Living fossil is an informal term for any living
species (or
clade) of
organism which appears to be the same as a
species otherwise only known from
fossils and
which has no close living relatives. These species have all
survived major
extinction events,
and generally retain low
taxonomic
diversities. A species which successfully radiates (forming many
new species after a possible
genetic
bottleneck) has become too successful to be considered a
"living fossil". However, the term is frequently
misinterpreted.
Overview
There is a subtle difference between a "living fossil" and a
"
Lazarus taxon". A Lazarus taxon is a
taxon (either one species or a
group of species) that suddenly reappears,
either in the fossil record or in nature (i.e. as if the fossil had
"come to life again"), while a living fossil is a species that
(seemingly) hasn't changed during its very long lifetime (i.e. as
if the fossil has always lived). The mean species turnover time
(the time a species lasts before it is replaced) varies widely
among the
phyla, but averages about
2-3 million years. So, a living species that was thought to be
extinct (e.g. the
coelacanth,
Latimeria chalumnae) is not a living fossil simply due to
that definition (though it may still be one because it hasn't
changed much), it is a Lazarus species. Coelacanths disappeared
from the fossil record some 80 million years ago (upper
Cretaceous). If, however, other
Cenozoic Latimeria fossil species were to
be found, the coelacanth would be considered a true living fossil,
as that would fill in the gap where the species is "dead". Of
course, species do not just appear out of thin air, so all living
Lazarus species (excluding disappearing and reappearing
red list species) are nonetheless considered
living fossils, if it can be shown they are not
Elvis taxa.
Some living fossils are species that were known from fossils before
living representatives were discovered. The most famous examples of
this are the coelacanthiform fishes
Latimeria chalumnae
and
Latimeria menadoensis and the
dawn redwood,
Metasequoia, discovered
in a remote Chinese valley. Others include
glypheoid lobsters,
mymarommatid wasps, and
jurodid beetles, all of which were first described
from fossils, but later found alive (2 species, 10 species, and one
species respectively). Others are a single living species with no
close living relatives, but which is the survivor of a large and
widespread group in the fossil record, perhaps the best-known
example of which is
Ginkgo biloba (the
ginkgo), though there are others, such as the
Syntexis libocedrii (the
cedar
wood wasp).
Note that just because a living fossil is a surviving
representative of an archaic lineage does not necessarily require
that it retains
all of the "primitive" features (
plesiomorphies) of the lineage it is descended
from; that is, they may possess one to many derived features
(
autapomorphies), that have evolved
since the time of their lineage's divergence. All that is required
is that they can be unambiguously assigned to an otherwise extinct
lineage (rarely are they
identical to the fossil forms).
See for example the uniquely and highly autapomorphic
oxpeckers, which are not "true" living fossils (as
no fossils are known yet) but nonetheless appear to be the only
survivors of an ancient lineage related to
starlings and
mockingbirds (2006): Nuclear and mitochondrial
sequence data reveal the major lineages of starlings, mynas and
related taxa.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
41(2): 333-344. (HTML abstract).

Note the similarity between the 170 million year old fossil
Ginkgo sp. leaves on the left, and the living plant on the
right.
Examples
Some of these are
informally known as "living
fossils".
Plants
Fungi
Animals
- Vertebrates
- Mammals
- Birds
- Reptiles
- Amphibians
- Bony fish
- Sharks
- Invertebrates
- Insects
- Crustaceans
- Molluscs
- Other invertebrates
History
The term was first coined by
Charles
Darwin in his
The Origin
of Species, when discussing
Ornithorhynchus (the platypus) and
Lepidosiren (the South American
lungfish):
Other definitions
There are quite a lot of (ambiguous) definitions denoting living
fossils:
- A living taxon that lived through a large portion of geologic time
- To prove this, all living specimens must belong to the same
fossil species. This rules out Limulus,
Peripatus, Latimeria, Sphenodon,
Didelphis, the platypus, and many others. To allow some
flexibility, the genus could be used. Paleontological taxonomy relies on hard-part morphology (the paleontological
species concept), so there is a bias
towards longer species turnover times, and relationships can only
be inferred partially. Modern molecular biology has shown that
genetic rates of change are relatively uniform and not well related
to morphological change rates. So from a more molecular basis of
interbreeding capabilities there are essentially no such thing as
species that lived through a long geological time. However, with
the proviso that we are using the special case of a paleontological
species name, the definition does hold together in context.
Queensland lungfish
(Neoceratodus fosteri) is an example of an organism that
meets this criteria, fossils identical to modern Queensland
lungfish have been dated at over 100 million years making this
species one of the oldest if not actually the oldest extant
vertebrate species.
- The living specimens need not belong to the same fossil species
(or even genus). There must at least be some physiological
resemblance.
- The coelacanth for example, is a marine fish. The Mesozoic coelacanth species lived in salt and fresh
water. Osmoregulation in
Latimeria is handled by ureum retention. Ureum retention
is considered to be an indication of fresh water ancestry. This
means that the coelacanth lineage has evolved from freshwater to
saltwater.
- The
resemblance between Peripatus and Aysheaia (an early Cambrian animal from the Burgess Shale
) is striking (as of now, both are classified in the
Tardipolypoda (Tardigrada and
Onychophora), were it not that Aysheaia was a marine
animal, while Peripatus lives in tropical leaf
mould.
- A living taxon with many primitive characteristics
- This is a more neutral definition. However, it does not make it
clear whether the taxon is truly old, or it simply has many
plesiomorphies. Note that, as mentioned above, the converse may
hold for true living fossil taxa; that is, they may possess a great
many derived features (autapomorphies),
and not be particularly "primitive" in appearance.
- Some paleontologists consider "living fossils" with large
distributions (such as Triops cancriformis) not to be real
living fossils. In the case of Triops cancriformis (living
from the Triassic until now), the Triassic
specimens have lost most of their appendages (mostly only carapaces remain), and they haven't been thoroughly
examined since 1938.
- Any of the first three definitions, but the clade also has a low taxonomic diversity (low
diversity lineages)
- Oxpeckers are morphological somewhat similar to
starlings due to shared plesiomorphies,
but are uniquely adapted to feed on parasites and blood of large
land mammals which has always obscured their relationships. This
lineage forms part of a radiation that includes Sturnidae and Mimidae but
appears to be the most ancient one of these groups. Biogeography strongly suggests that oxpeckers
originated in eastern Asia and only later
arrived in Africa, where they now have a relict distribution
(Zuccon et al. 2007). The two living species thus seem to
be representatives of an entirely extinct and (as Passerida go) rather ancient lineage, as certainly
as this can be said in the absence of actual fossils. The latter is
probably due to the fact that the oxpecker lineage never occurred
in areas where conditions were good for fossilization of small bird
bones, but of course, fossils of ancestral oxpeckers may one day
turn up enabling to test this theory.
An organism's living fossil status can be rejected if the
(smallest) clade the species belongs to is species rich, as this
would imply (recent) speciation.
References
External links