Underground nuclear testing refers to
test detonations of
nuclear weapons that are performed
underground. When the device being tested is buried at sufficient
depth, the
explosion may be
contained, with no release of
radioactive materials to the
atmosphere.
The extreme heat and pressure of an underground nuclear explosion
causes changes in the surrounding
rock. The rock closest to the location of the
test is vaporised, forming a cavity. Further away, there are zones
of crushed, cracked, and irreversibly strained rock. Following the
explosion, the rock above the cavity may collapse, forming a rubble
chimney. If this chimney reaches the surface, a bowl-shaped
subsidence crater may form.
The first underground test took place in 1951; further tests
provided information that eventually led to the signing of the
Limited Test Ban Treaty in
1963, which banned all nuclear tests except for those performed
underground. From then until the signing of the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
in 1996, most nuclear tests were performed underground, in order to
prevent
nuclear fallout from
entering into the atmosphere.
Background
Although
public concern about fallout from nuclear testing grew in the early
1950s, fallout was discovered after the Trinity
test in
1945. Photographic film manufacturers would later
report 'fogged' films, these were traced both to Trinity
and later tests at the Nevada Test Site
. Intense fallout from the 1953
Simon test was documented as far as Albany, New
York.
The
fallout from the March 1954 Bravo
test in
the Pacific would have "scientific, political and social
implications that have continued for more than 40 years."
The
multi-megaton test caused fallout to occur on the islands of
Rongerik and Rongelap, and a Japanese
fishing boat
known as the Daigo Fukuryū
Maru (Lucky Dragon). Prior to this test, there was
"insufficient" appreciation of the dangers of fallout.
The test became an international incident. In a PBS interview, the
historian Martha Smith argued: "In Japan, it becomes a huge issue
in terms of not just the government and its protest against the
United States, but all different groups and all different peoples
in Japan start to protest. It becomes a big issue in the media.
There are all kinds of letters and protests that come from, not
surprisingly, Japanese fishermen, the fishermen's wives; there are
student groups, all different types of people; the protest against
the Americans' use of the Pacific for nuclear testing. They're very
concerned about, first of all, why the United States even has the
right to be carrying out those kinds of tests in the Pacific.
They're also concerned about the health and environmental impact."
The Prime Minister of India "voiced the heightened international
concern" when he called for the elimination of all nuclear testing
worldwide.
Knowledge about fallout and its effects grew, and with it concern
about the global environment and long-term genetic damage. Talks
between the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, and
the Soviet Union began in May 1955 on the subject of an
international agreement to end nuclear tests.
On August 5, 1963, representatives
of the United
States
, the Soviet
Union
, and the United Kingdom
signed the Limited Test Ban Treaty, forbidding
testing of nuclear weapons in the atmosphere, in space, and
underwater. Agreement was facilitated by the decision to
allow underground testing, eliminating the need for on-site
inspections that concerned the Soviets. Underground testing was
allowed, provided that it does not cause "radioactive debris to be
present outside the territorial limits of the State under whose
jurisdiction or control such explosion is conducted."
Early history of underground testing

The 1951 Uncle test – the first
underground nuclear explosion
Following
analysis of underwater detonations that were part of Operation
Crossroads
in 1946, inquiries were made regarding the possible
military value of an underground explosion. The
Joint Chiefs of Staff thus obtained
the agreement of the
Atomic Energy
Commission to perform experiments on both surface and
sub-surface detonations.
The island of Amchitka
was
initially selected for these tests in 1950, but the site was later
deemed unsuitable and the tests were moved the Nevada Test
Site
.
The first underground nuclear test was conducted on
29 November,
1951. This was
the 1.2
kiloton Buster-Jangle
Uncle, detonated 5.2m (17ft) beneath ground level. The test
was designed as a scaled-down investigation of the effects of a 23
kiloton ground penetrating
gun-type device that was then being
considered for use as a cratering and
bunker-buster weapon. The explosion resulted
in a cloud that rose to 11,500 ft, and deposited fallout to the
north and north-northeast. The resulting crater was 260 feet wide
and 53 feet deep.
The next underground test was
Teapot Ess, on
23 March,
1955. The 1 kiloton
explosion was an operational test of an
atomic demolition munition (ADM).
It was detonated 67 feet underground, in a shaft lined with
corrugated steel, which was then back-filled with sandbags and
dirt. Because the ADM was buried underground, the explosion blew
tons of earth upwards, creating a crater 300 feet wide and 128 feet
deep. The resulting cloud rose to a height of 12,000 feet and
subsequent fallout drifted in an easterly direction, travelling as
far as 225 km from ground zero.
On
26 July,
1957,
Plumbbob Pascal-A was detonated at the bottom of a
485-foot shaft. According to one description, it "ushered in the
era of underground testing with a magnificent pyrotechnic Roman
candle!" As compared with an above-ground test, the radioactive
debris released to the atmosphere was reduced by a factor of ten.
Theoretical work began on possible containment schemes.
Plumbbob Rainier was detonated at 899 ft underground on
19 September,
1957.
The 1.7 kt explosion was the first to be entirely contained
underground, producing no fallout. The test took place in a 1,600 –
2,000 ft horizontal tunnel in the shape of a hook. The hook "was
designed so explosive force will seal off the non-curved portion of
tunnel nearest the detonation before gases and fission fragments
can be vented around the curve of the tunnel's hook." This test
would become the prototype for larger, more powerful tests. Rainier
was announced in advance, so that seismic stations could attempt to
record a signal. Analysis of samples collected after the test
enabled scientists to develop an understanding of underground
explosions that "persists essentially unaltered today." The
information would later provide a basis for subsequent decisions to
agree to the Limited Test Ban Treaty.
Cannikin, the last test at the
Amchitka
facility was
detonated on 6 November, 1971. At approximately 5
megatons, it was the largest underground test in US
history.
Effects
The effects of an underground nuclear test may vary according to
factors including the depth and yield of the explosion, as well as
the nature of the surrounding rock. If the test is conducted at
sufficient depth, the test is said to be
contained, with
no venting of gases or other contaminants to the environment. In
contrast, if the device is buried at insufficient depth
("underburied"), then rock may be expelled by the explosion,
forming a crater surrounded by ejecta, and releasing high-pressure
gases to the atmosphere (the resulting crater is usually conical in
profile, circular, and may range between tens to hundreds of metres
in diameter and depth). One figure used in determining how deeply
the device should be buried is the
scaled depth of burial,
or
-burst. This figure is calculated as the burial depth
in metres divided by the
cube root of the
yield in kilotons. It is estimated that, in order to ensure
containment, this figure should be greater than 100.
Zones in surrounding rock
| Name |
Radius |
| Melt cavity |
4 – 12 m/kt1/3 |
| Crushed zone |
30 - 40 m/kt1/3 |
| Cracked zone |
80 - 120 m/kt1/3 |
| Zone of irreversible strain |
800 - 1100 m/kt1/3 |
The energy of the nuclear explosion is released in one
microsecond. In the following few microseconds,
the test hardware and surrounding rock are vaporised, with
temperatures of several million degrees and pressures of several
million atmospheres. The heat and expanding shock wave cause the
surrounding rock to vaporise, or being melted further away,
creating a
melt cavity. The shock-induced motion and high
internal pressure cause this cavity to expand outwards, which
continues until the pressure has fallen sufficiently. Although not
observed in every explosion, four distinct zones (including the
melt cavity) have been described in the surrounding rock. The
crushed zone consists of rock that has lost all of its
former integrity. The
cracked zone consists of rock with
radial and concentric fissures. Finally, the
zone of
irreversible strain consists of rock deformed by the
pressure.
Once the pressure in the cavity has fallen below the level needed
to support the overburden, the rock above the void falls into the
cavity, creating a rubble
chimney. Depending on various
factors, including the yield and characteristics of the burial,
this collapse may extend to the surface. If it does, a subsidence
crater is created. Such a crater is usually bowl-shaped, and ranges
in size from a few tens of metres to over a kilometre in diameter.
At the
Nevada Test
Site
, 95 percent of tests conducted at a scaled depth of
burial (SDOB) of less than 150 caused surface collapse, compared
with about half of tests conducted at a SDOB of less than
180.
Other surface features may include disturbed ground, pressure
ridges, faults, water movement (including changes to the water
table level), rock falls, and ground slump.
Although there were early concerns about
earthquakes arising as a result of underground
tests, there is no evidence that this has occurred. However, fault
movements and ground fractures have been reported, and explosions
often precede a series of aftershocks, thought to be a result of
cavity collapse and chimney formation. In a few cases, seismic
energy released by fault movements has exceeded that of the
explosion itself.
International treaties
Signed in Moscow on August 5, 1963 by representatives of the United
States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom, the Limited Test
Ban Treaty agreed to ban nuclear testing in the atmosphere, in
space, and underwater. Due to the Soviet government's concern about
the need for the on-site inspections, underground tests were
excluded from the ban. 108 countries would eventually sign the
treaty, with the significant exceptions of France and China.
In 1974, the United States and the Soviet Union signed the
Threshold Test Ban Treaty, which
banned underground tests with yields greater than 150 kilotons. By
the 1990s, technologies to monitor and detect underground tests had
matured to the point that tests of one kiloton or over could be
detected with high probability, and in 1996 negotiations began
under the auspices of the
United
Nations to develop a comprehensive test ban. The resulting
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty was signed in 1996 by the United
States, Russia, United Kingdom, France, and China.
Monitoring
In the late 1940s, the United States began to develop the
capability to detect atmospheric testing using air sampling; this
system was able to detect the first Soviet test in 1949. Over the
next decade, this system was improved, and network of seismic
monitoring stations was established to detect underground tests.
Development of the Threshold Test Ban Treaty in the mid-1970s led
to an improved understanding of the relationship between test yield
and resulting seismic magnitude.
When negotiations began in the mid-1990s to develop a comprehensive
test ban, the international community was reluctant to rely upon
the detection capabilities of individual
nuclear weapons states (especially
the United States), and instead wanted an international detection
system. The resulting International Monitoring System consists of a
network of a total of 321 monitoring stations and 16 radionuclide
laboratories. Fifty "primary" seismic stations send data
continuously to the International Data Center, along with 120
"auxiliary" stations which send data on request. The resulting data
is used to locate the
epicentre, and
distinguish between the seismic signatures of an underground
nuclear explosion and an earthquake. Additionally, eighty
radionuclide stations detect radioactive particles vented by
underground explosions. Certain radionuclides constitute clear
evidence of nuclear tests; the presence of noble gases can indicate
whether an underground explosion has taken place. Finally, eleven
hydroacoustic stations and sixty infrasound stations monitor
underwater and atmospheric tests.
See also
Notes and references
- Some sources identify later tests as the "first." Adushkin
(2001) defines such a test as "the near-simultaneous detonation of
one or more nuclear charges inside one underground excavation (a
tunnel, shaft or borehole)", and identifies Uncle as the
first.
- Some sources refer to the test as Jangle Uncle (eg.,
Adushkin, 2001) or Project Windstorm (eg., DOE/NV-526,
1998). Operation Buster and Operation Jangle were
initially conceived as separate operations, and Jangle was
at first known as Windstorm, but the AEC merged the plans
into a single operation on 19 June, 1951.
See Gladeck, 1986.
- According to the Nuclear Weapons Archive, the yield is
described as "slight", but was approximately 55 tons.
- Hawkins and Wohletz specify a figure of 90-125.
External links
-
http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/pdf/3_3-4Adushkin.pdf
- Nuclear Pursuits, The Bulletin of the
Atomic Scientists, September/October 2003
- http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications.html
-
http://www.ingv.it/~roma/SITOINGLESE/research_projects/CTBTO/explosions.html
- http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/intro/ugt.htm
- http://www.fas.org/nuke/intro/nuke/ugt-nts.htm
-
http://www.lanl.gov/natlsecurity/nuclear/current/subcritical.shtml
- http://www.atomictraveler.com/UndergroundTestOTA.pdf
-
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1215_web.pdf
-
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/793554-ZAQEpq/native/793554.pdf
-
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/793554-ZAQEpq/native/793554.pdf
-
http://www.princeton.edu/~globsec/publications/effects/effects.shtml