Muhammad (c. 570–632) is
documented as having engaged
as a diplomat during
his propagation of
Islam and leadership over
the growing
Muslim Ummah (community).
He established a
method of communication with other tribal or national leaders
through letters, assigned envoys, or by visiting them personally, such as at
Ta’if
.
Instances of written correspondence include letters to
Heraclius, the
Negus and
Khosrau. Although it is likely that
Muhammad had initiated contact with other leaders within the
Arabian Peninsula, some have
questioned whether letters had been sent beyond these
boundaries.
When
Muhammad arrived in Medina
in 622,
local tribes,
mainly the
Banu Aus and
Banu Khazraj, had been feuding for several
decades. Muhammad addressed this by establishing the
Constitution of Medina: a document
which regulated interactions between the different factions, to
which the respective parties agreed.
This was a different
role for him, as he had remained only a religious figure during his
time in Mecca
.
The result
was the eventual formation of a united community in Medina
, as well as
the political supremacy of Muhammad.
Muhammad also participated in agreements and pledges such as
"Pledges of al-`Aqaba", the
Treaty
of Hudaybiyyah, and the "
Pledge
of the Tree". He reportedly used a silver
seal on letters sent to other notable leaders
who were
requested to convert to Islam.
Hilf al-Fudul
Hilf al-Fudul was an alliance created
by Muhammad in the
pre-Islamic
era.
Muslim migration to Abyssinia (615)
Muhammad's commencement of public preaching brought him stiff
opposition from the leading
tribe of Mecca,
the
Quraysh. Although Muhammad himself was
safe from persecution due to protection from his uncle,
Abu Talib ibn ‘Abd
al-Muttalib (a leader of the
Banu
Hashim), some of his followers were not in such a position. A
number of Muslims were mistreated by the Quraysh, some reportedly
beaten, imprisoned, or starved.
It was then, in 615, that Muhammad resolved
to send fifteen Muslims to emigrate to Abyssinia
to receive protection under the Christian ruler, the Negus. Emigration was
a means through which some of the Muslims could escape the
difficulties and persecution faced at the hands of the Quraysh,
although it also opened up new trading prospects.
The Quraysh, on hearing the attempted emigration, dispatched a
group led by
'Amr ibn al-'As and
Abdullah ibn Abi Rabia ibn Mughira in order to pursue the fleeing
Muslims. They were unsuccessful in their chase however as the
Muslims had already reached safe territory, and so approached the
Negus (named
Ashmaha), appealing to him to return the
Muslim migrants. Summoned to an audience with the Negus and his
bishops as a representative of Muhammad and the Muslims,
Ja`far ibn Abī Tālib spoke of
Muhammad's achievements and quoted
Qur'anic
verses related to Islam and
Christianity, including some from
Surah Maryam.
Ja'far ibn Abu Talib is quoted
according to
Islamic tradition as follows:
The Negus, seemingly impressed, consequently allowed the migrants
to stay, sending back the emissaries of Quraysh. It is also thought
that the Negus may have converted to Islam. The Christian subjects
of the Negus were displeased with his actions, accusing him of
leaving Christianity, although the Negus managed to appease them in
a way which, according to
Ibn Ishaq, could
be described as favourable towards Islam. Having established
friendly relations with the Negus, it became possible for Muhammad
to send another group of migrants, such that the number of Muslims
living in Abyssinia totalled around one hundred.
Journey to Ta'if (619)
In early June 619, Muhammad set out from Mecca to travel to the
town of Ta'if in order to convene with its chieftains, and mainly
those of
Banu Thaqif (such as
Abd-Ya-Layl ibn Amr). The main dialogue
during this visit is thought to have been the invitation by
Muhammad for them to accept Islam, while contemporary historian
Montgomery Watt observes the
plausibility of an additional discussion about wresting Ta'if
trade routes from Meccan control. The
reason for Muhammad directing his efforts towards Ta'if may have
been due to the lack of positive response from the people of Mecca
to his message until then.
In rejection of his message, and fearing that there would be
reprisals from Mecca for having hosted Muhammad, the groups
involved in meeting with Muhammad began to incite townfolk to pelt
him with stones. Having been beset and pursued out of Ta'if, the
wounded Muhammad sought refuge in a nearby
orchard. Resting under a
grape
vine, it is here that he invoked
God,
seeking comfort and protection.
According to Islamic tradition, Muhammad on his way back to Mecca
was met by the angel
Gabriel and the angels
of the mountains surrounding Ta'if, and was told by them that if he
willed, Ta'if would be crushed between the mountains in revenge for
his mistreatment. Muhammad is said to have rejected the
proposition, saying that he would pray in the hopes of succeeding
generations of Ta'if coming to accept
Islamic
monotheism.
al-`Aqaba pledges (620—621)
In the summer of 620 during the pilgrimage season, six men
travelling from Medina came into contact with Muhammad. Having been
impressed by his message and character, and thinking that he could
help bring resolution to the problems being faced in Medina, five
of the six men returned to Mecca the following year bringing seven
others. Following their
conversion
to Islam and attested belief in Muhammad as the messenger of
God, the twelve men pledged to obey him and to stay away from a
number of Islamically sinful acts. This was known as the "
First
Pledge of al-`Aqaba."
Following the pledge, Muhammad decided to send a Muslim
"ambassador",
Mus`ab ibn `Umair,
to Medina in order to teach people about Islam and invite them to
it.
Converts to Islam came from nearly all
Arab
tribes present in Medina, such that by June of the subsequent year
there were seventy-five Muslims coming to Mecca for pilgrimage and
to meet Muhammad. Meeting him secretly by night, the group made
what was known as the "
Second Pledge of al-`Aqaba", or the
"
Pledge of War". Conditions of the pledge, many of which
similar to the first, included obedience to Muhammad, "enjoining
good and forbidding evil" as well as responding to the call to arms
when required.
Some western academics are noted to have questioned whether or not
a second pledge had taken place, although Watt argues that there
must have been several meetings between the pilgrims and Muhammad
on which the basis of his move to Medina could be agreed
upon.
Reformation of Medina (622—)
Medinan society prior to Muslim migration
The demography of Medina before Muslim migration consisted mainly
of two pagan Arab tribes; the Banu Aus and the Banu Khazraj; and at
least three
Jewish tribes:
Qaynuqa,
Nadir, and
Qurayza. Medinan society, for perhaps
decades, had been scarred by feuds between the two main Arab tribes
and their sub-clans. The Jewish tribes had at times formed their
own alliances with either one of the Arab tribes. The oppressive
policy of the Khazraj who at the time had assumed control over
Medina, forced the Jewish tribes Nadir and Qurayza into alliance
with the Aus who had been significantly weakened. The culmination
of this was the
Battle of Bu'ath in
617, in which the Khazraj and their allies, Qaynuqa, has been
soundly defeated by the coalition of Aus and its
supporters.Bosworth. Bu'ā
th; Encyclopaedia of Islam
Although formal combat between the two clans had ended, hostilities
between them continued even up until Muhammad's arrival in Medina.
Muhammad had been invited by some Medinans, who had been impressed
by his religious preaching and apparent trustworthiness, as an
arbitrator to help reduce the prevailing factional discord.
Muhammad's task would thus be to form a united community out of
these heterogeneous elements, not only as a religious preacher, but
as a political and diplomatic leader who could help resolve the
ongoing disputes.
Constitution of Medina
By 622, Muhammad had
migrated to
Medina with a group of his
followers,
having escaped the forces of Quraysh. They were given shelter by
members of the indigenous community known as the
Ansar. After having established the first
mosque in Medina and obtaining residence with
Abu Ayyub al-Ansari, he then set
about the establishment of a pact known as the Constitution of
Medina. This document was a unilateral declaration by Muhammad, and
deals almost exclusively with the civil and political relations of
the citizens among themselves and with the outside.
The source of authority was transferred from public opinion to God.
Bernard Lewis writes the community at Medina became a new kind of
tribe with Muhammad as its
sheikh, while at
the same time having a religious character.
Watt argues that
Muhammad's authority had not extended over the entirety of Medina
at this time, such that in reality he was only the religious leader
of Medina, and his political influence would only become
significant after the Battle of Badr
in 624. Lewis
opines that Muhammad's assumption of the role of statesman was a
means through which the objectives of
prophethood could be achieved. The constitution,
although recently signed, was soon to be rendered obsolete due to
the rapidly changing conditions in Medina, with certain tribes
having been accused of breaching the terms of agreement.
Impact
The signing of the constitution could be seen as indicating the
formation of a united community, in ways similar to a
federation of
nomadic clans
and tribes, as the signatories were bound together by solemn
agreement. The community, however, now also had a religious basis.
Extending this analogy, Watt argues that the functioning of the
community resembled that of a tribe, such that it would not be
incorrect to call the community a kind of "super-tribe". The
signing of the constitution itself displayed a degree of diplomacy
by Muhammad, as although he envisioned a society eventually based
upon a religious outlook, practical consideration was needed to be
inclusive instead of exclusive of the varying social
elements.
Both the Aus and Khazraj had progressively converted to Islam,
although the latter had been more enthusiastic than the former: at
the second pledge of al-`Aqaba, the numbers of Khazraj to Aus
present was 62:3; and at the Battle of Badr, 175:63.Watt.
Khazradj; Encyclopaedia of Islam Subsequently, the hostility
between the Aus and Khazraj gradually diminished and became unheard
of after Muhammad's death. According to
Muslim scholar
al-Mubarakpuri, the 'spirit of brotherhood' as insisted by Muhammad
amongst Muslims was the means through which a new society would be
shaped.
The result was Muhammad's increasing influence in Medina, although
he was most probably only considered a political force after the
Battle of Badr, more so after the
Battle
of Uhud where he was clearly in political ascendency. To attain
complete control over Medina, Muhammad would have to exercise
considerable political, military as well as religious skills over
the coming years.
Events at Hudaybiyya (628)
In March
628, Muhammad reportedly saw himself in
a dream performing the
Umrah (lesser
pilgrimage), and so prepared to travel with his followers to Mecca
in the hopes of fulfilling this vision. He set out with a group of
around 1,400 pilgrims (in the traditional
Ihram garb), although it was not soon until
Mecca had discovered these arrangements. On hearing of the Muslims
travelling to Mecca for pilgrimage, the Quraysh sent out a force of
200 fighters in order to halt the approaching party. In no position
to fight, Muhammad evaded the cavalry by taking a more difficult
route, thereby reaching al-Hudaybiyya, just outside of Mecca.
It was at Hudaybiyya that a number of envoys went to and fro in
order to negotiate with the Quraysh. During the negotiations,
Uthman ibn Affan was chosen as an
envoy to convene with the leaders in Mecca, on account of his high
regard amongst the Quraysh. On his entry into Mecca, rumours
ignited that Uthman had subsequently been murdered by the Quraysh.
Muhammad responded by calling upon the pilgrims to make a pledge
not to flee (or to stick with Muhammad, whatever decision he made)
if the situation descended into war with Mecca. This pledge became
known as the "
Pledge of Good Pleasure" (
Arabic: بيعة الرضوان ,
bay'at
al-ridhwān) or the "
Pledge under the Tree".
The incident was mentioned in the
Qur'an as
follows:
Treaty
Soon afterwards, with the rumour of Uthman's slaying proven untrue,
negotiations continued and a treaty was eventually signed between
the Muslims and Quraysh. Conditions of the treaty included the
Muslims' postponement of the lesser pilgrimage until the following
year, a pact of mutual non-aggression between the parties, and a
promise by Muhammad to return any member of Quraysh (presumably a
minor or woman) fleeing from Mecca without the permission of their
parent or guardian, even if they be Muslim. Some of Muhammad's
followers were upset by this agreement, as they had insisted that
they should complete the pilgrimage they had set out for. Following
the signing of the treaty, Muhammad and the pilgrims
sacrificed the animals they had brought for it, and
proceeded to return to Medina. It was only later that Muhammad's
followers would realise the benefit behind this treaty. These
benefits, according to Islamic historian Buhl, included the
inducing of the Meccans to recognise Muhammad as an equal; a
cessation of military activity posing well for the future; and
gaining the admiration of Meccans who were impressed by the
incorporation of the pilgrimage rituals.
The treaty was set to expire after 10 years, but was broken after
only 10 months, due to a perceived violation of the treaty when a
Meccan had murdered a Muslim. Other sources suggest that the
violation was due to the Meccans' aiding of a client clan against a
tribal ally of Muhammad. The reaction was the assembly of an army
of ten thousand men by Muhammad to march unto Mecca, resulting in
the
Conquest of Mecca.
Correspondence with other leaders

Another rendering of the seal
attributed to Muhammad.
There are instances according to Islamic tradition where Muhammad
is thought to have sent letters to other heads of state during the
Medinan phase of his life.
Personalities, amongst others, included the
Negus of Abyssinia, Heraclius (emperor of the Byzantine Empire), the Muqawqis of Egypt
, Khosrau,
Sassanid King of Persia (Iran
).
There has been great controversy amongst academic scholars as to
their authenticity.El-Cheikh (1999) pp. 5—21 According to
Forward, academics have treated some reports
with
scepticism, although he argues that
it is likely that Muhammad had assumed correspondence with leaders
within the Arabian peninsula. R.B. Serjeant opines that the letters
are forgeries and were designed to promote both the 'notion that
Muhammad conceived of Islam as a universal religion and to
strengthen the Islamic position against Christian polemic.' He
further argues the unlikelihood of Muhammad sending such letters
when he had not yet mastered Arabia.
Irfan Shahid,
professor of Arabic and Islamic
literature at Georgetown University
, contends that dismissing the letters sent by
Muhammad as forgeries is "unjustified", pointing to recent research
establishing the historicity of the letter to Heraclius as an
example.
Letter to Heraclius
A letter was sent from Muhammad to the emperor of
Byzantium, Heraclius, through the Muslim envoy
Dihyah bin Khalifah
al-Kalbi, although Shahid suggests that Heraclius may never
have received it. He also advances that more positive
sub-narratives surrounding the letter contain little credence.
According to El-Cheikh, Arab historians and chroniclers generally
did not doubt the authenticity of Heraclius' letter due to the
documentation of such letters in the majority of both early and
later sources. Furthermore, she notes that the formulation and the
wordings of different sources are very close and the differences
are ones of detail: They concern the date on which the letter was
sent and its exact phrasing.
Muhammad Hamidullah, an Islamic research
scholar, argues for the authenticity of the letter sent to
Heraclius, and in a later work reproduces what is claimed to be the
original letter. The account as transmitted by
Muslim historians reads as
follows:
Abu Sufyan ibn Harb, currently
an adversary to Muhammad but a signatory to the recent Treaty of
Hudaybiyyah, was trading in
Greater
Syria when he was summoned to the court of Heraclius. Asked by
Heraclius about the man claiming to be a prophet, Abu Sufyan
responded, speaking favorably of Muhammad's character and lineage
and outlining some directives of Islam. Heraclius was seemingly
impressed by what he was told of Muhammad, and felt that Muhammad's
claim to prophethood was valid. Despite this incident, it seems
that Heraclius was more concerned with the current rift between the
various
Christian churches within
his empire, and as a result did not convert to Islam.
Deputation to Abyssinia
The letter inviting the Negus to Islam had been sent by Amr bin
Omayah ad-Damari, although it is not known if the letter had been
sent with Ja'far on
migration to
Abyssinia or at a later date following the Treaty of
Hudaibiyya. According to Hamidullah, the former may be more likely.
The letter reads:
Having received the letter, the Negus was purported to accept Islam
in a reply he wrote to Muhammad. According to Islamic tradition,
the Muslims in Medina prayed the
funeral prayer in absentia for the Negus on
his death. It is possible that a further letter was sent to the
successor of the late Negus.
Letter to Muqawqis
There has been conflict amongst scholars about the authenticity of
aspects concerning the letter sent by Muhammad to Muqawqis. Some
scholars such as
Nöldeke
consider the currently preserved copy to be a forgery, and
Öhrnberg considers the whole narrative
concerning the Muqawqis to be "
devoid of any historical
value". Muslim historians, in contrast, generally affirm the
historicity of the reports. The purported text of the letter (sent
by Hatib bin Abi Balta'a) according to Islamic tradition is as
follows:
The Muqawqis responded by sending gifts to Muhammad, including two
female slaves,
Maria al-Qibtiyya
and Sirin. Maria became the concubine of Muhammad, with some
sources reporting that she was later freed and married. The
Muqawqis is reported in Islamic tradition as having presided over
the contents of the parchment and storing it in an ivory casket,
although he did not convert to Islam.
Letter to Khosrau
The
letter
written by Muhammad addressing the Khosrau of Persia was
carried by Abdullah ibn
Hudhafah as-Sahmi who, through the governor of Bahrain
, delivered
it to the Khosrau. The account as transmitted by Muslim
historians reads:
On receival, the Khosrau reportedly tore up the letter in outrage.
This reaction of enmity contrasts with the responses of the other
leaders, and was supposedly due to Muhammad having placed his own
name before that of the Khosrau.
Other personalities
Apart from the aforementioned personalities, there are other
reported instances of correspondence.
Munzir ibn Sawa Al Tamimi, the
governor of Bahrain was apparently an addressee, with a letter
having been delivered to him through
Al-Ala'a Al-Hadrami. Some subjects of
the governor reportedly converted to Islam, whereas others did not.
A similar letter was sent to Hauda bin Ali, the governor of
Al-Yamama, who replied that he would only
convert if he were given a position of authority within Muhammad's
government, a proposition which Muhammad was unwilling to accept.
The
current ruler of Damascus
, Harith ibn Abi Shamir al-Ghassani, reportedly reacted less than
favourably to Muhammad's correspondence, viewing it as an
insult. Jaifer and `Abd al-Jalani, two brothers
belonging to the ruling Azd tribe in Oman
, converted
to Islam in 630 on receiving the letter sent from Muhammad through
'Amr ibn al-'As.
See also
Notes
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 412
- Irfan Shahid, Arabic literature to the end of the
Umayyad
period, Journal of the American Oriental Society,
Vol 106, No. 3, p.531
- Watt (1974) p. 81
- Forward (1998) pp. 28—29
- Watt. al-Aus; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- Buhl; Welch. Muhammad; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- Watt (1974) pp. 93—96
- Haykal (1993) Section: "The Prophet's Delegates"[1]
- Forward (1998) p. 14
- Forward (1998) p. 15
- Watt (1974) pp. 67—68
- van Donzel. al-Nadjāshī; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- Vaglieri. Dja'far b. Abī Tālib; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 162
- Muir (1861) Vol. II p. 200
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) pp. 163—166
- Muir (1861) Vol. II p. 202
- Sahih
al-Bukhari 4.54.454, Sahih Muslim 19.4425
- Watt (1974) p. 83
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 187
- Ibn Hisham, as-Seerat an-Nabawiyyah, Vol. I p. 454
- Watt (1974) p. 84
- Forward (1998) p. 19
- Ibn Kathir, al-Bidaayah wa an-Nihaayah, Vol. II, p. 279.
- Bernard Lewis, The Arabs in History, page 43.
- ibid.
- ibid, page 44.
- Watt (1974) pp. 95, 96
- Lewis (1984) p. 12
- Watt (1974) p. 94—95
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 227—229
- Watt (1974) p. 96
- Journey to Mecca performed by Muslims during which they perform
rites such as circumambulation (tawaf) of the Kaaba and briskly walking back and forth between the
hills of Safa and Marwa. The "Umrah"
is not to be confused with "Hajj", which is regarded as the greater
pilgrimage.
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 398
- Watt. al-Hudaybiya; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 402
- Forward (1998) p. 28
- Forward (1998) p. 29
- Footnote of the El-Cheikh(1999) reads: "Opposed to its
authenticity is R. B. Sejeant "Early Arabic Prose: in Arabic
Literature to the End of the Umayyad Period, ed. A. E L. Beeston et
a1 ... (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 141-2. Suhaila aljaburi also doubts
the authenticity of the document; "Ridlat al-nabi ila hiraql malik
al-~m,H" amdard Islamicus 1 (1978) no. 3, pp. 15-49"
- Serjeant also drAus the attention to anachronisms such as the
mention of the payment of the poll tax. Loc cit.
- Footnote of the El-Cheikh(1999) reads: "Hamidullah discussed
this controversy and tried to prove the authenticity of Heraclius'
letter in his "La lettre du Prophete P Heraclius et le sort de
I'original: Arabica 2(1955), pp. 97-1 10, and more recently, in Sir
originaw des lettms du prophbte de I'lslam (Paris, 1985), pp.
149.172, in which he reproduces what purports to be the original
letter."
- Muhammad and Heraclius: A Study in Legitimacy, Nadia Maria
El-Cheikh, Studia Islamica, No. 89. (1999), pp. 5-21.
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 420
- Rogerson (2003) p. 200
- Sahih al-Bukhari 5.58.220
- Öhrnberg; Mukawkis. Encyclopaedia of Islam.
- Buhl. Māriya; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 416
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) p. 417
- Morony. Kisrā; Encyclopaedia of Islam
- al-Mubarakpuri (2002) pp. 421—424
- Rogerson (2003) p. 202
References
Further reading
- Al-Ismail, Tahia (1998). The Life of Muhammad: his life
based on the earliest sources. Ta-Ha publishers Ltd, United
Kingdom
. ISBN 0907461646.
External links