Wiktionary (a
portmanteau of the words
wiki and
dictionary) is a
multilingual,
web-based project to create a
free content dictionary, available in over 151 languages.
Unlike standard dictionaries, it is written collaboratively by
volunteer, dubbed "Wiktionarians",
using
wiki software, allowing
articles to be changed by almost anyone with access to the
website.
Like its
sister project Wikipedia, Wiktionary is
run by the Wikimedia
Foundation
. Because Wiktionary is not limited by print
space considerations, most of Wiktionary's language editions
provide definitions and translations of words from many languages,
and some editions offer additional information typically found in
thesauri and
lexicons. Additionally, the English Wiktionary
includes
Wikisaurus, a category that serves as a
thesaurus, including lists of
slang words, and
the
Simple English Wiktionary, compiled using the
Basic English subset of the English
language.
History and development
Wiktionary was brought online on December 12, 2002, following a
proposal by
Daniel Alston. On March
29, 2004, the first non-
English
Wiktionaries were initiated in
French and
Polish. Wiktionaries in numerous other
languages have since been started. Wiktionary was hosted on a
temporary
URL
(wiktionary.wikipedia.org) until May 1, 2004, when it switched to
the current full URL. , Wiktionary features well over 5 million
entries across its 272 language editions. The largest of the
language editions is the French Wiktionary, with over 1,500,000
entries. The English Wiktionary is the second largest and currently
has over 1,400,000 entries. It has traded the top position with the
French Wiktionary on various occasions since the French Wiktionary
first overtook the English Wiktionary in early 2006. Thirteen
Wiktionary language editions now contain over 100,000 entries
each.
Despite Wiktionary's large number of entries, most of the entries
and many of the definitions at the project's largest language
editions were created by
bot that found
creative ways to generate entries or (rarely) automatically
imported thousands of entries from previously published
dictionaries. Seven of the 18 bots registered at the English
Wiktionary created 163,000 of the entries there. Only 259 entries
remain (each containing many definitions) on Wiktionary from the
original import by Websterbot from public domain sources; the
majority of those imports have been split out to thousands of
proper entries manually. Another one of these bots, "ThirdPersBot,"
was responsible for the addition of a number of
third-person conjugation that would not receive
their own entries in standard dictionaries; for instance, it
defined "smoulders" as the "third-person singular simple present
form of smoulder." Excluding these 163,000 entries, the English
Wiktionary would have about 137,000 entries, including terms unique
to languages other than English, making it smaller than most
monolingual print dictionaries. The
Oxford English Dictionary,
for instance, has 615,000 headwords, while
Merriam-Webster's
Third New International Dictionary of the English Language,
Unabridged has 475,000 entries (with many additional embedded
headwords). It should be noted, though, that more detailed
statistics now exist to
more clearly distinguish genuine entries from minor (small)
entries.
The English Wiktionary, however does not rely on bots to the extent
that somewhat smaller editions do. The
French and
Vietnamese Wiktionaries, for example,
imported large sections of the
Free Vietnamese Dictionary Project (FVDP), which
provides free content bilingual dictionaries to and from
Vietnamese. These imported entries make up virtually all of the
Vietnamese edition's offering. Like the English edition, the French
Wiktionary has imported the approximately 20,000 entries in the
Unihan database of
Chinese, Japanese, and Korean characters. The
French Wiktionary grew rapidly in 2006 thanks in large part to bots
copying many entries from old, freely licensed dictionaries, such
as the eighth edition of the
Dictionnaire de
l'Académie française (1935, around 35,000 words), and
using bots to add words from other Wiktionary editions with French
translations. The
Russian edition
grew by nearly 80,000 entries as "LXbot" added boilerplate entries
(with headings, but without definitions) for words in English and
German.
Most of Wiktionary currently uses a textual logo designed by Brion
Vibber, a
MediaWiki developer. Despite
frequent discussion of modifying or replacing the logo, a
four-phase contest held at the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki from September
to October 2006 did not see as much participation from the
Wiktionary community as some community members had hoped. The logo
that won was designed by "Smurrayinchester". As of June 2007,
seventeen of the Wiktionary editions –
French,
Turkish,
Vietnamese,
Arabic,
Italian,
Swedish,
Korean,
Dutch,
Lithuanian,
Persian,
Sicilian,
Ukrainian,
Albanian, Simple English,
Corsican,
Wolof, and
Yiddish – have switched to the
contest-chosen logo or variations of it.
The remaining editions
use either their language-specific version of the textual logo or,
in the case of the Galician Wiktionary, a logo that depicts a
dictionary bearing the Galicia
coat of
arms. In April 2009, the issue was resurrected and
discussions aiming to result in a new logo by the end of the
year.
Critical reception
Critical reception of Wiktionary has been mixed. Jill Lepore wrote
in the article "Noah’s Ark" for
The New Yorker, (November
6, 2006)
There’s no show of hands at
Wiktionary.
There’s not even an editorial staff.
"Be your own lexicographer!", might be
Wiktionary’s motto.
Who needs experts?
Why pay good money for a dictionary written by
lexicographers when we can cobble one together ourselves?
Wiktionary isn’t so much republican or democratic as
Maoist.
And it’s only as good as the copyright-expired books from which
it pilfers.
If you look up the word "Webster" in the Wiktionary,
you will be redirected to this handy tip:
Noah Webster’s New International Dictionary of the
English Language, 1911 (published by Merriam-Webster, Springfield,
MA) is a public domain dictionary, as is a 1913 edition, that can
be used to empower Wiktionary with more
definitions.
But, hey, at least they got his first name right.
Keir Graff’s review for
Booklist
was less critical:
Is there a place for Wiktionary?
Undoubtedly.
The industry and enthusiasm of its many creators are
proof that there’s a market.
And it’s wonderful to have another strong source to use
when searching the odd terms that pop up in today’s fast-changing
world and the online environment.
But as with so many Web sources (including this
column), it’s best used by sophisticated users in conjunction with
more reputable sources.
References in other publications are fleeting and part of larger
discussions of Wikipedia, not progressing beyond a definition,
although David Brooks in
The
Nashua Telegraph described it as
wild and woolly.
(
Wooly is defined as
"confused" and "unrestrained.") One of the impediments to
independent coverage of Wiktionary is the continuing confusion that
it is merely an extension of Wikipedia.In 2005,
PC Magazine rated Wiktionary as one of the
Internet's "Top 101 Web Sites," although little information was
given about the site.
See also
References
- Wiktionary's current URL is www.wiktionary.org.
- Wiktionary total article counts are here. Detailed statistics by word type are available
here.
- The user list at the English Wiktionary identifies
accounts that have been given "bot status".
- TheDaveBot, TheCheatBot, Websterbot, PastBot, NanshuBot
- Hồ Ngọc Đức, Free Vietnamese Dictionary Project. Details at
the Vietnamese Wiktionary.
- LXbot
- "Wiktionary talk:Wiktionary
Logo", English Wiktionary, Wikimedia Foundation.
- "Wiktionary/logo", Meta-Wiki, Wikimedia
Foundation.
- The full article is not available on-line.
- David Brooks, "Online, interactive encyclopedia not just for
geeks anymore, because everyone seems to need it now, more than
ever!" The Nashua Telegraph (August 4, 2004)
- In this citation, the author refers to Wiktionary as part of
the Wikipedia site:
External links