
Deep space radar TRADEX, Tracking
Radar Experiment
Radar is an object detection system that uses
electromagnetic waves to
identify the range, altitude, direction, or speed of both moving
and fixed objects such as
aircraft, ships,
motor vehicles, weather formations, and terrain. The term
RADAR was coined in 1941 as an
acronym for
RAdio D
etection
A
nd R
anging.
The term has since entered the English
language as a standard word, radar, losing the
capitalization.
Radar was originally called
RDF' (Radio Direction
Finder, now used as a totally different device) in the United
Kingdom, in order to preserve the secrecy of its ranging
capability.
A radar system has a transmitter that emits
microwaves or
radio
waves. These waves are in phase when emitted, and when they
come into contact with an object are
scattered in all directions. The signal is thus
partly reflected back and it has a slight change of wavelength (and
thus frequency) if the target is moving. The receiver is usually,
but not always, in the same location as the transmitter. Although
the signal returned is usually very weak, the signal can be
amplified through use of electronic techniques in the receiver and
in the antenna configuration. This enables radar to detect objects
at ranges where other emissions, such as
sound
or
visible light, would be too weak to
detect. Radar uses include
meteorological detection of
precipitation,
measuring ocean surface waves,
air traffic control,
police detection of
speeding
traffic, determining the speed of baseballs
and by the military.
History
Several
inventors, scientists, and
engineers contributed to the
development of radar. The first to use
radio waves to detect "the presence of distant metallic objects"
was Christian Hülsmeyer, who in 1904 demonstrated the feasibility
of detecting the presence of a ship in dense fog, but not its
distance. He received Reichspatent Nr. 165546 for his pre-radar
device in April 1904, and later patent 169154 for a related
amendment for ranging. He also received a patent in England for his
telemobiloscope on September 22, 1904.
In August 1917
Nikola Tesla first
established principles regarding frequency and power level for the
first primitive radar units. He stated, "[...]
by their
[standing electromagnetic waves]
use we may produce at will,
from a sending station, an electrical effect in any particular
region of the globe; [with which]
we may determine the
relative position or course of a moving object, such as a vessel at
sea, the distance traversed by the same, or its speed."
Before the
Second World War
developments by the British, the Germans, the French, the Soviets
and the Americans led to the modern version of radar. In 1934 the
French
Émile Girardeau stated
he was building a radar system "conceived according to the
principles stated by Tesla" and obtained a patent (French Patent n°
788795 in 1934) for a working dual radar system, a part of which
was installed on the
Normandie liner in
1935. The same year, American Dr.
Robert M. Page
tested the first monopulse radar and
the Soviet military engineer P.K.Oschepkov, in collaboration with
Leningrad Electrophysical
Institute
, produced an experimental apparatus RAPID capable
of detecting an aircraft within 3 km of a receiver.
Hungarian
Zoltán Bay produced a
working model by 1936 at the
Tungsram
laboratory in the same vein.
However, it was the British who were the first to fully exploit it
as a defence against aircraft attack. This was spurred on by fears
that the Germans were developing
death
rays. Following a study of the possibility of propagating
electromagnetic energy and the likely effect, the British
scientists asked by the
Air Ministry to
investigate concluded that a death ray was impractical but
detection of aircraft appeared feasible.
Robert Watson-Watt demonstrated to his
superiors the capabilities of a working prototype and patented the
device in 1935 (British Patent GB593017) It served as the basis for
the Chain Home network of radars to
defend Great
Britain
.
The war precipitated research to find better resolution, more
portability and more features for radar. The post-war years have
seen the use of radar in fields as diverse as
air traffic control, weather monitoring,
astrometry and road speed control.
Principles
The radar dish, or antenna, transmits pulses of radio waves or
microwaves which bounce off any object in their path. The object
returns a tiny part of the wave's energy to a dish or antenna which
is usually located at the same site as the transmitter. The time it
takes for the reflected waves to return to the dish enables a
computer to calculate how far away the object is, its radial
velocity and other characteristics.
Reflection
Electromagnetic waves
reflect (scatter) from any large change in the
dielectric or
diamagnetic constants. This means that a solid
object in
air or a
vacuum, or other significant change in atomic density
between the object and what is surrounding it, will usually scatter
radar (radio) waves. This is particularly true for
electrically conductive materials,
such as metal and carbon fiber, making radar particularly well
suited to the detection of
aircraft and
ships.
Radar absorbing
material, containing
resistive and sometimes
magnetic substances, is used on military vehicles
to reduce radar reflection. This is the radio equivalent of
painting something a dark color.
Radar waves scatter in a variety of ways depending on the size
(wavelength) of the radio wave and the shape of the target. If the
wavelength is much shorter than the target's size, the wave will
bounce off in a way similar to the way light is reflected by a
mirror. If the wavelength is much longer than
the size of the target, the target is
polarized (positive and negative charges are
separated), like a
dipole antenna.
This is described by
Rayleigh
scattering, an effect that creates the Earth's blue sky and red
sunsets. When the two length scales are
comparable, there may be
resonances. Early
radars used very long
wavelengths that
were larger than the targets and received a vague signal, whereas
some modern systems use shorter
wavelengths (a few
centimeters or shorter) that can image objects as
small as a loaf of bread.
Short radio waves reflect from curves and corners, in a way similar
to glint from a rounded piece of glass. The most reflective targets
for short wavelengths have 90° angles between the
reflective surface. A structure
consisting of three flat surfaces meeting at a single corner, like
the corner on a box, will always reflect waves entering its opening
directly back at the source. These so-called
corner reflectors are commonly used as
radar reflectors to make otherwise difficult-to-detect objects
easier to detect, and are often found on boats in order to improve
their detection in a rescue situation and to reduce
collisions.
For similar reasons, objects attempting to avoid detection will
angle their surfaces in a way to eliminate inside corners and avoid
surfaces and edges perpendicular to likely detection directions,
which leads to "odd" looking
stealth
aircraft. These precautions do not completely eliminate
reflection because of
diffraction,
especially at longer wavelengths. Half wavelength long wires or
strips of conducting material, such as
chaff, are very reflective but
do not direct the scattered energy back toward the source. The
extent to which an object reflects or scatters radio waves is
called its
radar cross
section.
Radar equation
The power
Pr returning to the receiving antenna
is given by the radar equation:
- P_r = {{P_t G_t A_r \sigma F^4}\over{{(4\pi)}^2
R_t^2R_r^2}}
where
- Pt = transmitter power
- Gt = gain of the
transmitting antenna
- Ar = effective aperture (area) of the
receiving antenna
- σ = radar cross
section, or scattering coefficient, of the target
- F = pattern propagation factor
- Rt = distance from the transmitter to the
target
- Rr = distance from the target to the
receiver.
In the common case where the transmitter and the receiver are at
the same location,
Rt =
Rr
and the term
Rt²
Rr² can be
replaced by
R4, where
R is the
range.This yields:
- P_r = {{P_t G_t A_r \sigma F^4}\over{{(4\pi)}^2 R^4}}.
This shows that the received power declines as the fourth power of
the range, which means that the reflected power from distant
targets is very, very small.
The equation above with
F = 1 is a simplification for
vacuum without interference. The propagation
factor accounts for the effects of
multipath and shadowing and depends on the details
of the environment. In a real-world situation,
pathloss effects should also be considered.
Polarization
In the transmitted radar signal, the electric field is
perpendicular to the direction of propagation, and this direction
of the electric field is the
polarization of the wave. Radars use
horizontal, vertical, linear and circular polarization to detect
different types of reflections. For example,
circular polarization is used to
minimize the interference caused by rain.
Linear polarization returns usually
indicate metal surfaces.
Random polarization
returns usually indicate a
fractal surface,
such as rocks or soil, and are used by
navigation radars.
Interference
Radar systems must overcome unwanted signals in order to focus only
on the actual targets of interest. These unwanted signals may
originate from internal and external sources, both passive and
active. The ability of the radar system to overcome these unwanted
signals defines its
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR is
defined as the ratio of a signal power to the noise power within
the desired signal.
In less technical terms, SNR compares the level of a desired signal
(such as targets) to the level of background noise. The higher a
system's SNR, the better it is in isolating actual targets from the
surrounding noise signals.
Noise
Signal noise is an internal source of
random variations in the signal, which is generated by all
electronic components. Noise typically appears as random variations
superimposed on the desired echo signal received in the radar
receiver. The lower the power of the desired signal, the more
difficult it is to discern it from the noise (similar to trying to
hear a whisper while standing near a busy road).
Noise figure is a measure of the noise produced
by a receiver compared to an ideal receiver, and this needs to be
minimized.
Noise is also generated by external sources, most importantly the
natural thermal radiation of the background scene surrounding the
target of interest. In modern radar systems, due to the high
performance of their receivers, the internal noise is typically
about equal to or lower than the external scene noise. An exception
is if the radar is aimed upwards at clear sky, where the scene is
so "cold" that it generates very little
thermal noise.
There will be also
flicker noise due
to electrons transit, but depending on 1/f, will be much lower than
thermal noise when the frequency is high. Hence, in pulse radar,
the system will be always
heterodyne. See
intermediate frequency.
Clutter
Clutter refers to radio frequency (RF) echoes returned from targets
which are uninteresting to the radar operators. Such targets
include natural objects such as ground, sea,
precipitation (such as rain,
snow or hail),
sand storms, animals
(especially birds), atmospheric
turbulence, and other atmospheric effects, such
as
ionosphere reflections and
meteor trails. Clutter may also be returned from
man-made objects such as buildings and, intentionally, by radar
countermeasures such as
chaff.
Some clutter may also be caused by a long radar
waveguide between the radar transceiver and the
antenna. In a typical
plan
position indicator (PPI) radar with a rotating antenna, this
will usually be seen as a "sun" or "sunburst" in the centre of the
display as the receiver responds to echoes from dust particles and
misguided RF in the waveguide. Adjusting the timing between when
the transmitter sends a pulse and when the receiver stage is
enabled will generally reduce the sunburst without affecting the
accuracy of the range, since most sunburst is caused by a diffused
transmit pulse reflected before it leaves the antenna.
While some clutter sources may be undesirable for some radar
applications (such as storm clouds for air-defence radars), they
may be desirable for others (
meteorological radars in this example).
Clutter is considered a passive interference source, since it only
appears in response to radar signals sent by the radar.
There are several methods of detecting and neutralizing clutter.
Many of these methods rely on the fact that clutter tends to appear
static between radar scans. Therefore, when comparing subsequent
scans echoes, desirable targets will appear to move and all
stationary echoes can be eliminated. Sea clutter can be reduced by
using horizontal polarization, while rain is reduced with
circular polarization (note that
meteorological radars wish for the opposite effect, therefore using
linear polarization the better
to detect precipitation). Other methods attempt to increase the
signal-to-clutter ratio.
Constant False Alarm Rate
(CFAR, a form of
Automatic Gain
Control, or AGC) is a method relying on the fact that clutter
returns far outnumber echoes from targets of interest. The
receiver's gain is automatically adjusted to maintain a constant
level of overall visible clutter. While this does not help detect
targets masked by stronger surrounding clutter, it does help to
distinguish strong target sources. In the past, radar AGC was
electronically controlled and affected the gain of the entire radar
receiver. As radars evolved, AGC became computer-software
controlled, and affected the gain with greater granularity, in
specific detection cells.
Clutter may also originate from
multipath
echoes from valid targets due to ground reflection,
atmospheric ducting or
ionospheric reflection/
refraction. This clutter type is especially
bothersome, since it appears to move and behave like other normal
(point) targets of interest, thereby creating a ghost. In a typical
scenario, an aircraft echo is multipath-reflected from the ground
below, appearing to the receiver as an identical target below the
correct one. The radar may try to unify the targets, reporting the
target at an incorrect height, or - worse - eliminating it on the
basis of
jitter or a physical impossibility.
These problems can be overcome by incorporating a ground map of the
radar's surroundings and eliminating all echoes which appear to
originate below ground or above a certain height. In newer Air
Traffic Control (ATC) radar equipment, algorithms are used to
identify the false targets by comparing the current pulse returns,
to those adjacent, as well as calculating return improbabilities
due to calculated height, distance, and radar timing.
Jamming
Radar jamming refers to radio
frequency signals originating from sources outside the radar,
transmitting in the radar's frequency and thereby masking targets
of interest. Jamming may be intentional, as with an
electronic warfare (EW) tactic, or
unintentional, as with friendly forces operating equipment that
transmits using the same frequency range. Jamming is considered an
active interference source, since it is initiated by elements
outside the radar and in general unrelated to the radar
signals.
Jamming is problematic to radar since the jamming signal only needs
to travel one-way (from the jammer to the radar receiver) whereas
the radar echoes travel two-ways (radar-target-radar) and are
therefore significantly reduced in power by the time they return to
the radar receiver. Jammers therefore can be much less powerful
than their jammed radars and still effectively mask targets along
the
line of sight from the
jammer to the radar (
Mainlobe Jamming). Jammers have an
added effect of affecting radars along other lines of sight, due to
the radar receiver's
sidelobes
(
Sidelobe Jamming).
Mainlobe jamming can generally only be reduced by narrowing the
mainlobe
solid angle, and can never
fully be eliminated when directly facing a jammer which uses the
same frequency and polarization as the radar. Sidelobe jamming can
be overcome by reducing receiving sidelobes in the radar antenna
design and by using an
omnidirectional antenna to detect
and disregard non-mainlobe signals. Other anti-jamming techniques
are
frequency hopping and
polarization. See
Electronic
counter-counter-measures for details.
Interference has recently become a problem for
C-band (5.66
GHz)
meteorological radars with the proliferation of 5.4 GHz band
WiFi equipment.
Radar signal processing
Distance measurement
Transit time

Pulse radar
One way to measure the distance to an object is to transmit a short
pulse of radio signal (electromagnetic radiation), and measure the
time it takes for the reflection to return. The distance is
one-half the product of the round trip time (because the signal has
to travel to the target and then back to the receiver) and the
speed of the signal. Since radio waves travel at the speed of light
(186,000
miles per second or 300,000,000 meters
per second), accurate distance measurement requires
high-performance electronics.
In most cases, the receiver does not detect the return while the
signal is being transmitted. Through the use of a device called a
duplexer, the radar switches between transmitting and
receiving at a predetermined rate. The minimum range is calculated
by measuring the length of the pulse multiplied by the speed of
light, divided by two. In order to detect closer targets one must
use a shorter pulse length.
A similar effect imposes a maximum range as well. If the return
from the target comes in when the next pulse is being sent out,
once again the receiver cannot tell the difference. In order to
maximize range, longer times between pulses should be used,
referred to as a pulse repetition time (PRT), or its reciprocal,
pulse repetition frequency (PRF).
These two effects tend to be at odds with each other, and it is not
easy to combine both good short range and good long range in a
single radar. This is because the short pulses needed for a good
minimum range broadcast have less total energy, making the returns
much smaller and the target harder to detect. This could be offset
by using more pulses, but this would shorten the maximum range
again. So each radar uses a particular type of signal. Long-range
radars tend to use long pulses with long delays between them, and
short range radars use smaller pulses with less time between them.
This pattern of pulses and pauses is known as the
pulse repetition frequency (or PRF), and is one of the main
ways to characterize a radar. As electronics have improved many
radars now can change their PRF thereby changing their range. The
newest radars fire 2 pulses during one cell, one for short range
10 km / 6 miles and a separate signal for longer ranges
100 km /60 miles.
The distance
resolution and the
characteristics of the received signal as compared to noise depends
heavily on the shape of the pulse. The pulse is often
modulated to achieve better performance using a
technique known as
pulse
compression.
Distance may also be measured as a function of time. The
radar mile is the amount of time it takes for a
radar pulse to travel one
nautical
mile, reflect off a target, and return to the radar antenna.
Since a nautical mile is defined as
exactly 1,852 meters,
then dividing this distance by the speed of light (
exactly
299,792,458 meters per second), and then multiplying the result by
2 (round trip = twice the distance), yields a result of
approximately 12.36 microseconds in duration.
Frequency modulation
Another form of distance measuring radar is based on
frequency modulation. Frequency
comparison between two signals is considerably more accurate, even
with older electronics, than timing the signal. By changing the
frequency of the returned signal and comparing that with the
original, the difference can be easily measured.
This technique can be used in
continuous wave radar, and is often
found in aircraft
radar altimeters.
In these systems a "carrier" radar signal is frequency modulated in
a predictable way, typically varying up and down with a
sine wave or sawtooth pattern at audio
frequencies. The signal is then sent out from one antenna and
received on another, typically located on the bottom of the
aircraft, and the signal can be continuously compared using a
simple
beat frequency modulator that produces an audio
frequency tone from the returned signal and a portion of the
transmitted signal.
Since the signal frequency is changing, by the time the signal
returns to the aircraft the broadcast has shifted to some other
frequency. The amount of that shift is greater over longer times,
so greater frequency differences mean a longer distance, the exact
amount being the "ramp speed" selected by the electronics. The
amount of shift is therefore directly related to the distance
traveled, and can be displayed on an instrument. This signal
processing is similar to that used in speed detecting
Doppler radar. Example systems using this
approach are
AZUSA,
MISTRAM, and
UDOP.
A further advantage is that the radar can operate effectively at
relatively low frequencies, comparable to that used by UHF
television. This was important in the early development of this
type when high frequency signal generation was difficult or
expensive.
A new terrestrial radar uses low-power FM signals that cover a
larger frequency range. The multiple reflections are analyzed
mathematically for pattern changes with multiple passes creating a
computerized synthetic image. Doppler effects are not utilized
which allows slow moving objects to be detected as well as largely
eliminating "noise" from the surfaces of bodies of water. Used
primarily for detection of intruders approaching in small boats or
intruders crawling on the ground toward an objective.
Speed measurement
Speed is the change in
distance to an object with respect to time. Thus
the existing system for measuring distance, combined with a
memory capacity to see where the target last
was, is enough to measure speed. At one time the memory consisted
of a user making
grease-pencil marks on the
radar screen, and then calculating the speed using a
slide rule. Modern radar systems perform the
equivalent operation faster and more accurately using
computers.
However, if the transmitter's output is coherent (phase
synchronized), there is another effect that can be used to make
almost instant speed measurements (no memory is required), known as
the
Doppler effect. Most modern radar
systems use this principle in the
pulse-doppler radar system. Return
signals from targets are shifted away from this base frequency via
the Doppler effect enabling the calculation of the speed of the
object relative to the radar. The Doppler effect is only able to
determine the relative speed of the target along the line of sight
from the radar to the target. Any component of target velocity
perpendicular to the line of sight cannot be determined by using
the Doppler effect alone, but it can be determined by tracking the
target's
azimuth over time. Additional
information of the nature of the Doppler returns may be found in
the
radar signal characteristics article.
It is also possible to make a radar without any pulsing, known as a
continuous-wave radar (CW
radar), by sending out a very pure signal of a known frequency. CW
radar is ideal for determining the radial component of a target's
velocity, but it cannot determine the target's range. CW radar is
typically used by traffic enforcement to measure vehicle speed
quickly and accurately where range is not important.
Other mathematical developments in radar signal processing include
time-frequency analysis
(
Weyl Heisenberg or
wavelet), as well as the
chirplet transform which makes use of the
fact that radar returns from moving targets typically "chirp"
(change their frequency as a function of time, as does the sound of
a bird or bat).
Reduction of interference effects
Signal processing is employed in
radar systems to reduce the
radar
interference effects. Signal processing techniques include
moving target indication
(MTI),
pulse doppler, moving
target detection (MTD) processors, correlation with
secondary surveillance radar
(SSR) targets,
space-time
adaptive processing (STAP), and
track-before-detect (TBD).
Constant false alarm rate (CFAR)
and
digital terrain model
(DTM) processing are also used in clutter environments.
Plot And Track Extraction
Radar video returns on aircraft can be subjected to a plot
extraction process whereby spurious and interfering signals are
discarded. A sequence of target returns can be monitored through a
device known as a plot extractor. The non relevant real time
returns can be removed from the displayed information and a single
plot displayed. In some radar systems, or alternatively in the
command and control system to which the radar is connected, a
radar tracker is used to associate the
sequence of plots belonging to individual targets and estimate the
targets' headings and speeds.
Radar engineering

Radar components
A radars components are:
- A transmitter that generates the
radio signal with an oscillator such as a klystron or a magnetron
and controls its duration by a modulator.
- A waveguide that links the transmitter
and the antenna.
- A duplexer that serves as a switch
between the antenna and the transmitter or the receiver for the
signal when the antenna is used in both situations.
- A receiver. Knowing the shape
of the desired received signal (a pulse), an optimal receiver can
be designed using a matched
filter.
- An electronic section that controls all those devices and the
antenna to perform the radar scan ordered by a software.
- A link to end users.
Antenna design
Radio signals broadcast from a single antenna will spread out in
all directions, and likewise a single antenna will receive signals
equally from all directions. This leaves the radar with the problem
of deciding where the target object is located.
Early systems tended to use
omni-directional broadcast antennas,
with directional receiver antennas which were pointed in various
directions. For instance the first system to be deployed,
Chain Home, used two straight antennas at
right angles for reception, each on a
different display. The maximum return would be detected with an
antenna at right angles to the target, and a minimum with the
antenna pointed directly at it (end on). The operator could
determine the direction to a target by
rotating the antenna so one display showed a
maximum while the other shows a minimum.
One serious limitation with this type of solution is that the
broadcast is sent out in all directions, so the amount of energy in
the direction being examined is
a
small part of that transmitted. To get a reasonable amount of
power on the "target", the transmitting aerial should also be
directional.
Parabolic reflector
More modern systems use a steerable
parabolic "dish" to create a tight broadcast beam,
typically using the same dish as the receiver. Such systems often
combine two radar frequencies in the same antenna in order to allow
automatic steering, or
radar lock.
Parabolic reflectors can be either symmetric parabolas or spoiled
parabolas:
- Symmetric parabolic antennas produce a narrow "pencil" beam in
both the X and Y dimensions and consequently have a higher gain.
The NEXRAD Pulse-Doppler weather
radar uses a symmetric antenna to perform detailed volumetric
scans of the atmosphere.
- Spoiled parabolic antennas produce a narrow beam in one
dimension and a relatively wide beam in the other. This feature is
useful if target detection over a wide range of angles is more
important than target location in three dimensions. Most 2D
surveillance radars use a spoiled parabolic antenna with a narrow
azimuthal beamwidth and wide vertical beamwidth. This beam
configuration allows the radar operator to detect an aircraft at a
specific azimuth but at an indeterminate height. Conversely,
so-called "nodder" height finding radars use a dish with a narrow
vertical beamwidth and wide azimuthal beamwidth to detect an
aircraft at a specific height but with low azimuthal
precision.
Types of scan
- Primary Scan: A scanning technique where the main antenna
aerial is moved to produce a scanning beam, examples include
circular scan, sector scan etc
- Secondary Scan: A scanning technique where the antenna feed is
moved to produce a scanning beam, examples include conical scan,
unidirectional sector scan, lobe switching etc.
- Palmer Scan: A scanning technique that produces a scanning beam
by moving the main antenna and its feed. A Palmer Scan is a
combination of a Primary Scan and a Secondary Scan.
Slotted waveguide
Applied similarly to the parabolic reflector, the slotted waveguide
is moved mechanically to scan and is particularly suitable for
non-tracking surface scan systems, where the vertical pattern may
remain constant. Owing to its lower cost and less wind exposure,
shipboard, airport surface, and harbour surveillance radars now use
this in preference to the parabolic antenna.
Phased array
Another method of steering is used in a phased array radar. This
uses an array of similar aerials suitably spaced, the phase of the
signal to each individual aerial being controlled so that the
signal is reinforced in the desired direction and cancels in other
directions. If the individual aerials are in one plane and the
signal is fed to each aerial in phase with all others then the
signal will reinforce in a direction perpendicular to that plane.
By altering the relative phase of the signal fed to each aerial the
direction of the beam can be moved because the direction of
constructive interference will move. Because phased array radars
require no physical
movement the
beam can scan at thousands of degrees per second, fast enough to
irradiate and track many individual targets, and still run a
wide-ranging search periodically. By simply turning some of the
antennas on or off, the beam can be spread for searching, narrowed
for tracking, or even split into two or more virtual radars.
However, the beam cannot be effectively steered at small angles to
the plane of the array, so for full coverage multiple arrays are
required, typically disposed on the faces of a triangular pyramid
(see picture).
Phased array radars have been in use since the earliest years of
radar use in
World War II, but
limitations of the electronics led to fairly poor accuracy. Phased
array radars were originally used for
missile defense.
They are the heart of the ship-borne
Aegis combat system, and the
Patriot Missile System, and are increasingly
used in other areas because the lack of moving parts makes them
more reliable, and sometimes permits a much larger effective
antenna, useful in fighter aircraft applications that offer only
confined space for mechanical scanning.
As the price of electronics has fallen, phased array radars have
become more and more common. Almost all modern military radar
systems are based on phased arrays, where the small additional cost
is far offset by the improved reliability of a system with no
moving parts. Traditional moving-antenna designs are still widely
used in roles where cost is a significant factor such as air
traffic surveillance, weather radars and similar systems.
Phased array radars are also valued for use in aircraft, since they
can track multiple targets. The first aircraft to use a phased
array radar is the B-1B Lancer. The first aircraft fighter to use
phased array radar was the
Mikoyan
MiG-31. The MiG-31M's SBI-16
Zaslon phased
array radar is considered to be the world's most powerful fighter
radar
[4242].Phased-array
interferometry or,
aperture synthesis techniques, using an
array of separate dishes that are phased into a single effective
aperture, are not typically used for radar applications, although
they are widely used in
radio
astronomy. Because of the
Thinned array curse, such arrays of
multiple apertures, when used in transmitters, result in narrow
beams at the expense of reducing the total power transmitted to the
target. In principle, such techniques used could increase the
spatial resolution, but the lower power means that this is
generally not effective. Aperture synthesis by post-processing of
motion data from a single moving source, on the other hand, is
widely used in space and airborne radar systems (see
Synthetic aperture radar).
Frequency bands
The traditional band names originated as code-names during
World War II and are still in military and
aviation use throughout the world in the 21st century. They have
been adopted in the United States by the
IEEE,
and internationally by the
ITU. Most countries
have additional regulations to control which parts of each band are
available for civilian or military use.
Other users of the radio spectrum, such as the
broadcasting and electronic countermeasures
(
ECM) industries, have
replaced the traditional military designations with their own
systems.
Radar frequency bands
| Band name |
Frequency range |
Wavelength range |
Notes |
| HF |
3–30 MHz |
10–100 m |
coastal radar systems, over-the-horizon radar (OTH) radars;
'high frequency' |
| P |
300 MHz |
1 m+ |
'P' for 'previous', applied retrospectively to early radar
systems |
| VHF |
30–330 MHz |
0.9–6 m |
Very long range, ground penetrating; 'very high frequency' |
| UHF |
300–1000 MHz |
0.3–1 m |
Very long range (e.g. ballistic missile early
warning), ground penetrating, foliage penetrating; 'ultra high
frequency' |
| L |
1–2 GHz |
15–30 cm |
Long range air traffic
control and surveillance; 'L' for
'long' |
| S |
2–4 GHz |
7.5–15 cm |
Terminal air traffic control, long-range weather, marine radar;
'S' for 'short' |
| C |
4–8 GHz |
3.75–7.5 cm |
Satellite transponders; a compromise (hence 'C') between X and
S bands; weather |
| X |
8–12 GHz |
2.5–3.75 cm |
Missile guidance,
marine radar, weather,
medium-resolution mapping and ground surveillance; in the USA the narrow
range 10.525 GHz ±25 MHz is used for airport radar. Named X band because the
frequency was a secret during WW2. |
| Ku |
12–18 GHz |
1.67–2.5 cm |
high-resolution |
| K |
18–24 GHz |
1.11–1.67 cm |
from German kurz,
meaning 'short'; limited use due to absorption by water vapour, so Ku and Ka
were used instead for surveillance. K-band is used for detecting
clouds by meteorologists, and by police for detecting speeding
motorists. K-band radar guns operate at 24.150 ±
0.100 GHz. |
| Ka |
24–40 GHz |
0.75–1.11 cm |
mapping, short range, airport surveillance; frequency just
above K band (hence 'a') Photo radar, used to trigger cameras which
take pictures of license plates of cars running red lights,
operates at 34.300 ± 0.100 GHz. |
| mm |
40–300 GHz |
7.5 mm – 1 mm |
millimetre band, subdivided as
below. The frequency ranges depend on waveguide size. Multiple
letters are assigned to these bands by different groups. These are
from Baytron, a now defunct company that made test equipment. |
| Q |
40–60 GHz |
7.5 mm – 5 mm |
Used for Military communication. |
| V |
50–75 GHz |
6.0–4 mm |
Very strongly absorbed by atmospheric oxygen, which resonates
at 60 GHz. |
| E |
60–90 GHz |
6.0–3.33 mm |
| W |
75–110 GHz |
2.7 – 4.0 mm |
used as a visual sensor for experimental autonomous vehicles,
high-resolution meteorological observation, and imaging. |
| UWB |
1.6–10.5 GHz |
18.75 cm – 2.8 cm |
used for through-the-wall radar and imaging systems. |
Radar modulators
Modulators act to provide the short
pulses of power to the
magnetron, a
special type of vacuum tube that converts DC (usually pulsed) into
microwaves. This technology is known as
Pulsed power. In this way, the transmitted
pulse of RF radiation is kept to a defined, and usually, very short
duration. Modulators consist of a high voltage pulse generator
formed from an HV supply, a
pulse
forming network, and a high voltage switch such as a
thyratron.
A
klystron tube may also be used as a
modulator because it is an amplifier, so it can be modulated by its
low power input signal.
Radar coolant
Coolanol and
PAO (poly-alpha olefin) are the two main coolants
used to cool airborne radar equipment today.
The
U.S. Navy has
instituted a program named
Pollution Prevention (P2) to reduce or
eliminate the volume and toxicity of waste, air emissions, and
effluent discharges. Because of this Coolanol is used less often
today.
PAO is a synthetic lubricant composition is a blend of a polyol
ester admixed with effective amounts of an
antioxidant, yellow metal pacifier and
rust inhibitors. The polyol ester blend includes a major proportion
of poly (neopentyl polyol) ester blend formed by reacting
poly(
pentaerythritol) partial esters
with at least one C7 to C12
carboxylic
acid mixed with an ester formed by reacting a polyol having at
least two hydroxyl groups and at least one C8-C10 carboxylic acid.
Preferably, the acids are linear and avoid those which can cause
odours during use. Effective additives include secondary arylamine
antioxidants,
triazole derivative yellow
metal pacifier and an
amino acid
derivative and substituted primary and secondary
amine and/or diamine rust inhibitor.
A synthetic coolant/lubricant composition, comprising an ester
mixture of 50 to 80 weight percent of poly (neopentyl polyol) ester
formed by reacting a poly (neopentyl polyol) partial ester and at
least one linear monocarboxylic acid having from 6 to 12 carbon
atoms, and 20 to 50 weight percent of a polyol ester formed by
reacting a polyol having 5 to 8 carbon atoms and at least two
hydroxyl groups with at least one linear monocarboxylic acid having
from 7 to 12 carbon atoms, the weight percents based on the total
weight of the composition.
Radar configurations and types
Radars configurations include
Monopulse
radar,
Bistatic radar,
Doppler radar,
Continuous-wave radar, etc.. depending
on the types of hardware and
software used.
It is used in aviation (Primary and
secondary radar), sea vessels, law
enforcement,
weather surveillance,
ground mapping, geophysical surveys,
and biological research.
See also
- Definitions
- Hardware
- Similar detection and ranging methods
- Historical radars
Notes
References
- Barrett, Dick, " All you
ever wanted to know about British air defence radar". The
Radar Pages. (History and details of various British radar
systems)
- Buderi, " Telephone History: Radar History".
Privateline.com. (Anecdotal account of the carriage of the world's
first high power cavity magnetron from Britain to the US during
WW2.)
- Ekco Radar WW2 Shadow Factory The secret development of British
radar.
- ES310 " Introduction to Naval Weapons Engineering.".
(Radar fundamentals section)
- Hollmann, Martin, " Radar Family
Tree". Radar World.
- Penley, Bill, and Jonathan Penley, " Early Radar History - an Introduction".
2002.
- Pub 1310 Radar Navigation and Maneuvering Board
Manual, National Imagery and Mapping Agency, Bethesda, MD 2001
(US govt publication '...intended to be used primarily as a manual
of instruction in navigation schools and by naval and merchant
marine personnel.')
Further reading
- Batt, Reg, "The Radar Army: Winning the War of the
Airwaves", Robert Hale Ltd. 1991 ISBN 0-7090-4508-5
- Bowen, E.G., Radar Days, Institute of Physics
Publishing, Bristol, 1987., ISBN 0-7503-0586-X
- Bragg, Michael., RDF1 The Location of Aircraft by Radio
Methods 1935–1945, Hawkhead Publishing, Paisley 1988 ISBN
0-9531544-0-8 The history of ground radar in the UK during World
War II
- Brown, Louis., A Radar History of World War II,
Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 1999., ISBN
0-7503-0659-9
- Buderi, Robert, The invention that changed the world: the
story of radar from war to peace, Simon & Schuster, 1996.
ISBN 0-349-11068-9 ISBN 0-316-90715-4
- Burch, David F., Radar For Mariners, McGraw Hill,
2005, ISBN 0-07-139867-8.
- Hall, P.S., T.K. Garland-Collins, R.S. Picton and R.G. Lee,
Radar, Brassey's (UK) Ltd., 1991, Land Warfare Series: Vol
9, ISBN 0-08-037711-4.
- Howse, Derek, Radar At Sea The Royal Navy in World War
2, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, 1993, ISBN
1-55750-704-X
- Jones, R.V., Most Secret War, ISBN 1-85326-699-X. R.V.
Jones' account of his part in British Scientific Intelligence
between 1939 and 1945, working to anticipate the German's radar,
radio navigation and V1/V2 developments.
- Kaiser, Gerald, Chapter 10 in "A Friendly Guide to Wavelets",
Birkhauser, Boston, 1994.
- Latham, Colin & Stobbs, Anne., Radar A Wartime
Miracle, Sutton Publishing Ltd, Stroud 1996 ISBN 0-7509-1643-5
A history of radar in the UK during World War II told by the men
and women who worked on it.
- Le Chevalier, François, Principles of Radar and Sonar
Signal Processing, Artech House, Boston, London, 2002. ISBN
1-58053-338-8.
- Pritchard, David., The Radar War Germany's Pioneering
Achievement 1904–1945 Patrick Stephens Ltd, Wellingborough
1989., ISBN 1-85260-246-5
- Skolnik, Merrill I.,
Introduction to Radar Systems, McGraw-Hill (1st ed., 1962;
2nd ed., 1980; 3rd ed., 2001), ISBN 0-07-066572-9. The de-facto
radar introduction bible.
- Skolnik, Merrill I., Radar Handbook. ISBN 0-07-057913-X
widely used in the US
since the
1970s. New 3rd Edition, February 2008, ISBN 0-07-148547-3;
978-0-07-148547-0
- Stimson, George W., Introduction to Airborne Radar,
SciTech Publishing (2nd edition, 1998), ISBN 1-891121-01-4. Written
for the non-specialist. The first half of the book on radar
fundamentals is also applicable to ground- and sea-based
radar.
- Younghusband, Eileen., Not an Ordinary Life. How
Changing Times Brought Historical Events into my Life, Cardiff
Centre for Lifelong Learning, Cardiff, 2009., ISBN
987-0-9561156-9-0 (Pages 36–67 contain the experiences of a WAAF
radar plotter in WWII.)
- Zimmerman, David., Britain's Shield Radar and the Defeat of
the Luftwaffe, Sutton Publishing Ltd, Stroud, 2001, ISBN
0-7509-1799-7
External links