Shame is, variously, an
affect,
emotion,
cognition,
state, or condition. The roots of the word
shame are thought to derive from an older word meaning
to
cover; as such, covering oneself, literally or figuratively,
is a natural expression of shame.
Description
Nineteenth century scientist
Charles
Darwin, in his book
The Expression of the Emotions in Man
and Animals, described shame affect as consisting of
blushing, confusion of mind, downward cast eyes,
slack posture, and lowered head, and he noted observations of shame
affect in human populations worldwide. He also noted the sense of
warmth or heat (associated with the vasodilation of the face and
skin) occurring in intense shame.
A "sense of shame" is the consciousness or awareness of shame as a
state or condition. Such shame
cognition
may occur as a result of the experience of shame affect or, more
generally, in any situation of
embarrassment,
dishonor, disgrace, inadequacy,
humiliation, or
chagrin.
A condition or state of shame may also be assigned externally, by
others, regardless of the one's own experience or awareness. "To
shame" generally means to actively
assign or communicate a state of shame
to another. Behaviors designed to "uncover" or "expose" others are
sometimes used for this purpose, as are utterances like "Shame!" or
"Shame on you!"
Finally, to "have shame" means to maintain a sense of restraint
against offending others while to "have no shame" is to behave
without such restraint.
Shame vs. guilt and embarrassment
The location of the dividing line between the concepts of shame,
guilt, and
embarrassment is not fully standardized.
According to cultural anthropologist
Ruth
Benedict, shame is a violation of cultural or social values
while guilt feelings arise from violations of one's internal
values. Thus, it is possible to feel ashamed of thought or behavior
that no one knows about and to feel guilty about actions that gain
the approval of others.
Psychoanalyst Helen B. Lewis argued that "The experience of shame
is directly about the self, which is the focus of evaluation. In
guilt, the self is not the central object of negative evaluation,
but rather the thing done is the focus." Similarly, Fossum and
Mason say in their book
Facing Shame that "While guilt is
a painful feeling of regret and responsibility for one's actions,
shame is a painful feeling about oneself as a person." Following
this line of reasoning, Psychiatrist Judith Lewis Herman concludes
that "Shame is an acutely self-conscious state in which the self is
'split,' imagining the self in the eyes of the other; by contrast,
in guilt the self is unified."
Clinical psychologist Gershen Kaufman's view of shame is derived
from that of
Affect Theory, namely
that shame is one of a set of instinctual,
subcortically-controlled,
short-duration physiological reactions to stimulation. Kaufman
considered guilt to be a learned behavior consisting essentially of
self-directed blame or contempt, with shame occurring consequent to
such behaviors making up a part of the overall experience of guilt.
Here, by self-blame and self-contempt Kaufman means the
application, towards (a part of) one's self, of exactly the same
dynamic that blaming of, and contempt for, others represents when
it is applied interpersonally. Kaufman saw that mechanisms such as
blame or contempt may be used as a defending strategy against the
experience of shame and that someone who has a pattern of applying
them to himself may well attempt to defend against a shame
experience by applying self-blame or self-contempt. This, however,
can lead to an internalized, self-reinforcing sequence of shame
events for which Kaufman coined the term "shame spiral.
One view of difference between shame and embarrassment is that
shame does not necessarily involve public humiliation while
embarrassment does, that is, one can feel shame for an act known
only to oneself but in order to be embarrassed one's actions must
be revealed to others. In the field of ethics (moral psychology, in
particular), however, there is debate as to whether or not shame is
a heteronomous emotion, i.e. whether or not shame does involve
recognition on the part of the ashamed that they have been judged
negatively by others.
Immanuel Kant
and his followers held that shame is heteronomous;
Bernard Williams and others have argued
that shame can be autonomous. Shame may carry the connotation of a
response to something that is morally wrong whereas embarrassment
is the response to something that is morally neutral but socially
unacceptable. Another view of shame and embarrassment, though, is
that the two emotions lie on a continuum and only differ in
intensity.
Subtypes
- Genuine shame: is associated with genuine
dishonor, disgrace, or condemnation.
- False shame: is associated with false
condemnation as in the double-bind form of false shaming; "he
brought what we did to him upon himself". Author and TV personality
John Bradshaw calls shame the
"emotion that lets us know we are finite".
- Toxic shame: describes false, pathological
shame, and Bradshaw states that toxic shame is induced, inside
children, by all forms of child abuse. Incest
and other forms of child sexual
abuse can cause particularly severe toxic shame. Toxic shame
often induces what is known as complex trauma in children who cannot cope with
toxic shaming as it occurs and who dissociate the shame until it is
possible to cope with.
- Vicarious shame: In the 1990s, psychologists
introduced the notion of vicarious shame, which refers to the
experience of shame on behalf of another person. Individuals vary
in their tendency to experience vicarious shame, which is related
to neuroticism and to the tendency to
experience personal shame. Extremely shame-prone people might even
experience vicarious shame even to an increased degree, in other
words: shame on behalf of another person who is already feeling
shame on behalf of a third party (or possibly on behalf of the
individual proper).
Social aspects
Shame is considered one aspect of
socialization in all societies. Shame is
enshrouded in legal precedent as a pillar of punishment and
ostensible correction. Shame has been linked to
narcissism in the psychoanalytic literature. It
is one of the most intense emotions. The individual experiencing
shame may feel totally despicable, worthless and feel that there is
no
redemption. According to the
anthropologist
Ruth Benedict,
cultures may be classified by their emphasis of
using either shame or
guilt to regulate the
social activities of their members. Shared opinions and expected
behaviours that cause the feeling of shame (as well as an
associated reproval) if violated by an individual are in any case
proven to be very efficient in guiding behaviour in a group or
society.
Shame is a common form of control used by those people who commit
relational aggression. It is
also used in the workplace as a form of overt social control or
aggression. Shamery is also a central feature of
punishment,
shunning, or
ostracism. In addition, shame is often
seen in victims of child neglect, child abuse and a host of other
crimes against children.
Shame campaign
A
shame campaign is a tactic in which particular
individuals are singled out because of their behavior or suspected
crimes, often by marking them publicly, such as
Hester Prynne in
Nathaniel Hawthorne's
The Scarlet Letter.
In the Philippines
, Alfredo Lim popularized
such tactics during his term as mayor of Manila
. On
July 1, 1997, he began a controversial "spray paint shame campaign”
in an effort to stop drug use. He and his team sprayed bright red
paint on two hundred squatter houses whose residents had been
charged, but not yet convicted, of selling prohibited substances.
Officials of other municipalities followed suit. Former Senator
Rene A. Saguisag condemned Lim’s policy.
Despite this criticism, the shame campaigns continued. In January
2005, Metro Manila Development Authority Chair
Bayani Fernando announced shame campaign to
target jaywalkers by splashing them with wet rags. Sen.
Richard Gordon disagreed with
the shame tactic, and Rep. Vincent Crisologo called this approach
"martial law tactics". Rep. Rozzano Rufino Biazon argued jaywalkers
were being treated like cattle.
See also
Footnotes
- Williams, Bernard: Shame and Necessity
- Hutchinson, Phil: chapter four of Shame and Philosophy
- Pulta, Benjamin B. "Spray campaign debate heats up." Sun.Star
Manila. June 26, 2003.
- " MMDA’s shame campaign slammed,"
The
Manila Times, January 12, 2005.
- " campaign' vs graft backed," The Philippine
Star, March 20, 2005.
Additional references
- Bradshaw, J (1988) Healing the Shame That Binds You, HCI. ISBN
0-932194-86-9
- Gilbert, P (2002) Body Shame: Conceptualisation, Research and
Treatment. Brunner-Routledge. ISBN 1-58391-166-9
- Gilbert, P (1998) Shame: Interpersonal Behavior,
Psychopathology and Culture. ISBN 0-19-511480-9
- Goldberg, Carl (1991) Understanding Shame, Jason Aaronson,
Inc., Northvale, NJ. ISBN 0-87668-541-6
- Hutchinson, Phil (2008) Shame and Philosophy. London: Palgrave
MacMillan. ISBN 0-23-054271-9
- Lewis, Michael (1992) Shame: The Exposed Self. NY: The Free
Press. ISBN 0-02-918881-4
- Middelton-Moz, J, (1990) Shame and Guilt: Masters of Disguise,
HCI, ISBN 1-55874-072-4
- Miller, Susan B. (1996) Shame in Context, Routledge, ISBN
0-88163-209-0
- Morrison, Andrew P. (1996) The Culture of Shame. Ballantine
Books. ISBN 0-345-37484-3
- Morrison, Andrew P. (1989) Shame: The Underside of Narcissism.
The Analytic Press. ISBN 0-88163-082-9
- Nathanson, D., ed. (1987) The Many Faces of Shame. NY: The
Guilford Press. ISBN 0-89862-705-2
- Schneider, Carl D. (1977) Shame, Exposure, and Privacy. Boston:
Beacon Press, ISBN 0-8070-1121-5
- Vallelonga, Damian S. (1997) An empirical phenomenological
investigation of being ashamed. In Valle, R. Phenomenological
Inquiry in Psychology: Existential and Transpersonal
Dimensions. New York: Plenum Press, 123-155.
External links