Students for a Democratic
Society (SDS) was a student activist movement in the United States
that was one of the main iconic representations of
the country's New Left. The
organization developed and expanded rapidly in the mid-1960s before
dissolving at its last convention in 1969.
SDS was the organizational high point for student radicalism in the
United States and has been an important influence on student
organizing in the decades since its collapse.
Participatory democracy,
direct action, radicalism, student power,
shoestring budgets, and its organizational structure are all
present in varying degrees in current national student activist
groups. Though various organizations have been formed in subsequent
years as proposed national networks for
left-wing student organizing, none has approached
the scale of SDS, and most have lasted a few years at best.
Origins
SDS developed from the Student League for Industrial Democracy
(SLID), the youth branch of a socialist educational organization
known as the
League for
Industrial Democracy (LID). LID descended from the
Intercollegiate Socialist
Society, started in 1905. Early in 1960, SLID decided to change
its name into SDS. The phrase “industrial democracy” sounded too
narrow and too labor oriented, making it more difficult to recruit
students. Moreover, because the LID's leadership did not correspond
to the expectations and the mood on the campuses, the SLID felt the
need to dissociate itself from its parent organization.
SDS held
its first meeting in 1960 on the University of Michigan
campus at Ann Arbor, Michigan
, where Alan Haber was
elected president. Its political manifesto, known as the
Port Huron Statement, was
adopted at the organization's first convention in 1962, based on an
earlier draft by staff member
Tom
Hayden.
The
Port
Huron
Statement criticized the political system of the
United
States
for failing to achieve international peace and
critiqued Cold War foreign policy, the threat of nuclear war, and the arms
race. In domestic matters, it criticized
racial discrimination, economic
inequality, big businesses,
trade unions
and
political parties. In addition
to its deep critique and analysis of the American system, the
manifesto also suggested a series of reforms: it proclaimed a need
to reshape into two genuine political parties to attain greater
democracy, for stronger power for individuals through citizen's
lobbies, for more substantial involvement by workers in business
management, and for an enlarged public sector with increased
government
welfare, including a "program
against
poverty." The manifesto provided
ideas of what and how to work for and to improve, and also
advocated
nonviolent civil disobedience as the means by which
student youth could bring forth a "
participatory democracy."
Kirkpatrick Sale described the manifesto as "nothing less than an
ideology, however raw and imperfect and however much would have
resisted this word."
The manifesto also presented SDS's break with the left-wing
policies of the postwar years. Firstly, it was written with the
same overall vision all along the document and reflected their view
that all problems in every area were linked to each other and their
willingness not to lead single-issue struggles but a broad struggle
on all fronts at the same time. Then, it expressed SDS's
willingness to work with groups whatever may be their political
inclination and announced their rejection of
anti-communism, a definitely new radical view
contrasting with much of the American left which had always
developed a policy of anti-communism. Without being Marxist or
pro-communism, they denounced anti-communism as being a social
problem and an obstruction to democracy. They also criticized the
United States for their exaggerated paranoia and exclusive
condemnation of the Soviet Union and blamed this for being a reason
of failing to achieve disarmament and to assure peace.
The
Port Huron Convention
opened with a symbol of this break with the policy of the past
years: the delegate of the Communist Progressive Youth Organizing
Committee asked for attending the conference as an observer. The
people from the Young People's Socialist League objected while most
of the SDSers insisted on letting him sit. He eventually sat.
Later in
the meeting, Michael Harrington,
a LID member, got worked up over the manifesto because he found the
stand they took toward the Soviet Union
and authoritarian regimes in general was
insufficiently critical, and because, according to him, they
deliberately wrote sections to have liberals fly off the
handle. Surprisingly, Roger Hagan, a liberal, defended SDS
and its policy. After lively debates between the two, the draft
finally remained more or less unchanged.Some two weeks later, a
meeting between the LID and SDS was held where the LID expressed
its discontent about the manifesto. As a result, Haber and Hayden,
at this time respectively the National secretary and the new
President of the organization, were summoned to a hearing on the 6
July 1962. There, Hayden clashed with Michael Harrington (as he
later would with
Irving Howe) over the
perceived potential for totalitarianism among other things.
Harrington denounced the seating of the PYOC member, SDS’s
tolerance for communism and their lack of clarity in their
condemnation of communist totalitarianism and authoritarianism, and
he reproached SDS for providing only a mild critique of the Soviet
Union and for blaming the cold war mostly on the United States.
Hayden then asked him to read the manifesto more carefully,
especially the section on values. Hayden later wrote:
"While the draft Port Huron Statement included a strong
denunciation of the Soviet Union, it wasn't enough for LID leaders
like Michael Harrington. They wanted absolute clarity, for example,
that the United States was blameless for the nuclear arms race...In
truth, they seemed threatened by the independence of the new wave
of student activism..."
The hearing ended up with the SDS members' leaving.
Early years: 1962–1965
In the academic year 1962–1963, the President was
Tom Hayden, the Vice President was
Paul Booth and the National
Secretary was
Jim Monsonis. There were
nine chapters with, at most, about 1000 members.
The national office
(NO) in New York
City
consisted of a few desks, some broken chairs, a
couple of file cabinets and a few typewriters. As a student
group with a strong belief in decentralization and a distrust for
most organization, the SDS did not have a strong central
bureaucracy. The three stalwarts at the office, Don McKelvey, Steve
Max, and the National Secretary, Jim Monsonis, worked long hours
for little pay to service the local chapters, and to help establish
new ones. Even during the
Cuban
Missile Crisis in October, little could be accomplished. Most
activity was oriented toward
civil
rights issues and the
Student Nonviolent
Coordinating Committee (SNCC) played a key role in inspiring
SDS.
By the end
of the academic year, there were over 200 delegates at the annual
convention at Pine Hill,
New York
, from 32 different colleges and
universities. It was then decided to give more power to the
chapters, who would then send delegates to the National Council
(NC), which would meet quarterly to handle the on-going activities.
Also, in the spirit of participatory democracy, a consensus was
reached to elect new officers each year.
Lee Webb of Boston
University
was chosen
as National Secretary, and Todd Gitlin
of Harvard
University
was made president. Some continuity was
preserved by retaining Paul Booth as Vice President. The search
began for something to challenge the idealistic, budding
activists.
It was at this time that the
Black
Power Movement was first gaining some momentum (although
Stokely Carmichael would make the
movement more mainstream in 1966). The movement made it impolitic
for white activists, such as those in SDS, to presume to lead
protests for black civil rights. Instead, SDS would try to organize
white unemployed youths through a newly established program they
called the Economic Research and Action Project (ERAP). This "into
the ghetto" move was a practical failure, but the fact that it
existed at all drew many young idealists to SDS.
At the summer convention in 1964 there was a split between those
who were campus-oriented, and the ERAP supporters. Most of the old
guard were ERAP supporters, but the campus activists were growing.
Paul Potter was elected president, and by the end of summer there
were ten ERAP programs in place, with about 125 student volunteers.
C. Clark Kissinger of Shimer College in Illinois
was elected as National Secretary, and he put the
NO on a much more business-like basis. He and his assistant,
Helen Garvey mailed out the literature list, the newsletters and
the news of chapter's activities to a growing membership list.
Kissinger also worked to smooth the relationship with the
LID.
A small faction of SDS that was interested in change through
conventional electoral politics established a program called the
Political Education Project (PEP). Its Director was Jim Williams of
the University of Louisville, and Steve Max served as its Associate
Director. This was never very large, and it was opposed by the
mainstream SDSers, who were mostly opposed to such traditional,
old-fashioned activity, and were looking for something new that
"worked". The
Johnson landslide
victory in November played its part, as well, and PEP soon withered
away. A Peace Research and Education Project (PREP) headed by Paul
Booth, Swarthmore, met a similar fate. Meanwhile, the local
chapters got into all sorts of projects, from University reform,
community-university relations, and now, in a small way, the issue
of the
draft and
Vietnam War.
Then, on
October 1, the University of California,
Berkeley
exploded into the dramatic and prolonged agony that
was the free speech
movement. Led by a charismatic Friends of
SNCC student
activist named
Mario Savio, upwards of
three thousand students surrounded a police car in which a student,
arrested for setting up a card table in defiance of a ban by the
University, was being taken away. The sit-down prevented the police
car from moving for 32 hours. The demonstrations, meetings and
strikes that resulted all but shut the university down. Hundreds of
students were arrested.
From protest to resistance: 1965–1968
In February 1965, United States President
Lyndon Johnson dramatically escalated the war
in Vietnam by bombing North Vietnam in
Operation Flaming Dart and
introducing ground troops directly involved in fighting the
Viet Cong in the South. Campus chapters of
SDS all over the country started to lead small, localized
demonstrations against the war and the NO became the focal group
that organized the March against the war in Washington on April 17.
Endorsements came from nearly all of the other peace groups and
leading personalities, there was significant increase in income and
by the end of March there were 52 chapters. The media began to
cover the organization and the
New Left.
However, the call for the march and the openness of the
organization in allowing other groups, even
communist front groups, or communists themselves,
to join in caused great strains with the LID and some other old
left organizations.
The first
teach-in against the war was held in the
University of
Michigan
. Soon hundreds more, all over the country,
were held.
The demonstration in Washington,
DC
attracted about 25,000 anti-war protesters and SDS
became the leading student group against the war on most U.S.
campuses.
Representing its move into the heartland, the 1965 summer
convention was held at
Kewadin, a small camp
in
Northern Michigan.
Moreover, its
National Office, which was previously located in Manhattan
, was moved to Chicago
at about the same time. The rapid growth of
the membership rate during the preceding year brought with it a new
breed with a new style:
The
convention elected an Akron,
Ohio
student, Carl Oglesby,
President and Jeff Shero, Vice President
in preference to "old guard" candidates. The convention
voted to remove the
anti-communist
exclusion clauses from the SDS constitution. failed to provide for
any national program, and increased the reliance on local
initiatives at the chapters. As a result, the National Office's
leadership fell into ineffectual chaos. The League for Industrial
Democracy, SDS's nominal sponsoring organization, was disappointed
with removal of the exclusion clause from the SDS constitution, as
SDS was covered under LID's non-profit status which excluded
political activity. By mutual agreement the relationship was
severed October 4, 1965.
On November 27, 1965 there was a major anti-war demonstration in
Washington, D.C. at which Carl Ogelsby, the new SDS president, made
a very successful speech, addressed to the liberal crowd, exposing,
but not mentioning by name, the
imperialist
nature of the United States government, citing numerous examples.
The speech received a standing ovation, substantial press coverage,
and resulted in greatly increased national prominence for
SDS.
The unexpected influx of substantial numbers of new members and
chapters combined with the ousting of the previous leadership, the
"old guard", resulted in a crisis which dogged SDS until its final
breakup; despite repeated attempts to do so, consensus was never
reached on what form the organization should take or what role it
should play. A final attempt by the old guard at a "rethinking
conference" to establish a coherent new direction for the
organization failed. The conference, held on the University of
Illinois campus at Champaigne-Urbana over Christmas vacation, 1965,
was attended by about 360 people from 66 chapters, many of whom
where new to SDS. Despite a great deal of discussion, no
substantial decisions were made.
Nationally, the SDS continued to use the draft as an important
issue for students, and over the rest of the academic year began to
attack university complicity in it, as the universities had begun
to supply student's class rankings, used to determine who was to be
drafted. The University of Chicago's administration building was
taken over in a three day sit-in in May. Rank protests and sit-ins
spread to many other universities.
The
summer convention of 1966 was moved even farther west, this time to
Clear
Lake
, Iowa
. The
"prairie people" continued to increase their influence. Nick
Egleson was chosen as President, and
Carl
Davidson was elected Vice President.
Greg Calvert, recently a History Instructor at
Iowa State University, was chosen as National Secretary. It was at
this convention that members of
Progressive Labor Party (PL) first
participated. PL was a Maoist group that had turned to SDS as
fertile ground for recruiting new members sympathetic to its
long-term strategy of organizing the industrial working class.
SDSers of that time were nearly all anti-communist, but they also
refused to be drawn into actions that smacked of
red-baiting, which they viewed as mostly
irrelevant and old hat. PL soon began to organize a
Worker Student Alliance. By 1968 and
1969 they would profoundly affect SDS, particularly at national
gatherings of the membership, forming a well-groomed, disciplined
faction which followed the Progressive Labor Party line.
The 1966 convention also marked an even greater turn towards
organization around campus issues by local chapters, with the NO
cast in a strictly supporting role. Campus issues ranged from bad
food, powerless student "governments," various
in loco parentis manifestations,
on-campus recruiting for the military and, again, ranking for the
draft. Campuses around the country were in a state of unprecedented
ferment and activism. Despite the absence of a politically
effective campus SDS chapter, Berkeley again became a center of
particularly dramatic radical upheaval over the university's
repressive anti-free-speech actions, and an effective student
strike with very wide support occurred. Even Harvard endured an
upheaval engendered by a visit there of
Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara.
The Winter and Spring of 1967 saw an escalation of the militancy of
the protests at many campuses. SDSers and self-styled radicals were
even elected into the student government at a few places.
Demonstrations against
Dow Chemical
Company and other campus recruiters were widespread, and
ranking and the draft issues grew in scale.
The FBI
(mainly through its secret COINTELPRO) and other law enforcement
agencies were often exposed as having spies and informers in the
chapters. Harassment by the authorities was also on the
rise. The National Office became distinctly more effective in this
period, and the three officers actually visited most of the
chapters.
New Left Notes, as well, became a potent vehicle
for promoting some coherence and solidarity among the chapters. The
Anti-War movement began to take hold among university
students.
The 1967 convention took an
egalitarian turn by eliminating the
Presidential and Vice-Presidential offices and replacing them with
a National Secretary (20 year old
Mike
Spiegel), an Education Secretary (Texan Bob Pardun), and an
Inter‑organizational Secretary (former VP Carl Davidson). A clear
direction for a national program was not set but they did manage to
pass strong resolutions on the draft, resistance within the Army
itself, and they made a call for immediate withdrawal from Vietnam.
A
women's liberation resolution
on the issue of
male chauvinism was
passed by conference attendees, for the first time.
That Fall saw a great escalation of the anti-war actions of the
New Left.
The school year started with a large
demonstration against university complicity in the war in allowing
Dow recruiters on campus at the University
of Wisconsin in Madison
on October 17.
Peaceful at first, the demonstrations turned to a sit-in that was
violently dispersed by the Madison police and riot squad, resulting
in many injuries and arrests. A mass rally and a student strike
then closed the university for several days. A coordinated series
of demonstrations against the draft led by members of the
Resistance, the
War Resisters
League, and SDS added fuel to the fire of resistance. After
conventional civil rights tactics of peaceful pickets seemed to
have failed, the Oakland, California Stop the Draft Week ended in
mass hit and run skirmishes with the police. The huge (100,000
people) October 21
March on the
Pentagon saw hundreds arrested and injured. Night-time raids on
draft offices began to spread.
Climax and split: 1968–1969
In the spring of 1968, National SDS activists led an effort on the
campuses called "Ten Days of Resistance" and local chapters
cooperated with the Student Mobilization Committee in rallies,
marches, sit-ins and teach-ins, which culminated in a one-day
strike on
April 26. About a million
students stayed away from classes that day, the largest
student strike in the history of the United
States. It was largely ignored by the New York City-based national
media, which focused on the student shutdown of
Columbia University in New York, led by
an inter-racial alliance of Columbia SDS chapter activists and
Student Afro Society activists. As a result of the mass media
publicity given to Columbia SDS activists such as Columbia SDS
chairperson
Mark Rudd during the
Columbia Student
Revolt, the organization was put on the map politically and
"SDS" became a
household name in
the United States for a few years. Membership in SDS chapters
around the United States increased dramatically during the 1968-69
academic year.
Led by the Worker-Student Alliance and rival Joe Hill caucuses, SDS
in San Francisco played a major role in the Third World Student
Strike at San Francisco State College. This strike, the longest
student strike in U. S. history, led to the creation of Black and
other ethnic studies programs on campuses across the country.
SDS
members from Austin
, Texas
participated
in a mass demonstration in San Antonio
, Texas in April 1969 at the "Kings River
Parade". San Antonio SNCC members called the demonstration
to protest the killing of
Bobby Joe
Phillips by San Antonio Police Officers.
In the
summer of 1969, the ninth SDS national convention was held at the
Chicago
Coliseum
with some 2000 people attending. Many
factions of the movement were present, and set up their literature
tables all around the edges of the cavernous hall. The
Young Socialist Alliance,
Wobblies,
Spartacists,
Marxists and
Maoists
of various sorts, all together with various law-enforcement spies
and informers contributed to the air of impending
expectations.
Each delegate was given the convention issue of the newspaper
New Left Notes, which
contained a manifesto, "You don't need a Weatherman to know which
way the wind blows".
This manifesto had been first presented at
the Spring, 1969, SDS National Council Meeting in Austin, Texas
. The document had been written by an
11-member committee that included Mark Rudd,
Bernardine Dohrn and
John Jacobs, and represented
the position of the
Revolutionary Youth Movement
(RYM) wing of SDS, most of which later turned into the
Weather Underground Organization.
The
New Left Notes issue was full of the language of the
Old Left of the 1930s; and was thus
impenetrable and irrelevant to the majority of SDSers.
Once it became clear that the WSA faction was the largest
contingent with a majority of the delegates, the convention quickly
fell into disarray, as the RYM and allied groups moved to expel
Progressive Labor (PL)
members and the
Worker Student
Alliance (WSA) faction of SDS. The
Black Panther representatives attacked PL and
at the same time proved itself inclined towards
sexism by advocating "pussy power." The entire
convention fell into something approaching chaos, or worse,
farce.
The RYM and the National Office faction, led by
Bernardine Dohrn, led a breakaway meeting
from which PL and WSA members were barred. This group then voted by
about 500 to 100 to expel PL from SDS, and then walked out of the
conference hall with that 500. By the next day, there were two SDS
organizations, which RYM termed "SDS-RYM" and "SDS-WSA."
In the fall of 1969, many of the SDS-RYM chapters also split up or
disintegrated. The Weatherman faction evolved into a small
underground organization that first took to street confrontations
and then to a bombing campaign. SDS-RYM held no more national
conventions. SDS-RYM was fully defunct by 1970, while SDS-WSA
continued its activity.
SDS-WSA: 1969–1974 and beyond
SDS-Worker-Student Alliance (SDS-WSA) continued to function
nationwide, with a focus on (a) fighting racism; and (b) supporting
workers' struggles and strikes, including the 1969 General Electric
strike and 1970 Postal Workers' strikes. The WSA organized a
support demonstration for the post office strikers, which worried
the
Nixon administration a lot. This
is the entry from H.R. Haldeman’s diary:
Now calling itself simply SDS, SDS-WSA continued to publish the
newspaper
New Left Notes. It held a convention in Boston
in 1971, at which a striking
General
Motors worker was a featured speaker.
In 1972,
SDS-WSA demonstrated at the Democratic National
Convention in Miami
against
Democratic presidential candidate George
McGovern's retreating from his original stronger campaign
positions against the Vietnam
War. Several hundred SDS members staged a sit-in at the
Doral Hotel as McGovern and his staff met upstairs with protesting
members of Grassroots McGovern Volunteers and sympathizers angry
over the same issues.
In
Newark, New
Jersey
, SDS-WSA demonstrated against Anthony Imperiale and
his racist North Ward Citizens' Council which was opposing the
construction of Kawaida Towers, a building complex sponsored by a
community organization led by Black nationalist and poet Amiri
Baraka (formerly Leroy Jones) (New
York Times January 3, 1973, p. 84)
SDS joined with PLP and others to protest the writings of
Arthur Jensen,
William Shockley, and
Richard Herrnstein, all of whom promoted
the notion that black people were genetically inferior in
intelligence to whites. In October 1973, SDS-WSA, PLP, and others
organized a convention at the Loeb Student Center of New York
University dedicated to opposing academic racism. SDS circulated a
petition entitled "A Resolution Against Racism" that was published
in the
New York Times on October 28, 1973 (p. 211).
Out of this convention the Committee Against Racism (CAR) was
formed to continue the fight against racism.
CAR later changed its
name to International Committee Against Racism (InCAR), when some
chapters were formed in Canada
.
In 1974, National SDS(-WSA) voted to dissolve as a separate
organization and reform as chapters of InCAR. However, individual
chapters of SDS continued to exist for some time.
A chapter at Purdue
University
was active as late as 1976.
All references to contemporary activities of SDS in sources such as
the
New York Times after early 1970 are to SDS-WSA.
For
example, SDS confronted Indiana
Senator Vance Hartke at
an antiwar rally in New York
City
in 1971 (New York Times July 3, 1971,
p. 3 and July 4, 1971, p. 3). SDS denounced
liberal Democrats as having been the authors of the Vietnam War in
the first place.
SDS demonstrated against the Republican National
Convention in Miami Beach, Florida
in August 1972 (New York Times August 21,
1972, p. 20; August 22, 1972, pp. 1,36; August 23, 1972,
pp. 1, 28).
Unlike SDS-RYM and the Weathermen, SDS-WSA strongly opposed bombing
and
terrorism. In 1971, SDS-WSA published
a pamphlet titled
Who Are The Bombers?. It warned readers
against police agents sent into the anti-Vietnam War movement to
foment violence to justify police attacks. It also sharply
criticized the
Weathermen, which had begun its campaign of
bombings.
On June
26, 1972, the US
Supreme Court
gave a unanimous opinion, in the case Healy v. James, stating that members of the SDS had
been unconstitutionally deprived of their First
Amendment right to freedom of assembly when a group was denied
permission to form on the campus of Central
Connecticut State College
in New
Britain
, Connecticut
.
A few early SDS leaders went on to careers as
Democratic Party
politicians, including
Tom Hayden, who is
still active in politics and writing.
Hayden is a former
member of the legislature of the state of California
and is well-known as the former husband of actress
Jane Fonda, a prolific author, and a
former candidate for offices such as Governor of California, Mayor of Los Angeles, and US
Senator.
References
- Sale, Kirkpatrick, SDS (New York : Random House, 1973)
p. 51.
- Gitlin, Todd. "The Sixties", Bantam; Revised edition (July 1,
1993) ISBN 0553372122
- Tom Hayden and Dick Flacks, ‘The Port Huron Statement at 40’ in
The Nation, 5 August 2002
- Page 85, Flying Close to the Sun, Cathy Wilkerson,
Seven Stories Press (2007), hardcover, 422 pages, {
- Page 138 at http://www.sds-1960s.org/books/sds.pdf SDS
by Kirkpatrick Sale, Random House (1973), Hardcover, 495 pages,
trade paperback, Vintage Books (January 1, 1974), 752 pages.
- Pages 83 and 84, Flying Close to the Sun, Cathy
Wilkerson, Seven Stories Press (2007), hardcover, 422 pages.
- Page 157 at http://www.sds-1960s.org/books/sds.pdf SDS
by Kirkpatrick Sale, Random House (1973), Hardcover, 495 pages,
trade paperback, Vintage Books (January 1, 1974), 752 pages.
- Pages 159 to 163 at http://www.sds-1960s.org/books/sds.pdf
SDS by Kirkpatrick Sale, Random House (1973), Hardcover,
495 pages, trade paperback, Vintage Books (January 1, 1974), 752
pages.
- Page 93-97, Ravens in the Storm, Carl Oglesby, Scribner
(2008), hardcover, 336 pages.
- Pages 204-205 Pages 163 and 164 at
http://www.sds-1960s.org/books/sds.pdf SDS by Kirkpatrick
Sale, Random House (1973), Hardcover, 752 pages, trade paperback,
Vintage Books (January 1, 1974), 752 pages.
- Pages 103 and 104, Ravens in the Storm, Carl Oglesby, Scribner
(2008), hardcover, 336 pages.
- Page 320 at http://www.sds-1960s.org/books/sds.pdf SDS
by Kirkpatrick Sale, Random House (1973), Hardcover, 752 pages,
trade paperback, Vintage Books (January 1, 1974), 752 pages.
- Sale, Kirkpatrick (1973). SDS p. 566
Further reading
Archives
Articles
- Alper, Mark. The Legacy of S.D.S. and Its Relevance to Today's
Activists. Electronic Worker. Direct Action
Tendency, Socialist Party USA.
Retrieved April 12, 2005.
- Bookchin, Murray. Anarchy and Organization: A Letter To The
Left. Reprinted from New Left Notes. January 15,
1969. Retrieved April 12, 2005. "The essay originally was
written in reply to an attack by Huey
Newton on anarchist forms of organization."
- Maines, Billy. Second Coming : The Infamous SDS is Back, and Now It's
Local. Orlando Weekly. November 23, 2006
- SDS
in the 1960s: From A Student Movement to National Resistance, The
Indypendent
- SDS: The signature organization of the 1960s student left
has been reborn, The Indypendent
- Tom Hayden, "The Future of 1968's 'Restless
Youth'" in: Martin Klimke and Joachim Scharloth, 1968 in Europe
(New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 325-331.
- Who Are The Bombers? SDS-WSA pamphlet,
1972, attacking terrorism, including Weatherman
terrorism.
- Setting The Record Straight: Progressive Labor
& SDS
- "A Short History of Progressive Labor Party (PLP)
and Its Activities in Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)"
Series of 12 articles originally published in
Challenge-Desafio, biweekly newspaper of The Progressive Labor Party
January - July 2007.
- "The Death of SDS", essay by Mark Rudd.
Books
- Adelson, Alan. SDS. New York, Charles Scribener's
Sons, 1972 ISBN 0-684-12393-2.
- Frost, Heather. "An Interracial Movement of the Poor: Community
Organizing and the New Left in the 1960s." New York: New York
University press, 2001 ISBN 0814726976.
- Heath, G. Louis, ed. Vandals in the Bomb Factory: The
History and Literature of the Students for a Democratic
Society. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1976 ISBN
0-810-80890-0.
- Halstead, Fred. Out Now!: A Participant's Account of the
Movement in the United States Against the Vietnam War
Hardcover edition. Anchor Foundation; Reprint edition 1978 ISBN
0-913460-47-8.
- Klatch, Rebecca E. A Generation Divided: The New Left, the
New Right, and the 1960s. Berkeley : University of California
Press, 1999 ISBN 0-520-21714-4.
- Pardun, Robert. "Prairie Radical: A Journey Through the
Sixties" Shire Press, 2001 ISBN 0-918-82820-1.
- Sale, Kirkpatrick SDS. New York: Random House, 1973
ISBN 0-394-47889-4.
SDS publications
- Davidson, Carl. Toward a Student Syndicalist Movement or
University Reform Revisited. Chicago: Students for a
Democratic Society. ca. 1967. Mimeographed. 7 p.
- Gilbert, David and David Loud.
U. S. Imperialism. Chicago: Students for
a Democratic Society, 1968. Wraps. 33 p.
- Haber, Al and Dick Flacks. Peace, Power and the University:
Prepared for Students for a Democratic Society and the Peace
Research and Education Project.Ann Arbor: Peace Research and
Education Project, 1963. Mimeographed. 12 p..
- James, Mike. Getting Ready for the Firing Line: Join
Community Union. Chicago: Students for a Democratic Society,
March 1968. Stapled softcover. 8p. Photos by Nancy Hollander, Tom
Malear of the Chicago Film Coop, Todd Gitlin & Les Jordan,
SCEF. Reprinted from "The Activist," Spring 1967. Introduction for
this pamphlet by Mike James.
- Lemisch, Jessie. Towards a Democratic History. Ann
Arbor & Chicago: Radical Education Project/Students for a
Democratic Society, (1967). Radical Education Project Occasional
Paper. 8 p.
- Lynd, Staughton. The New
Radicals and "Participatory Democracy". Chicago: Students for
a Democratic Society, 1965. 10 p.
- Oglesby, Carl. The Speech Given
by Carl Oglesby, President, Students for a Democratic Society, at
the Nov. 27, 1965 March on Washington to End the War in
Vietnam. Chicago: Students for a Democratic Society, ca. 1965.
8 1/2 x 11 in. Mimeographed. 8 p.
- Olinick, Michael. The Campus Press. Distributed by
Students for a Democratic Society for the Liberal Study Group,
National Student
Association, 1962. 13 p.
- Oppenheimer, Martin. Alienation or Participation: The
Sociology of Participatory Democracy. n.p.: Students of a
Democratic Society (S.D.S.), 1966. 7 pages. 1st edition. Stapled
booklet.
- Students For A Democratic Society [S.D.S.]. Fight
Racism! Boston: Students for a Democratic Society, n.d.
[1969]. 28pp. 1st edition. Stapled softcover.
- Students for a Democratic Society. New Left Notes.
Chicago. [?] Vol. 1 # 1 1965 [?] - Vol. 4 # 31 October 2,
1969.
- Students for a Democratic Society [Progressive Labor]. SDS
New Left Notes, Vol. 5, No. 15, July 6, 1970 - [?]. Boston,
1970.
United States Government publications
- U.S. House of Representatives. Investigation of Students
for a Democratic Society, Part 2 (Kent State University): Hearings
Before the Committee on Internal Security, House of
Representatives; 91st Congress, 2nd Session, June 24 and 25,
1969. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
- U.S. House of Representatives. Investigation of Students
for a Democratic Society, Part 3-A (George Washington University);
Hearings Before the Committee on Internal Security, House of
Representatives; 91st Congress, 2nd Session, July 22, 1969.
Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
- U.S. House of Representatives. Student Views Toward
U.S. Policy in Southeast Asia; Hearings Before an Ad Hoc
Committee of Members of the House of Representatives; 91st
Congress, 2nd Session, July 22, 1969. Washington: U.S.
Government Printng Office, 1969.
- U.S. President. Commission on Campus Unrest. Report.
This publication is often referred to as the Scranton
Report, issued in 1970.
External links