The
Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion were
established in 1563 and are the historic defining statements of
Anglican doctrine in relation to the
controversies of the
English
Reformation; especially in the relation of
Calvinist doctrine and
Roman Catholic practices to the nascent
Anglican doctrine of the evolving
English Church. The name is commonly abbreviated as the
Thirty-Nine Articles or the
XXXIX
Articles.
The
Church of England was
searching out its doctrinal position in relation to the Roman
Catholic Church and the continental
Protestants. A series of defining documents were
written and replaced over a period of 30 years as the doctrinal and
political situation changed from the
excommunication of
Henry VIII in 1533, to the
excommunication of
Elizabeth
I in 1570.
Prior to King Henry's death in 1547, several statements of position
were issued. The first attempt was the
Ten Articles in
1536 which showed some slightly
Protestant leanings; the result of an English
desire for a political alliance with the German
Lutheran princes. The next revision was the
Six
Articles in 1539 which swung away from all reformed positions,
and the
King's Book in 1543 which re-established almost in
full the familiar Catholic doctrines. Then, during the reign of
Edward VI in 1552, the
Forty-Two Articles were written under the direction of
Archbishop Thomas Cranmer. It was in this document that
Calvinist thought reached its zenith of its influence in the
English Church. These articles were never put into action, due to
the king's death and the reunion of the English Church with Rome
under Queen Mary I. Finally, upon the coronation of Elizabeth I and
the re-establishment of the separate Church of England the
Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion were established by a
Convocation of the
Church in 1563, under the direction of
Matthew Parker, the then
Archbishop of Canterbury, which
pulled back from some of the more extreme Calvinist thinking and
created the peculiar English reformed doctrine.The articles,
finalised in 1571, were to have a lasting effect on
religion in the United
Kingdom and elsewhere through their incorporation into and
propagation through the
Book of
Common Prayer.
Ten Articles (1536)
The
Ten Articles were published in 1536 by
Thomas Cranmer. They were the first
guidelines of the
Church of
England as it became independent of
Rome.
In summary, the Ten Articles asserted:
- The binding authority of the Bible, the three œcumenical
creeds, and the first four œcumenical councils
- The necessity of baptism for salvation, even in the case of
infants (Art. II. says that 'infants ought to be baptized;' that,
dying in infancy, they 'shall undoubtedly be saved thereby, and
else not ;' that the opinions of Anabaptists and Pelagians are 'detestable heresies, and utterly
to be condemned.')
- The sacrament of penance, with confession and absolution, which
are declared 'expedient and necessary'
- The substantial, real, corporal presence of Christ's body and
blood under the form of bread and wine in the eucharist
- Justification by faith, joined with charity and obedience
- The use of images in churches
- The honoring of saints and the Virgin Mary
- The invocation of saints
- The observance of various rites and ceremonies as good and
laudable, such as clerical vestments, sprinkling of holy water,
bearing of candles on Candlemas-day, giving of ashes on Ash
Wednesday
- The doctrine of purgatory, and prayers for the dead in
purgatory (made purgatory a non-essential doctrine)
The emerging doctrines of the autonomous Church of England were
followed by further explication in
The Institution of the
Christian Man.
Bishops' Book (1537)

Thomas Cranmer headed the committee
that authored the
Bishop's Book.
The Institution of the Christian Man (also called
The
Bishops' Book), published in 1537, was written by a committee
of forty-six divines and bishops headed by Thomas Cranmer. The
purpose of the work, along with the Ten Articles of the previous
year, was to implement the reforms of
Henry
VIII in separating from the
Roman Catholic Church and establishing
the
Ecclesia Anglicana. It was
considered "reformed" in basic orientation, though it was not
strongly
Lutheran. The work functioned as
an official formulary of the new Anglican faith in England. It was
later superseded by other creedal and official statements during
the successive reigns of
Edward
VI and
Elizabeth I, as the Anglican
Church moved toward a more Reformed theological position. It would
evolve into the
King's Book. "The work was a noble
endeavor on the part of the bishops to promote unity, and to
instruct the people in Church doctrine."
Authorship
The list of the 46 divines as they appear in the
Bishop's
Book included all of the bishops, eight archdeacons and
seventeen other Doctors of Divinity, some of whom were later
involved with translating the
Bible and
compiling the
Prayer
Book:
Thomas Cranmer -
Edward Lee -
John Stokesley -
Cuthbert Tunstall -
Stephen Gardiner -
Robert Aldrich -
John Voysey -
John
Longland -
John
Clerk -
Royland Lee -
Thomas Goodrich -
Nicholas Shaxton -
John Bird -
Edward
Foxe -
Hugh Latimer -
John Hilsey -
Richard
Sampson -
William Repps -
William Barlowe -
Robert Partew -
Robert Holgate -
Richard Wolman -
William Knight -
John Bell -
Edmond Bonner -
William
Skip -
Nicholas Heath -
Cuthbert Marshal -
Richard Curren -
William Cliffe -
William Downes -
Robert Oking -
Ralph
Bradford -
Richard
Smyth -
Simon Matthew -
John Pryn -
William
Buckmaster -
William May
-
Nicholas Wotton -
Richard Cox -
John Edmunds -
Thomas Robertson -
John Baker -
Thomas Barett -
John
Hase -
John Tyson
Six Articles (1539)
In 1538
three German theologians – Francis Burkhardt, vice-chancellor of
Saxony; George von Boyneburg, doctor of law; and Friedrich Myconius, superintendent of the
church of Gotha – were sent to London and held conferences with the
Anglican bishops and clergy in the
archbishop’s palace at Lambeth
for several
months. The Germans presented, as a basis of agreement, a
number of Articles based on the
Lutheran
Confession of Augsburg.
Bishops
Tunstall,
Stokesley and others were not won over by
these
Protestant arguments and did
everything they could to avoid agreement.
They were willing to
separate from Rome, but their plan was to unite with the Greek
Church
and not with the evangelical Protestants on the
continent. The bishops also refused to eliminate what the
Germans called the "Abuses" (e.g., private Masses, celibacy of the
clergy, invocation of
saints) allowed by the
reformed English Church. Stokesley considered these customs to be
essential because the Greek Church, as the
Eastern Orthodox Church was called
at that time, practised them. In opposition, Cranmer favoured a
union with the Germans. The king, unwilling to break with
Catholic practices, dissolved the conference.
Henry had felt uneasy about the appearance of the Lutheran doctors
and their theology within his kingdom. On 28 April 1539 Parliament
met for the first time in three years.
On 5 May, the House of Lords
created a committee with the customary religious
balance to examine and determine doctrine. Eleven days
later, the
Duke of
Norfolk noted that the committee had not agreed on anything and
proposed that the Lords examine six doctrinal questions which
eventually became the basis of the
Six Articles. The
articles reaffirmed traditional Catholic doctrine on key issues:
- transubstantiation,
- the reasonableness of withholding of the cup from the laity during communion,
- clerical celibacy,
- observance of vows of chastity,
- permission for private masses,
- the importance of auricular confession.
Penalties under the act ranged from imprisonment and fine to death.
However, its severity was reduced by an act of 1540, which retained
the death penalty only for denial of transubstantiation, and a
further act limited its arbitrariness. The Catholic emphasis of the
doctrine commended in the articles is not matched by the
ecclesiastical reforms Henry undertook in the following years, such
as the enforcement of the necessity of the English Bible and the
insistence upon the abolition of all shrines, both in 1541.
As the
Act of the Six Articles neared passage in
Parliament, Cranmer moved his wife and children out of England to
safety.
Up
to then the family was kept quietly hidden, most likely in Ford
Palace in Kent
. The
Act passed Parliament at the end of June and it forced Latimer and
Nicholas Shaxton to resign their
dioceses due to their outspoken opposition to the measure. After
Henry's death the articles were repealed by his son, Edward
VI.
King's Book (1543)
The Necessary Doctrine and Erudition for Any Christian
Man, also known as the
King's Book, was published in
1543, and attributed to Henry VIII. It was a revision of
The
Institution of the Christian Man, and defended
transubstantiation and the Six Articles. It also encouraged
preaching and attacked the use of images.
Forty-Two Articles (1552)

Thomas Cranmer, principal author of
the
Forty-Two Articles.
The
Forty-Two Articles were intended to summarise
Anglican doctrine, as it now existed under the
reign of
Edward VI, who
favoured a more Protestant faith. Largely the work of Thomas
Cranmer, they were to be short formularies that would demonstrate
the faith revealed in
Scripture and the
existing Catholic creeds. Completed in 1552, they were issued by
Royal Mandate on
19 June 1553. The articles were claimed to have received the
authority of a Convocation, although this is doubtful. With the
coronation of
Queen Mary I and the
reunion of the Church of England with the Roman Catholic Church,
the Articles were never enforced. However, after Mary's death, they
became the basis of the
Thirty-Nine Articles. In 1563,
Convocation met under
Archbishop
Parker to revise the articles. Convocation passed only 39 of
the 42, and Elizabeth I reduced the number to 38 by throwing out
Article XXIX to avoid offending her subjects with Catholic
leanings. In 1571, the XXIXth Article, despite the opposition of
Bishop
Edmund Guest, was inserted, to
the effect that the wicked do not eat the Body of Christ. This was
done following the queen’s
excommunication by the
Pope in 1570. That act destroyed any hope of
reconciliation with Rome and it was no longer necessary to fear
that Article XXIX would offend Catholic sensibilities. The
Articles, increased to Thirty-nine, were ratified by the Queen, and
the bishops and clergy were required to assent.
Thirty-Nine Articles (1563)
Queen Elizabeth I of England, in whose reign the
Thirty-Nine
Articles were passed.
The
Thirty-Nine Articles were not intended as a complete
statement of the
Christian faith, but of
the position of the Church of England in relation to the Roman
Catholic Church and dissident
Protestants. The Articles argue against some
Anabaptist positions such as the holding
of goods in common, and the necessity of
believer's baptism. The purpose of their
production and enactment was the absence of a general consensus on
matters of faith following the separation with Rome. There was a
concern that dissenters who wanted the reforms to go much further
(for example, to abolish hierarchies of
bishops) would increase in influence. Wishing to
pursue Elizabeth I's agenda of establishing a national church that
would maintain the indigenous
apostolic faith and incorporate some of
the insights of Protestantism, the Articles were intended to
incorporate a balance of theology and doctrine. This allowed them
to appeal to the broadest domestic opinion, Catholic and otherwise.
In this sense, the Articles are a revealing window into the ethos
and character of Anglicanism, in particular in the way the document
works to navigate a
via media, or
"middle path," between the beliefs and practices of the Roman
Catholic Church and of the English Puritans, thus lending the
Church of England a mainstream Reformed air. The "via media" was
expressed so adroitly in the Articles that some Anglican scholars
have labeled their content as an early example of the idea that the
doctrine of Anglicanism is one of "Reformed Catholicism".
Content of the Articles
The Articles highlight the Anglican positions with regards to the
corruption of
Catholic
doctrine in the
Middle Ages, to orthodox
Roman Catholic teachings, to
Puritanism,
and to Anabaptist thought.They are divided, per the command of
Queen Elizabeth I, into four sections: Articles 1-8, "The Catholic
Faith"; Articles 9-18, "Personal Religion"; Articles 19-31,
"Corporate Religion"; and Articles 32-39, "Miscellaneous." The
articles were issued both in English and in Latin, and both are of
equal authority.
In summary
Articles I—VIII: The Catholic faith:The first five
articles articulate the Catholic creedal statements concerning the
nature of God, manifest in the
Holy
Trinity. Articles VI and VII deal with scripture, while Article
VIII discusses the essential creeds.
Articles IX—XVIII: Personal religion:These
articles dwell on the topics of
sin,
justification, and the eternal
disposition of the soul. Of particular focus is the major
Reformation topic of
justification by faith. The Articles
in this section and in the section on the Church plant Anglicanism
in the
via media of the debate,
portraying an
Economy of
Salvation where good works are an outgrowth of faith, and there
is a role for the Church and for the
sacraments.
Articles XIX—XXXI: Corporate religion:This section
focuses on the expression of faith in the public venue – the
institutional church, the
councils of
the church,
worship,
ministry, and
sacramental theology.
Articles XXXII—XXXIX: Miscellaneous:These articles
concern
clerical celibacy,
excommunication, traditions of the
Church, and other issues not covered elsewhere.
Meaning of the Articles
The 1571
Book of Common Prayer
contains a royal declaration introducing the articles which demands
a literal interpretation of them, on pain of death for academics or
churchmen teaching any personal interpretations or encouraging
debate about them. It states: "no man hereafter shall either print
or preach, to draw the Article aside any way, but shall submit to
it in the plain and Full meaning thereof: and shall not put his own
sense or comment to be the meaning of the Article, but shall take
it in the literal and grammatical sense."
However, what the Articles truly mean has been a matter of debate
in the church since before they were issued. The
evangelical wing of the Church has taken the
Articles at face value. In 2003, evangelical Anglican clergyman
Chris Pierce wrote:
This view has never been held by the whole church. In 1643,
Archbishop of
Armagh John Bramhall laid out the
core argument against the Articles:
This split of opinion was seen vividly during the
Oxford Movement of the 19th century. The
stipulations of Articles XXV and XXVIII were regularly invoked by
evangelicals to oppose the reintroduction of certain beliefs,
customs, and acts of piety with respect to the sacraments. In
response,
John Henry Newman's
Tract 90 attempted to show that the
Articles could be interpreted in a way less hostile to Roman
Catholic doctrine. Consensus on anything is rare in the Anglican
Communion, and the
Thirty-Nine Articles are no
different.
History and impact of the Articles

The Prayer book of 1662 included the
Thirty-Nine Articles.
Adherence to the Articles was made a legal requirement by the
English Parliament in 1571. They are printed in the
Book of Common Prayer and other
Anglican prayer books. The
Test Act of 1672
made adherence to the Articles a requirement for holding civil
office in England (repealed in 1824).
In the past, in numerous national churches and dioceses, those
entering
Holy Orders had to make an oath
of subscription to the Articles. Clergy of the Church of England
are still required to acknowledge that the Articles are "agreeable
to the Word of God," but the laity are not. The Church of Ireland
has a similar declaration for its clergy, while some other Churches
of the Anglican Communion make no such requirement.
The impact of the Articles on Anglican thought, doctrine, and
practice has been profound. Although Article VIII itself states
that the three Catholic creeds are a sufficient statement of faith,
the Articles have often been perceived as the nearest thing to a
supplementary confession of faith possessed by the tradition.
A revised version was adopted in 1801 by the US Episcopal Church.
Earlier,
John Wesley, founder of the
Methodists adapted the Thirty-Nine
Articles for use by
American
Methodists in the 18th century. The resulting
Articles of Religion remain
official United Methodist doctrine.
In Anglican discourse, the Articles are regularly cited and
interpreted in order to attempt to clarify doctrine and practice.
Sometimes their supposedly prescriptive tendency has been invoked
in support of Anglican
comprehensiveness. An important concrete
manifestation of this is the
Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral,
which incorporates Articles VI, VIII, XXV, and XXXVI in its broad
articulation of fundamental Anglican identity. In other
circumstances, their proscriptive character has been appealed to in
an attempt to delineate the parameters of acceptable belief and
practice.
The Articles continue to be invoked today in the Anglican Church.
For example, in the ongoing debate over homosexual activity and the
concomitant controversies over episcopal authority, Articles VI,
XX, XXIII, XXVI, and XXXIV are regularly cited by those of various
opinions.
Each of the 44 member churches in the Anglican Communion are,
however, free to adopt and authorise their own official documents,
and the Articles are not officially normative in all Anglican
Churches (neither is the
Athanasian
Creed). The only doctrinal documents agreed upon in the
Anglican Communion are the Apostolic Creed, the Nicene Creed of AD
381 and the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral. Beside these documents,
authorised liturgical formularies, such as Prayer Book and Ordinal,
are normative. The several provincial editions of Prayer Books (and
authorised alternative liturgies) are, however, not identical,
although they share a greater or smaller amount of family
resemblance. No specific edition of the Prayer Book is therefore
binding for the entire Communion.
Notes
- The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, p.1611
- The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, p.428
- The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, p.625
-
http://www.episcopalian.org/pbs1928/Articles/AnglicanTeaching/007.HTM
Anglican Teaching by W. G. WILSON, M.A., B.D., Ph.D. and
J.H. TEMPLETON. M.A., B.D.. M.LITT.. Ph.D.
- http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01498a.htm Catholic
Encyclopedia Anglicanism
- The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church
- Henry Chadwick , Tradition,
Fathers, and Councils. In "The Study of Anglicanism," ed. by
S. Sykes and J. Booty. London: SPCK, 1988
- John Guy, Tudor England Oxford 1991.
- J. D.
Mackie, The Earlier Tudors,
1485-1558, Oxford Paperbacks, 1994, paperback, 721 pages, ISBN
0-19-285292-2
References
Further reading
- Redworth, Glyn. A Study in the Formulation of Policy: The
Genesis and Evolution of the Act of Six Articles. Journal of
Ecclesiastical History 37/1 (1986): 42–67.
External links