Tawana Brawley (born 1972) is an
African American woman from
Wappinger, New
York
.
In 1987, at the age of 15, she received
national media attention in the US
for accusing
six white men of rape,
some of whom were police officers. The accusations soon
earned her notoriety, which was inflamed by Brawley's advisers
Reverend
Al Sharpton and attorneys
Alton H. Maddox and
C.
Vernon Mason, public officials, and
intense media attention. After hearing evidence, a grand jury
concluded in October 1988 that Brawley had not been the victim of a
forcible sexual assault and that she herself may have created the
appearance of an attack. The New York prosecutor whom Brawley
accused as one of her alleged assailants successfully sued Brawley
and her three advisers for defamation.
Brawley initially received considerable support from the
African-American community. Some scholars suggested that Brawley
was victimized by biased reporting that adhered to racial
stereotypes. The mainstream media's coverage drew heated criticism
from the African-American press and leaders for its treatment of
the teenager. The outcome of the grand jury decreased support for
Brawley and her advisers. Brawley's family has maintained that the
allegations were true.
Origins of the case
On November 28, 1987, Brawley, who had been missing for four days,
was found lying conscious but unresponsive in a garbage bag several
feet from an apartment where she had once lived. Her clothing was
torn and burned, her body smeared with feces. She was taken to the
emergency room, where various slurs and epithets were discovered
written on her torso with a black substance described as
charcoal.
A detective from the Sheriff's Juvenile Aid Bureau, among others,
was summoned to interview Brawley, but she remained unresponsive.
The family requested a black officer, which the police granted.
Brawley, described as having an "extremely spacey" look on her
face, communicated with this officer with nods of the head, shrugs
of the shoulder, and written notes. The interview lasted 20
minutes, during which she uttered only one word: "neon." Through
gestures and writing, however, she indicated she had been raped
repeatedly in a wooded area by three white men, at least one of
them a police officer. A
sexual
assault kit was administered, and police began building a
case.
Brawley claimed she had been repeatedly raped by a group of white
men but could provide no names or descriptions of her assailants.
She later told others that there had been no rape, only other kinds
of sexual abuse. Forensic tests found no evidence that a sexual
assault of any kind had occurred. There was no evidence of exposure
to elements, which would be expected in a victim held for several
days in the woods at a time when the temperature dropped below
freezing at night.
There were other discrepancies in Brawley's story. On the morning
after the alleged abduction, she was seen entering the empty
apartment at the Pavilion Apartments where she had once lived.
Other witnesses claimed to have seen her at parties in a nearby
town during the period when she was said to be missing. She had no
bruises, contusions, scratches or other injuries except for a small
bruise behind the left ear, which was determined to be several days
old. One witness claimed to have seen her climb into the garbage
bag in which she was found. Her mother, Glenda Brawley, was spotted
at the apartment complex shortly before Brawley was seen getting
into the garbage bag. The mother waited until that same afternoon
to report Brawley as missing to the police. The investigation
turned up evidence that indicated damage done to Brawley's clothing
had occurred in the apartment. According to the grand jury report,
all of "the items and instrumentalities necessary to create the
condition in which Brawley appeared on Saturday, November 28, were
present inside of or in the immediate vicinity of Apartment 19A."
The feces had come from a neighbor's dog.
Public response
Public response to Brawley's story was at first mostly sympathetic.
Bill Cosby, among others, pledged support
for her and helped raise money for a legal fund. In December 1987,
1,000 people marched through the streets of Newburgh, New York in
support of Brawley.
Brawley's claims in the case captured headlines across the country.
Public rallies were held denouncing the incident. Racial tensions
also climbed. When civil rights activist Rev.
Al Sharpton, with attorneys
Alton H. Maddox and
C.
Vernon Mason, began handling
Brawley's publicity, the case quickly took on an explosive edge. At
the height of the controversy, public opinion was sharply divided
along racial lines on the question of whether the teenager was
telling the truth, and on support for her advisers. A June 1988
poll showed a gap of 34 percentage points between blacks (51%) and
whites (85%) on the question of whether she was lying.
Sharpton, Maddox, and Mason generated a national media sensation.
The three claimed officials all the way up to the state government
were trying to cover up defendants in the case because they were
white. Specifically, they named
Steven
Pagones, an Assistant District Attorney in Dutchess County, as
one of the rapists, and a racist, among other accusations.
The mainstream media's coverage drew heated criticism from the
African-American press and leaders for its treatment of the
teenager. They cited the leaking and publication of photos taken of
her at the hospital and the revelation of her name despite her
being underage.
In addition, critics were concerned that Brawley had been left in
the custody of her mother, stepfather and advisers, rather than
being given protection by the state, that she was used as a pawn by
adults who should have protected her.
Grand jury hearings
Under the authority of New York State Attorney General
Robert Abrams, a grand jury was called to hear
evidence. On October 6, 1988, the
Abrams Grand Jury released its 170-page report
concluding Brawley had not been abducted, assaulted, raped and
sodomized, as had been claimed by Brawley and her advisers. The
report further concluded that the "unsworn public allegations
against Dutchess County Assistant District Attorney Steven Pagones"
were false and had no basis in fact. To issue the report, the Grand
Jury heard from 180 witnesses, saw 250 exhibits and recorded more
than 6,000 pages of testimony.
In the decision, the grand jury noted many problems with Brawley's
story. Among these were that the rape kit results did not indicate
sexual assault. Also, despite her claim of having been held captive
for days, Brawley was not suffering from exposure, was well
nourished, and appeared to have brushed her teeth recently. Despite
her clothing being charred, there were no burns on her body.
Although a shoe she was wearing was cut through, Brawley had no
injuries to her foot. The racial epithets written on her were
upside down, which led to suspicion that Brawley wrote the words.
Testimony from her schoolmates indicated she had attended a local
party during the time of her supposed abduction. One witness
claimed to have observed Brawley climbing into the garbage bag.
Brawley herself never testified.
Possible motives
Much of the Grand Jury evidence pointed to a possible motive for
Brawley's falsifying the incident: trying to avoid violent
punishment from her mother and her stepfather, Ralph King.
Witnesses testified that Glenda Brawley had beaten her daughter for
running away and for spending nights with boys. King had a history
of violence that included stabbing his first wife 14 times, later
shooting and killing her. There was considerable evidence that King
could and would violently attack Brawley; when Brawley had been
arrested on a shoplifting charge the previous May, King attempted
to beat her for the offense—at the police station. Witnesses have
also described King as having talked about his stepdaughter in a
sexualized manner. On the day of her alleged disappearance, Brawley
had skipped school to visit boyfriend Todd Buxton, who was serving
a six-month jail sentence. When Buxton's mother (with whom she had
visited Buxton in jail) urged her to get home before she got in
trouble, Brawley told her, "I'm already in trouble." She described
how angry Ralph King was over a previous incident of her staying
out late.
There was evidence that Brawley's mother and King participated
knowingly in the hoax. Neighbors told the Grand Jury that in
February they overheard Glenda Brawley saying to Mr. King, "You
shouldn't have took the money because after it all comes out,
they're going to find out the truth." Another neighbor heard Mrs.
Brawley say, "They know we're lying and they're going to find out
and come and get us."
In April 1989,
New York
Newsday published claims by a boyfriend of Brawley's,
Daryl Rodriguez, that she had told him the story was fabricated,
with help from her mother, in order to avert the wrath of her
stepfather.
Writing about the case in a 2004 book on perceptions of racial
violence, sociologist Jonathan Markovitz concluded "it is
reasonable to suggest that Brawley's fear and the kinds of
suffering that she must have gone through must have been truly
staggering if they were enough to force her to resort to cutting
her hair, covering herself in feces and crawling into a garbage
bag."
Aftermath
The case exposed deep distrust in the black community about winning
justice from white institutions and it also showed how some
attempted to manipulate the justice system before a full
investigation could take place. Some opinions remained fixed.
Patricia Williams wrote in 1991 that the teenager "has been the
victim of some unspeakable crime. No matter how she got there. No
matter who did it to her and even if she did it to herself." These
comments aroused controversy as well.
Alton H. Maddox, Jr. was indefinitely suspended
by the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court in Brooklyn on
May 21, 1990 after failing to appear before a disciplinary hearing
to answer allegations regarding his conduct in the Brawley
case.
In 1998, Pagones was awarded $345,000 (he sought $395 million)
through a lawsuit for defamation of character that he had brought
against Sharpton, Maddox and Mason. The jury found Sharpton liable
for making seven defamatory statements about Pagones, Maddox for
two and Mason for one. The jury deadlocked on four of the 22
statements over which Pagones had sued and eight statements were
found non-defamatory. In a later interview, Pagones said the
turmoil by the accusations of Brawley and her advisers had cost him
his first marriage and much personal grief.
Pagones had also sued Brawley. She defaulted by not appearing at
the trial and the judge ordered her to pay him damages of $185,000.
As of 2003, none of the award had been paid. The $65,000 portion of
the judgment assigned to Al Sharpton was paid for him in 2001 by
supporters, including renowned attorney
Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. plus former businessman
Earl G. Graves, Jr.
Brawley has maintained she did not invent the story and in a 1997
appearance, she still had supporters. In November 2007, Brawley's
stepfather and mother, in a 20th anniversary feature for the
New York Daily News
contended the attack happened. "How could we make this up and take
down the state of New York? We're just regular people," Glenda
Brawley said, adding, "We should be millionaires." They said they
had asked
New York State
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and
Governor Eliot Spitzer to reopen the case. They also
said that Brawley, who has converted to
Islam,
would speak at any legal proceedings.
See also
References
- Edwin Diamond. The Media Show: The Changing Face of the News,
1985-1990. MIT Press, 1991. “The great paradox of Brawley 2 was
that this dumb show went on for months, encouraged by the
authorities and the media. The “white power structure" —as Sharpton
calls it — all but propped up the advisers' shaky scenarios. The
governor and the attorney general, their eyes on electoral politics
as well as the case, gave the appearance of trying to avoid offense
to any constituency, black or white.”
- Court TV
- Pagones v. Maddox et al.
- Jonathan Markovitz. Legacies of Lynching: Racial Violence
and Memory. University of Minnesota Press, 2004,
- K. Sue Jewell. From Mammy to Miss America and Beyond: Cultural
Images and the Shaping of U.S. Social Policy. Routledge, 1993. p
200. “Specifically, Tawana Brawley, Robin Givens and Anita Hill
were subjected to the mass media's and, more generally, society's
negative and hostile perception of African American women.”
- Pamela Newkirk. Within the Veil: Black Journalists, White
Media. New York University Press, pp152-154.
- Robert Charles Smith, Richard Seltzer. Contemporary
Controversies and the American Racial Divide. Rowman &
Littlefield, 2000.
- Jonathan Markovitz. Legacies of Lynching: Racial Violence
and Memory.University of Minnesota Press, 2004, p. 92: "That
the story of a black girl's extreme racial and sexual victimization
was not by itself sufficiently newsworthy for the mainstream press
became an important bone of contention in later coverage by some of
the Black press."
- Ellen G. Friedman, Corinne Squire. Morality USA.
University of Minnesota Press, 1998, p. 69: "For segments of the
black press, however, the Brawley story's truth was not in
question: the case simply demonstrated the bankruptcy of the white
justice system."
- Robert D. McFadden, Ralph Blumenthal, M. A. Farber, E. R.
Shipp, Charles Strum and Craig Wolff. Outrage: The Story Behind
the Tawana Brawley Hoax. Bantam Books, 1990. "The white media
was skeptical of the Brawley story; the black press believed that
it was another milestone on its long crusade to fight racial
injustice and to promote the self-esteem of black people."
- Utrice Leid. It's an outrage! The City Sun. April 26 - May 2, 1989.
"The same media that demanded Brawley "prove" her sexual assault
made no such demands in the Central Park case. The same media that
had no difficulty identifying the underaged Wappingers Falls
teenager by name, invading the sanctity of her home to show her
face and even televising seminude pictures of her while she was in
the hospital..."
- Patricia J. Williams. The Alchemy of Race and Rights.
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1991. ISBN 9780674014718, page
169.
- Daniel A. Farber, Sue Sherry. Beyond All Reason: The
Radical Assault on Truth in American Law. Oxford University
Press, 1997.
- Sharpton's Debt in Brawley Defamation Is Paid by
Supporters. New York Times; June 15, 2001
External links