The
Lausanne Conference, 1949 was convened by the
United Nations
Conciliation Commission for Palestine (UNCCP) from
27 April to
12
September,
1949.
During the conference,
representatives of Israel
, the Arab
states Egypt
, Transjordan
, Lebanon
and Syria
, and
Palestinian refugees attempted
to resolve disputes arising from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, (mainly in
accordance with Resolution 181 and
Resolution 194). Amongst the
issues discussed were territorial questions and the establishment
of recognized borders, the question of Jerusalem, the repatriation
of refugees, (and whether the issue could be discussed separately
from the overall Arab-Israeli conflict), Israeli counter-claims for
war damages, the fate of orange groves belonging to refugees and of
their bank accounts blocked in Israel.
On
12 May, 1949, the conference achieved its
only success when the parties signed a joint protocol on the
framework for a comprehensive peace, which included territories,
refugees, and Jerusalem.
Ilan Pappé
writes that the Israeli agreement to consider repatriation of
refugees was made under pressure from the United States
, and because the Israelis wanted United Nations membership. Once Israel
was admitted to the UN, Pappé writes, it retreated from the
protocol it had signed, because it was completely satisfied with
the status quo, and saw no need to make any concessions with regard
to the refugees or on boundary questions. Israeli Foreign Minister
Moshe Sharett had hoped for a
comprehensive peace settlement at Lausanne, but he was no match for
Prime Minister
David Ben Gurion,
who saw the armistice agreements that stopped the fighting with the
Arab states as sufficient, and put a low priority on a permanent
peace treaty.
Among the Arabs, only
King
Abdullah of Transjordan (today's Jordan) worked for a permanent
peace treaty with Israel, in part because he had annexed the West
Bank and wanted the Israelis to recognize this. When Abdullah's
secret negotiations and agreements with Israel were exposed, he was
assassinated on
20 July,
1951 in Jerusalem by a Palestinian. In the end, no
agreement was reached. The failure to settle the refugee question
led to the establishment of the
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in
the Near East to care for the needs of refugees.
Criticism of participants
According to
Yagil Levy,
- The Lausanne Conference was convened in 1949 in the aftermath
of the 1948 War, with Israel and the Arab states participating. The
sides agreed on a protocol based on the Arabs' acceptance of the
principle of partition in Palestine, implying recognition of
Israel, and Israeli acceptance of the principle of the repatriation
of the Palestinian refugees. Nevertheless, Israel, inspired by its
newly defined security interests, signed the document but
successfully impeded its translation into a political agreement
(Levy, 1997, p. 60).
The Israelis insisted on discussing solutions to refugee problems
only in the context of an overall settlement of the
Arab-Israeli conflict. This agreed
with the commission's stance that
- The interrelation of all the aspects of the problem was too
obvious to be overlooked." The Israeli government briefly offered
to repatriate 100,000 refugees, but only as part of a final
settlement in which all other refugees were absorbed by Arab
states. Compensation would be paid, but not to individual refugees
or Arab states, only to a "common fund" and only for land that had
been under cultivation prior to being abandoned; not for any
movable property or uncultivated land. The common fund would be
reduced by an amount of compensation to Israel for war
reparations.
The Commission found this proposal to be unsatisfactory and
declared that
- the Government of Israel is not prepared to implement the part
of paragraph 11 of the General Assembly resolution of 11 December
1948 which resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their
homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted
to do so at the earliest practicable date.
The Arab delegations insisted on dealing with the refugee problem
separately from an overall settlement, and refused to deal directly
with the Israeli delegation. The commission found that
- The Arab Governments, on the other hand, are not prepared fully
to implement paragraph 5 of the said resolution, which calls for
the final settlement of all questions outstanding between them and
Israel. The Arab Governments in their contacts with the Commission
have evinced no readiness to arrive at such a peace settlement with
the Government of Israel.
and that
- no constructive progress towards a solution of existing
problems would be possible unless all the parties to the dispute,
at the outset of the discussions, expressed their determination to
respect each other's right to security and freedom from attack, to
refrain from warlike or hostile acts against one another, and to
promote the return of permanent peace in Palestine.
Overall,
- For reasons that were beyond the Commission's task of
facilitation, this movement did not come to pass. The respective
attitudes of the parties on this matter--attitudes which produced a
complete deadlock as regards the refugee question--are well known.
The Arab States insisted upon a prior solution of the refugee
question, at least in principle, before agreeing to discuss other
outstanding issues. In their opinion, a solution of the refugee
problem could be reached only as a result of unconditional
acceptance by Israel of the right of refugees to be repatriated.
Israel, on the other hand, has maintained that no solution of the
refugee question involving repatriation could be envisaged outside
the framework of an over-all settlement.
References
- Pappe, 1992, Chapter 9: The Lausanne Conference.
- Pappe, 1992, Chapter 10: The Final Quest for Peace.
- Fischbach, Michael R. (2003). Records of Dispossession:
Palestinian Refugee Property and the Arab-Israeli Conflict.
Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-12978-5
- Levy, Yagil (1997). Trial and Error: Israel's Route from
War to De-Escalation. SUNY Press. ISBN 0-7914-3429-X
- Pappe, Ilan (1992). The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict
1947-1951. I.B. Tauris, London. ISBN 1-85043-819-6
- Schulz, Helena Lindholm (2003). The Palestinian
Diaspora. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-26820-6
External links