Operation Castle was the highest-yield nuclear test series ever
conducted by the United States.

Operation Castle test video
Operation Castle was a
United
States
series of high-energy (high-yield) nuclear
tests by Joint Task Force SEVEN (JTF-7) at Bikini Atoll
beginning in March 1954. It followed
Operation Upshot-Knothole
and preceded
Operation
Teapot.
Conducted
as a joint venture between the Atomic Energy
Commission (AEC) and the Department of
Defense
(DoD), the ultimate objective of the operation was
to test designs for an aircraft-deliverable thermonuclear weapon.
Operation Castle was considered by government officials to be a
success as it proved the feasibility of deployable "dry fuel"
designs for thermonuclear weapons. There were, however, technical
difficulties with some of the tests: one device had a yield much
lower than its predicted yield (a "
fizzle"),
while two other devices detonated with over twice their predicted
yields.
One test in particular, Castle Bravo
, resulted in extensive radiological contamination
of nearby islands (including inhabitants and U.S. soldiers
stationed there), as well as a nearby Japanese fishing boat
(Daigo Fukuryū
Maru), resulting in one direct fatality and continued
health problems for many of those exposed. Public reaction
to the tests and an awareness of the long-range effects of
nuclear fallout has been attributed as being
part of the motivation for the
Partial Test Ban Treaty of
1963.
Background
AEC Authorization for
Operation Castle
Bikini Atoll
had previously hosted nuclear testing in 1946 as
part of Operation
Crossroads
where the world’s fourth and fifth atomic weapons
were detonated in Bikini Lagoon. Since then, US nuclear
weapons testing had moved to
Eniwetok Atoll
to take advantage of generally larger islands and deeper water.
Both Atolls were part of the US
Pacific Proving Grounds.
However, the extremely high yields of the Castle weapons caused
concern within the AEC that potential damage to the limited
infrastructure already established at Eniwetok would delay other
operations.
Additionally, the cratering from the Castle
weapons was expected to be comparable to that of Ivy Mike
, a 10.4
Mt device tested at Eniwetok in 1952 leaving
a crater approximately 1 mile (1.6 km) in diameter.
The Ivy Mike test had been the world’s first full scale
thermonuclear or
fusion explosion. The Mike device used liquid
deuterium, an
isotope of
hydrogen, making
it a "wet bomb." The complex
dewar
mechanisms needed to store the liquid deuterium at
cryogenic temperatures made the device three
stories tall and 82 tons in total weight, far from being a
deliverable weapon. With the success of Ivy Mike as a proof of the
Teller-Ulam concept, research began on
using a “dry" fuel to make a practical fusion weapon so that the
United States could begin deploying thermonuclear designs in
quantity. This applied the Teller-Ulam concept with
lithium deuteride as the fusion fuel,
greatly reducing size, weight, and complexity. Operation Castle was
chartered to test four dry fuel designs, two wet bombs, and one
smaller device. Approval for Operation Castle was communicated to
JTF-7 by Major General
Kenneth D.
Nichols, General Manager of the
AEC, on 21 January 1954.
Experiments
Operation Castle was organized into 7 experiments, all but one of
which were to take place at Bikini Atoll. Below is the original
test schedule (as of February 1954).
Operation Castle Schedule
| Experiment |
Device |
Prototype |
Fuel |
Date |
Predicted Yield |
Manufacturer |
Test Location |
BRAVO |
Shrimp |
TX-21 |
40% Li-6 D (dry) |
1 March, 1954 |
6 Mt |
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory |
Reef off Nam Is, Bikini |
| UNION |
Alarm Clock |
EC-14 |
95% Li-6 D (dry) |
11 March, 1954 |
3-4 Mt |
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory |
Barge off Iroij, Bikini |
| YANKEE |
Jughead |
TX/EC-16 |
Cryo H-3 (wet) |
22 March, 1954 |
8 Mt |
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory |
Barge off Iroij, Bikini |
| ECHO |
Ramrod |
N/A |
Cryo H-3 (wet) |
29 March, 1954 |
65-275 Kt |
University of California Radiation Laboratory (Livermore) |
Eleleron, Enewetak |
| NECTAR |
Zombie |
TX-15 |
Boosted fission |
5 April, 1954 |
1.8 Mt |
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory |
Barge off Iroij, Bikini |
| ROMEO |
Runt |
TX/EC-17A |
7.5% Li-6 D (natural) |
15 April, 1954 |
4 Mt |
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory |
Barge off Iroij, Bikini |
| KOON |
Morgenstern |
N/A |
7.6% Li-6 D (natural) |
22 April, 1954 |
1 Mt |
University of California Radiation Laboratory (Livermore) |
Eneman, Bikini |
|
Operation Castle was intended to test lithium deuteride (LiD) as a
thermonuclear fusion fuel. A solid at room temperature, "dry" LiD,
if it worked, would be far more practical than the cryogenic liquid
deuterium (hydrogen-2) fuel in the Ivy Mike device. The same
Teller-Ulam principle would be used as in the Ivy Mike "Sausage"
device, but the fusion reactions were different. Mike fused
deuterium with deuterium, but the LiD devices would fuse deuterium
with tritium. The tritium was produced during the explosion by
irradiating the lithium with
fast
neutrons.
Bravo and Union used lithium enriched in the Li-6 isotope while
Romeo and Koon were fueled with natural lithium (92% Li-7, 7.5%
Li-6). The use of natural lithium would be important to the ability
of the US to rapidly expand its nuclear stockpile during the cold
war
arms race.
As a hedge, development of liquid deuterium weapons continued in
parallel. Even though they were much less practical because of the
logistical problems dealing with the transport, handling, and
storage of a cryogenic device, the cold war arms race drove the
demand for a viable fusion weapon. The Ramrod and Jughead devices
were liquid fuel designs greatly reduced in size and weight from
their Ivy Mike "Sausage" predecessor. The Jughead device was
ultimately weaponized and saw limited fielding in the inventory
until the dry fuel weapons were common.
Nectar was not a fusion weapon in the same sense as the rest of the
Castle series. Even though it used a dry lithium fuel for
fission boosting, the principal reaction
material in the second stage was uranium and plutonium. Similar to
the Teller-Ulam configuration, a
fission device was used to create high
temperatures and pressures in order to compress a second
fissionable mass that would have otherwise been
too large to sustain an efficient reaction if it were triggered
with conventional explosives. This experiment was intended to
develop intermediate yield weapons for expanding the inventory
(around 1-2
Mt vs. 4-8).
It should be noted that many "fusion" or "thermonuclear" weapons
still generate much or even most of their yields from fission.
Although the U-238 isotope of uranium (i.e., "natural" or
"depleted" uranium) will not sustain a chain reaction, it still
fissions when irradiated by the intense fast neutron flux of a
fusion explosion. Because U-238 is plentiful and has no critical
mass, it can be added in almost unlimited quantities as a "tamper"
around a fusion bomb, helping to contain the fusion reaction and
contributing its own fission energy. Fission of the U-238 tamper
contributed 77% -- 8 megatons -- to the yield of the 10.4 Mt Ivy
Mike explosion.
Test execution
The most notable event of Operation Castle was the Bravo test. The
dry fuel for Bravo was 40% Li-6 and 60% Li-7. Only Li-6 was
expected to breed tritium for the deuterium-tritium fusion
reaction; Li-7 was expected to be inert. Yet
J. Carson Mark,
head of the Los Alamos Theoretical Design Division, had speculated
that Bravo could "go big", estimating that the device could produce
an explosive yield as much as 20% more than had been originally
calculated. Li-7 turned out to be an excellent source of tritium
through a previously unquantified reaction.
Bravo exceeded
expectations by 250%, yielding
15 Mt -- 1,000 times more powerful than the
Little
Boy
weapon used on Hiroshima. Bravo is to this day the largest
detonation ever conducted by the United States, and the seventh
largest ever detonated in the world.
Because Bravo greatly exceeded its expected yield, JTF-7 was caught
unprepared.
Much of the permanent infrastructure on
Bikini
Atoll
was heavily damaged. The intense thermal
flash ignited a fire at a distance of on the island of Eneu (base
island of Bikini Atoll). The ensuing
fallout contaminated all of the atoll, so
much so that it could not be approached by JTF-7 for 24 hours after
the test, and even then exposure times were limited. As the fallout
spread downwind to the east, more atolls were contaminated with
activated calcium ash.
Although the atolls were evacuated soon after
the test, 239 Marshallese on the Utirik
, Rongelap
, and Ailinginae Atolls
were subjected to significant levels of
radiation. 28 Americans stationed on the
Rongerik Atoll were also exposed. Follow-up studies
of the contaminated individuals began soon after the blast as
Project 4.1, and though the short-term
effects of the radiation exposure for most of the Marshallese were
mild and/or hard to correlate, the long-term effects were
pronounced. Additionally, 23 Japanese fishermen aboard
Lucky Dragon No. 5 were also exposed to high
levels of radiation. They suffered symptoms of
radiation poisoning, and one crew member
died in September 1954.
The heavy contamination and extensive damage from Bravo
significantly delayed the rest of the series. The post-Bravo
schedule was revised on 14 April 1954.
Operation Castle Schedule (Post BRAVO)
| Experiment |
Original Date |
Revised Date |
Original Yield |
Revised Yield |
| UNION |
11 March, 1954 |
22 April, 1954 |
3-4 Mt |
5-10 Mt |
| YANKEE |
22 March, 1954 |
27 April, 1954 |
8 Mt |
9.5 Mt |
| NECTAR |
5 April, 1954 |
20 April |
1.8 Mt |
1-3 Mt |
| ROMEO |
15 April, 1954 |
27 March, 1954 |
4 Mt |
8 Mt |
| KOON |
22 April, 1954 |
7 April, 1954 |
1 Mt |
1.5 Mt |
|
The Romeo and Koon tests were complete by the time of this
revision. The Echo test was canceled due to the liquid fuel design
becoming obsolete with the success of the dry-fueled Bravo. Yankee
was similarly considered obsolete and the Yankee test was conducted
using a Runt II device (similar to the Union device) hastily
completed at Los Alamos and flown to Bikini. With this revision,
both of the "wet" fuel devices were removed from the test
schedule.
As Operation Castle continued, the increased yields and fallout
caused test locations to be re-evaluated. While the majority of the
tests were planned for barges near the sand spit of Iroij, some
were moved to the Bravo and Union craters. Additionally, Nectar was
moved from Bikini Atoll to the Ivy Mike crater at
Enewetak for expediency since Bikini was still
heavily contaminated from the previous tests.
The final test in Operation Castle took place on 14 May 1954.
Operation Castle (Actual)
| Experiment |
Date |
Yield |
Location |
BRAVO |
1 March, 1954 |
15Mt |
Reef off Nam Is, Bikini |
| ROMEO |
27 March, 1954 |
11 Mt |
Barge in BRAVO crater, Bikini |
| KOON |
7 April, 1954 |
110 kt |
Eneman, Bikini |
| UNION |
26 April, 1954 |
6.9 Mt |
Barge off Iroij, Bikini |
| YANKEE |
5 May, 1954 |
13.5 Mt |
Barge in UNION, Bikini |
| NECTAR |
14 May, 1954 |
1.69 Mt |
Barge Ivy-MIKE crater, Enewetak |
|
Results
Operation Castle was an unqualified success for the implementation
of dry fuel devices. The Bravo design was quickly weaponized and is
suspected to be the progenitor of the
Mk-21 gravity bomb. The Mk-21 design
project began on 26 March 1954 (just three weeks after Bravo) with
production of 275 weapons beginning in the fall of 1955. Romeo,
relying on natural lithium, was rapidly turned into the
Mk-17 bomb, the US first deployable
H bomb , and was available to strategic
forces as an Emergency Capability by late summer of 1954. Most of
the Castle dry fuel devices eventually appeared in the inventory
and ultimately grandfathered the majority of
thermonuclear configurations.
In
contrast, the Livermore
-designed Koon design was a failure. Using
natural lithium and a heavily modified
Teller-Ulam configuration, the test produced
only 110
Kt of an expected 1.5
Mt. While engineers at the Radiation Laboratory had
hoped it would lead to a promising new field of weapons, it was
eventually determined that the design allowed premature heating of
the lithium fuel, thereby disrupting the delicate fusion
conditions.
See also
References
Bibliography
External links