bill Clinton voiced support for immigrants,
including immigrants from Asia and Latin America when he said that
"America has constantly drawn strength and spirit from wave after
wave of immigrants...They have proved to be the most restless, the
most adventurous, the most innovative, the most industrious of
people.
Given the distance of North America from
Eurasia and the difficulty of travel before
commercial airlines, most historical U.S.
immigration was risky. Passenger aircraft have facilitated travel
to the United States since the 1960s, but migration remains
difficult, expensive and dangerous for those who cross the
United States–Mexico
border illegally.
Recent immigration-related legislation has called for increasing
enforcement of existing laws with regard to
illegal immigrants, building a
barrier along some or all of the
U.S.-Mexico border, or creating a new
guest
worker program. Through much of 2006, the country and Congress
was immersed in a debate about these proposals. As of March 2007,
few of these proposals had become law, though a partial border
fence was approved.
Many
cities, including Washington
D.C.
, New York
City
, Los
Angeles
, Chicago
, San Francisco
, San
Diego
, San Jose
, Salt Lake
City
, Phoenix
, Dallas
, Fort
Worth
, Houston
, Detroit
, Jersey City
, Minneapolis
, Miami
, Denver
, Baltimore
, Seattle
, Portland,
Oregon
and Portland, Maine
, have adopted sanctuary ordinances banning police from
asking people about their immigration status.
History
American immigration history can be viewed in four epochs: the
colonial period, the mid-nineteenth century, the turn of the
twentieth, and post-1965. Each epoch brought distinct national
groups - and races and ethnicities - to the United States. The
mid-nineteenth century saw mainly an influx from northern Europe;
the early twentieth-century mainly from Southern and Eastern
Europe; post-1965 mostly from Latin America and Asia. From 1836 to
1914, over 30 million Europeans migrated to the United
States.
Contemporary immigration
Until the 1930s, the gender imbalance among legal immigrants was
quite sharp, with most legal immigrants being male. As of the
1990s, however, women accounted for just over half of all legal
immigrants, indicating a shift away from the male dominated
immigration of the past.
Contemporary immigrants tend to be younger than the native
population of the United States, with people between the ages 15
and 34 substantially overrepresented. Immigrants are also more
likely to be married and less likely to be divorced than
native-born Americans of the same age.
Immigrants are likely to move to and live in areas populated by
people with similar backgrounds. This phenomenon has held true
throughout the history of immigration to the United States.
Three-quarters of immigrants surveyed by Public Agenda said they
intend to make the U.S. their permanent home. If they had to do it
over again, 80 percent of immigrants say they would still come to
the U.S. 50 percent of immigrants say the government has become
tougher on enforcing immigration laws since
9/11, and 30% report that they personally have
experienced discrimination.
[2018]
Public attitudes about immigration in the U.S. have been heavily
influenced by the aftermath of the
September 11, 2001 attacks. The
number of Americans who told the
Gallup
poll they wanted immigration restricted increased 20 percentage
points after the attacks.
[2019] Half of Americans say tighter controls
on immigration would do "a great deal" to enhance U.S. national
security, according to a
Public Agenda
survey.
[2020]
Public opinion surveys suggest that Americans see both the good and
bad sides of immigration.
[2021] A June 2006 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll
found the public evenly divided on the fundamental question of
whether immigration helps or hurts the country, with 44 percent
saying it helps and 45 percent saying it hurts the U.S.
[2022] Surveys show that the U.S. public has a far
more positive outlook about legal immigration than illegal
immigration. The public is less willing to provide government
services or legal protections to illegal immigrants. When survey
data is examined by race, African Americans are both more willing
to extend government services to illegal immigrants and more
worried about competition for jobs, according to the Pew Research
Center.
[2023]
Demography
Current immigration rates are moderate, even though America
admitted more legal immigrants from 1991 to 2000 (between 10-11
million) than in any previous decade. In the most recent decade,
the 10 million legal immigrants that settled in the U.S. represent
an annual growth of only about one-third of 1% (as the U.S.
population grew from 249 million to 281 million). By comparison,
the highest previous decade was 1901-1910 when 8.8 million people
arrived increasing the total U.S. population by 1 percent per year
as the U.S. population grew from 76 to 92 million during that
decade. Specifically, "nearly 15% of Americans were foreign-born in
1910, while in 1999, only about 10% were foreign-born."
"The racial and ethnic identity of the United States is - once
again - being remade. The 2000 Census counts some 28 million first
generation immigrants among us. This is the highest number in
history - often pointed out by anti-immigration lobbyists - but it
is not the highest percentage of the foreign-born in relation to
the overall population. In 1907, that ratio was 14 percent; today
it is 10 percent."
Legal immigration to the U.S. increased from 250,000 in the 1930s,
2.5 million in the 1950s, 4.5 million in the 1970s, and 7.3 million
in the 1980s to about 10 million in the 1990s. Since 2000, legal
immigrants to the United States number approximately 1,000,000 per
year, of whom about 600,000 are
Change of Status
immigrants who already are in the U.S. Legal immigrants to the
United States now are at their highest level ever at over
37,000,000 legal immigrants. Illegal immigration may be as high as
1,500,000 per year with a net of at least 700,000 illegal
immigrants arriving each year to join the 12,000,000 to 20,000,000
that are already there. (Pew Hispanic Data Estimates
[2024]) Immigration led to a 57.4% increase in foreign
born population from 1990 to 2000.
While immigration has increased drastically over the last century,
the foreign born share of the population was still higher in 1900
(about 20%) than it is today (about 10%). A number of factors may
be attributed to the decrease in the representation of foreign born
residents in the United States. Most significant has been the
change in the composition of immigrants. Prior to 1890, 82% of
immigrants came from north and western Europe. From 1891 to 1920,
that number dropped to 25%, with a rise in immigrants from East,
Central, and South Europe summing up to 64%. Animosity towards
these different and foreign immigrants rose in the United States,
resulting in much legislation to limit immigration.
Contemporary immigrants settle predominantly
in seven states: California
, New
York
, Florida
, Texas
, Pennsylvania
, New
Jersey
and Illinois
. These are all high foreign-born population
states, together comprising about 44% of the U.S. population as a
whole. The combined total immigrant population of these seven
states is much higher than what would be proportional, with 70% of
the total foreign-born population as of 2000. Of those who
immigrated between 2000 and 2005, 58% were from
Latin America.
Bureau figures show that the U.S. population grew by 2.8 million
between July 1, 2004, and July 1, 2005.
Hispanics accounted for 1.3
million of that increase. If current
birth
rate and immigration rates were to remain unchanged for another
70 to 80 years, the U.S. population would double to nearly 600
million. The Census Bureau's estimates actually go as high as
predicting that there will be one billion Americans in 2100,
compared with one million people in 1700 and 5.2 million in 1800.
Census statistics also show that 45% of children under age 5 are
from a
racial
or ethnic minority.
In 2006, a total of 1,266,264 immigrants became legal permanent
residents of the United States, up from 601,516 in 1987, 849,807 in
2000, and 1,122,373 in 2005.
The top twelve migrant-sending countries in
2006, by country of birth, were Mexico
(173,753),
People's
Republic of China
(87,345), Philippines
(74,607), India
(61,369),
Cuba
(45,614), Colombia
(43,151), Dominican Republic
(38,069), El Salvador
(31,783), Vietnam
(30,695),
Jamaica
(24,976),
South
Korea
(24,386), Guatemala
(24,146), Other countries - 606,370. In
fiscal year 2006, 202
refugees from
Iraq were allowed to resettle in the United States. Muslim
immigration to the U.S. is rising and in 2005 alone more people
from
Muslim countries became legal
permanent U.S. residents — nearly 96,000 — than in any year in the
previous two decades.
In 1900, when the U.S. population was 76 million, there were an
estimated 500,000
Hispanics. The
Census Bureau projects that by
2050, one-quarter of the population will be of Hispanic descent.
This demographic shift is largely fueled by
immigration from Latin America.
Origin

Rate of immigration to the United
States relative to sending countries' population size,
2001-2005

Projected regional growth rates using
birth, death, immigration, and emigration rates.
Latin America and Caribbean will be growing slower than US by
2024
Projected immigration 2000, 2004 and 2010:
| Top Ten Foreign
Countries - Foreign Born Population Among U.S.
Immigrants |
| Country |
#/year |
2000 |
2004 |
2010 |
2010, % |
| Mexico |
175,900 |
7,841,000 |
8,544,600 |
9,600,000 |
23.7% |
| China |
50,900 |
1,391,000 |
1,594,600 |
1,900,000 |
4.7% |
| Philippines |
47,800 |
1,222,000 |
1,413,200 |
1,700,000 |
4.2% |
| India |
59,300 |
1,007,000 |
1,244,200 |
1,610,000 |
4.0% |
| Vietnam |
33,700 |
863,000 |
997,800 |
1,200,000 |
3.0% |
| Cuba |
14,800 |
952,000 |
1,011,200 |
1,100,000 |
2.7% |
| El Salvador |
33,500 |
765,000 |
899,000 |
1,100,000 |
2.7% |
| Dominican Republic |
24,900 |
692,000 |
791,600 |
941,000 |
2.3% |
| Canada |
24,200 |
678,000 |
774,800 |
920,000 |
2.3% |
| Korea |
17,900 |
701,000 |
772,600 |
880,000 |
2.2% |
| Total Pop. Top 10 |
498,900 |
16,112,000 |
18,747,600 |
21,741,000 |
53.7% |
| Total Foreign Born |
940,000 |
31,100,000 |
34,860,000 |
40,500,000 |
100% |
| Historical Data from 2000
U.S. Census and 2004 Yearbook of
Immigrant Statistics |
- The average number of legal immigrants/year immigrating from
2000 to 2007
- The number of foreign born immigrants in the U.S. from 2000
census
- Year 2004 foreign born. Year 2000 foreign born plus 2000 to
2004 immigration
- Year 2010 foreign born projected assuming average number per
year is maintained
- Percent of foreign born from this country
- Legal immigration numbers as reported to immigration
authorities only
- Estimated illegal immigration numbers.
Immigration by state
| Percentage change in Foreign
Born Population 1990 to 2000 |
| North Carolina |
273.7% |
South Carolina |
132.1% |
Mississippi |
95.8% |
Wisconsin |
59.4% |
Vermont |
32.5% |
| Georgia |
233.4% |
Minnesota |
130.4% |
Washington |
90.7% |
New Jersey |
52.7% |
Connecticut |
32.4% |
| Nevada |
202.0% |
Idaho |
121.7% |
Texas |
90.2% |
Alaska |
49.8% |
New Hampshire |
31.5% |
| Arkansas |
196.3% |
Kansas |
114.4% |
New Mexico |
85.8% |
Michigan |
47.3% |
Ohio |
30.7% |
| Utah |
170.8% |
Iowa |
110.3% |
Virginia |
82.9% |
Wyoming |
46.5% |
Hawaii |
30.4% |
| Tennessee |
169.0% |
Oregon |
108.0% |
Missouri |
80.8% |
Pennsylvania |
37.6% |
North Dakota |
29.0% |
| Nebraska |
164.7% |
Alabama |
101.6% |
South Dakota |
74.6% |
California |
37.2% |
Rhode Island |
25.4% |
| Colorado |
159.7% |
Delaware |
101.6% |
Maryland |
65.3% |
New York |
35.6% |
West Virginia |
23.4% |
| Arizona |
135.9% |
Oklahoma |
101.2% |
Florida |
60.6% |
Massachusetts |
34.7% |
Montana |
19.0% |
| Kentucky |
135.3% |
Indiana |
97.9% |
Illinois |
60.6% |
Louisiana |
32.6% |
Maine |
1.1% |
|
| Source: U.S.
Census 1990 and 2000 |
Average change in U.S. from 1990 to 2000 was a 57.4% increase in
foreign population.
See:Census 2003 publications
[2025] for more complete information.
Effects of immigration
Demographics
Immigration is now what keeps America growing. According to the UN
the typical American woman today bears 1.93 children. That is below
the 2.1 "replacement" rate required to keep a population stable
over time, absent immigration. The Census Bureau estimates the US
population will grow from 281 million in 2000 to 397 mil in 2050
with expected immigration, but only to 328 mil with zero
immigration. "If we have zero immigration with today's low
birthrates the American population would eventually begin to
shrink.
A new report from the
Pew Research
Center projects that by 2050, non-Hispanic
whites will account for 47% of the
population, down from the 2005 figure of 67%. Non-Hispanic whites
made up85% of the population in 1960. It foresees the
Hispanic population rising
from 14% in 2005 to 29% by 2050. The
Asian population is expected to more than
triple by 2050. Overall, the population of the United States is due
to rise from 296 million in 2005 to 438 million, with 82% of the
increase coming from immigrants.
In 35 of the country's
50
largest cities, non-Hispanic
whites were at the last census or are
predicted to be in the minority.
In California
, non-Hispanic whites slipped from 80% of the
state's population in 1970 to 43% in 2006.
Economic
Hispanic immigrants across the United States are being hit hard by
the
subprime mortgage
crisis. There is a disproportionate level of foreclosures in
some immigrant neighborhoods.
The banking industry provided home loans to
undocumented
immigrants, viewing it as an untapped resource for growing
their own revenue stream.
In October 2008, KFYI
reported
that according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, five million illegal immigrants hold fraudulent home
mortgages. The story was later pulled from their website and
replaced with a correction. The
Phoenix Business Journal cited a
HUD spokesman saying there is no basis to news reports that more
than 5 million bad mortgages are held by illegal immigants, and
that the agency has no data showing the number of illegal
immigrants holding foreclosed or bad mortgages. Radio hosts
Rush Limbaugh and Lee Rodgers repeated
a variation of the claim without noting that HUD has reportedly
stated that this statistic is false.
Roger Hedgecock also repeated the incorrect
claim on
CNN's
Lou
Dobbs show.
At the June 13, 1998, Commencement Address at Portland State
University, president Bill Clinton said, "new immigrants are good
for America. They are revitalizing our cities...building our new
economy...strengthening our ties to the global economy, just as
earlier waves of immigrants settled on the new frontier and powered
the Industrial Revolution. They are energizing our culture and
broadening our vision of the world. They are renewing our most
basic values and reminding us all of what it truly means to be an
American."
Opinions vary about the economic effects of immigration. Those who
find that immigrants produce a negative effect on the U.S. economy
often focus on the difference between taxes paid and government
services received and wage-lowering effects among low-skilled
native workers, while those who find positive economics effects
focus on added productivity and lower costs to consumers for
certain goods and services.In a late 1980s study, economists
themselves overwhelmingly viewed immigration, including illegal
immigration, as a positive for the economy. According to James
Smith, a senior economist at Santa Monica-based
RAND Corporation and lead author of the
United States
National Research Council's study
"The
New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of
Immigration", immigrants contribute as much as $10 billion
to the
U.S. economy each year. The NRC
report found that although immigrants, especially those from Latin
America, were a net cost in terms of taxes paid versus social
services received, overall immigration was a net economic gain due
to an increase in pay for higher-skilled workers, lower prices for
goods and services produced by immigrant labor, and more efficiency
and lower wages for some owners of capital. The report also notes
that although immigrant workers compete with domestic workers for
some low skilled jobs, some immigrants specialize in activities
that otherwise would not exist in an area, and thus are performing
services that otherwise would not exist, and thus can be beneficial
to all domestic residents About 21 million immigrants, or about 15
percent of the labor force, hold jobs in the United States.
However, the number of unemployed is only seven million, meaning
that immigrant workers are not taking jobs from domestic workers.
Rather, they are doing jobs that would not have existed had the
immigrant workers not been in the United StatesLowenstein, Roger.
"The Immigration Equation." The New York Times 9 July 2006.
/www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/magazine/09IMM.html>.
U.S. Census
Bureau's
Survey of Business Owners: Hispanic-Owned Firms:
2002 indicated that the number of Hispanic-owned businesses in
the United States grew to nearly 1.6 million in 2002. Those
Hispanic-owned businesses generated about $222 billion in revenue.
The report notes that the burden of poor immigrants is not born
equally among states, and is most heavy in California. Another
claim that those supporting current and expanded immigration levels
is that immigrants mostly do jobs Americans don't want. A 2006
Pew Hispanic Center report added
evidence to support that claim when they found that increasing
immigration levels have not hurt employment prospects for American
workers.
In
2009, a study by the
Cato Institute, a
free
market think tank, found that
legalization of low-skilled illegal resident workers in the US
would result in a net increase in US GDP of $180 billion over ten
years.
Jason Riley notes that because of progressive income taxation, in
which the top 1% of earners pay 37% of federal income taxes, 60% of
Americans collect more in government services than they pay in.
Thus, it is not remarkable that some immigrants would do the same.
In any event, the typical immigrant and his children will pay a net
$80,000 more in their lifetimes than they collect in government
services, according to the NAS.
The Kauffman Foundation’s index of entrepreneurial activity is
nearly 40% higher for immigrants than for natives. Immigrants were
involved in the founding of many prominent American high-tech
companies, such as Google, Yahoo, Sun Microsystems, and eBay.
On the poor end of the spectrum, the "New Americans" report found
that low-skill low wage immigration does not, on aggregate, lower
the wages of most domestic workers. The report also addresses the
question of if immigration affects black Americans differently from
the population in general: "While some have suspected that blacks
suffer disproportionately from the inflow of low-skilled
immigrants, none of the available evidence suggests that they have
been particularly hard-hit on a national level. Some have lost
their jobs, especially in places where immigrants are concentrated.
But the majority of blacks live elsewhere, and their economic
fortunes are tied to other factors."
Robert Samuelson points out that poor immigrants strain public
services such as local schools and health care. He points out that
"from 2000 to 2006, 41 percent of the increase in people without
health insurance occurred among Hispanics." According to the
immigration reduction advocacy group
Center for Immigration
Studies, 25.8% of Mexican immigrants live in poverty — more
than double the rate for natives in 1999. In another report,
The Heritage Foundation
notes that from 1990 to 2006, the number of poor Hispanics
increased 3.2 million, from 6 million to 9.2 million.
Brain drain has cost
Africa over $4 billion in the employment of 150,000
expatriate professionals annually. According to
UNDP, "Ethiopia lost
75% of its skilled workforce between 1980 and 1991," which harms
the ability of such nations to get out of poverty.
There are more
Ethiopian doctors in Chicago
than there
are in Ethiopia. The UNDP estimates that India
loses $2
billion a year because of the emigration of computer experts to the
U.S. Over 80% of Jamaicans
with higher education live abroad. However,
it is noted that these nationals pay valuable
remittances. In Jamaica, the money sent back
amounts to 18% of
GNP.
Social
The more contact a native-born American has with immigrants,
typically the more positive view of immigrants one has. The less
contact a native-born American has with immigrants, the more likely
one would have a negative view of immigrants.
Benjamin Franklin opposed German immigration, stating that they
would not assimilate into the culture. Irish immigration was
opposed in the 1850s by the
Nativist/
Know Nothing
movement, originating in New York in 1843. It was engendered by
popular fears that the country was being overwhelmed by Irish
Catholic immigrants.
In 1891, a lynch mob stormed a local jail
and hanged several Italians following the
acquittal of several Sicilian immigrants alleged to be involved in
the murder of New
Orleans
police chief David
Hennessy. The Congress passed the
Emergency Quota Act in 1921, followed by
the
Immigration Act of 1924.
The Immigration Act of 1924 was aimed at further restricting the
Southern and Eastern Europeans who had begun to enter the country
in large numbers beginning in the 1890s. Systematic bias against
Japanese and German immigrants emerged during and after
World War II. Irish and Jewish immigrants were
popular targets early in the 20th century and most recently
immigrants from Latin American countries are often viewed with
hostility. Some Americans have not completely adjusted to the
largely non-European immigration and racism does occur. After
September 11, many
Middle Eastern
immigrants and those perceived to be of Middle Eastern origins were
targets of hate crimes.
Minority
racism, on the other hand, is
sometimes considered controversial because of theories of
power in society. Racist thinking among
and between minority groups does occur, examples of this are
conflicts between blacks and
Korean
immigrants (notably in the
1992
Los Angeles Riots) or between
African Americans and the mostly non-white
Latino immigrants.
There has been a long
running racial tension between African
American and Mexican prison gangs
and significant riots in California
prisons where Mexican inmates and African Americans have
targeted each other particularly, based on racial reasons.
There have been reports of racially motivated attacks against
African Americans who have moved
into neighborhoods occupied mostly by people of Mexican descent,
and vice versa. There has also been an increase in violence between
European Americans and Latino
immigrants, and between
African immigrants and
African Americans. There are also
tensions between native-born Hispanic Americans and newly-arrived
Latino immigrants.
Political
Immigrants differ on their political views; however, the
Democratic Party is
considered to be in a far stronger position among immigrants
overall. However, immigrants are similar to the broader US
population in that their religious affiliation can significantly
impact both their social values and votes. Hispanic evangelicals,
for example, are even more strongly conservative than non-Hispanic
evangelicals . This trend is often similar for Hispanics or others
strongly identifying with
Catholicism - a
religion that strongly opposes abortion and gay marriage.
Health
Another topic that is widely discussed relates to the issue of the
health of immigrants and the associated cost to the public of their
use of public health services. Immigrants, legal and illegal, use
the public health care system, particularly emergency room
services. The non-emergency use of emergency rooms ostensibly
indicates an incapacity to pay, yet some studies allege
disproportionately lower access to — and usage of — unpaid health
care by immigrants. For this and other reasons, there have been
various disputes about how much immigration is costing the United
States public health system.
University
of Maryland
economist and Cato
Institute scholar, Julian
Lincoln Simon, concluded in 1995 that although overall,
immigrants probably pay more into the health system than they take
out, this is not likely the case for elderly immigrants and many
refugees, who are more dependent on public services for
survival.
Immigration from areas of high incidence of disease is thought to
have fueled the resurgence of
tuberculosis (TB),
chagas, and
hepatitis in
areas of low incidence. According to
Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), TB cases among foreign-born
individuals remain disproportionately high, at nearly nine times
the rate of U.S.-born persons. To reduce the risk of
diseases
in low-incidence areas, the main countermeasure has been the
screening of immigrants on arrival.
HIV/AIDS entered the United States
in about 1969 likely through a single infected
immigrant fromHaiti
.
Conversely, many new HIV infections in Mexico can be traced back to
the United States. People infected with HIV were banned from
entering the United States in 1987 by executive order, but the 1993
statue supporting the ban was lifted in 2009. The executive branch
is expected to administratively remove HIV from the list of
infectious diseases barring immigration (but immigrants generally
need to show they would not be a burden on public welfare).
Researchers have found what is called the "healthy immigrant
effect," in which immigrants in general tend to be healthier
(mental health, healthy nutrition) than individuals born in the
U.S.
Various researchers have criticized the position held by Simon and
others that increased U.S. population growth is sustainable.
David
Pimentel, professor of ecology and agriculture at Cornell
University
, and Mario Giampietro, senior researcher at the
National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition (INRAN), place in
their study Food, Land, Population and the U.S.
Economy the maximum U.S. population for a
sustainable economy at 200 million. To
achieve a sustainable economy the United States must reduce its
population by at least one-third. Current U.S. population of more
than 300 million and U.S. population growth of approximately three
million people each year, partly fueled by immigration, are
unsustainable, says study.
Perceived heavy immigration, especially in the southwest, has led
to some fears about population pressures on the water supply in
some areas.
California
continues to grow by more than a half million a
year and is expected to reach 48 million in 2030. According
to the
California Department
of Water Resources, if more supplies are not found by 2020,
residents will face a
water shortfall
nearly as great as the amount consumed today.
Los Angeles
is a coastal desert able to support at most one
million people on its own water. California is considering
using
desalination to solve this
problem.
Crime
Empirical studies on links between immigration and crime are mixed.
Certain studies have suggested that immigrants are underrepresented
in criminal statistics.
An Op-Ed in The New York Times by Harvard
University
Professor in Sociology Robert J. Sampson says that immigration of Hispanics may in fact
be associated with decreased crime. A 1999 paper by John Hagan and
Alberto Palloni estimated that the involvement in crime by Hispanic
immigrants are less than that of other citizens.
Immigrants, both legal and illegal do not raise the rate of crime
in the United States and native born Americans are five times more
likely to be incarcerated than immigrants. In a study released by
the non-partisan research group The Public Policy Institute of
California immigrants (legal and illegal) were ten times less
likely to be incarcerated than native born Americans.
In his 1999 book
Crime and Immigrant Youth, sociologist
Tony Waters writes that immigrants themselves are less likely to be
arrested and incarcerated. He also noted, however, that the
children of some immigrant groups are more likely to be arrested
and incarcerated. This is a by-product of the strains that emerge
between immigrant parents living in
poor inner city neighborhoods, and their sons.
According to
Bureau of
Justice Statistics, for example, as of 2001, 4% of Hispanic
males in their twenties and thirties were in
prison or jail, compared with
1.8% of white males. Hispanic men are almost four times as likely
to go to prison at some point in their lives aswhite males,
although less likely than African American males.
There were an estimated 30,000
street gang and more than 800,000
gang members active across the U.S. in 2007, up from 731,500 in
2002. New immigrants are susceptible to gang influences and
activities because of language barriers, employment difficulties,
support, protection, and fear.
Environment
Some commentators have suggested that increased immigration has a
negative effect on the environment, especially as the level of
economic development of the United States (and by extension, its
energy, water and other needs that underpin its prosperity) means
that the impact of a larger population is greater than what would
be experienced in other countries. There is, however, no empirical
evidence linking immigration to the degradation of the
environment.
Americans constitute approximately 5% of the
world's population, but produce roughly 25%
of the world’s
CO2, consume about 25%
of
world’s resources, including
approximately 26% of the
world's energy, although
having only around 3% of the world’s known
oil reserves, and generate
approximately 30% of
world’s waste. The
average American's impact on the
environment is approximately 250
times greater than the average
Sub-Saharan African's.
With
current consumption patterns, population growth in the United States
is therefore more of a threat
to the Earth's environment than population growth in any other part
of the world. (currently, at least 1.8 million legal and
illegal immigrants settle in the United States each year; with the
average
Hispanic
woman giving
birth to 3
children in her lifetime. Though, "on the other hand, a substantial
portion of immigrants (about 30 percent) return to their country of
origin, presumably taking at least their younger children with
them, thus substantially mitigating the effect of their higher
fertility.") . Overall, immigrants to the United States, and their
first-generation of
children, currently account for two-thirds of the country's
population growth.
Paul Ehrlich made the point that a
state or nation may have a large land area or considerable wealth
(which implies, by conventional wisdom, that
overpopulation should not be at play), and
yet be overpopulated.
The U.S. state of Arizona
, for example, has enormous land area, but has
neither the carrying capacity of
arable land or potable water to support its growing
population. While it imports food, using its wealth to
offset this shortfall, that only serves to illustrate that it has
insufficient carrying capacity.
The only way that Arizona (and Southern California) obtains sufficient
water is by extraction of water from the Colorado River
beyond its fair share (and beyond its own carrying
capacity of innate water resources), based on international
standards of fair use per lineal mile of river.
Education
Forty percent of Ph.D. scientists working in the United States were
born abroad .
Immigrant children have historically been greatly affected by
cultural misunderstanding, language barriers, and feelings of
isolation within the school atmosphere. More recently, however,
immigrant children are finding a more welcoming school atmosphere.
This does not undermine the difficulties immigrants face upon
entering U.S. schools. Immigrant children maintain their native
tongue which can leave them feeling disadvantaged within English
speaking schools.
Public opinion
| Group |
Good |
Bad |
| English |
66% |
6% |
| Irish |
62% |
7% |
| Jews |
59% |
9% |
| Germans |
57% |
11% |
| Italians |
56% |
10% |
| Poles |
53% |
12% |
| Japanese |
47% |
18% |
| Blacks |
46% |
16% |
| Chinese |
44% |
19% |
| Mexicans |
25% |
34% |
| Koreans |
24% |
30% |
| Vietnamese |
20% |
38% |
| Puerto Ricans |
17% |
43% |
| Haitians |
10% |
39% |
| Cubans |
9% |
59% |
in 1982, an
opinion poll organization
showed respondents a card listing a number of groups and asked,
"Thinking both of what they have contributed to this country and
have gotten from this country, for each one tell me whether you
think, on balance, they've been a good or a bad thing for this
country.", producing results shown in the table.
"By high margins, Americans are telling pollsters it was a very
good thing that Poles, Italians, and Jews emigrated to America.
Once again, it's the newcomers who are viewed with suspicion. This
time, it's the Mexicans, the Filipinos, and the people from the
Caribbean who make Americans nervous."
In 2006 the immigration-reduction advocacy think tank the
Center for Immigration
Studies released a poll that found 68% of Americans said US
immigration levels are too high, and just 2% said they are too low.
They also found that 70% said they are less likely to vote for
candidates that favor increasing legal immigration.
In 2004, 55% of Americans believe legal immigration should remain
at the current level or increased and 41% say it should be
decreased.
In a 2002 study that occurred soon after 9/11 where 55% of
Americans favored decreasing legal immigration, 27% favored keeping
it at the same level, and 15% favored increasing it.
In 1996, 70% of Americans wanted immigration reduced to 300,000
annually and 20% wanted to halt allimmigration.
One of the most important factors regarding public opinion about
immigration is the level of
unemployment;
anti-immigrant sentiment is highest where unemployment is highest
and vice-versa.
Legal issues
Laws concerning immigration and naturalization
Laws concerning immigration and naturalization are mainly:
The 1990 Immigration Act (IMMACT) limits the annual number of
immigrants to 700,000. It emphasizes that family reunification is
the main immigration criteria, in addition to employment-related
immigration.
The
Antiterrorism
and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and
Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA)
exemplifies many categories of criminal activity for which
immigrants, including
green card holders,
can be deported and imposed
mandatory detention for certain types of
deportation cases.
Visas
Asylum for refugees
In contrast to economic migrants, who generally do not gain legal
admission,
refugees, as defined by
international law, can gain legal status through a process of
seeking and receiving
asylum, either
by being designated a refugee while abroad or by physically
entering the United States and requesting asylee status thereafter.
A specified number of
legally defined
refugees, who either apply for asylum overseas or after arriving in
the U.S., are admitted annually. Refugees compose about one-tenth
of the total annual immigration to the United States, though some
large refugee populations are very prominent.
Since
World War II, more refugees have
found homes in the U.S. than any other nation and more than 2
million refugees have arrived in the U.S. since 1980. Of the top
ten countries accepting resettled refugees in 2006, the United
States accepted more than twice as much as the next nine countries
combined.
For example, Japan
accepted
just 16 refugees in 1999, while the United States took in 85,010
for resettlement, according to the United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).
The U.S. will accept 70,000 refugees in fiscal year 2007, and
President
Bush stated that his
eventual goal is a program that resettles 90,000 refugees in the
United States each year. In 2006, the State Department officially
re-opened the
Vietnamese resettlement
program. In recent years, the main refugee sending-region has been
Africa (Somalia, Liberia, Sudan, Ethiopia). A
July 22, 2007 article notes that in the past nine months only 133
of the planned 7000
Iraqi refugees
were allowed into the United States. The ceiling for refugee
resettlement for fiscal year 2008 is 80,000 refugees. The United
States expects to admit a minimum of 17,000 Iraqi refugees in
fiscal year 2009.
In
1991-92, Bhutan
expelled
roughly 100,000 ethnic Nepalis
, most of whom have been living in seven refugee
camps in eastern Nepal ever since. At present, the
United
States
is working towards resettling more than 60,000 of
these refugees in the US as third country settlement
programme.
Miscellaneous documented immigration
In
removal proceedings
(deportation) in front of an
immigration judge,
cancellation of removal is a form of
relief that is available for certain long-time residents of the
United States. It allows a person being faced with the threat of
removal to obtain permanent residence if that person: (1) has been
physically present in the U.S. for at least ten years, (2) has had
good moral character during that period, (3) has not been convicted
of certain crimes, and (4) can show that removal would result in
exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his or her U.S.
citizen/permanent resident spouse, children, or parent. This form
of relief is only available when a person is served with a Notice
to Appear (like a civil summons) to appear in the proceedings in
the
Immigration Court. Many
persons have received their green cards in this way even when
removal or deportation was imminent.
Members of Congress may submit
private
bills granting residency to specific named individuals. A
special committee vets the requests, which require extensive
documentation. Congress has bestowed the title of "
Honorary Citizen of the
United States" to six people. The only two living recipients
were
Winston Churchill and
Agnes Gonxha Bojaxhiu (Mother
Teresa), the other instances were posthumous honors.
The
Central Intelligence
Agency has the statutory authority to admit up to one hundred
people a year outside of normal immigration procedures, and to
provide for their settlement and support. The program is called
"PL110" after the legislation that created the agency,
Public Law 110, the
Central Intelligence Agency
Act.
Illegal immigration
Illegal immigration has recently
resurfaced as a major political issue. Various bills are in the
United States Congress either to provide for legalization and
amnesty of those present in the country illegally, or to crack down
on employers that hire undocumented workers and build a wall along
the Mexican border.
The
Illegal
immigrant population of the United States is estimated to be
between 7 and 20 million.
The majority of the illegal immigrants are
from Mexico
.
The
U.S. Census Bureau estimated that 8.7 million
illegal immigrants were living in the United States in 2000.
Immigration in popular culture

1888 cartoon in
Puck attacks
businessmen for welcoming large numbers of low paid immigrants,
leaving the American workingman unemployed
The history of immigration to the United States of America is the
history of the United States itself, and the journey from beyond
the sea is an element found in the
American myth, appearing over and over
again in everything from
The
Godfather to
Gangs of New
York to "
The Song of Myself"
to
Neil Diamond's "America" to the
animated feature An American Tail.
As in many myths, the immigrant story has been exaggerated.
Immigrants, including new colonists from before the establishment
of the United States as a separate country, were never more than
15% of the population and usually considerably less. Immigrants
were often poor and uneducated but the succeeding generations took
advantage of the opportunities offered. The reality is even more
amazing than the myth in some ways as the succeeding generations
learn how to cooperate or at least tolerate each other to build a
strong system of shared core beliefs that has succeeded far beyond
its original founders would have ever believed possible.
Immigration in literature
Interpretive perspectives
The
American Dream is the
belief that through hard work and determination, any United States
immigrant can achieve a better life, usually in terms of financial
prosperity and enhanced personal freedom of choice. This Dream has
been a major factor in attracting immigrants to the United States.
According to historians, the rapid economic and industrial
expansion of the U.S. is not simply a function of being a resource
rich, hard working, and inventive country, but the belief that
anybody could get a share of the country's wealth if he or she was
willing to work hard. Many have also argued that the basis of the
American greatness is how the country began without a rigid class
structure at a time when other countries in Africa, Europe, China,
India and Latin America had much more stratified social
structures.
Legal perspectives
Hiroshi Motomura, University of North Carolina law professor and
nationally recognized expert on citizenship and immigration, has
identified three approaches America has taken to the legal status
of immigrants (considering only legal immigrants) in his book
Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of Immigration and
Citizenship in the United States. The first, dominant in the
19th century, treated immigrants as in transition—that is, as
prospective citizens. As soon as people declared their intention to
become citizens, and before the five year wait was over, they
received multiple low cost benefits, including eligibility for free
homesteads (in the
Homestead Act of
1869), and in many states the right to vote. The goal was to make
America attractive so large numbers of farmers and skilled
craftsmen would settle new lands. By the 1880s, a second approach
took over, treating newcomers as "immigrants by contract." An
implicit deal existed whereby immigrants who were literate and
could earn their own living were permitted in restricted numbers
(with the exception of Asians). Once in the United States, they
would have somewhat limited legal rights, but were not allowed to
vote until they became citizens, and would not be eligible for the
New Deal government benefits available in the 1930s. The third more
recent policy is "immigration by affiliation," Motomura argues,
whereby the treatment in part depends on how deeply rooted people
have become in America. An immigrant who applies for citizenship as
soon as permitted, has a long history of working in the United
States, and has significant family ties (such as American-born
children), is more deeply affiliated and can expect better
treatment.
See also
General
Laws
History
United States
Controversy
References
- 2004 Year Book of Immigration Statistics [2026]
- Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times
to 1970 [2027]
- The Foreign-Born Population: 2000; U.S.
Census [2028]
- Virginia Library Geostat Center Census Data
[2029]
- The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal
Effects of Immigrationl Edited by James P. Smith and Barry
Edmonston, National Science Foundation ISBN 0-309-06356-6. [2030]
Secondary sources
- Archdeacon, Thomas J. Becoming American: An Ethnic
History (1984)
- Bankston, Carl L. III and Danielle Antoinette Hidalgo, eds.
Immigration in U.S. History Salem Press,
(2006)
- Berthoff, Rowland Tappan.
British Immigrants in Industrial America, 1790-1950
(1953).
- Bodnar, John. The Transplanted: A History of Immigrants in
Urban America Indiana University Press, (1985)
- Briggs, John. An Italian Passage: Immigrants to Three
American Cities, 1890-1930 Yale University Press, (1978)
- Daniels, Roger. Asian America: Chinese and Japanese in the
United States since 1850 University of Washington Press,
(1988)
- Daniels, Roger. Coming to America 2nd ed. (2005)
- Daniels, Roger. Guarding the Golden Door : American
Immigration Policy and Immigrants since 1882 (2005)
- Diner, Hasia. The Jews of the
United States, 1654 to 2000 (2004)
- Diner, Hasia. Hungering for
America: Italian, Irish, and Jewish Foodways in the Age of
Migration (2003)
- Eltis, David; Coerced and Free Migration: Global
Perspectives (2002) emphasis on migration to Americas before
1800
- Gjerde, Jon, ed. Major Problems
in American Immigration and Ethnic History (1998) primary
sources and excerpts from scholars.
- Glazier, Michael, ed. The Encyclopedia of the Irish in
America (1999), articles by over 200 experts, covering both
Catholics and Protestants.
- Greene, Victor R. A Singing Ambivalence: American
Immigrants Between Old World and New, 1830-1930 (2004), coving
musical traditions
- Isaac Aaronovich Hourwich. Immigration and Labor: The Economic Aspects of
European Immigration to the United States (1912) full text
online]
- Joseph, Samuel; Jewish Immigration to the United States
from 1881 to 1910 Columbia University Press, (1914)
- Kulikoff, Allan; From British Peasants to Colonial American
Farmers (2000), details on colonial immigration
- Meagher, Timothy J. The Columbia Guide to Irish American
History. (2005)
- Miller, Kerby M. Emigrants and Exiles (1985),
influential scholarly interpretation of Irish immigration
- Motomura, Hiroshi. Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of
Immigration and Citizenship in the United States (2006), legal
history
- Pochmann, Henry A. and Arthur R. Schultz; German Culture in
America, 1600-1900: Philosophical and Literary Influences
(1957)
- Sowell, Thomas. Ethnic America: A History (1981), by a
conservative economist
- Thernstrom, Stephan, ed. Harvard Encyclopedia of American
Ethnic Groups (1980) (ISBN 0-674-37512-2), the standard
reference, covering all major groups and most minor groups
- Waters, Tony. Crime and Immigrant Youth Sage
Publications (1999), a sociological analysis.
- U.S. Immigration Commission, Abstracts of Reports, 2
vols. (1911); the full 42-volume report is summarized (with
additional information) in Jeremiah W. Jenks and W. Jett Lauck,
The Immigrant Problem (1912; 6th ed. 1926)
- Wittke, Carl. We Who Built America: The Saga of the
Immigrant (1939), covers all major groups
- Yans-McLaughlin, Virginia ed. Immigration Reconsidered:
History, Sociology, and Politics Oxford University Press.
(1990)
Notes
- U.S. population hits 300 million
- Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants in
the United States
- Stephen Ohlemacher, Number of Immigrants Hits Record 37.5M,
Washington
Post
- “Naturalizations in the United States: 2008â€.
Office of Immigration
Statistics Annual Flow Report.
- Mary E. Williams, Immigration. (San Diego: GreenHaven
Press) 2004. Page 69.
- Indirect passage from Europe. Journal for
Maritime Research.
- The New Americans, Smith and Edmonston, The
Academy Press. Page 5253.
- The New Americans, Smith and Edmonston, The
Academy Press. Page 54.
- The New Americans, Smith and Edmonston, The
Academy Press. Page 56.
- The New Americans, Smith and Edmonston, The
Academy Press. Page 58 ("Immigrants have always moved to relatively
few places, settling where they have family or friends, or where
there are people from their ancestral country or community.").
- Mary E. Williams, Immigration. (San Diego: GreenHaven
Press) 2004. Page 82.
- Know the flow - economics of immigration
- Illegal immigrants in the US: How many are
there?
- Characteristics of the Foreign Born in the United
States: Results from Census 2000
- 300 Million and Counting
- U.S. Census Bureau: Nation’s Population One-Third
Minority
- US population to 'double by 2100',
BBC
- Balancing Act: Can America Sustain a Population of 500
Million -- Or Even a Billion -- by 2100?
- Census Bureau Projects Doubling of Nation's Population by
2100
- U.S. Population Is Now One-Third Minority -
Population Reference Bureau
- Beneath the surface, Americans are deeply
ambivalent about diversity
- US Faced with a Mammoth Iraq Refugee
Crisis
- United States Unwelcoming to Iraqi
Refugees
- More Muslims Arrive in U.S., After 9/11
Dip
- The People Perceived as a Threat to Security: Arab
Americans Since September 11
- Latinos and the Changing Face of America -
Population Reference Bureau
- More than 100 million Latinos in the U.S. by
2050
- US - Census figures show dramatic growth in Asian,
Hispanic populations
- Population Growth And Immigration, U.S. Has Highest
Population Growth Rate Of All Developed Nations - CBS News
- Pew Hispanic Center [1] [2], (The Underground Labor Force Is Rising To The
Surface)[3]
- Mary E. Williams, Immigration. (San Diego: Greenhaven
Press, 2004). Page 83.
- Pew Research Center: Immigration to Play Lead Role
In Future U.S. Growth
- U.S. Hispanic population to triple by 2050,
USATODAY.com
- Study Sees Non-Hispanic Whites Shrinking to
Minority Status in U.S. - February 12, 2008, The New York
Sun
- Whites to become minority in U.S. by 2050,
Reuters
- Whites Now A Minority In California, Census:
Non-Hispanic Whites Now 47% Of State's Population, CBS
News
- The Best Story of Our Lives
- Immigrants hit hard by slowdown, subprime
crisis
- Banks help illegal immigrants own their own
home, CNN/Money, August 8, 2005
- HUD: Five Million Fraudulent Mortgages Held by
Illegals
-
http://kfyi.com/pages/money-matters.html?feed=268721&article=4381201
-
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2008/10/06/daily54.html?ana=from_rss
- http://mediamatters.org/items/200810130015
- http://mediamatters.org/items/200810100018
- National Poverty Center - The University of
Michigan
- The Seattle Times: Some blacks say Latino
immigrants taking their jobs
- Suarez-Orozco, Carola and Suarez-Orozco, Marcelo (2001)
Children of Immigration. Harvard University Press
pages 41-45
- Survey results reported in Simon, Julian L. (1989) The
Economic Consequences of Immigration Boston: Basil
Blackwell are discussed widely and available as of September 12,
2007 at a Cato group policy paper by Simon here. They find that 81 percent of the economists
surveyed felt that 20th century immigration had very favorable
effects, and 74 percent felt that illegal immigration had positive
effects, with 76 percent feeling that recent immigration has "about
the same effect" as immigrants from past years.
- The Immigration Debate / Effect on Economy
- James p. Smith, Chair. The New Americans: Economic,
Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration (1997)
Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
(CBASSE), National Academy of Sciences. page 5
- U.S. Census Press Releases
- Smith (1997) 7,8
- Perez, Miguel (2006) "Hire education: Immigrants aren't taking
jobs from Americans" Chicago Sun-Times Aug. 22, 2006, available
here
- http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb108/hb108-63.pdf
- http://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/cea_immigration_062007.pdf
-
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jun2007/db20070606_792054.htm
- Smith (1997) page 6
- Samuelson, Robert (2007) "Importing poverty" Washington Post,
September 5, 2007 (Accessible as of September 12, 2007 here)
- Center for Immigration Studies
- Importing Poverty: Immigration and Poverty in the
United States: A Book of Charts
- Brain drain in Africa
- More Ethiopia doctors in Chicago than
Ethiopia
- Brain drain costs Asia billions , BBC News
- Study finds small developing lands hit hardest by
'brain drain', DUGGER, Celia, New York Times, 25 October
2005
- Brain drain or export earnings? -
BBCCaribbean.com
- Summary
-
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/documents/documents_p2.cfm?doc=233
- The black-Latino blame game
- Gang rivalry grows into race war
- Race relations | Where black and brown collide |
Economist.com
- Riot Breaks Out At Calif. High School, Melee
Involving 500 People Erupts At Southern California School
- JURIST - Paper Chase: Race riot put down at
California state prison
- Racial segregation continues in California
prisons
- A bloody conflict between Hispanic and black
American gangs is spreading across Los Angeles
- The Hutchinson Report: Thanks to Latino Gangs,
There’s a Zone in L.A. Where Blacks Risk Death if They
Enter
- African immigrants face bias from blacks
- Tension between U.S.-born Latinos, immigrants stems
from differences in language, values and education
- Hispanics turning back to Democrats for 2008 -
USATODAY.com
- Exit Poll of 4,600 Asian American Voters Reveals
Robust Support for Democratic Candidates in Key Congressional and
State Races
- [4]
- Brown, Richard, et al. (1998) "Access to Health Insurance and
Health Care for Mexican American Children in Immigrant Families" In
Marcelo M. Suarez-Orozco, ed. Crossings: Mexican
Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge,
Mass.: David
Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and Harvard
University Press pages 225-247
- in fact, Simon, Juliana (1995) "Immigration: The Demographic
and Economic Facts". Washington, D.C.: The Cato Institute and
National Immigration Forum (available here) finds that estimates of the cost of
public health care provided to undocumented immigrants that have
been used by the press have been extremely inflated
- Simon (1995)
- National Institutes of Health. Medical Encyclopedia Accessed 9/25/2006
- Tuberculosis in the United States, 2004
- U.S. tuberculosis cases at an all-time low in 2006, but
drug resistance remains a threat
- Tuberculosis among US Immigrants
- AIDS virus invaded U.S. from Haiti: study
- Key HIV strain 'came from Haiti'
-
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/17/world/americas/17mexico.html?hp
Mexican Migrants Carry H.I.V. Home
-
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113704086
- What Happens to the "Healthy Immigrant
Effect"
- notably, National Research Council. (1997) "From Generation to
Generation: The Health and Well-Being of Children in Immigrant
Families". Washington D.C.: National Academy Press (Available
here
- Eating Fossil Fuels | EnergyBulletin.net
- Threat to our food security
- See, for instance, immigration reform group Federation for
American Immigration Reform,s page on Immigration & U.S. Water Supply
- A World Without Water -Global Policy Forum-
NGOs
- Immigration & U.S. Water Supply
- State looks to the sea for drinkable water
- On immigration and Crime
- [5]
- John Hagan, Alberto Palloni. [6] Sociological Criminology and the Mythology
of Hispanic Immigration and Crime]. Social Problems, Vol. 46, No. 4
(Nov., 1999), pp. 617-632
- Rumbaut G. Ruben and Ewing A. Walter, The Myth of Immigrant
Criminality and the Paradox of Assimilation,[7]
- California: Study of Immigrants and Crime - New
York Times
- The Immigrant Gang Plague by Heather Mac Donald, City
Journal Summer 2004
- Hispanic prisoners in the United States
- COPS Office: Gangs
- L.A. Gangs: Nine Miles and Spreading
- Measuring the Extent of Gang Problems—National
Youth Gang Survey Analysis
- Into the Abyss: The Racial and Ethnic Composition
of Gangs
- Overpopulation and Over-Immigration Threaten Water
Supply, Says Ad Campaign, Reuters, October 20, 2008
- The Environmental Impact Of Immigration Into The United
States
- Global Warming
- Illinois Recycling Association Recycling Facts
- SEI: Energy Consumption
- NRDC: Reducing U.S. Oil Dependence
- Alarm sounds on US population boom - The Boston
Globe
- Consumption Industrialized, Commercialized,
Dehumanized, and Deadly
- October 4, 2006: U.S. Population Reaches 300
Million, Heading for 400 Million: No Cause for Celebration
- U.S. immigration, population growth, and the
environment
- Immigration's Dire Effect On The
Environment
- Why Excess Immigration Damages The
Environment
- Remote Island Provides Clues On Population Growth,
Environmental Degradation
- Smith and Edmonston: 1997, 304
- Women Are Having More Children -
MedicalNewsService.com
- Welcome to United States Hispanic Business
Association! -USHispanics
- " U.S. Population Growth." Population and Habitat.
National Audubon Society. Accessed January 5,
2009.
- Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb, Buccaneer Books;
Reprint edition (December 1995) ISBN 1568495870
- Critical water basins worldwide
- Colorado River Water Users Association: Arizona
- Stakeholders in the Colorado River
- Allocation by U.S. of Colorado River use beyond fair
share
- John F. Kennedy Library, Ralph A. Dungen #8.6 White
House Files, Washington DC
- Abernethy, C. L., ed. Intersectoral Management of River Basins.
Proceedings of an International Workshop on "Integrated Water
Management in Water-Stressed River Basins in Developing Countries:
Strategies for Poverty Alleviation and Agricultural Growth," Loskop
Dam, South Africa, 16Â21 October 2000. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI and
German Foundation for International Development (DSE), 2001.;
Mostert, E., ed. River Basin Management. Proceedings of the
International Workshop, The Hague, 27Â29 October. UNESCO, 1999
- Mexico's small share of Colorado River extraction
- Mary E. Williams, Immigration. (San Diego: GreenHaven
Press, 2004). Page 85.
- New Poll Shows Immigration High Among US Voter
Concerns
- "Worldviews 2002 Survey of American and European
Attitudes and Public Opinion on Foreign Policy: US Report"
- NPG/Roper Poll, February 1996
- Espenshade, Thomas J. and Belanger, Maryanne (1998)
"Immigration and Public Opinion." In Marcelo M. Suarez-Orozco, ed.
Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary
Perspectives. Cambridge, Mass.: David
Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies and Harvard
University Press, pages 365-403
- A New Era Of Refugee Resettlement
- Ambassador wants more visas for loyal Iraqis
- "Iraq refugees find no refuge in America." By
Ann McFeatters. Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
May 25, 2007.
- Presidential Determination on FY 2008 Refugee
Admissions Numbers
- U.S. Goals for Iraqi Refugees are Inadequate,
Refugees International
- Study Details Lives of Illegal Immigrants in
U.S., NPR
- Boritt, Gabor S. Lincoln and the Economics of the American
Dream. Page 1. 1994. ISBN 0-252-06445-3.
- Jim Cullen, The American Dream : A Short History of an Idea
that Shaped a Nation. 2004. ISBN 0-19-517325-2.
- Heiner, Robert. Social Problems: An Introduction to
Critical Constructionism. Page 114. August 16, 2001. Oxford
University Press, USA. ISBN 0-19-512992-X.
- This argument was made in Isaac A. Hourwich. Immigration
and Labor: the Economic Aspects of European Immigration to the
United States (2012).
- Hiroshi Motomura. Americans in Waiting: The Lost Story of
Immigration and Citizenship in the United States (2006)
Recent: post 1965
- Beasley, Vanessa B. ed. Who Belongs in America?:
Presidents, Rhetoric, And Immigration (2006)
- Bogen, Elizabeth. Immigration in New York (1987)
- Bommes, Michael and Andrew Geddes. Immigration and Welfare:
Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State (2000)
- Borjas, George J. ed. Issues in the Economics of
Immigration (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference
Report) (2000) 9 statistical essays by scholars;
- Borjas, George. Friends or Strangers (1990)
- Borjas, George J. "Welfare Reform and Immigrant Participation
in Welfare Programs" International Migration Review 2002
36(4): 1093-1123. ISSN 0197-9183; finds very steep decline of
immigrant welfare participation in California.
- Briggs, Vernon M., Jr. Immigration Policy and the America
Labor Force Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.
- Briggs, Vernon M., Jr. Mass Immigration and the National
Interest (1992)
- Cooper, Mark A. Moving to the United States of America and
Immigration. 2008 IBSN 741446251
- Fawcett, James T., and Benjamin V. Carino. Pacific Bridges:
The New Immigration from Asia and the Pacific Islands . New
York: Center for Migration Studies, 1987.
- Foner, Nancy. In A New Land: A Comparative View Of
Immigration (2005)
- Levinson, David and Melvin Ember, eds. American Immigrant
Cultures 2 vol (1997) covers all major and minor groups
- Lowe, Lisa. Immigrant Acts: On Asian American Cultural
Politics (1996)
- Meier, Matt S. and Gutierrez, Margo, eds. The Mexican
American Experience : An Encyclopedia (2003) (ISBN
0-313-31643-0)
- Mohl, Raymond A. "Latinization in the Heart of Dixie: Hispanics
in Late-twentieth-century Alabama" Alabama Review 2002
55(4): 243-274. ISSN 0002-4341
- Portes, Alejandro, and Robert L. Bach. Latin Journey: Cuban
and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. University of
California Press, 1985.
- Portes, Alejandro, and Jozsef Borocz. "Contemporary Immigration: Theoretical Perspectives on Its
Determinants and Modes of Incorporation." International Migration Review 23 (1989):
606-30.
- Portes, Alejandro, and Ruben Rumbaut. Immigrant
America. University of California Press, 1990.
- Reimers, David. Still the Golden Door: The Third World
Comes to America Columbia University Press, (1985).
- Smith, James P, and Barry Edmonston, eds. The Immigration
Debate: Studies on the Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of
Immigration (1998), online version
- Zhou, Min and Carl L. Bankston III Growing Up American: How
VIetnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States Russell
Sage Foundation. (1998)
External links
History
Immigration policy
Current immigration
Economic impact