The Full Wiki

More info on Light rail in North America

Light rail in North America: Map

  
  

Wikipedia article:

Map showing all locations mentioned on Wikipedia article:

Light rail in North America has had a long history. The term light rail was coined in 1972 by the U.S. Urban Mass Transit Association (UMTA) to describe new streetcar transformations which were taking place in Europe and the United States. The Germans used the term stadtbahn to describe the concept, and many in the UMTA wanted to adopt the direct translation, which is city rail. However, in its reports the UMTA finally adopted the term light rail instead.

History of Streetcar and Light rail

Preserved streetcar in New Orleans, April 2005.


From the mid-19th century onwards, horse-drawn trams (or horsecars) were used in cities around the world. In the late 1880s electrically-powered street railways became technically feasible following the invention of a trolley pole system of collecting current by American inventor Frank J. Sprague who installed the first successful system at Richmond, Virginiamarker. They became popular because roads were then poorly-surfaced, and before the invention of the internal combustion engine and the advent of motor-buses, they were the only practical means of public transport around cities.

The streetcar systems constructed in the 19th and early 20th centuries typically only ran in single-car setups. Some rail lines experimented with multiple unit configurations, where streetcars were joined together to make short trains, but this did not become common until later. When lines were built over longer distances (typically with a single track) before good roads were common, they were generally called interurban streetcars in most of North America or radial railways in Ontariomarker. After World War II, seven major North American cities (Torontomarker, Bostonmarker, Philadelphiamarker, San Franciscomarker, Pittsburghmarker, Newarkmarker, and New Orleansmarker) continued to operate large streetcar systems. When these cities upgraded to new technology, they called it light rail to differentiate it from their existing streetcars since some continued to operate both the old and new systems.

In North America, many of these original Streetcar systems were decommissioned in the 1950s and onward as the popularity of the automobile increased. Britain abandoned its last light rail system except Blackpoolmarker by 1962. Although some traditional trolley or tram systems still exist to this day, the term "light rail" has come to mean a different type of rail system. Modern light rail technology has primarily German origins, since an attempt by Boeing Vertol to introduce a new American light rail vehicle was a technical failure. After World War II, the Germans retained their streetcar networks and evolved them into model light rail systems (stadtbahnen). Except for Hamburg, all large and most medium-sized German cities maintain light rail networks.

The renaissance of light rail in North American began in 1978 when the Canadian city of Edmonton, Albertamarker adopted the German Siemens-Duewag U2 system, followed three years later by Calgarymarker, Albertamarker and San Diego, Californiamarker.

Historically, the rail gauge has had considerable variations, with narrow gauge common in many early systems. However, most light rail systems are now standard gauge. An important advantage of standard gauge is that standard railway maintenance equipment can be used on it, rather than custom-built machinery. Using standard gauge also allows light rail vehicles to be delivered and relocated conveniently using freight railways and locomotives. Another factor favoring standard gauge is that low-floor vehicles are becoming popular, and there is generally insufficient space for wheelchairs to move between the wheels in a narrow gauge layout.

Origins of light rail in North America

The renaissance of light rail in North American began in 1978 when Edmontonmarker adopted the German Siemens-Duewag U2 system, followed three years later by Calgarymarker and San Diegomarker. These modern light-rail systems are more like subway or metro systems that operate at street level. They include modern, multi-car trains that can only be accessed at stations that are spaced anywhere from a couple blocks to a mile or more apart. Some of these systems operate within roadways alongside automobile traffic, and others operate on their own separate right-of-way.

Politics of light rail in North America

Due to lower density of many American cities, LRT speed relative to the automobile, generally lower ridership levels, and questions of cost-effectiveness, the construction of light rail systems has spurred political controversy as a use of public funds. Arguments made against light rail systems often bill it as less practical than equivalent bus systems and less effective than increases in highway capacity. Arguments in favor of light rail point to overall improvements in safety and quality of life in cities supporting rail-based mass transit and long-term sustainability benefits.

Usage of light rail in North America

Rank System

Largest city served

Daily ridership
(2Q2009)


Annual Ridership
(Jan-Dec 2008)


1 Sistema de Transporte Colectivo Metrorrey Monterrey* 403.0 88,348.0
2 Toronto Transit Commission Toronto 259.7 80,982.5
3 Calgary Transit Calgary 259.2 83,750.3
4 Massachusetts Bay Tr Auth Boston 229.8 80,337.2
5 Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano Guadalajara* 194.8 72,644.0
6 San Francisco Muni Rwy San Francisco 163.7 48,889.6
7 Los Angeles County MTA Los Angeles 144.0 45,343.4
8 Tri-County Metro Trp Dist Portland 108.7 35,772.9
9 San Diego Trolley, Inc. San Diego 93.3 36,054.6
10 Southeastern Penn TA Philadelphia 80.6 32,453.3
11 Servicios de Transportes Electricos Mexico City* 64.4 20,495.0
12 Dallas Area Rapid Transit Dallas 63.6 19,826.5
13 Regional Trp District Denver 62.7 20,617.5
14 New Jersey Transit Corp Newark* 58.9 21,858.3
15 Sacramento Reg Tr Dist Sacramento 58.2 17,146.4
16 Bi-State Dev Agency Saint Louis 52.9 20,212.7
17 Utah Transit Authority Salt Lake City 41.3 13,949.0
18 Metro Tr Auth of Harris Co Houston 38.8 11,640.2
19 Edmonton Transit System Edmonton* 37.0 14,393.4
20 Maryland Transit Admin Baltimore 34.6 8,054.1
21 Valley Metro Rail, Inc. Phoenix 33.5 N/A
22 Santa Clara Valley Trp Auth San Jose 32.5 10,797.6
23 Metro Transit Minneapolis 31.1 10,221.6
24 Port Auth of Allegheny Co Pittsburgh 26.7 7,306.2
25 Niagara Frontier Trp Auth Buffalo 21.6 6,869.0
26 Charlotte Area Transit Charlotte 20.2 4,975.0
27 Regional Transit Auth New Orleans 13.7 4,708.1
28 Greater Cleveland Reg TA Cleveland* 7.1 3,278.4
29 OC Transpo/Para Transpo Ottawa 7.1 N/A
30 North County Transit District Oceanside 6.6 N/A
31 Memphis Area Transit Auth Memphis 3.7 1,060.3
32 Sound Transit Seattle 3.1 930.7
33 King County Dept of Trp Seattle 1.4 414.2
34 Hillsborough Area Reg TA Tampa 0.8 436.8
35 Kenosha Transit Kenosha 0.3 N/A


Note: Ridership figures are in thousands. Daily ridership figures represent average weekday ridership figures for all cities except those marked with an asterisk (*), where they represent average for all days (i.e. including weekends).

Sources:
  • American Public Transportation Association 2Q2009 and 4Q2008.
  • INEGI


See also: List of United States light rail systems by ridership

Diesel light rail

A few recently-opened systems in North America use diesel-powered trains, including the River Linemarker in New Jerseymarker (opened in 2004), the O-Train in Ottawamarker (opened in 2001), and the SPRINTER in northern San Diego County, Californiamarker. Diesel operations are chosen in corridors where lower ridership is expected (and thus do not justify the expense of the electric power infrastructure) or which have an "interurban" nature with stations spaced relatively far apart (electric power provides greater acceleration, making it essential for operations with closely-spaced stations). Operations with diesel-powered trains can be an interim measure until ridership growth and the availability of funding allow the system to be upgraded to electric power operations.

Light rail in Canada

In general, Canadian cities have rates of public transit use which are two to three times as high as comparably sized U.S. cities. Census data for 2006 show that 11.0% of Canadians use public transit to commute to work, compared to 4.8% of Americans.
This means that transportation planners must allow for higher passenger volumes on Canadian transit systems than American ones.


As a result of lower government funding, Canadian cities have to recover a much higher share of their costs out of operating revenues. This lack of funding may explain why there is resistance to the high capital costs of rail systems and there are only a few light rail systems in Canada.

Calgary



Despite Calgary, Albertamarker having a relatively low population density, the city's C-Train system has developed into one of the most successful and busiest light rail systems in North America with an average of 259,200 boardings per weekday in the second quarter of 2009. Only the Monterrey Metro of Monterreymarker, Mexicomarker, which carried approximately 403,000 passengers per day in second quarter of 2009 and the Toronto Transit Commission's light rail system, which carried 259,700 passengers per day, surpass the Calgary C-Train passenger load.

The Calgary system was started in 1981 as the result of decisions to avoid building either downtown freeways or a heavy rail system. At that time, Calgary had less than half a million people and was considered too small for rail transit, but when it first opened the C-Train carried about 40,000 passengers per day. By 2007, Calgary was twice as big with 1 million people, but the C-Train system was over three times as long and carried over six times as many passengers.

As of 2007 45% of the people working in downtown Calgary took transit to work, and the city's objective was to increase that to 60%. The reason is that Calgary's downtown core covers only , is isolated from the rest of the city by two rivers and a railway line, and was built with relatively narrow streets by North American standards. In the 1960s planners proposed a comprehensive freeway system to improve access, but this was rejected due to intense public opposition. However, subsequent growth exceeded expectations and by 2006, Calgary had become the second largest head office center in Canada, with of office space and 120,000 people working in the downtown core. The downtown street system is at maximum capacity and has no room for traffic growth, but the city is confident it can add another 60,000 downtown workers in the next 20 years without making space for more cars. Peak hour travel by LRT is equivalent to the capacity of about 16 free flow traffic lanes and allows the city to have fewer than 0.4 downtown parking places available per worker.

Despite the downtown rush, 25% of the riders during rush hour are counterflow commuters - going out of downtown during the morning and into it during the afternoon. Many of these are students going to educational institutions, who receive deep discounts because they are filling seats that otherwise would be empty, and workers doing crosstown commutes to avoid the lack of freeways. However, as of 2007, the C-Train is suffering growing pains. Because population growth has exceeded expectations and LRT ridership has outpaced population growth, Calgary has had trouble buying enough new LRT vehicles and hiring enough new drivers to meet the demand. As a result, many passengers experience lengthy train waits due to overcrowding.

Despite funding problems resulting from lack of support from the provincial and federal governments, there are two extensions under construction. In November 2007, Calgary City Council approved another two further extensions on the two lines, to be completed by 2012.

In addition, on November 20, 2007, Council gave final approval for the new West Leg of Calgary's LRT, which would be the system's fourth leg. Construction for the West leg will begin in 2009, with completion expected in 2012. When the new light rail vehicles ordered for the extension are finally delivered, the city will have a total of 223 LRVs.

Besides the ongoing program of extending all station platforms to 100 m to accommodate four-car trains, transportation planners have identified two additional lines to be constructed within the next 25 years. They are to the North-Central and South-East districts of the city. BRT service is in place along the future North-Central route and the South-East route as of September 1st 2009. Calgary will also one day have to place a tunnel in their downtown to accommodate one of these new lines, or a combination of lines, much like Edmonton has already done.

Edmonton

Edmonton's Light Rail in an above ground station .
Edmonton was the first city in North America with a population of less than one million to build a modern light rail system (Greater Edmonton now has over 1 million people). The route first started construction in 1974, and opened its first segment on April 22, 1978, in time for the 1978 Commonwealth Games. While groundbreaking at the time, in contrast with Calgary the Edmonton Transit System built much of its light rail system underground, which meant that it could not afford to lay as much track to the suburbs. In addition, Edmonton's central business district has less office space and the single line which was built did not reach areas which housed many commuters to downtown. The system is successful by North American Standards, but not nearly as successful as Calgary's: it has attracted only a sixth of the ridership. Edmonton is building new extensions at grade that will extend to the TOD Century Parkmarker.

According to John Bakker, professor emeritus at the University of Alberta and one of the original designers of the system, going underground was a serious mistake. "Going into tunnels is about 10 times as expensive as going on the surface because you have to relocate utilities", said Mr Bakker. "Edmonton went into tunnels first, and it really bogged down everything thereafter, because they didn't have money". Edmonton's system is only 15 km long, while Calgary's light-rail system covered 42.1 km for about the same cost. However, a 7.8 km South LRT expansion is underway, almost all of it at surface, and is expected to be completed by 2010.

Ottawa

In the 1970s and 1980s Ottawa, Ontariomarker opted for grade-separated busways (the Ottawa Transitway) over light rail on the theory that buses were cheaper. In practice, the capital costs escalated from the original estimate of C$97 million to a final value of C$440 million, a cost overrun of about 450%. This is nearly as high as Calgary's C-Train system, which had a capital cost of C$548 million, is about the same length, and carries more passengers. Unfortunately, the Ottawa Transitway has reached capacity, with over 175 buses per hour on the downtown section, and has no cost-effective way to increase the volume.

In 2001, to supplement its BRT system, Ottawa opened a diesel light rail pilot project, (the O-Train), which was relatively inexpensive to construct (C$21 million), due to its single-track route along a neglected freight-rail right of way and use of diesel multiple units (DMUs) to avoid the cost of building overhead lines along the tracks. O-Train has had some success in attracting new ridership to the system (a few thousand more riders), due to its connection of a south end big box shopping mall (South Keysmarker), through Carleton Universitymarker to the east-west busway (Ottawa Transitway) near the downtown core of the city.

Ottawa produced plans to expand both the Transitway and to open additional rail routes. The intention of the light rail project was to add to the system, not to replace the existing Transitway. However, in mid-December 2006, the new Ottawa city council voted to cancel the LRT system despite the fact that funding was already in place and contracts were already signed. As of 2008, lawsuits against the city of Ottawa over its canceled light rail system totaled over $280 million. Examinations for discovery are expected to start in the fall, with the trial beginning in 2009. The trial is expected to be lengthy.

Toronto

On March 16 2007, the Toronto Transit Commission announced a 120 Kilometre Light Rapid transit web throughout the city. This will be a 15 year project predicted to have 175 million-users by 2021. Funding has been announced at the municipal and provincial level, though not the federal. The plan has been released and can also be viewed at TransitCity.ca

LRT in Torontomarker is somewhat difficult to classify, since the city employs several forms of transit that may or may not be considered "light rail". The legacy streetcar system is still largely in place in the central area and its extensive routes are intensively served. Some lines even tie into integrated subway stations without the need for a transfer, and many traffic signals give priority to streetcars. However, the system as a whole is not normally considered true light rail because the mixed running with surface traffic slows travel considerably. Because of the differences in technology and speed, Canadian transportation planners do not usually classify historic streetcar systems as LRT, although they may technically qualify as such. Two streetcar lines (Spadina/Harbourfront and St. Clair) have been recently rebuilt and come closer to meeting light rail standards as they run in dedicated rights-of-way. However, the largest vehicles used are articulated double streetcars which are much smaller than most LRT trains and these use trolley wheels rather than pantographs to collect electricity. Streetcar fares must also be paid upon boarding as with a local bus.

Finally, the Scarborough RT was a demonstration project for elevated light rail that served as a prototype for Vancouver's SkyTrain and JFK's AirTrain as well as Pearson Airport's LINK Train). However, it does not meet the common definition of light rail either since it supplies electricity to the trains using two extra power rails (one at +300 VDC and the other at -300 VDC), uses linear induction motors acting on a metal plate between the tracks for propulsion, requires a fully grade-separated right-of-way, and has large stations that have much more in common with a heavy-rail metro. In Toronto it is usually mapped as part of the subway system. All of the above is now under reconsideration as vehicles near the end of their lifespan and the future size and type of vehicle and trackway is contemplated.

Vancouver

In 1986, Vancouver, British Columbia built the Expo Line of the SkyTrain.It is the longest automated light rapid transit system in the world. In addition to using driverless trains, it uses two energized power rails (one at +300 VDC and the other at -300 VDC) rather than overhead wires to supply electricity, making it unsafe to operate in the street or use level crossings. Since it is not conventional light rail it is often called an advanced light rapid transit or light metro system. The network, including the newer Millennium Line and extension, carries about 73.5 million passengers annually. In August, 2009, a new line, the Canada Line, came into operation. It connects downtown with the airport and the suburb of Richmond. Another line, the Evergreen Line, is planned to be grade-separated automated light rapid transit. Additional extensions are plannedfor the Millennium Line mostly underground under Central Broadway to University of British Columbiamarker. There is preliminary talk about extending the Expo Line (although its routing has not yet been determined).

Waterloo

On June 29, 2009, the region of Waterloo approved a major light rail project for the cities of Kitchener, Waterloo and Cambridge, Ontario.

Light rail in Mexico

Light rail train at Estadio Azteca Station in Mexico City

Monterrey

Monterreymarker, Nuevo Leónmarker boasts Mexico's largest and North America's busiest light rail system. Both of the city's metro lines are light rail, one elevated and the other subterranean. Combined, they carried approximately 88.3 million passengers in calendar year 2008. In the first quarter of 2009, following an extension of Line 2, the system carried approximately 328,000 passengers per day.

The first line of Metrorrey opened in 1991 and as of September 2008, the system included 32 stations and operated 40 high-floor trains on approximately 41 kilometers of routes. The light rail system is complemented by a single fare bus service from a number of the lines' terminuses called Transmetro.

Guadalajara

The metro system of the city of Guadalajaramarker employs light rail for both of its lines. The north-south line which replaced a trolleybus line in 1989, has 19 stations, is 15.5 km in length and is only partially grade separated in the center of the city. The east-west opened in July 1994, has 8 stations and runs 8.5 kilometers completely underground from the center of the city to Tetlán. The two lines combined carry approximately 72.6 million passengers in calendar year 2008 and an average of 208,000 passengers per day in 1Q2009, making it one of the busiest light rail systems in North America.

Mexico City

The Mexico City Metro uses exclusively heavy rail technology. However, the city's trolleybus agency, Servicio de Transportes Electricos, operates a light rail line which runs in the southern extreme of the city from the southern terminus of the Tasqueñamarker station of Metro Line 2 to Xochimilcomarker. The single line carries approximately 62,433 passengers per day.

Light rail in the United States



The United States has a number of light rail systems in its mid-sized to large cities. In older systems, such as in San Francisco and Boston, the light rail is vestigal from streetcar days but were spared the fate of other streetcar systems by some grade separation from traffic and high ridership. A number of systems were built in the 1980s, a few more in the 1990s, and many more were opened in lower density cities in the early 2000s. The older systems attain higher ridership.

United States use of light rail is low by European standards. According to the American Public Transportation Authority, of the 20-odd light rail systems in the United States only five (Bostonmarker, San Franciscomarker, Los Angelesmarker, San Diegomarker and Portland, ORmarker), achieve more than 25 million passenger boardings per year, and only Boston exceeds the 50+ million boardings per year of the London Docklands Light Rail system.

Compared with that of Canada, the United States federal government offers considerably more funding for transportation projects of all types, resulting in smaller portions of light rail construction cost to be borne at the local and state levels. This funding is provided by the Federal Transit Administration though as of 2004 the rules to determine which projects will be funded are biased against the simpler streetcar systems (partly because the vehicles tend to be somewhat slower). Some cities in the U.S. (e.g. San Pedro, California) have set about building the less expensive streetcar lines themselves or with only minimal federal support.

Boston

The oldest and busiest light rail system in the United States is the MBTA Green Line in Boston. With 235,300 daily ridership on its of track, the Green Line is a primary transportation route within downtown, and is patronized by students and workers from close-in suburbs like Brighton and Allstonmarker.

The subsurface portion of the line was opened in 1897 to alleviate congestion for street level trolley cars, with numerous lines from the north and south converging via several portals to Park Street Station. By 1964, the transformation to today's system was nearly complete with the elimination of streetcars entering at Lechmere and Boylston; lines into the four remaining portals would be designated B, C, D, and E (the A line to Watertown being abandoned in the late 1960s). Three of today's four lines, although having their own separate path in the medians of their respective roads, still have segments without grade-separated rights-of-way, and consequently wait at traffic lights. The D line, which runs on a former Boston and Albany Railroad right-of-way, is the lone exception.

In 2004, the MBTA removed the Causeway Street Elevated portion of the line, and replaced it with an underground tunnel, as a part of Big Digmarker environmental remediation, leaving the Lechmere Viaductmarker as the only remaining elevated part of the line. Other work includes many station overhauls that will improve handicapped accessibility.

Los Angeles

Gold Line Maravilla station under construction as of December 2008.
The Los Angeles County Metro Rail light rail system comprises three lines: the Green, Gold, and Blue lines. Collectively they have 144,900 daily weekday boardings. The Blue line, in particular is the second-busiest line in the United States with 84,353 average weekday boardings. The Blue and Gold Lines run mostly at grade, with some street-running, elevated, and underground stretches in more densely populated areas. The Green Line is entirely grade separated, running in the median of I-105 and then turning southward along an elevated route.

The Blue Line opened first, in 1990. The Green Line began service in 1995, and the Gold Line entered service in 2003. A 6-mile extension of the Gold Line into East Los Angeles is under construction (scheduled completion late 2009), and a further extension to Azusamarker from the other end of the same line is also planned. Additional extensions of the Gold line to Whittier, Montclair and possibly Ontario Airport are under study.

A new line, the Expo light rail line which will run from Downtown Los Angelesmarker to Culver Citymarker (Phase 1) is currently under construction and is scheduled for completion in 2010. A further extension to Santa Monicamarker (Phase 2) is currently under study as are other extensions of the Los Angeles County light rail system. Among these is the Crenshaw Corridor Line, a light rail line running from the Miracle Mile area to the Los Angeles International Airportmarker primarily along Crenshaw Boulevard.

San Francisco

The San Francisco Municipal Railway (MUNI) light rail lines are vestigial from its streetcar days, and it is one of few American cities to continuously operate light rail from the streetcar era. As a result, the present-day system has above ground portions running in mixed traffic, stopping at traffic lights as streetcars, while buried sections have their own right-of-way like a subway. Though in other United States cities in 1950s, the trend was to replace streetcars with bus service, five heavily used lines traveled through tunnels or otherwise had private right-of-ways, making bus replacement not viable. About this time, plans for a subway, the Muni Metro, were drawn up, opening in 1980. Similar to Boston's Green Line, five separate lines above ground converge to one subway route, though in the former, the underground line was constructed first and surface routes later.

In response to the dot com boom, the system became strained and Muni ordered newer, larger vehicles, which turned out to have their own noise and braking problems. In 1998, a four station extension of the trunk line was built, and in 2007 light rail service began on a new line going south from downtown, achieving limited success. Plans are underway for a three station underground light rail line, expected to serve 78,000 daily riders by 2030. Due to underground routing, the cost for the line is estimated at $1.5 billion.

Portland, Oregon

The Metropolitan Area Express (MAX) system serves the Portland metropolitan areamarker. It has , comprising four lines: the Blue, Green, Red and Yellow, and serves about 107,000 daily, counting the free boarding Fareless Squaremarker. Like most modern light rail systems MAX runs along city streets—albeit in reserved lanes—in the city, but has its own right-of-way farther out. The only mixed-traffic street running on the system is along the Portland Transit Mallmarker, in downtown, and light rail trains only share lanes with buses there, not any private vehicles. The length of MAX trains is limited to two cars by the relatively small blocks in downtown Portland.

The MAX system was born out of funds left over from the canceled Mount Hood Freeway, with the Gresham/eastside line (now part of the Blue Line) opening in 1986. The Hillsboro/westside line (now also part of Blue Line) opened in 1998, more than doubling the system's size, followed in 2001 by the Red Line connection to Portland International Airportmarker and in 2004 by the Yellow Line, which connects downtown to the Portland Expo Centermarker via Interstate Avenue. Route colors were adopted in 2000. The Green Line is a extension that opened in September 2009 and connects a new transit center at Clackamas Town Centermarker to the Gateway Transit Center, from where it follows previously existing MAX lines to downtown. Another major addition in 2009 was a new, second alignment through downtown, along the transit mall; it is used by both the Yellow and Green lines. A planned Orange Line would be built from the Green Line's downtown terminus at Portland State Universitymarker to the southeast suburb of Milwaukiemarker and include a new bridge across the Willamette River.

Phoenix

METRO Light Rail is a light rail line operating in the cities of Phoenixmarker, Tempemarker, and Mesamarker, Arizonamarker and is part of the Valley Metro public transit system. Construction began in March 2005; operation started December 27, 2008.

San Diego

San Diego Trolley currently comprises three lines, the Blue, Orange and Green, collectively running on of track and achieving a ridership of 107,000. During the time that the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) was drawing up options for a transit system, Hurricane Kathleen made landfall, damaging many of the tracks operated by the freight carrier, San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway, and cutting them off from the greater Southern Pacific Railroad, and Southern Pacific petitioned for abandonment. The auspicious timing of the incident led the MTDB to buy and repair the tracks, opening a light rail segment on 1981, while also reestablishing freight service on the same line (the Blue Line runs on shared-use track). The system has been expanded incrementally ever since. There are currently plans for an extension to the University City community, connecting the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) campus and University Towne Centre shopping center to the rest of the system.

The North County Transit District also operates a diesel light rail line, called the Sprinter which runs between Oceansidemarker and Escondidomarker. The service began operations in March 2008 and operates with Desiro-class diesel multiple units (DMU) manufactured by Siemens in Germany.

Philadelphia

Philadelphiamarker has a light rail system operated by the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA), which also operates other transit modes. The Norristown High-Speed Line is officially considered light rail, and serves 69th Street Terminalmarker in Upper Darbymarker just outside of Philadelphia to the Norristown Transportation Centermarker, located in Norristownmarker, a far-off suburb of Philadelphia. Other systems consist of the Media-Sharon Hill Lines, which also begins at 69th Street Terminal, and the SEPTA Subway-Surface Trolley Lines which run between Philadelphia Center Citymarker and the nearby western suburbs. The NHSL, and MSH lines were once owned by the Philadelphia and Western Railroad and Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Company. The Subway-Surface Trolley Lines share stations with SEPTA's Market-Frankford Line between 30th Streetmarker and Juniper Stationsmarker on 13th Street.

St. Louis

St. Louis light rail system, St. Louis MetroLinkmarker, consists of two lines, both running through the city center with 73.3 kilometers (46 miles) of track. There are terminals across the Mississippi River in western Illinois, at Lambert St. Louis International Airport, and in the southwestern part of the metro area. The first part of the system (RED LINE: Lambert/Shiloh) opened in 1993. The second line of the system (BLUE LINE: Shrewsbury/I-44) entered service in 2006. All track is in independent right of way, mostly at surface level, but includes several miles of subways and elevated track as well. St. Louis' light rail system has no street or traffic running trains. The system runs more similar to a heavy rail rail system than most light rail systems in North America. All stations are independent entry and platforms are all flush level with trains providing passengers easy access on/off. In the downtown area, the system uses abandoned railway tunnels built in the 19th century. The downtown subway stations have an ancient appearance with rough-hewn rock walls. The Shrewsbury/I-44 station also has a few portions in tunnels, which are large and of modern concrete construction. Since the line opened, expansion has continued, and the transit agency has future lines in planning stages. Ridership, at more than 16 million yearly, has always exceeded expectations. St. Louis' rail system has been lauded one of the finest light rail systems built in North America.

Dallas

Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) is the operator of the light rail system that runs in Dallasmarker and three of its suburbs, along with a commuter rail line that connects to Fort Worth and runs through Irvingmarker, a DART member city. The LRT lines began with the opening of the starter system in 1996. In the first few years after the turn of the century, DART opened several small expansions, culminating in the opening of Victory Station, serving the American Airlines Centermarker in 2004.

DART currently runs two LRT lines. The Red Line begins in southwest Dallas at Westmoreland Station and runs northeast to downtown, then runs north through the suburbs of Richardsonmarker and Planomarker to its terminus at Parker Road Station. The Blue line begins in South Dallas at Ledbetter Station and runs north, joining the Red Line at 8th and Corinth Station on its trek to downtown. It continues north to Mockingbird Station before it breaks away from the Red Line and turns northeast toward Garlandmarker, ending its run at Downtown Garland Station.

The system is currently under expansion as the Green Line is under construction and will run from Pleasant Grove in southeast Dallas to the suburbs Farmers Branchmarker and Carrolltonmarker. It is set to open in two phases, first in September 2009, then in December of 2010. Other expansions include the Orange Line, to run from downtown, the Las Colinasmarker in Irving and on to DFW Airport. Also, the Blue Line is set to expand east to Rowlettmarker and south to Interstate 20. When the latest expansion round is completed, DART's system will have of LRT.

Denver

Sacramento

Salt Lake City

The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) runs the 19 mile (31 km) light rail system known as TRAX in the Salt Lake Valley. The system, which opened in 1999, serves approximately 58,300 people every day and contains 69 vehicles. The system has 2 lines, both of which end Downtownmarker at Salt Lake Central Station. One line ends at the University of Utahmarker, while the other ends in the suburb of Sandymarker. Four extensions have recently been approved and funded, with completion expected by 2014.

Houston

The Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (METRO), opened its METRORail service on January 1, 2004 to very large crowds. The system currently consists of a single double track line of . The system serves 45,000 passengers daily. Like many other light rail systems in America, METRORail runs in city streets and does not have its own right of way for most of its route. Two-car trains are the maximum on the line due to Downtown Houston's city block size.

San Jose

San Jose's light rail network, owned and maintained by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, consists of of track across three different lines.

The Alum Rock - Santa Teresa line serves the eastern, northern, downtown, and southern areas of San Jose. The Mountain View - Winchester line operates between Mountain Viewmarker and the Winchester neighborhood of San Jose. Both of these lines share the same tracks and stations on First Street between Tasman Drivemarker in northern San Jose and the San Jose Convention Centermarker in downtown. A third line, the Ohlone-Chynoweth - Almaden line, is a three-stop spur that connects the Almaden Valleymarker area to the Alum Rock - Santa Teresa Line.

Minneapolis

The Twin Cities have one LRT Line, the Hiawatha Line. This line runs from downtown Minneapolismarker, next to the Metrodomemarker, near the University of Minnesotamarker campus, to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airportmarker, then to the Mall of Americamarker. This line opened in 2004, and by the end of 2009, two additional stations will be added at Target Field in the downtown Minneapolis Warehouse District, and at American Boulevard in Bloomington. All stations are also being modified to accomodate 3-car trains beginning in 2010. Two other lines are in planning: the Central Corridor, which would run from downtown Minneapolis to downtown St. Paulmarker; and the Southwest Corridor, which would run from Eden Prairiemarker to downtown Minneapolis.

New Jersey

In New Jerseymarker, New Jersey Transit provides light rail service along three lines in different parts of the state.

Hudson County

The Hudson-Bergen Light Rail (HBLR) services Bayonnemarker, the West Side and Downtown Jersey City, Hobokenmarker, and the North Hudson towns in three lines.

Newark

Like San Francisco, Newark never fully abandoned its old streetcar system, due to the fact that part of it had a dedicated, underground right-of-way in an old canal bed. Beginning in the 1940s, a system that once extended far into Newark's suburbs was pared down to just the underground route, "Streetcar #7" which was rebilled the Newark City Subway. After decades of cutbacks, the line was finally expanded northward to Bellevillemarker in the early 2000s. A second branch running through downtown to Newark-Broad St. stationmarker was opened in the mid 2000's, and the system was rebranded again as Newark Light Rail.

Trenton to Camden via Burlington City

River Line diesel light rail car in the Camden yard.


The River Line is a diesel light rail line in southern New Jersey, running along, except at its ends, what was previously the Bordentown Secondary, from Trentonmarker to Camdenmarker, serving communities along the Delaware River between thee cities. This line is one of only two diesel light rail lines in North America, and the only one in the United Statesmarker.

Baltimore

The Baltimore Light Rail is a single line reaching from BWI Airportmarker south of Baltimoremarker, through the city and north to a strip mall and office park. With of track, the line achieves a daily ridership of 24,500.

Major efforts toward the creation of the light rail were championed by then mayor William Donald Schaefer, who wanted a transit link to the new baseball park, Camden Yardsmarker, about to be built downtown. In order to have the line completed the month that the Baltimore Orioles started playing in Camden Yards in 1992, the system was built entirely without federal money, a rarity in late 20th century U.S. transit projects. Federal funds would later be used to double track the whole system, decreasing headways which had been restricted to 17 minutes.

The light rail line was built entirely at grade, even through downtown's narrow streets. Though the majority of the track's length is grade-separated from acquiring disused railroad rights-of-way, trains run in the streets in some sections downtown. When the system was built, this resulted in vehicles having to wait in traffic lights, though in 2007 a signal preemption system was installed.

The Maryland Transit Administration has drawn up plans for an additional four lines which may be light rail, bus rapid transit, or heavy rail to create a comprehensive city system. As of 2007, only the future of one line is certain. The Red Line, which is in its intermediate planning stages, would be an East-West link via either bus rapid transit or light rail. Whichever mode is selected, officials have insisted that the line be underground through the city center because of Baltimore's narrow streets and dense traffic.

Charlotte

Charlotte's LYNX system consists of a single line called the Blue Line. After receiving a positive Record of Decision from the Federal Transit Administration on May 19, 2003, continued preparation and land acquisition would finally result in its groundbreaking in spring 2005. The line is in full operation, at a projected final cost of $462.7 million. This price tag does not include indirect or ancillary costs such as rerouting water and sewer lines to accommodate the line, estimated at an additional $72 million as of April 2006.

The Blue Line's construction is part of a greater comprehensive transit network for the Charlotte metropolitan region. 70.6 more miles of track are planned, though some of these could be constructed as Bus Rapid Transit or streetcar lines.

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh's light rail network, commonly known as The T, is a light rail system in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvaniamarker; it functions as a subway in downtown Pittsburghmarker and largely as an at-grade light rail service in the suburbs. The system is owned and operated by the Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAT). It is the successor system to the far more extensive streetcar network formerly operated by Pittsburgh Railways.

The current lines, which run south from the downtown into the South Hills area, were formerly operated by PCC streetcars. Beginning in the 1980s PAT reconstructed the lines along the existing right-of-way and ordered new trams from Siemens. PCCs continued to operate in tandem with the new light rail vehicles until 1999 when the last five were retired from service. PAT also constructed a new subway line in the downtown, ending decades of street-running in the Golden Triangle. Current expansion plans include an extension from the downtown subway under the Allegheny River to connect with PNC Parkmarker and Heinz Fieldmarker; the North Shore Connector is slated to open by 2011.

Buffalo

Buffalo has a somewhat unique rail system. While the majority of the 6.6 miles of track operate as a "heavy" rail, a small section of the system operates down a fare-free pedestrian mall. Because cars and pedestrians cross the median where trains pass, the line uses overhead power. Buffalo opened the metro rail in the 1980s as a single line that would grow into a large rapid transit system. However, cost overruns and population decline caused expansion plans to be put on hold. The system still serves about 20,000 people daily.

Cleveland

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority owns three main lines in Clevelandmarker, as well as Cuyahoga Countymarker. The system was established in the 1970s through a merger between the Cleveland Interurban Railroad and the Shaker Heights Rapid Transit. The Blue and Green Lines were established in 1913, and the Red Line was established in 1955.

Seattle - Tacoma

The Seattle - Tacoma Metropolitan area Sound Transit light rail system consists of two lines. The first is Tacoma Link and the other line is Central Link and runs 16 miles from Seattle-Tacoma International Airportmarker to downtown Seattle New lines to the north, south, and east were approved by voters in November 2008.

See also

United States
Canada
Mexico


External links



References


Embed code:






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message